There is no such thing as Sola Scriptura

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

homwardbound

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2012
17,571
750
113
WOW - just . . . WOW.

Do you mean to tell me that you have been arguing against the Immaculate Conception in post after post - and you don't even know what it means??
You claim that Mary HAS Original Sin otherwise "she wouldn't have had to be saved." This statement is based in an abject ignorance of the Immaculate Conception.

As I pointed out - Mary was saved FROM the stain of Original Sin - not AFTER. She was CONCEIVED immaculately. Indeed, she needed a Savior but that doesn't mean she sinned.

When the Angel visited Mary, he called her "Kecharitomene". It translates as, "completely, perfectly, enduringly endowed with grace." No othe human being in ALL of Scripture is described this way. In fact, Jesus is the ONLY human who is spoken of more highly.

Your claim that Mary was nothing special other than the fact that she was a mere vessel is Biblically preposterous. Call me crazy, but YOU weren't chosen from all of the women in eternity to be the Mother of Jesus, who is GOD.
Any woman could have been chosen by God in the same lineage of Abraham. God chose a virgin, so therefore being born from a Virgin Christ was born a life-giving Spirit, And Who besides Christ performed miracles, the ones that Christ gave authority to do, not Mary. Mary's purpose wss to bear Jesus and raise Jesus and she did her Job.
 
May 6, 2013
119
1
0
wow, you are not serious are you? Rev 12: 1 is speaking os Isreal. who gave birth To Christ. The 12 stars represent his 12 children (12 tribes) of which one of them mary came through (judah). Not the woman Mary, who is awaiting the return of her savior with all of the saints who went before her and have went since!
Rev. 12:1 is what is known as a polyvalent symbol. A polyvalent symbol can have multiple meanings.

First of all, Rev. 12:1 is preceded by Rev. 11:19. In case you're unaware, chapter and verse were not added by the Church until the Middle Ages. Each Book was simply written as a long letter.

In Rev. 11:19, we read:
Then God's temple in heaven was opened, and the ark of his covenant could be seen in the temple. There were flashes of lightning, rumblings, and peals of thunder, an earthquake, and a violent hailstorm.

In the very next verse - we see the Ark being described:
Rev. 12:1-2
A great sign appeared in the sky, a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars.
She was with child and wailed aloud in pain as she labored to give birth.

Mary is the Ark of the NEW Covenant (Jesus). She carried the 2nd Person of the Trinity in her womb, who is GOD. The old Ark vanished because it was merely a SYMBOL of the New Ark that was to come.

Here is the Biblical PROOF that Mary is the Ark of the New Covenant:

The Word was written by God on Tablets of Stone (Ex. 25:10) placed inside the Ark (Deut. 10:1)
The Word of God became Flesh (John 1) conceived inside Mary (Luke 2:38) Mary carried the Word of God.


[The New Covenant] will not be like the covenant that... they broke though I was their husband (Jer. 31:31)

The Holy Spirit (God) is Mary's spouse (Luke 1:35)


"Who am I that the Ark of my Lord should come to me?" (2 Sam. 6:9)

“Who am I that the mother of my Lord should come to me?” (Luke 1:43)


When the Ark carrying the Word of God returned “David was leaping and dancing before the Lord” (2 Sam. 6:14)

When Mary came into Elizabeth's presence carrying the word of God, the baby “leaped for joy” in Elizabeth's womb (Luke 2 38)


The Ark carrying the Word of God is brought to the house of Obed-Edom for 3 months, where it was a blessing. (2 Sam. 6:11)

Mary (the new Ark) carrying the Word of God goes to Elizabeth's house for 3 months, where she is a blessing (Luke 1:56)


The Ark is captured (1 Sam 4:11) and brought to a foreign land and later returns (1 Sam 6:13)

Mary (the new Ark) is exiled to a foreign land (Egypt) and later returns (Mat 2:14)


 
May 6, 2013
119
1
0
Any woman could have been chosen by God in the same lineage of Abraham. God chose a virgin, so therefore being born from a Virgin Christ was born a life-giving Spirit, And Who besides Christ performed miracles, the ones that Christ gave authority to do, not Mary. Mary's purpose wss to bear Jesus and raise Jesus and she did her Job.
Yes, she did.
Her purpose was ALSO to fulfill all of the prohecies that surrounded His birth, her virginity and her place as the Ark of the New Covenant.
 

homwardbound

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2012
17,571
750
113
It's all very well saying this, but where are the scriptures to prove your claim?

