The 7 year covenant -- COP28?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
31,948
5,635
113
#1

Interview With Craig Bong Cop28 UAE 7 Year Covenant

I think too many cannot see the forest because of the trees.

1. When Daniel says that "He will confirm the covenant with the many" it is very clear that this would refer to a seven year covenant confirmed in the UN. The UN was "born" at the same time as Israel after WW2. The word "many" can definitely be understood as "many ambassadors".

There is no other 7 year covenant that the many are about to confirm other than COP28

2. We can definitely connect this covenant that is confirmed with the mark of the beast. Whether the two are intertwined, they definitely would take place during the same time frame, and you could not have one global currency without one global government and so this is also closely tied to the UN. However, in COP28 they want to control what people buy or sell in order to regulate carbon emissions and the way in which that would be done is a one world digital currency, ie the Mark of the Beast.

3. Regardless of who "King Charles" is, the fact is you would expect a 33 degree Mason who is also a king, a member of the elite, and the richest man on earth to be part of this Antichrist system. King Charles is the key person pushing this COP28 agenda.

4. Likewise, regardless of who this Pope is. you would expect a pagan Pope who is clearly undermining the gospel of Jesus Christ to be associated with the false prophet that pushes this covenant and sure enough, the Pope is pushing COP28.
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
31,948
5,635
113
#2
Agenda 2030 is done in the UN, COP28 is with all the other organizations.

So you can see COP28 as being "with the many".
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
31,948
5,635
113
#3
So then the covenant was made by the UN with Agenda 2030 and COP28 is confirming it "with the many". King Charles will speak on the last day of COP28. I suspect he will be "confirming the covenant with the many" on that day.

Also they have said that you cannot have peace and security unless this covenant is confirmed.
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
31,948
5,635
113
#4
For those who do not understand what COP28 is


COP21 was when they agreed to a covenant (a legal agreement) to deal with Climate change and it is called the Paris accords. That is the "covenant" that they are now strengthening (confirming). Agenda 2030 was the UN's role in confirming the covenant and COP28 is for the private sector and NGOs to confirm it. Even though everyone agreed to reign in carbon emissions they are up significantly since the Paris accord so they need to "strengthen" the covenant by having one world digital currency that will control what people buy and sell to make sure the covenant is kept.

King Charles confirming the covenant with the many, with the UN ambassadors and with the non government sector. That is why he has the opening and closing remarks.
 

DRobinson

Active member
Aug 23, 2023
367
182
43
#5
The covenant spoken about in Daniel 9 is the covenant promised by God in Jeremiah 31 and confirmed by Jesus on the cross.
Go and study Hebrews 8,9 10.
There will be no seven year covenant with Israel confirmed by the man of sin as falsely taught.
The man of sin, anti-christ is not mentioned in Daniel 9 and the prince mentioned in Daniel 9:26 is the emperor of Rome whose people, army destroyed Israel, Jerusalem, the temple, and scattered the Jews all over the world as Ezekiel prophesied.
The pronoun he mentioned 3 times in Daniel 9:27 is the Messiah, the Prince.
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
31,948
5,635
113
#6
The covenant spoken about in Daniel 9 is the covenant promised by God in Jeremiah 31 and confirmed by Jesus on the cross.
Go and study Hebrews 8,9 10.
There will be no seven year covenant with Israel confirmed by the man of sin as falsely taught.
The man of sin, anti-christ is not mentioned in Daniel 9 and the prince mentioned in Daniel 9:26 is the emperor of Rome whose people, army destroyed Israel, Jerusalem, the temple, and scattered the Jews all over the world as Ezekiel prophesied.
The pronoun he mentioned 3 times in Daniel 9:27 is the Messiah, the Prince.
Are you saying that "he shall confirm the covenant" is referring to Jesus on the cross and that the covenant confirmed is referring to this

Jeremiah 31:33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the Lord, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people. 34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the Lord: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.

But that Jesus only confirmed this for one week and then said, nope, because of the overspreading of abominations He would make desolate?

Daniel 9:27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

That is "another gospel" only not another but a perversion of the gospel that we preach.

"They shall be My people, and l will be their God. And I will make an everlasting covenant with them, that I will not turn away from them, to do them good; but I will put My fear in their hearts, that they shall not depart from Me."-Jer 32:38, 40.
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
31,948
5,635
113
#7
Hebrews 13:20 20 Now the God of peace, that brought again from the dead our Lord Jesus, that great shepherd of the sheep, through the blood of the everlasting covenant,

The covenant that Jesus confirmed with His blood is everlasting, He doesn't say after a couple of years no, the sins are overflowing, so forget it.
 

