What makes a raciest?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Embankment

Senior Member
Feb 28, 2017
693
190
43
It would be hard to make a case for any of these extreme groups given we are to be following Christ.
 
Sep 13, 2018
2,587
885
113
The post I made a few ticks back that shared a brief history of Quantrill and his raiders. It's pencil images that were used back in Civil War news times to deliver reporting with a visual attachment to the news.
Here's another.

Thank you Lilly...
 

memyselfi

Junior Member
Jan 12, 2017
503
260
63
I'm just wondering what does the Civil War have to do with being a white republican and am I a raciest now because of my race (which I left put on purpose Jewish; yet still white and republican) yet we are back in the 1800's.... So what about the 1800's.... My people have some history to....lol...
 
Sep 13, 2018
2,587
885
113
I'm just wondering what does the Civil War have to do with being a white republican and am I a raciest now because of my race (which I left put on purpose Jewish; yet still white and republican) yet we are back in the 1800's.... So what about the 1800's.... My people have some history to....lol...
Who is "your people" ??? The white republicans? Or the Israelis?
 

I_am_Canadian

Senior Member
Dec 8, 2014
2,217
713
113
This is how the left currently defines racism... and it's all based on Neo-Marxist Conflict Theory.

It wasn't my idea.


...
I get it, thanks for explaining.
So we can conclude liberals/democrats are communists lol.
 

Quantrill

Well-known member
Sep 20, 2018
988
300
63
So if Lincoln was a white Supremesist, why did he fight to free the black slaves? If I am not mistaken that is what the Emancipation Proclimation is, is that white people could no longer own slaves and the black people were given the same rights and libertys as the whites.
He didn't fight to free the black slaves. This is the myth of they yankees and the blacks. They view Lincoln as the black Moses, who delievered them from slavery and brought them to the promised land.

The 'Emancipation Proclamation' was a war measure. It was not a humanitarian measure. It wasn't given till 1863, The war started in 1861. If the war was all about freeing the slaves and Lincoln was all about freeing the slaves, why didn't he emancipate in 1861?

Have you read the Emancipation proclamation. You should. It didn't free one slave. Lincolcn declared the slaves free in 'Confederate held territories' only. At this time in 1863, the yankees has already taken over much of the South where slaves existed. Guess what? They were not freed because they were no longer in Confederate held territories. So, Lincoln proclaimed the salves free that he couldn't free. Yet left the slaves in bondage who he could have freed.

It was a war measure. Lincoln hoped to inspire the slaves in the South to rise up against their masters and their families and kill them. But, guess what? They didn't. And they could have as most of the men of the South were gone to war. Instead the black slaves who had been part of the Southern culture, and their families, instead took care of those families instead of rebelling and klling them as Lincoln wanted them to do. Of course the NAACP will never give that history, as it doesn't make any hay for them.

Lincoln believed all the blacks should be sent back to Africa. Oh My....

Quanrill
 

Quantrill

Well-known member
Sep 20, 2018
988
300
63
Revisionist History & Problem Solving


Revisionist history isn't a threat which is exclusive to the southern states,
and the driving forces behind revisionism aren't black Americans.

The problems run deeper than these sophomoric and racially charged polemics.


Propagating Division?

I truly can't understand why anyone on a Christian forum would choose an avatar of a man like Quantrill -
a figure well documented as a thief and cattle rustler, slave hunter, outlaw, and murderer.

Quantrill is a figure whom, at the very BEST, is controversial, divisive, sometimes criminal, and has absolutely nothing to do with Christ.



Conclusion

1. There are real problems in the world, and in the U.S... agreed.

2. However, we really can't solve problems by completely misidentifying the actual problems, digging our heals into a few symptoms, dividing the body of Christ along arbitrary lines, and then fighting endlessly with everyone in sight.


..
I choose it because I know the true history of Quantrill and not your perverted views which are just you coughing up the smoke they have been blowing up your back side.

