Survey Poll: Will you take the Covid 19 Vaccine

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Will you take the Covid 19 Vaccine if it is considered safe and effective?

  • Yes

    Votes: 23 19.2%
  • Never

    Votes: 72 60.0%
  • I will wait a year or more to see what happens with people who take it.

    Votes: 25 20.8%

  • Total voters
    120

bojack

Well-known member
Dec 16, 2019
2,311
997
113
i'm already part of the testing pool for clinical trials.

guess i'll let y'all know if i notice CIA drones following me everywhere i go. gotta tell ya tho, they're going to be pretty bored watching my every move, and i really can't fathom what the point would be.
That is the best place to be, I'd bet they'll be on their best behavior .. They have to make the sale ..
 
S

Scribe

Guest
That's a misspoke and someone using it to dishonestly suggest that he meant that vaccines will kill people. I will have to read the transcript of that talk to find out what he meant to say. I assume you have read the actual transcript and know what he meant but are not telling us because you want to make people think his misspoke was a freudean slip.
Was he meaning to say "birth control" "contraceptives"? Do I have to be the one to fact check this? I will start as soon as I post this and see how long it takes to find out.
Wow, took me less than a minute....
" Gates is not interested in using vaccines to reduce the population by using them as an agent of death or a tool to sterilize unsuspecting masses. Rather, Gates is interested in keeping more children alive in order to reduce the need for parents to have more children, thus limiting the overall population growth rate."

You be the judge of what Bill Gates meant instead of the video that does not let you get the whole story:

Claim
Bill Gates has openly admitted that vaccinations are designed so that governments can depopulate the world.

False



On 21 January 2016, dubious news and conspiracy theory site Your News Wire (now NewsPunch) published an article with the headline “Bill Gates Admits ‘Vaccines Are Best Way to Depopulate’”. The article opened with a damning assertion: “Bill Gates has openly admitted that vaccinations are designed so that governments can depopulate the world.”

To support this claim, the site presented a February 2011 video clip of Bill Gates being interviewed by CNN’s Sanjay Gupta about his foundation’s vaccination efforts:

Dr. Sanjay Gupta: Ten billion dollars over the next 10 years to make it “the year of the vaccines.” What does that mean exactly?

Bill Gates: Over this decade, we believe unbelievable progress can be made, in both inventing new vaccines and making sure they get out to all the children who need them … We only need about six or seven more — and then you would have all the tools to reduce childhood death, reduce population growth, and everything — the stability, the environment — benefits from that.

To make sure the point was not lost on the reader, Your News Wire repeated the “reduce population growth” emphasized above numerous times at a variety of different playback speeds, as if to suggest this were a slip of the tongue revealing some nefarious secret. This narrative was reinforced with another video that opens with this text

Next are two short excerpts from a recently filmed TED presentation (Feb 2010) by none other than Bill “Microsoft” Gates … As Gates casually addresses the issue [of reducing carbon emissions], he goes on to state that one way to accomplish this goal is to reduce the global human population.

In the first clip you will hear him state in plain language that he considers VACCINES to be desirable to that end. You will also casually hear him promoting HEALTH CARE and REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES, to accomplish that same goal.

In the second excerpt you will hear Gates again confirming his profound affection for vaccines



The damming moment, according to Your News Wire was the following statement from Gates: “First, we’ve got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent …”

The suggestion, hinted at by both of these clips and argued later in the article, was that Gates knows vaccines are dangerous — and he is using this information to kill children in the developing world to stem population growth. In reality, however, Gates’ statements regarding vaccines and population growth were neither an accidental slip nor a nefarious admission of plans for a new world order.

As discussed in a 21 November 2011 Forbes cover story profiling the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, reducing population growth has always been integral to their stated mission of “improving people’s health and giving them the chance to lift themselves out of hunger and extreme poverty”:

In 1997, when he and Melinda first ventured into public health … they focused on birth control, funding a Johns Hopkins effort to use computers to help women in the developing world learn about contraception. The logic was crisp and Bill Gates-friendly. Health = resources ÷ people. And since resources, as Gates noted, are relatively fixed, the answer lay in population control.