DRobinson

Active member
Aug 23, 2023
367
182
43
#8
Are you saying that "he shall confirm the covenant" is referring to Jesus on the cross and that the covenant confirmed is referring to this

Jeremiah 31:33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the Lord, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people. 34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the Lord: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.

But that Jesus only confirmed this for one week and then said, nope, because of the overspreading of abominations He would make desolate?

Daniel 9:27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

That is "another gospel" only not another but a perversion of the gospel that we preach.

"They shall be My people, and l will be their God. And I will make an everlasting covenant with them, that I will not turn away from them, to do them good; but I will put My fear in their hearts, that they shall not depart from Me."-Jer 32:38, 40.
Jesus went to Israel. He instructed his disciples to go only to Israel. Many of Israel believe, All those in the first church were Jews.
He made Israel desolate at the hands of the army of Rome in 70ad because of their abominations of not only rejecting the Messiah but falsely accusing him and murdering him and then continuing to offer sacrifices in the temple even after the veil of the temple was rent.
While many did accept the covenant, Israel rejected it and will only accept it and its benefits after Jesus returns.
We are living under that covenant today.
Where is the man of sin, the anti christ mentioned in Daniel 9?
To say the prince whose army is to come and destroy the city and the temple shows a complete inability to understand Scripture and believe what others have taught.
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
31,948
5,635
113
#9
Jesus went to Israel. He instructed his disciples to go only to Israel. Many of Israel believe, All those in the first church were Jews.
He made Israel desolate at the hands of the army of Rome in 70ad because of their abominations of not only rejecting the Messiah but falsely accusing him and murdering him and then continuing to offer sacrifices in the temple even after the veil of the temple was rent.
While many did accept the covenant, Israel rejected it and will only accept it and its benefits after Jesus returns.
We are living under that covenant today.
Where is the man of sin, the anti christ mentioned in Daniel 9?
To say the prince whose army is to come and destroy the city and the temple shows a complete inability to understand Scripture and believe what others have taught.
It was not seven years from the crucifixion to AD 70.

None of the pieces fit together. God is not like man, His yea and amen is everlasting.

The covenant that Jesus confirmed on the cross was everlasting. The covenant that Jeremiah refers to is everlasting.
 

DRobinson

Active member
Aug 23, 2023
367
182
43
#10
It was not seven years from the crucifixion to AD 70.

None of the pieces fit together. God is not like man, His yea and amen is everlasting.

The covenant that Jesus confirmed on the cross was everlasting. The covenant that Jeremiah refers to is everlasting.
Never said it was 7 years from the crucifixion to 70ad.
Yes the covenant confirmed on the cross is everlasting. It replaced the covenant of the law as God said it would.
The first covenant was done away with and made void with the covenant Jesus confirmed. The fact Israel rejected it then and now does not change that. That is why the city and the temple were destroyed and the people scattered over the world and became a valley of dry bones.
How can you not see that the covenant Jesus confirmed on the cross is the one God said would come in Jeremiah 31.?
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
31,948
5,635
113
#11
Never said it was 7 years from the crucifixion to 70ad.
Yes the covenant confirmed on the cross is everlasting. It replaced the covenant of the law as God said it would.
The first covenant was done away with and made void with the covenant Jesus confirmed. The fact Israel rejected it then and now does not change that. That is why the city and the temple were destroyed and the people scattered over the world and became a valley of dry bones.
How can you not see that the covenant Jesus confirmed on the cross is the one God said would come in Jeremiah 31.?
Of course it is. But the 70th week is referring to a seven year period after the times of the Gentiles.
 

DRobinson

Active member
Aug 23, 2023
367
182
43
#12
The first half of the 70th week was the ministry of Jesus. Began at his baptism and ended when he went to the cross.
The final part of the 70 week judgement pronounced on Israel in Daniel 9:24 was set aside until the man of sin comes as the judgment pronounced for their abomination of rejecting and murdering Jesus was fulfilled.
The teaching that there is still seven years left is based on only one verse of Scripture and I believe I have already proven that Scripture misunderstood.
If you can find other Scripture that supports the entire 70th week remains, please list them.
 

DRobinson

Active member
Aug 23, 2023
367
182
43
#13
Another thing I have noticed.
Those who teach the prince whose people will destroy the city and the temple as the man of sin also teach the man of sin will make his throne or his image will be set up in the temple.
You cannot have it both ways.
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
31,948
5,635
113
#14
The first half of the 70th week was the ministry of Jesus. Began at his baptism and ended when he went to the cross.
The final part of the 70 week judgement pronounced on Israel in Daniel 9:24 was set aside until the man of sin comes as the judgment pronounced for their abomination of rejecting and murdering Jesus was fulfilled.
The teaching that there is still seven years left is based on only one verse of Scripture and I believe I have already proven that Scripture misunderstood.
If you can find other Scripture that supports the entire 70th week remains, please list them.
Not interested in pursuing this, the covenant that Jesus confirmed is an eternal one, this guy cancels the covenant after a few years. 70AD was not at the same time that Jesus was crucified, it was 40 years later. I'm not interested in wasting my time with this doctrine. Nor is it my job to debate every worthless doctrine and error.