Why is it important that Mary be sinless? God could've breathed Jesus into existence, but instead He chose for Jesus to enter this world as a man through birth. Clearly, God doesn't need a perfect and sinless vessel to give birth to Jesus, because Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit.

Since God chose to use a human vessel, someone had to be picked, whether it be a Mary, Susan or Margaret. I expect Mary was chosen as a Godly woman, the right one to raise Jesus as her own. She gave birth to the humanity side of Jesus. God doesn't have a mother, He is the creator of all things and not created by anyone.

Without scripture how do you discern between truth and error?

Without scripture how do you test to see who the false teachers are? How do you know who is deceiving you and who is not?

Since you believe Mary remained a virgin her entire life, you would be admitting that she sinned, because not consummating her marriage to Joseph would've been a sin.

Edit: scripture says Mary had sons and daughters after Jesus.
No Mary did not remain a virgin for she ahd Janmes and Jude half- brothers of Jesus
 
7

7seven7

Guest
it is in chapter 6. And we do it like Christ did.

"It is written"

Thats the only way to defeat satan.. Notice satan never argued with Christ? he can;t it is the only thing that will defeat him
Which explains why we're taught from a young age (at the Catholic Church) to say "In the name of Jesus Christ be gone" to any sort of evil influence. Makes complete sense

[SUP]12 [/SUP]For our[SUP][b][/SUP]struggle is not against enemies of blood and flesh, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers of this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places. [SUP]13 [/SUP]Therefore take up the whole armor of God, so that you may be able to withstand on that evil day, and having done everything, to stand firm. [SUP]14 [/SUP]Stand therefore, and fasten the belt of truth around your waist, and put on the breastplate of righteousness. [SUP]15 [/SUP]As shoes for your feet put on whatever will make you ready to proclaim the gospel of peace. [SUP]16 [/SUP]With all of these,[SUP][c][/SUP] take the shield of faith, with which you will be able to quench all the flaming arrows of the evil one. [SUP]17 [/SUP]Take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God.


How cool is this verse!! I just wanna please Him with righteousness after reading it.
 
May 6, 2013
119
1
0
I know all the Saints are in Heaven and see this to be true. The ? is from me to you why does the Catholic Chirch pray to Mother Mary? Who is the way to Heaven? I again know Mary is there and I know Paul is to, so wht don't we pray to all the Saints and not Christ? Does the Catholic Church end all prayers in The name of Christ or the name of Paul, or in the name of Mary? Just curious because I remember Paul saying not to bow to him and Peter saying the same things as to this not toput them on any pedestal. And it seems that this is what is being Done. Now only each person themselves can decide this in and of themselves between God and them whether this is true or not true.
I am not by any means condeming anyone for their practice, I am not God, I just Love god because God first loved me via the cross, and am estatic. elated over this, and see for me nother way to worship God except by Spirit and truth, reception of the Love of God best described to me in 1Cor 13, all else goes away except love God's type 1 cor 13:13 and God is love
So do you think that when we are in heaven we wll be so busy praising each other as what goes on in all denominations? Or might we be too busy praising God for this miraculous provided by his Son Chrisat Jesus not Mary, even though he was the virgin that supplied Christ through her womb.?
thanks in advance for your response
Do ANY of you guys bother to READ the posts? ALL of you are asking the same questions ad nauseam.
I answered this SEVERAL times, starting with post #183:

The word, "pray", in its most rudimentary form means to ask, to entreat to supplicate. We pray to God in worship, thanksgiving and supplication. We ask those in heaven to pray FOR us to God.

Rev. 5:8
shows the Elders in heaven bringing our prayers before God and Rev. 8:3-4 speaks of the Angels in heaven doing the same thing.

We don't WORSHIP Mary. We worship God ALONE.
We ASK Mary to pray FOR us - just as I might ask you or another person to pray for me. We DON'T pray in HER name.

REALLY, people - start paying attention to the posts.
 
May 6, 2013
119
1
0
No Mary did not remain a virgin for she ahd Janmes and Jude half- brothers of Jesus
Rubbish.
I already debunked that myth with the BIBLE. Why don't you read before posting?
Here we go . . . again:

Protestants and anti-Catholics always try to prove that Mary had other children and list the names given in the Bible. They give the names of these adelphoi, James, Joseph (Joses), Jude (Judas), and list the passages that mention these adelphoi, (Matt. 12:46; Matt. 13:55; Mark 3:31–34; Mark 6:3; Luke 8:19–20; John 2:12, 7:3, 5, 10; Acts 1:14; 1 Cor. 9:5).

