what's really happening in Turkey?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
tsk....still
i'm not going over it all again:rolleyes:

cliff notes:

CIA WAS OSS
The OSS was set up by:

Lord Mountbatten, relative of the Frankfort banking families, Rothschild and Cassel
Charles Hambro, Special Operations Executive and director of Hambros Bank
Col. Stewart Menzies - Secret Intelligence Service
William Stephenson - SIS American operations

OSS (CIA) is a 'British' operation.

they run the Tavistock Institute, which has a US branch called CFR.
look up membership (invitation only) of CFR for the late 1940s.

all ya haveta do is find out who took control of the British Empire with the South Africa wealth they had won in the Boer War.

good luck:)
Here's the tip of the iceberg on Lesotho.
Link--> http://christianchat.com/miscellane...ed-lesotho-lasso-poor-nation-rules-world.html

Remember nothing is at it seems.
 
Here's the tip of the iceberg on Lesotho.
Link--> http://christianchat.com/miscellane...ed-lesotho-lasso-poor-nation-rules-world.html

Remember nothing is at it seems.

is Lesotho involved in the Middle East uprisings?
or...who is their proxy?:confused:

waits for next installment.

btw Still - when this is either proven true or false (i'm not sure which yet - cough).
you still haven't given a real answer as to WHY the USA is fighting 9 illegal wars and WHY your Constitution is kipput.

maybe it is the Lesothos.
time will tell:rolleyes:

no wonder Alex Jones never mentioned them.
he's covering.
 
erdogan has been the number one supporter of the syrian rebels...whoever is behind the movement to overthrow assad...it cannot be the same people behind the protests against erdogan...that would be pulling the rug out from under their best hope of overthrowing assad...
 
is Lesotho involved in the Middle East uprisings?
or...who is their proxy?:confused:

waits for next installment.

btw Still - when this is either proven true or false (i'm not sure which yet - cough).
you still haven't given a real answer as to WHY the USA is fighting 9 illegal wars and WHY your Constitution is kipput.

maybe it is the Lesothos.
time will tell:rolleyes:

no wonder Alex Jones never mentioned them.
he's covering.
Everyone is their proxy.
"Poorest" nations rules all.
Nothing is as it seems.

Iz con-speer-see
 
erdogan has been the number one supporter of the syrian rebels...

lol....wha?
you mean publically/verbally? that may or may not be true.

it just proves he's a stooge.
he's prolly a nice husband and a good daddy and all that - but not the sharpest knife in the drawer.

Turkey was promised a lot of things if they "joined" the EU - what they got was a ton of western military bases (forward op theaters right where they need to be); a S&P extortion scheme; and a ton of headaches. for the obvious reasons.

the Friends of Syria (friends of the rebels) didn't count on LOSING.

i suspect this has something to do with Erdogan's current dilemma:rolleyes:

because Assad is taking control (with help from his BIG friends, who warned the West repeatedly not to do what we are doing), erdogan might be being pushed aside to make room for bigger guns to come in.

i hvae little doubt he was promised it would never come to this.

its even likely this implosion in Turkey was also planned from the beginning (?)
have to see where it goes. it's pretty complex now that Iran is moving.
i admit i am really concerned about Russia - wild card.

.....

as for the #1 supporters of the "Syrian" rebels (the majority of whom are not, and never were Syrians):

The Group of Friends of the Syrian People[1] (sometimes: Friends of Syria Group or Friends of the Syrian People Group or Friends of Democratic Syria or simply Friends of Syria) is an international diplomatic collective of countries and bodies convening periodically on the topic of Syria outside the U.N. Security Council. The collective was created in response to a Russian and Chinese veto on a Security Council resolution condemning Syria; American president Barack Obama has stated that it was organized by the United States.[2]

Countries
Current members of Friends of Syria, which met in 2013 in Rome and Istanbul.[9][10]

Egypt
France
Germany
Italy
Jordan
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Turkey
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States

International organisations
International organizations participating in the Friends of Syria conference included:[11]

African Union[12]
Arab League
Arab Maghreb Union
European Union
Gulf Cooperation Council
Organisation of Islamic Cooperation
United Nations

oh look - only one actual "Syrian group:

Syrian opposition groups

Syrian National Council

Friends of Syria Group - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia < click


The Syrian National Council (Arabic: المجلس الوطني السوري‎, al-Majlis al-Waṭanī as-Sūri, French: Conseil national syrien) sometimes known as SNC,[2][3] the Syrian National Transitional Council,[4] or the National Council of Syria is a coalition of Syrian opposition groups based in Istanbul, Turkey.
Syrian National Council - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia < click

The Syrian National Council was formed in October in an effort to offer a credible alternative to President Assad's government and serve as a single point of contact for the international community.
BBC News - Opposition unite behind Syrian National Council < click

these guys are just like the Muslim Brotherhood and other western proxies set up in advance to make the right arrangements when Assad fell - unfortunately for them, he's not falling like they wanted.