As further discussed in this piece, Gates later came to the conclusion that birth control was not the best approach to achieve the goal of slower population growth, instead realizing that — counterintuitively — a reduction in childhood mortality was the best way to limit population growth:

In society after society, he saw, when the mortality rate falls—specifically, below 10 deaths per 1,000 people—the birth rate follows, and population growth stabilizes. “It goes against common sense,” Gates says. Most parents don’t choose to have eight children because they want to have big families, it turns out, but because they know many of their children will die.

“If a mother and father know their child is going to live to adulthood, they start to naturally reduce their population size,” says Melinda.

This is a point Gates has made repeatedly, and his views were clearly articulated in the 2009 Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Annual Letter:

A surprising but critical fact we learned was that reducing the number of deaths actually reduces population growth … Contrary to the Malthusian view that population will grow to the limit of however many kids can be fed, in fact parents choose to have enough kids to give them a high chance that several will survive to support them as they grow old. As the number of kids who survive to adulthood goes up, parents can achieve this goal without having as many children.



In other words, Gates is not interested in using vaccines to reduce the population by using them as an agent of death or a tool to sterilize unsuspecting masses. Rather, Gates is interested in keeping more children alive in order to reduce the need for parents to have more children, thus limiting the overall population growth rate.

As evidenced in a 2014 paper published in Science that attempted to calculate future population growth, not everyone is convinced childhood mortality is the smoking gun to quell population growth:

Among the most robust empirical findings in the literature on fertility transitions are that higher contraceptive use and higher female education are associated with faster fertility decline. These suggest that the projected rapid population growth could be moderated by greater investments in family planning programs to satisfy the unmet need for contraception and in girls’ education.

But Gates’ view on childhood mortality contribution to population growth is increasingly discussed in the scientific literature and is still subject to debate. What is not up to debate are the intentions of the Bill and Melinda Gate’s Foundation with regard to vaccines and population growth, as articulated by Bill and Melinda Gates in their Foundation’s 2017 Annual Letter:

Melinda: Saving children’s lives is the goal that launched our global work. It’s an end in itself. But then we learned it has all these other benefits as well. If parents believe their children will survive — and if they have the power to time and space their pregnancies — they choose to have fewer children.

Bill: When a mother can choose how many children to have, her children are healthier, they’re better nourished, their mental capacities are higher — and parents have more time and money to spend on each child’s health and schooling. That’s how families and countries get out of poverty. This link between saving lives, a lower birthrate, and ending poverty was the most important early lesson Melinda and I learned about global health.

This is obviously a far cry from, as Your News Wire.com put it, having Bill Gates tell us “how we must all consent to a ‘kill the humans’ strategy, to ‘save the planet’ from the carbon dioxide we make.”

The facts about this misinformation have been clearly available since 2017 and yet you have chosen to dishonestly twist Bill Gates intended meaning by not letting people know that he wants to keep kids ALIVE in these third world countries as a method of reducing population clearly stated from his own words in the explanation above is purposely left out would make you a liar and a false brother if you were knowingly doing so. I am going to think that best about you and assume you have not read these above explanations by Bill Gates as to his theory on keeping children alive with vaccines will ultimately reduce the world population. :)
 
S

Scribe

Guest
interesting!
when you're one of the richest men in the world the 'under contract' thing usually goes the other way around.
That is judging by outward appearance again. It is ungodly to accuse someone of impure motives without evidence base on your own biased.
 

PC123

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2020
850
474
63
Australia
What do u guys think is the deal with Trump
- Is he waiting for the right time to drain the swamp?
- Is he finding it difficult to reach the well guarded drain?
- Is he being stalled and sent the wrong way by members in his own party?
- Has he fallen into the swamp and become one of them?
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
30,853
10,135
113
That is judging by outward appearance again. It is ungodly to accuse someone of impure motives without evidence base on your own biased.
i don't understand why you're saying this to me?

i was just pointing out that the most powerful people in the world don't work for other men; they have other men work for them.
so, Bill Gates being under contract to someone? had never thought of that. i would have assumed the opposite, that other people are under contract to Mssr Gates. what would he need from some other man that money can't buy?

ergo i find the idea interesting, and said as much.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
30,853
10,135
113
what would he need from some other man that money can't buy?