The “other Mary” at the foot of the cross is described as being the mother of James and Joses and Salome. She is also described as being Mary’s (mother of Jesus) “sister” (adelphe) (John 19:25).

James is elsewhere described as the son of Alphaeus (Matt. 10:3), which would mean this other Mary, whoever she was, was the wife of both Clopas and Alphaeus. However, Alphaeus and Clopas are the same person, since the Aramaic name for Alphaeus could be rendered in Greek either as Alphaeus or as Clopas. It’s also possible that Alphaeus took a Greek name similar to his Jewish name, the same way that Saul took the name Paul.

What do the Scriptures have to say about the women standing at the cross and their children?
Matt. 27:56 says, "…among whom were Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James and Joseph, and the mother of the sons of Zebedee".

Mark 15:40 states, "There were also women looking on from afar, among whom were Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James the younger and of Joses, and Salome").
Finally, John 19:25 states, "But standing by the cross of Jesus were his mother, and his mother’s sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene".

When you compare the different accounts of the crucifixion, they clearly show the mother of James and Joseph to be the wife of Clopas (also called, Alphaeus) – not Mary, the Mother of Jesus. Any attempt to connect these people as uterine brothers of Jesus are squashed by the Bible.


Uhhh, by the way, there was NO term for the word “cousin” in the Aramaic language that Jesus spoke. When the Old Testament was translated into Greek in the centuries before the birth of Christ (the Septuagint), the words “adelphos” and “adelphoi” were used in places where “ach” was. This is why we have many examples in the Septuagint of the following:

In Gen. 14:14, Lot is called Abraham’s "brother", even though he was the son of Haran, Abraham’s brother (Gen. 11:26–28). In Gen. 29:15, Jacob is referred to as the "brother" (adelphos) of his uncle Laban.

Brothers Kish and Eleazar were the sons of Mahli. Kish had sons of his own, but Eleazar’s daughters married their "brethren” (adelphoi) , the sons of Kish - who were actually their cousins (1 Chr. 23:21–22).

Finally, of the 344 times that Adelphos is used in its various forms in the New Testament - a whopping 74% of them are NOT speaking of uterine sublings - but something else entirely.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Rev. 12:1 is what is known as a polyvalent symbol. A polyvalent symbol can have multiple meanings.

First of all, Rev. 12:1 is preceded by Rev. 11:19. In case you're unaware, chapter and verse were not added by the Church until the Middle Ages. Each Book was simply written as a long letter.

In Rev. 11:19, we read:
Then God's temple in heaven was opened, and the ark of his covenant could be seen in the temple. There were flashes of lightning, rumblings, and peals of thunder, an earthquake, and a violent hailstorm.

In the very next verse - we see the Ark being described:
Rev. 12:1-2
A great sign appeared in the sky, a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars.
She was with child and wailed aloud in pain as she labored to give birth.

Mary is the Ark of the NEW Covenant (Jesus). She carried the 2nd Person of the Trinity in her womb, who is GOD. The old Ark vanished because it was merely a SYMBOL of the New Ark that was to come.

Here is the Biblical PROOF that Mary is the Ark of the New Covenant:

The Word was written by God on Tablets of Stone (Ex. 25:10) placed inside the Ark (Deut. 10:1)
The Word of God became Flesh (John 1) conceived inside Mary (Luke 2:38) Mary carried the Word of God.


[The New Covenant] will not be like the covenant that... they broke though I was their husband (Jer. 31:31)

The Holy Spirit (God) is Mary's spouse (Luke 1:35)


"Who am I that the Ark of my Lord should come to me?" (2 Sam. 6:9)

“Who am I that the mother of my Lord should come to me?” (Luke 1:43)


When the Ark carrying the Word of God returned “David was leaping and dancing before the Lord” (2 Sam. 6:14)

When Mary came into Elizabeth's presence carrying the word of God, the baby “leaped for joy” in Elizabeth's womb (Luke 2 38)


The Ark carrying the Word of God is brought to the house of Obed-Edom for 3 months, where it was a blessing. (2 Sam. 6:11)

Mary (the new Ark) carrying the Word of God goes to Elizabeth's house for 3 months, where she is a blessing (Luke 1:56)


The Ark is captured (1 Sam 4:11) and brought to a foreign land and later returns (1 Sam 6:13)

Mary (the new Ark) is exiled to a foreign land (Egypt) and later returns (Mat 2:14)


wow.. I can't get this at all.

rev is speaking of literal events which will happen in the future. not symbolic things.. John was shown things which will take place.