France; Britain; US & Israel, Sauds et al had already been carving up the spoils in advance - you get this, we'll take that.....oopsie.
not happening so far.

.....

MATERIAL SUPPORT FOR SYRIAN 'REBELS'
(who are mercenaries, primarily Al Qaeda - LOL):


US Senate committee votes to arm Syrian rebels
May 22, 2013 06:09
US Senate committee votes to arm Syrian rebels — RT USA < click

US “Military Aid” to Syrian Opposition Goes to Al Qaeda
By Bill Van Auken
Global Research, October 16, 2012
US “Military Aid” to Syrian Opposition Goes to Al Qaeda | Global Research < click

Britain: EU Ends Arms Embargo On Syrian Rebels
By RAF CASERT and JAMEY KEATEN 05/27/13 08:14 PM ET EDT
Britain: EU Ends Arms Embargo On Syrian Rebels < click

Israel pushed U.S. to delist Mojahedin Khalq (MKO, MEK, Rajavi cult) terrorist group – Syria unrest: The price of defying the West
2013/03/29 by Iran Interlink
Israel pushed U.S. to delist Mojahedin Khalq (MKO, MEK, Rajavi cult) terrorist group – Syria unrest: The price of defying the West | Iran Interlink.exposing Mojahedin Khalq,Rajavi cult,Massoud Rajavi, Maryam Rajavi < click

Saudi Arabia edges out Qatar for control over Syrian rebel support
June 03, 2013 01:13 AM
BEIRUT: Saudi Arabia has prevailed over its small but ambitious neighbor Qatar to impose itself as the main outside force supporting the Syrian rebels
Saudi Arabia edges out Qatar for control over Syrian rebel support | News , Middle East | THE DAILY STAR < click

etc.

whoever is behind the movement to overthrow assad...it cannot be the same people behind the protests against erdogan...that would be pulling the rug out from under their best hope of overthrowing assad...

erogan is a nothing-much.
it's the bases and geography that matters.
perhaps he was balking at the reality....who wouldn't?
it's possibly just a smokescreen to move in heavier arms and troops.

it might be Iran or Russia acting in Turkey but all one has to do is look at the student activists.
they're the same lot we saw in Libya and Egypt.
so, no...i don't think it's Iran - Iran expelled that lot when they tried there recently.

they're going to need something new to overthrow Assad - he's winning.

TBC
 
Last edited:
the Memory Hole: How the Media Drives us to War

this is important, because the script is always the same: the "enemy" has committed atrocities and we must intervene.

please read as much of this as you can, to see how many organizations (which are ALL connected) took part in the SINGLE LIE fabricated by Hill & Knowlton, and "authenticated" by George Soros' Amnesty International, in order to involve the US giant to back Kuwait in the Gulf War. following this post is a list of ORGs which deliberately propagated the single lie of the INCUBATOR BABIES in the push to war. we need to know who they were, as they are the same ones we listen to today.

[if we remember anything about that war(s) - it had NOTHING to do with the United States, and was not in it's National Interest. George H W Bush was the President at that time. Iraq's Saddam was actually a US "friend" at that time (he was needed to advance toward Iran) Saddam was given chemical weapons by the US to fight the Iran Iraq war. Iran lost ONE MILLION men but ceded no ground. Saddam was dispensed with by GW (Jr) following the 9-11 false flag event, though it was freely admitted he had nothing to do with 9-11, for several reasons: one being that the tracks of US and Israel collusion in the Iran-Iraq war and war crimes committed during Gulf 1 & 2 had to be erased. Iraq, is now a wasteland of misery and death, with the exception of US/Israeli ultra-plush bases]

~

Nayirah Testimony refers to the controversial testimony given before the non-governmental Congressional Human Rights Caucus on October 10, 1990, by a female who provided only her first name, Nayirah. In her emotional testimony, Nayirah stated that after the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait she had witnessed Iraqi soldiers take babies out of incubators in a Kuwaiti hospital, take the incubators, and leave the babies to die. Though reporters did not then have access to Kuwait, her testimony was regarded as credible at the time and was widely publicized. It was cited numerous times by United States senators and the president in their rationale to back Kuwait in the Gulf War.