in re:

A feast is made for laughter, and wine makes merry; but money answers everything.
(Ecclesiastes 10:19)
 
S

Scribe

Guest
What do u guys think is the deal with Trump
- Is he waiting for the right time to drain the swamp?
- Is he finding it difficult to reach the well guarded drain?
- Is he being stalled and sent the wrong way by members in his own party?
- Has he fallen into the swamp and become one of them?
He is not a King and the president does not have the power to do as much as he gets blamed for.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
30,853
10,135
113
What do u guys think is the deal with Trump
- Is he waiting for the right time to drain the swamp?
- Is he finding it difficult to reach the well guarded drain?
- Is he being stalled and sent the wrong way by members in his own party?
- Has he fallen into the swamp and become one of them?
when i go out to walk on the beach, and then later come back inside, i track sand everywhere.
kinda like i brought the beach with me.
 
S

Scribe

Guest
i don't understand why you're saying this to me?

i was just pointing out that the most powerful people in the world don't work for other men; they have other men work for them.
so, Bill Gates being under contract to someone? had never thought of that. i would have assumed the opposite, that other people are under contract to Mssr Gates. what would he need from some other man that money can't buy?


ergo i find the idea interesting, and said as much.
Sorry, I did not understand your post. I misjudged your comment. My apologies. :)
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
14,316
6,677
113
I believe that if Mr. Trump loses by a big enough margin, He will definitely fade away into the night. As far as Dr. Fauci. most Americans still trust in him.
If most Americans trust Fauci (which is highly unlikely) it is only because the media have been deliberately suppressing the truth about HCQ.

Fauci has a conflict of interest in the matter because of Remdesivir, and Trump should never have even considered him to virtually become the COVID-19 Czar.

It has now been established worldwide that the use of HCQ could have prevented at least 80% of the deaths due to Wuhan virus. Which means that Fauci is directly responsible for the deaths of 100,000 Americans. And since President Trump could have fired him in March 2020, but refused to do so, then Trump must share the responsibility also.
 

J-T

Banned
Jul 29, 2020
477
77
28
Heaven Bound
The devil is always busy deceiving the nations, that is nothing new.

However I do not believe any of the conspiracy theories about Bill Gates. His donating money for vaccine development to Moderna (for one example) does not mean that he will profit from the success of the vaccine. I don't know if he owns any stock in Moderna, my guess is that he does not since I have already read how he will not be profiting from their success simply by donating to the cause. As far as I can tell Bill Gates believes in the science of vaccines and in using his money to help save lives.

What I believe is that many people who are accusing Bill Gates and anyone else of things that are not true, will be judged with the same measure they judged with. I know this for a fact because the Word of God will not return void...
Matt 7:1 Judge not, that ye be not judged. 2For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.
Now instead of using this in the wrong context as it is so often used by those who want to hold on to their sins, we will use it as it was intended by Jesus in the original context...
John 7:7
Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment. It is not godly to assume that if a man donates to a cause they will gain financially from it simply because you are a skeptic and do not believe that the donater real cares about human lives being saved. Your skepticism does not equal "the way things really are" your skepticism could simply be you judging by outward appearance and you could be dead wrong. If Bill Gates simply wants to use his money to make a difference in easing human suffering in the world and you believe that he has other sinister motives, then when you stand before the Judgment seat of Christ and are still believing these things, and they turn out to be just you judging a man without cause what is going to happen? Do you care?
Obviously, the answer from you is no? Please understand that I am neither a theorist, not a skeptic. I stated the factual truth when I said that Bill Gates and his wife are Satanists. They are NOT Christians.

Per The Lord Jesus Christ's words, from His sermon on the mount, I take ALL of The Lord's words seriously. What I see that has become commonplace is that many people take The Lord's words out of context (This is called cherry picking and/or twisting the scriptures) to defend men, as well as false teachers such as Oneness Pentecostal and Baal bender T.D. Jakes; Benny Hinn who also preaches "another Jesus" per 2Corinthians 11 such as the invisible Jesus that he had on his stage while he deceived millions of people; Kenneth Copeland who blasphemously teaches a transgender god, and that he and his deceived followers are little gods (Luciferien doctrine); and the list goes on.