Isreal is the woman. who satan has been trying to destroy since she was born (see hitler and many others) Rev 12 is a promise God will protect them, and not allow satan to touch them. Then this causes satan to go after her offspring which is the church.

it is dangerous to try to symbolise everything the way you all do.. you change the meaning of scripture. The ark of the covenant was seen in heaven because it is not on earth right now. the ark is Christ himself. he is the mercy seat.. And his blood is spilt on the latar that grants forgiveness!
 

homwardbound

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2012
17,571
750
113
God bless you, brother!!
Thanks and I hear you saying that the Catholic Church has not put Mother Mary in front of Christ, yet looking from outside in it appears this way, would you agree with this?
I know a book can't be judged by its cover, one would have to read it first? And is it possible for others to put Mother Mary first, just as it is possible for anyone to rely on their own flesh as in works to gain salvation?
Thanks in advance for the answers
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
Rubbish.
I already debunked that myth with the BIBLE. Why don't you read before posting?
Here we go . . . again:

Protestants and anti-Catholics always try to.........
 
7

7seven7

Guest
Rubbish.
I already debunked that myth with the BIBLE. Why don't you read before posting?
Here we go . . . again:

Protestants and anti-Catholics always try to prove that Mary had other children and list the names given in the Bible. They give the names of these adelphoi, James, Joseph (Joses), Jude (Judas), and list the passages that mention these adelphoi, (Matt. 12:46; Matt. 13:55; Mark 3:31–34; Mark 6:3; Luke 8:19–20; John 2:12, 7:3, 5, 10; Acts 1:14; 1 Cor. 9:5).

The “other Mary” at the foot of the cross is described as being the mother of James and Joses and Salome. She is also described as being Mary’s (mother of Jesus) “sister” (adelphe) (John 19:25).

James is elsewhere described as the son of Alphaeus (Matt. 10:3), which would mean this other Mary, whoever she was, was the wife of both Clopas and Alphaeus. However, Alphaeus and Clopas are the same person, since the Aramaic name for Alphaeus could be rendered in Greek either as Alphaeus or as Clopas. It’s also possible that Alphaeus took a Greek name similar to his Jewish name, the same way that Saul took the name Paul.

What do the Scriptures have to say about the women standing at the cross and their children?
Matt. 27:56 says, "…among whom were Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James and Joseph, and the mother of the sons of Zebedee".

Mark 15:40 states, "There were also women looking on from afar, among whom were Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James the younger and of Joses, and Salome").
Finally, John 19:25 states, "But standing by the cross of Jesus were his mother, and his mother’s sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene".

When you compare the different accounts of the crucifixion, they clearly show the mother of James and Joseph to be the wife of Clopas (also called, Alphaeus) – not Mary, the Mother of Jesus. Any attempt to connect these people as uterine brothers of Jesus are squashed by the Bible.


Uhhh, by the way, there was NO term for the word “cousin” in the Aramaic language that Jesus spoke. When the Old Testament was translated into Greek in the centuries before the birth of Christ (the Septuagint), the words “adelphos” and “adelphoi” were used in places where “ach” was. This is why we have many examples in the Septuagint of the following:

In Gen. 14:14, Lot is called Abraham’s "brother", even though he was the son of Haran, Abraham’s brother (Gen. 11:26–28). In Gen. 29:15, Jacob is referred to as the "brother" (adelphos) of his uncle Laban.

Brothers Kish and Eleazar were the sons of Mahli. Kish had sons of his own, but Eleazar’s daughters married their "brethren” (adelphoi) , the sons of Kish - who were actually their cousins (1 Chr. 23:21–22).