My job is to point out the error, what you do with it is your business. There are many great Biblical scholars who have gone through this with great scholarship, so any person who is genuinely seeking the truth can go to them. Dr. Barnett is a good scholar, or you can read any of the very many Bible commentaries that are available.
 

DRobinson

Active member
Aug 23, 2023
367
182
43
#15
Not interested in pursuing this, the covenant that Jesus confirmed is an eternal one, this guy cancels the covenant after a few years. 70AD was not at the same time that Jesus was crucified, it was 40 years later. I'm not interested in wasting my time with this doctrine. Nor is it my job to debate every worthless doctrine and error.

My job is to point out the error, what you do with it is your business. There are many great Biblical scholars who have gone through this with great scholarship, so any person who is genuinely seeking the truth can go to them. Dr. Barnett is a good scholar, or you can read any of the very many Bible commentaries that are available.
Never said that 70ad was the same time Jesus was crucified.
You should study the Scripture yourself instead of reading commentaries and after so called bible scholars who seldom agree on anything.
But I agree it is a waste of time to debate every worthless doctrine, so I will leave you with your commentaries and I will study the Word.
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
31,948
5,635
113
#16
Another thing I have noticed.
Those who teach the prince whose people will destroy the city and the temple as the man of sin also teach the man of sin will make his throne or his image will be set up in the temple.
You cannot have it both ways.
I have noticed that those who teach error don't actually read the whole Bible but take verses out of context to wrestle square pegs into round holes.

Daniel 9:24 Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy.

There are excellent scholars who have shown that this prophecy will lead you directly from Daniel to the crucifixion of Jesus at the end of the 69 weeks. That was when Jesus made an end of sins and a reconciliation for iniquity. However, bringing in everlasting righteousness has obviously not been done yet, we are still in the process.

25 Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.

I am not a Biblical historian or archaeologist, but they have shown that it was exactly 483 years from the commandment to the crucifixion. This is why Jesus rebuked those in Jerusalem saying that they should have known when their visitation was.

26 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself:

The Messiah shall be cut off, that is a reference to the crucifixion.

and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary;


That is a reference to 70AD and Titus. You can't have it both ways thinking this is referring to that and that the middle of the 70th week is also referring to that.

and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.

That certainly describes what happened to the Jews after 70AD in fact from 70AD all the way to the holocaust. From God's point of view He gave the Jews 40 years to receive Jesus Christ as their Messiah and the work of redemption that He did on the cross. After that, and from that point on they were punished. Scholars have gone through the prophecy in Ezekiel concerning the punishment to both Judah and Israel as well as Leviticus which shows the principle that if they don't repent after the appointed time of punishment the time is lengthened 7 fold. When you run the math there is only one time when both Judah and Israel could return to Israel from their time out and become "one branch" and that was 1948. In no other year past or future would the two punishments end the same year.

27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week:

That is right, after returning to the land of Israel when the punishment to the unbelieving Jews is over they still have one week left.

(Luke 21:24 And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled. This period of time while the Jews are being punished is called "the times of the Gentiles", or "the church age". Paul tells us in Romans that what happened to the Jews being punished was for us, the Gentiles, it was an opportunity for us to be saved).

and in the midst of the week


A 3 1/2 year period which is described precisely in the book of Revelation, and is the time given to the Antichrist, the counterfeit Christ, for his ministry.

he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

The consummation -- כָּלָה kâlâh, kaw-law'; from H3615; a completion; adverb, completely; also destruction:—altogether, (be, utterly) consume(-d), consummation(-ption), was determined, (full, utter) end, riddance.
  1. completion, termination, full end, complete destruction, consumption, annihilation
    1. completion
      1. completely, altogether (adv)
    2. complete destruction, consumption, annihilation

At the end of Revelation it describes Armageddon and "the full end", the "complete destruction".
 

DRobinson

Active member
Aug 23, 2023
367
182
43
#17
I have noticed that those who teach error don't actually read the whole Bible but take verses out of context to wrestle square pegs into round holes.

Daniel 9:24 Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy.

There are excellent scholars who have shown that this prophecy will lead you directly from Daniel to the crucifixion of Jesus at the end of the 69 weeks. That was when Jesus made an end of sins and a reconciliation for iniquity. However, bringing in everlasting righteousness has obviously not been done yet, we are still in the process.