Shows your ignorance of history.

Do yourself a favor and do your own research.

Quantrill
 

Quantrill

Well-known member
Sep 20, 2018
988
300
63
The post I made a few ticks back that shared a brief history of Quantrill and his raiders. It's pencil images that were used back in Civil War news times to deliver reporting with a visual attachment to the news.
Here's another.

Don't get your understanding of history from the movies. Good night. Can't anyone read any more? Do your research. Follow a movie and you just get the same old lies. Follow a movie Lillwolf gives you and get what Lillywolf's view of history.

Quantrill
 

Quantrill

Well-known member
Sep 20, 2018
988
300
63
So Lilly, what do you think about him? ( The real Quantrill. I mean)
She doesn't know what to think about the real Quantrill because she has encountered some real history about Quantrill that she never heard. She never heard it because she just believed, like everyone else, the bull they had been feeding her.

Quantrill
 
Sep 13, 2018
2,587
885
113
She doesn't know what to think about the real Quantrill because she has encountered some real history about Quantrill that she never heard. She never heard it because she just believed, like everyone else, the bull they had been feeding her.

Quantrill

Hey Quantrill, So what do you find positive in a man such as "Quantrill"...
 

Quantrill

Well-known member
Sep 20, 2018
988
300
63
Hey Quantrill, So what do you find positive in a man such as "Quantrill"...
'positive'....such a queer word. Sort of like 'guys'.

Quantrill and the men that rode with him, stood up against overwhelming odds for the South and her people. When he was given no quarter, he gave no quarter. And he expected no quarter in return.

Quantrill
 

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,349
2,434
113
I choose it because I know the true history of Quantrill and not your perverted views which are just you coughing up the smoke they have been blowing up your back side.

Shows your ignorance of history.

Do yourself a favor and do your own research.

Quantrill

I'm ignorant of history?

Maybe I am.

So are you making the claims that:
a)
Quantrill's group did NOT surround Lawrence, burn it down, and murder the people there?
b) Quantrill did NOT work as a bounty hunter, capturing escaped slaves?
c) Quantrill was NEVER a cattle rustler, or outlaw, and he never broke any laws?


...
 

Quantrill

Well-known member
Sep 20, 2018
988
300
63
I'm ignorant of history?

Maybe I am.

So are you making the claims that:
a)
Quantrill's group did NOT surround Lawrence, burn it down, and murder the people there?
b) Quantrill did NOT work as a bounty hunter, capturing escaped slaves?
c) Quantrill was NEVER a cattle rustler, or outlaw, and he never broke any laws?


...
Yes they did destroy Lawrence Kansas. If you have read this thread completely you will see why they did. Have you? What say you to that?

Capturing slaves was in line with the Constitution. Quantrill was supporting the Constitution.

Everyone fighting for the South was considered outlaws.

Quantrill
 

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,349
2,434
113
I get it, thanks for explaining.
So we can conclude liberals/democrats are communists lol.

Since that is not what I actually said...

it might be an error to suggest that is what I said.




...
 

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,349
2,434
113
Yes they did destroy Lawrence Kansas. If you have read this thread completely you will see why they did. Have you? What say you to that?

Capturing slaves was in line with the Constitution. Quantrill was supporting the Constitution.

Everyone fighting for the South was considered outlaws.

Quantrill

You just admitted Quantrill murdered people in the Lawrence massacre, that he captured runaway slaves, and that he was an outlaw....

you just verified every claim i made.


Sounds like we're in perfect agreement.


...
 
Sep 13, 2018
2,587
885
113
'positive'....such a queer word. Sort of like 'guys'.

Quantrill and the men that rode with him, stood up against overwhelming odds for the South and her people. When he was given no quarter, he gave no quarter. And he expected no quarter in return.

Quantrill

And exactly what cause this guy fighting for? anything for the good, or positive??? lol..