Finally, of the 344 times that Adelphos is used in its various forms in the New Testament - a whopping 74% of them are NOT speaking of uterine sublings - but something else entirely.
I always wondered about the Mary's at the crucifixion. There you have it lol Thanx brother!! That's excellent
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Which explains why we're taught from a young age (at the Catholic Church) to say "In the name of Jesus Christ be gone" to any sort of evil influence. Makes complete sense

[SUP]12 [/SUP]For our[SUP][b][/SUP]struggle is not against enemies of blood and flesh, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers of this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places. [SUP]13 [/SUP]Therefore take up the whole armor of God, so that you may be able to withstand on that evil day, and having done everything, to stand firm. [SUP]14 [/SUP]Stand therefore, and fasten the belt of truth around your waist, and put on the breastplate of righteousness. [SUP]15 [/SUP]As shoes for your feet put on whatever will make you ready to proclaim the gospel of peace. [SUP]16 [/SUP]With all of these,[SUP][c][/SUP] take the shield of faith, with which you will be able to quench all the flaming arrows of the evil one. [SUP]17 [/SUP]Take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God.


How cool is this verse!! I just wanna please Him with righteousness after reading it.
Just remember, it is more than this. The guys who tried to expel the demon in the name of Jesus were tore up because they were missing something.

Alot of people say in the name of Jesus, that is not the thing I was getting at.

Jesus said, "it is written, man shall not live by bread alone
"it is written, You will worship the lord your God and only him"

Paul reasoned from scripture.

we fight with the word.. Scripture is known by satan, and he will not argue it, because it is the only thing which defeats him
 

homwardbound

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2012
17,571
750
113
HEY EVERYONE!! UNLESS YOU COME TO AN AGREEMENT AS TO WHETHER IT'S SOLA SCRIPTURA OR NOT, YOU WILL NEVER AGREE ON ANY OF THE POINTS YOU ARGUE ABOUT!!! YOU'RE ALL RUNNING AROUND IN CIRCLES TRYING TO MAKE POINTS FROM COMPLETELY DIFFERENT ENDS OF THE SPECTRUM MAKING ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE TO EACHOTHER!! FROM THE BELIEF SYSTEM YOU ALL COME FROM, YOU ALL MAKE ABSOLUTE SENSE. WHEN TRYING TO PROVE IT TO EACH OTHER, FORGETTING THAT THE OTHER DOESN'T GO BY THE SAME UNDERSTANDING AS YOU, IT MAKES ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE.LOL ITS FUNNY. GOD BLESS YOU ALL

In the meantime, the sarcasm and attitudes towards each other, lacking in love, is really upsetting Christ. I think anyway. Peace!
Yes in and under the new covenat we are to recieve the new Love best described in 1 Cor 13:4-13
[h=3]1 Corinthians 13:4-13[/h]King James Version (KJV)

[SUP]4 [/SUP]Charity suffereth long, and is kind; charity envieth not; charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up,
[SUP]5 [/SUP]Doth not behave itself unseemly, seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil;
[SUP]6 [/SUP]Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth;
[SUP]7 [/SUP]Beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things.
[SUP]8 [/SUP]Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away.
[SUP]9 [/SUP]For we know in part, and we prophesy in part.
[SUP]10 [/SUP]But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.
[SUP]11 [/SUP]When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.
[SUP]12 [/SUP]For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.
[SUP]13 [/SUP]And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.
 
May 6, 2013
119
1
0
wow.. I can't get this at all.

rev is speaking of literal events which will happen in the future. not symbolic things.. John was shown things which will take place.

Isreal is the woman. who satan has been trying to destroy since she was born (see hitler and many others) Rev 12 is a promise God will protect them, and not allow satan to touch them. Then this causes satan to go after her offspring which is the church.

it is dangerous to try to symbolise everything the way you all do.. you change the meaning of scripture. The ark of the covenant was seen in heaven because it is not on earth right now. the ark is Christ himself. he is the mercy seat.. And his blood is spilt on the latar that grants forgiveness!
Where did you get the idea that Revelation ONLY speaks of future events??
Even most Protestant scholars agree that some, if not MUCH of it has already taken place. The Whore of Babylon and other symbols are references to the Roman Empire and Nero, in particular.