25 Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.

I am not a Biblical historian or archaeologist, but they have shown that it was exactly 483 years from the commandment to the crucifixion. This is why Jesus rebuked those in Jerusalem saying that they should have known when their visitation was.

26 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself:

The Messiah shall be cut off, that is a reference to the crucifixion.

and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary;

That is a reference to 70AD and Titus. You can't have it both ways thinking this is referring to that and that the middle of the 70th week is also referring to that.

and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.

That certainly describes what happened to the Jews after 70AD in fact from 70AD all the way to the holocaust. From God's point of view He gave the Jews 40 years to receive Jesus Christ as their Messiah and the work of redemption that He did on the cross. After that, and from that point on they were punished. Scholars have gone through the prophecy in Ezekiel concerning the punishment to both Judah and Israel as well as Leviticus which shows the principle that if they don't repent after the appointed time of punishment the time is lengthened 7 fold. When you run the math there is only one time when both Judah and Israel could return to Israel from their time out and become "one branch" and that was 1948. In no other year past or future would the two punishments end the same year.

27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week:

That is right, after returning to the land of Israel when the punishment to the unbelieving Jews is over they still have one week left.

(Luke 21:24 And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled. This period of time while the Jews are being punished is called "the times of the Gentiles", or "the church age". Paul tells us in Romans that what happened to the Jews being punished was for us, the Gentiles, it was an opportunity for us to be saved).

and in the midst of the week

A 3 1/2 year period which is described precisely in the book of Revelation, and is the time given to the Antichrist, the counterfeit Christ, for his ministry.

he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

The consummation -- כָּלָה kâlâh, kaw-law'; from H3615; a completion; adverb, completely; also destruction:—altogether, (be, utterly) consume(-d), consummation(-ption), was determined, (full, utter) end, riddance.
  1. completion, termination, full end, complete destruction, consumption, annihilation
    1. completion
      1. completely, altogether (adv)
    2. complete destruction, consumption, annihilation

At the end of Revelation it describes Armageddon and "the full end", the "complete destruction".
Never said 70ad was the middle of the week. You need to learn to read what is posted.
The Messiah would be cut off, crucified in the middle of the week. Titus would destroy the city 40 years later.
If the people of the prince is referring to Titus, and it is, than how can so many teach that the prince whose people (the army of Titus) be the man of sin?
The pronoun HE must refer to someone previously identified in the discourse of the passage in question or it is improperly used and passage cannot be understood.
Where is the man of sin mentioned?
 

DRobinson

Active member
Aug 23, 2023
367
182
43
#18
How about you offering Scripture to support your first post in this discussion.
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
31,948
5,635
113
#19
How about you offering Scripture to support your first post in this discussion.
Watch the video on Youtube, he provides many verse references.

1. The mandates from this covenant include controlling what people buy or sell. That would be a reference to the Mark of the Beast.

2. The covenant was made in 2016, what they are doing now is "confirming it" or "strengthening it" for seven years which is a direct reference to what Daniel says in chapter 9.

3. The tagline of COP28 is "no one left behind" which is a direct reference to the rapture.

4. In COP28 they say that there cannot be peace and security without this covenant.

5. King Charles is an excellent candidate for the "He" that Daniel refers to and which is described in Revelation. The video gives some examples (King Charles gets his power from the Red Dragon, he is called "the little horn", he claims to be descended from both king David and Mohammed, etc). Craig Bong has focused his attention on King Charles since the 1990s. There are Biblical prophecies that the Antichrist comes from the UK (called Tarshish in the Bible) and the expression "rises out of the sea" is a reference to the UK according to Craig Bong.

6. King Charles has been the prime mover of this COP28, Paris accords, Agenda 2030 initiative. He gives the opening speech and will also give the closing speech where he will confirm the covenant along with the many.

7. Because King Charles rescued the Paris accords they made a statue of him called "Savior of the World", it depicts Charles with wings as people cry out to him for salvation. The statue was made 10 cubits tall, the same height as the two cherubim in Solomon's temple and they did this so that when the Jews rebuilt their temple they could put it in the temple. The expression "overspreading of abominations" in Daniel could also be translated "winged idol".

8. The pope is also pushing this agenda 2030/ COP28. So we have a false prophet along with a king who rules over a fourth of the earth pushing this on us.
 

DRobinson

Active member
Aug 23, 2023
367
182
43
#20
You seem to post many videos about many subjects, You seem to rely on videos and others opinions for what you believe. I do not. I spend all my free time in Scripture. From Genesis to Revelations. All Scripture. Well, I do waste some time on this forum, but not as much as you seem to.
We disagree.
Good night.