There is clear instruction give by The Lord Jesus Christ in Matthew 7:13-27, Matthew 24, Revelation 2-3 and other passages pertaining to be aware of false prophets and false Christs; as well as clear instruction from His chosen Apostles, such as Apostle Peter in 2Peter 2-3 about false teachers; Also from Jude, as his epistle is direct parallel to 2Peter 2-3; Apostle John warned of deceiving antichrists in 1John, 2John, & 3John; Apostle Paul also warned about Satan's ministers in 2Timothy 3, 2Corinthians 11, Philippians 3, as well as not being unequally yoked with them in 2Corinthians 6:14-18 and other passages. So yes there are things that Believers are to both test and judge! Be aware that there is also the Great White Throne Judgement where The Lord Jesus Christ will judge those that followed after the ways of the Devil, including Satan's ministers.

I strongly encourage a study of "judge" in the New Testament. This can be accomplished by simply typing the word "judge" into the search engine of Bible software, and prayerfully read each verse in context of the related passage. By doing so, you will better hear and understand precisely what The Lord Jesus Christ said in Matthew 7:1-2, 7 and understand the full counsel of The Lord. I recommend using www.e-sword.net
 
S

Scribe

Guest
If most Americans trust Fauci (which is highly unlikely) it is only because the media have been deliberately suppressing the truth about HCQ.

Fauci has a conflict of interest in the matter because of Remdesivir, and Trump should never have even considered him to virtually become the COVID-19 Czar.

It has now been established worldwide that the use of HCQ could have prevented at least 80% of the deaths due to Wuhan virus. Which means that Fauci is directly responsible for the deaths of 100,000 Americans. And since President Trump could have fired him in March 2020, but refused to do so, then Trump must share the responsibility also.
It has not been established at all. Cite your sources that show this to be true. I am always interested in reading the published clinical tests.
 

J-T

Banned
Jul 29, 2020
477
77
28
Heaven Bound
It has not been established at all. Cite your sources that show this to be true. I am always interested in reading the published clinical tests.
Perhaps you should prayerfully examine the Christians' "Conspiracy Theorists" videos that have well documented sources that pertain to the facts, instead of looking to the world for answers including so-called "published clinical tests".
 

PennEd

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2013
9,412
5,811
113
That's a misspoke and someone using it to dishonestly suggest that he meant that vaccines will kill people. I will have to read the transcript of that talk to find out what he meant to say. I assume you have read the actual transcript and know what he meant but are not telling us because you want to make people think his misspoke was a freudean slip.
Was he meaning to say "birth control" "contraceptives"? Do I have to be the one to fact check this? I will start as soon as I post this and see how long it takes to find out.
What are you talking about? People can misspeak all the time. That’s not what’s happening here.

The whole TED talk is about Global ibal warming, and that the only way to mitigate the effects, and reverse the man caused global warming is to lessen the population.

Now I’m not saying his vaccines will immediately kill you. It may simply make you sterile, or kill you slowly. Mass sterility would achieve his sick goal through attrition.

But make no mistake, he says that if we do a really good job with vaccines we can achieve depopulation.

Did you even watch The Whole thing?
 
S

Scribe

Guest
Obviously, the answer from you is no? Please understand that I am neither a theorist, not a skeptic. I stated the factual truth when I said that Bill Gates and his wife are Satanists. They are NOT Christians.

Per The Lord Jesus Christ's words, from His sermon on the mount, I take ALL of The Lord's words seriously. What I see that has become commonplace is that many people take The Lord's words out of context (This is called cherry picking and/or twisting the scriptures) to defend men, as well as false teachers such as Oneness Pentecostal and Baal bender T.D. Jakes; Benny Hinn who also preaches "another Jesus" per 2Corinthians 11 such as the invisible Jesus that he had on his stage while he deceived millions of people; Kenneth Copeland who blasphemously teaches a transgender god, and that he and his deceived followers are little gods (Luciferien doctrine); and the list goes on.