The references to Satan falling from heaven into hell took place before the creation of the world.
 

homwardbound

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2012
17,571
750
113
Translation...I don't understand because it doesn't jive with what the priest brainwashed me with.
crossnote, do you not have God's type of love, what is it you all are fighting? God has poured out his LOVE to all and we are not to be seperated yet this whole world is divided in cults and Paul definately did not praise this.
These people here of the Catholic persausion have said especially 7seven7 that he loves us all here unconditionally, and you all in and of yuor own religous presausion claiming you are right and go ahead is this not of flesh? Is this of God's Spirit to only Love those that Love you?
Not trying to make things worse just looking at it from the stadium seeing the football game going on.
You know that is what going to Church is actually like going to a football game
One arrives on time at 3:00 PM and when one arrives in his tennis shorts and racket, sees oh no it is a football game and gets trampled, beat up and spit out. You know even though I do not agree with the Catholic way of worship. in all of 7seven7 posts I have not seen one railing accusation towards anyone, He has responded every time in Love. And when he has gotten a little to a lot upset, he has withdrawn himsel so that his old Flesh would not get in the way.
So please take a learning lesson herer about waht God's true LOVE is and be a doer of this as God through this man has so graciously shown. I only speak for 7seven7 here
 
May 6, 2013
119
1
0
Sorry I have not entered in the conversation. I am away from home, and relaxing after my graduation. Feels good to be done, but also exciting to be serving God in new ways.

I confess I am puzzled in more ways than one about this whole thread. I like Catholics, and I know many. Most of my Catholic friends have a great love for God and Mary does not enter the picture in their theology. They know Jesus as Lord and Saviour, and they recognize all believers, as those who "Love God, and their neighbor as themselves." (Paraphrase: Luke 10:27). None of them believe that the Catholic Church is the only way to salvation, and I lead Bible studies in long term care, and they all recognize that the way to salvation is through the grace of God.

As for Kecharitomene, it is a hapax legomena. that means it is only found one place in the Bible. Looking at the word closely, and in Exegetical commentaries, the word is a derivative of χάρις or charis. That means grace, favor or kindness. And I am sure that God picked the right woman to bear his Son, and she was Mary. But no where do I see in the Bible, or that word specifically a doctrine of Mary being immaculately conceived.

I also must also pound in the fact, that you NEVER make a doctrine out of just one word, one passage, that is not confirmed in many other places. ESPECIALLY a hapax legomena!! It means you have to go to non- biblical sources to compare usage, and you might get a huge range of meanings, resulting in cherry picking doctrines, like Mary was immaculately conceived.

So bad hermeneutics all the way around!!

On the other hand, that is EXACTLY what this whole post is basically about! Because this doctrine of Mary cannot be seen anywhere in the Bible, so therefore, the Bible is not adequate to explain the truth. So you need some popes making declarations, ex cathedra that Mary was not only immaculately conceived but assumed into heaven.

But even if we create a straw man (or straw Mary!) just to discuss this topic and pretend the Catholic Church is right about Mary, it all comes back to the fact, that Catholic DO pray to Mary, and how is one person (not God!!) supposed to answer to the prayers of millions of Catholic all around the globe, praying the rosary???? Even, as you say, Mary is not God, and only God is worshiped. So how does a mere person, not God hear all those prayers? That in itself is a major stumbling block to this whole Mariology nonsense.

Once again I really think we need to get off the side topic of Mary, and address the real issue with the Catholic church and that is soteriology. How are we saved?

According to the Catholic Church, the monolith of the RCC is what saves, esp the mass, in which a little piece of bread, and a bit of wine turns literally into Jesus, and that is what saved. Jesus work on the cross and believing in that does not save, but rather transubstantiation is the means to salvation.

Transubstantiation is an 18-letter word that is a complete theological statement. . . and the name of a doctrine, out of which springs the most astounding set of beliefs and practices that has ever been taught in the name of religion. Very, very few people know what the Catholic Church actually believes and teaches concerning this subject. and I am convinced that even fewer Catholics realize themselves what they are taking part in. Literally, what "transubstantiation" means the Roman Catholic Church teaches their flocks that the bread and the wine used in the Mass actually, physically, turn into the flesh and blood of Jesus Christ after the priest blesses it during the liturgy (ceremony).

"Jesus Christ does not cease to exist under the appearances of bread and wine after the Mass is over. Furthermore. some hosts are usually kept in all Catholic churches. In these hosts, Jesus is physically and truly present, as long as the appearances of bread remain. Catholics therefore have the praiseworthy practice of 'making visits' to our Lord present in their churches to offer Him their thanks, their adoration, to ask for help and forgiveness; in a word, to make Him the center around which they live their daily lives." ("The Spirit of Jesus" Catholic Home Study Instruction Course, Book #3, p. 92.) That is an incredible interpretation of how to make Jesus the center of your daily life!

Then there is confession to a priest. The priesthood died out with the death and resurrection of Christ and the Bible says we are all a Royal Priesthood.

"But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for his own possession, that you may proclaim the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light." 1 Peter 2:9

In fact, the only other references in the entire Bible to "priest" is the Jewish priest, and then a large section in Hebrews on Jesus being the high priest, which is very instructive.

"For it was indeed fitting that we should have such a high priest, holy, innocent, unstained, separated from sinners, and exalted above the heavens. [SUP]27 [/SUP]He has no need, like those high priests, to offer sacrifices daily, first for his own sins and then for those of the people, since he did this once for all when he offered up himself.[SUP]28 [/SUP]For the law appoints men in their weakness as high priests, but the word of the oath, which came later than the law, appoints a Son who has been made perfect forever." Hebrews 7:26-28

We ARE the priests!

"Worthy are you to take the scrolland to open its seals,
for you were slain, and by your blood you ransomed people for God
from every tribe and language and people and nation,
[SUP]10 [/SUP]and you have made them a kingdom and priests to our God,
and they shall reign on the earth.” Rev. 5:9-10



Who can forgive sins, according to the Bible?

"And when Jesus saw their faith, he said to the paralytic, “Son, your sins are forgiven.” [SUP]6 [/SUP]Now some of the scribes were sitting there, questioning in their hearts, [SUP]7 [/SUP]“Why does this man speak like that? He is blaspheming! Who can forgive sins but God alone?” Mark 2:5-7

Yet the Catholic church believes that somehow a priest can forgive sins.

"The priest forgives the guilt of mortal sins which saves the penitent from going to hell, but he cannot remit the penalty due for those sins, and so the penitent must atone for them by performance of good works which he prescribes. The penitent may be, and usually is, interrogated by the priest so that he or she may make a full and proper confession. Stress is placed on the fact that any sin not confessed is not forgiven, any mortal sin not confessed in detail is not forgiven, and that the omission of even one sin (mortal) may invalidate the whole confession. Every loyal Roman Catholic is required under pain of mortal sin to go to confession at least once a year. But even after a penitent has received pardon, a large, but unknown amount of punishment remains to be suffered in purgatory." (The doctrine of purgatory rests on the assumption that while God forgives sin, His justice nevertheless demands that the sinner must suffer the full punishment due to him for his sin before he will be allowed to enter heaven.)

I don't know, this sounds like a doctrine straight from the pit of hell. It means a man (the priest!) is the only one who can forgive our sins - not Jesus, not Mary, not a saint - but a man with a collar and title. And yet, the poor person will still need punishment, even though Christ took our punishment on himself. And don't go saying the priest stands in the place of Jesus. Unless you can find a verse somewhere in those 860 references to the word "priest" in the Bible, that says "the Catholic priest takes the place of Jesus in forgiving sins" I am not going to believe this dogma for a second!

"Surely he has borne our griefs
and carried our sorrows;
yet we esteemed him stricken,
smitten by God, and afflicted.
[SUP]5 [/SUP]But he was pierced for our transgressions;
he was crushed for our iniquities;
upon him was the chastisement that brought us peace,
and with his wounds we are healed." Isa. 53:4-5

"For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh but made alive in the spirit," 1 Peter 3:18.


Just give me the verse that states we have to go to purgatory, because Christ's sacrifice wasn't enough. God's justice was satisfied at the cross and no amount of our works or punishment is ever going to breach the separation we have created by our sin to satisfy God. NONE!! And while we are at it, give me a verse that says ONLY a priest can forgive sins, when the Bible is full of verses that Jesus forgives sin, and in fact his very name is from Yeshua in the Hebrew, which means salvation or deliverance.

"The Council of Trent, in its opposition to the reformer's doctrine of justification by faith, and in defense of its doctrine of penance, declared: "Whosoever shall affirm that men are justified solely by the imputation of the righteousness of Christ... let him be accursed" (Council of Trent, section 6.) And the Catholic Almanac says, "Penance is necessary for salvation...and was instituted by Christ for the forgiveness of sins". (pps. 269, 559.)

No wonder the OP started this post. The whole Catholic church falls into ruins if you rely only on the Word of God. You must have all these councils, declarations etc, etc, which add greatly to the rules by which a person can be saved, and take away from the finished work of Christ on the cross.

But again, that is why this is the topic of this thread, because if you believe the Bible, you cannot believe the doctrine of salvation according to the RCC church. The Catholic doctrine of salvation is based on priests, masses and confessions, and that is simply not in the Bible!