There is clear instruction give by The Lord Jesus Christ in Matthew 7:13-27, Matthew 24, Revelation 2-3 and other passages pertaining to be aware of false prophets and false Christs; as well as clear instruction from His chosen Apostles, such as Apostle Peter in 2Peter 2-3 about false teachers; Also from Jude, as his epistle is direct parallel to 2Peter 2-3; Apostle John warned of deceiving antichrists in 1John, 2John, & 3John; Apostle Paul also warned about Satan's ministers in 2Timothy 3, 2Corinthians 11, Philippians 3, as well as not being unequally yoked with them in 2Corinthians 6:14-18 and other passages. So yes there are things that Believers are to both test and judge! Be aware that there is also the Great White Throne Judgement where The Lord Jesus Christ will judge those that followed after the ways of the Devil, including Satan's ministers.

I strongly encourage a study of "judge" in the New Testament. This can be accomplished by simply typing the word "judge" into the search engine of Bible software, and prayerfully read each verse in context of the related passage. By doing so, you will better hear and understand precisely what The Lord Jesus Christ said in Matthew 7:1-2, 7 and understand the full counsel of The Lord. I recommend using www.e-sword.net
What if you are wrong? Would you then be in violation of the scripture about judging someones motives and being wrong about it?
Have you done a study on these scriptures? Do you think you would be guilty of this sin Jesus is speaking of if you were to say Bill Gates is donating money to a vaccine because he wants to ..... fill in the blank with any bad motive... and then find out later that you were wrong. Would you need to repent? Just answer that question please.
 
S

Scribe

Guest
What are you talking about? People can misspeak all the time. That’s not what’s happening here.

The whole TED talk is about Global ibal warming, and that the only way to mitigate the effects, and reverse the man caused global warming is to lessen the population.

Now I’m not saying his vaccines will immediately kill you. It may simply make you sterile, or kill you slowly. Mass sterility would achieve his sick goal through attrition.

But make no mistake, he says that if we do a really good job with vaccines we can achieve depopulation.

Did you even watch The Whole thing?
I think you missed my second post. I am reposting it below:

Wow, took me less than a minute....
" Gates is not interested in using vaccines to reduce the population by using them as an agent of death or a tool to sterilize unsuspecting masses. Rather, Gates is interested in keeping more children alive in order to reduce the need for parents to have more children, thus limiting the overall population growth rate."

You be the judge of what Bill Gates meant instead of the video that does not let you get the whole story:

Claim
Bill Gates has openly admitted that vaccinations are designed so that governments can depopulate the world.

False



On 21 January 2016, dubious news and conspiracy theory site Your News Wire (now NewsPunch) published an article with the headline “Bill Gates Admits ‘Vaccines Are Best Way to Depopulate’”. The article opened with a damning assertion: “Bill Gates has openly admitted that vaccinations are designed so that governments can depopulate the world.”

To support this claim, the site presented a February 2011 video clip of Bill Gates being interviewed by CNN’s Sanjay Gupta about his foundation’s vaccination efforts:

Dr. Sanjay Gupta: Ten billion dollars over the next 10 years to make it “the year of the vaccines.” What does that mean exactly?

Bill Gates: Over this decade, we believe unbelievable progress can be made, in both inventing new vaccines and making sure they get out to all the children who need them … We only need about six or seven more — and then you would have all the tools to reduce childhood death, reduce population growth, and everything — the stability, the environment — benefits from that.

To make sure the point was not lost on the reader, Your News Wire repeated the “reduce population growth” emphasized above numerous times at a variety of different playback speeds, as if to suggest this were a slip of the tongue revealing some nefarious secret. This narrative was reinforced with another video that opens with this text

Next are two short excerpts from a recently filmed TED presentation (Feb 2010) by none other than Bill “Microsoft” Gates … As Gates casually addresses the issue [of reducing carbon emissions], he goes on to state that one way to accomplish this goal is to reduce the global human population.

In the first clip you will hear him state in plain language that he considers VACCINES to be desirable to that end. You will also casually hear him promoting HEALTH CARE and REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES, to accomplish that same goal.

In the second excerpt you will hear Gates again confirming his profound affection for vaccines



The damming moment, according to Your News Wire was the following statement from Gates: “First, we’ve got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent …”

The suggestion, hinted at by both of these clips and argued later in the article, was that Gates knows vaccines are dangerous — and he is using this information to kill children in the developing world to stem population growth. In reality, however, Gates’ statements regarding vaccines and population growth were neither an accidental slip nor a nefarious admission of plans for a new world order.