"But now the righteousness of God has been manifested apart from the law, although the Law and the Prophets bear witness to it— [SUP]22 [/SUP]the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe. For there is no distinction: [SUP]23 [/SUP]for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, [SUP]24 [/SUP]and are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, [SUP]25 [/SUP]whom God put forward as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith. This was to show God's righteousness, because in his divine forbearance he had passed over former sins. [SUP]26 [/SUP]It was to show his righteousness at the present time, so that he might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus." Romans 3:21-26

Nothing about needing Mary, a priest, or suffering punishment in that passage!! Just believing in Christ!

It is obvious by even a brief glimpse into the doctrines of mortal and venial sins, confession, penance, and purgatory, that the Roman Catholic Church has constructed one of the most unbiblical doctrinal systems that has ever been considered "Christian". The fear, anguish, and religious bondage that such a system of "reward and punishment" creates, has tormented millions of lives for centuries, and continues to prey on those who are ignorant of the biblical way of salvation.
To merely call such a system "a cult", would be to throw it into the vast category of religions and quasi-religions that are currently making the rounds of our college campuses and city streets, snatching up many-an-unsuspecting youth. No, the Roman Church is not a cult. It's an empire! With its own ruler, its own laws, and its own subjects! The empire has no borders, it encompasses the globe with its eye on every person who does not vow allegiance. It calls the members of other faiths "separated brethren" (The term used by Vatican II to describe the members of Eastern Orthodox, Anglican, and Protestant churches.) and has as its goal the eventual bringing together of everyone under its flag.

So the OP's point is that you need MORE than the Bible to be saved. I get that. What I just don't see anywhere in that massive, monetarily rich hierarchy is anything that remotely builds on the truth of salvation by the grace of God in their heretical system. And if you want to yell at me about being "anti-Catholic" remember, I did not start this thread, but a Catholic trying to convince us that this wicked and evil church is the only way to salvation.

"B
ecause, if you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. [SUP]10 [/SUP]For with the heart one believes and is justified, and with the mouth one confesses and is saved." Romans 10:9-10

Sorry for the LONG post! I just had to make up some ground I lost being mostly off line!
Angela -
Thank you for that mostly charitable post (you were doing fine until the last part). More of your friends here could use a little more charity in their posts instead of the virulent anti-Catholic drivel they're so fond of.

That being said, Mary's Immaculate Conception is not only based on one verse, as I have shown over and over. Mary is the fulfillment of the type that was the Ark of the Covenant. I have alreadylisted this MANY times so if you go back just a few posts, you'll see what I'm talking about.

Just as the Ark was to be undefiled, untouched and pure - so was Mary because unlike the Ark that caried mere symbols of God within it, she actually carried God within her. That, coupled with other pro[phecies such as Ezekiel 44:2, which speak of her perpetual virginity.

As for your other points about "unbiblical" Catholic doctrines, you are wrong here as well because they are ALL supprted by Scripture.
We can tackle them one by one, if you'd like.
 

homwardbound

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2012
17,571
750
113
SOLA SCRIPTURA!

all the things we are to do are in scripture.

2 Timothy 3
All Scripture Is Breathed Out by God
10You, however, have followed my teaching, my conduct, my aim in life, my faith, my patience, my love, my steadfastness, 11my persecutions and sufferings that happened to me at Antioch, at Iconium, and at Lystra—which persecutions I endured; yet from them all the Lord rescued me. 12Indeed, all who desire to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted, 13while evil people and impostors will go on from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived. 14But as for you, continue in what you have learned and have firmly believed, knowing from whoma you learned it 15and how from childhood you have been acquainted with the sacred writings, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. 16All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, 17that the man of Godb may be competent, equipped for every good work.
yes Sister I agree and where is it he has not done waht this scripture says. 7seven7 has done nothing but shown love back to every accusation and is fine where he is at. Are we here to take away others free as choice as what Sodom and Gemorrah did as what was happening in Noahs day also.
Hmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I think to take away others free choice is waht God is incredibly anxst about
 
Nov 14, 2012
2,113
4
0
Those were Joseph's children, not Mary's
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
yes Sister I agree and where is it he has not done waht this scripture says. 7seven7 has done nothing but shown love back to every accusation and is fine where he is at. Are we here to take away others free as choice as what Sodom and Gemorrah did as what was happening in Noahs day also.
Hmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I think to take away others free choice is waht God is incredibly anxst about
home, purleeze.
thus far i have had no issue with sevens.
thx.