As discussed in a 21 November 2011 Forbes cover story profiling the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, reducing population growth has always been integral to their stated mission of “improving people’s health and giving them the chance to lift themselves out of hunger and extreme poverty”:

In 1997, when he and Melinda first ventured into public health … they focused on birth control, funding a Johns Hopkins effort to use computers to help women in the developing world learn about contraception. The logic was crisp and Bill Gates-friendly. Health = resources ÷ people. And since resources, as Gates noted, are relatively fixed, the answer lay in population control.

As further discussed in this piece, Gates later came to the conclusion that birth control was not the best approach to achieve the goal of slower population growth, instead realizing that — counterintuitively — a reduction in childhood mortality was the best way to limit population growth:

In society after society, he saw, when the mortality rate falls—specifically, below 10 deaths per 1,000 people—the birth rate follows, and population growth stabilizes. “It goes against common sense,” Gates says. Most parents don’t choose to have eight children because they want to have big families, it turns out, but because they know many of their children will die.

“If a mother and father know their child is going to live to adulthood, they start to naturally reduce their population size,” says Melinda.

This is a point Gates has made repeatedly, and his views were clearly articulated in the 2009 Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Annual Letter:

A surprising but critical fact we learned was that reducing the number of deaths actually reduces population growth … Contrary to the Malthusian view that population will grow to the limit of however many kids can be fed, in fact parents choose to have enough kids to give them a high chance that several will survive to support them as they grow old. As the number of kids who survive to adulthood goes up, parents can achieve this goal without having as many children.



In other words, Gates is not interested in using vaccines to reduce the population by using them as an agent of death or a tool to sterilize unsuspecting masses. Rather, Gates is interested in keeping more children alive in order to reduce the need for parents to have more children, thus limiting the overall population growth rate.

As evidenced in a 2014 paper published in Science that attempted to calculate future population growth, not everyone is convinced childhood mortality is the smoking gun to quell population growth:

Among the most robust empirical findings in the literature on fertility transitions are that higher contraceptive use and higher female education are associated with faster fertility decline. These suggest that the projected rapid population growth could be moderated by greater investments in family planning programs to satisfy the unmet need for contraception and in girls’ education.

But Gates’ view on childhood mortality contribution to population growth is increasingly discussed in the scientific literature and is still subject to debate. What is not up to debate are the intentions of the Bill and Melinda Gate’s Foundation with regard to vaccines and population growth, as articulated by Bill and Melinda Gates in their Foundation’s 2017 Annual Letter:

Melinda: Saving children’s lives is the goal that launched our global work. It’s an end in itself. But then we learned it has all these other benefits as well. If parents believe their children will survive — and if they have the power to time and space their pregnancies — they choose to have fewer children.

Bill: When a mother can choose how many children to have, her children are healthier, they’re better nourished, their mental capacities are higher — and parents have more time and money to spend on each child’s health and schooling. That’s how families and countries get out of poverty. This link between saving lives, a lower birthrate, and ending poverty was the most important early lesson Melinda and I learned about global health.

This is obviously a far cry from, as Your News Wire.com put it, having Bill Gates tell us “how we must all consent to a ‘kill the humans’ strategy, to ‘save the planet’ from the carbon dioxide we make.”

The facts about this misinformation have been clearly available since 2017 and yet you have chosen to dishonestly twist Bill Gates intended meaning by not letting people know that he wants to keep kids ALIVE in these third world countries as a method of reducing population clearly stated from his own words in the explanation above is purposely left out would make you a liar and a false brother if you were knowingly doing so. I am going to think that best about you and assume you have not read these above explanations by Bill Gates as to his theory on keeping children alive with vaccines will ultimately reduce the world population. :)
 
S

Scribe

Guest
Perhaps you should prayerfully examine the Christians' "Conspiracy Theorists" videos that have well documented sources that pertain to the facts, instead of looking to the world for answers including so-called "published clinical tests".
Christians are called to be truthful not liars. All liars will have their part in the lake of fire. Well documented sources can be cited.