Her story was initially corroborated by Amnesty International[1] and testimony from evacuees. Following the liberation of Kuwait, reporters were given access to the country and found the story of stolen incubators unsubstantiated. However, they did find that a number of people, including babies, died when nurses and doctors fled the country.

In 1992, it was revealed that Nayirah's last name was al-Ṣabaḥ (Arabic: نيره الصباح‎) and that she was the daughter of Saud bin Nasir Al-Sabah, the Kuwaiti ambassador to the United States. Furthermore, it was revealed that her testimony was organized as part of the Citizens for a Free Kuwait public relations campaign which was run by Hill & Knowlton for the Kuwaiti government. Following this, al-Sabah's testimony has largely come to be regarded as wartime propaganda.

.....

Nayirah's testimony was widely publicized.[45] Hill & Knowlton, which had filmed the hearing, sent out a video news release to Medialink, a firm which served about 700 television stations in the United States.[46]

That night, portions of the testimony aired on ABC's Nightline and NBC Nightly News reaching an estimated audience between 35 and 53 million Americans.[44][46] Seven senators cited Nayirah's testimony in their speeches backing the use of force.[Note 1] President George Bush repeated the story at least ten times in the following weeks.[49] Her account of the atrocities helped to stir American opinion in favor of participation in the Gulf War.[50]

.....

cont...


We disseminated information in a void as a basis for Americans to form opinions.

—Frank Mankiewicz, Vice Chairman, Hill & Knowlton
 
The Memory Hole cont....

Nayirah (testimony) - Media collaboration; taking Americans to war based on televised fabricated emotional LIES.



The Washington Post described the origin of the Kuwaiti baby story as follows:

The Kuwaiti baby story originated with a letter from a senior Kuwaiti public health official that was smuggled out of the country by a European diplomat late last month, according to Hudah Bahar, an architect who received the letter here in London. It was supplemented by information gathered from fleeing Kuwaitis and other sources by Fawzia Sayegh, a Kuwaiti pediatrician living here. The letter claimed that Iraqi soldiers ordered patients evicted from several hospitals and closed down critical units for treating cancer patients, dialysis patients and those suffering from diabetes. Bahar and Sayegh said the Iraqis hauled sophisticated equipment such as dialysis machines back to Baghdad, part of the haul of cash, gold, cars and jewelry that is said by Arab banking sources to exceed $2 billion. Among the equipment taken were the 22 infant incubator units, they said.[7]


^ ALL LIES ^ < the debriefings of fleeing Kuwaitis were done by Amnesty International

Organizations Funded by George Soros and His Open Society Institute - Discover the Networks < click

in fact, the looting of Kuwait that was done, was an inside job by the Kuwaiti Royal Family.
the looting of Iraq following 9-11 was done first by Israelis then by Americans.



WHO SPREAD THE LIE:

The Washington Post [though it ran the story] also noted that it was unable to verify the accusations as Iraq did not permit access to the area and had quarantined diplomats.[7]

On September 5, in another letter to the UN Secretary General, Abulhasan reiterated Fowzan's claims writing:

We are informed by impeccable sources in Kuwait's health institutions that the Iraqi occupation authorities have carried out the following brutal crimes, which may be described as crimes against humanity: ... 2. The incubators in maternity hospitals used for children suffering from retarded growth (premature children) have been removed, causing the death of all the children who were under treatment.[8]

The letter did not state how many babies had died.[7][9] The allegations in the letter received widespread media coverage in the following days.[10][11][12][13][14][15]

That day, in an interview with released hostages on NPR's All Things Considered, a hostage stated that Iraqi troops were "hitting children with the butts of the guns, taking infants out of incubators and taking the incubators."[16]

Reuters also reported they had been told "that Iraqi troops took premature babies out of incubators in Kuwait in order to steal the equipment."[17][18]

On September 9, NPR reported that "in a ward for premature infants, soldiers had turned off the oxygen on incubators and packed the equipment for shipment to Iraq."[19]

On September 17, Edward Gnehm Jr., the U.S. ambassador-designate to Kuwait, told reporters that Kuwaiti health officials told him 22 babies had died when Iraqi troops had stolen their incubators.[20]

The Los Angeles Times reported that "refugees reported that incubators for premature babies were confiscated by Iraqi troops and the babies inside were piled on the floor and left to die."[6][21]

The San Jose Mercury News also reported the same allegation that day, adding that Western diplomats thought "this is the kind of thing that some people call genocide, and if people wanted to construe it as such, it could be cause for some kind of military intervention."[22]

On September 25, the Washington Post reported that "Kuwait City's hospitals are being stripped of incubators."[6][23]

The president of Citizens for a Free Kuwait wrote to Representative Gus Yatron stating of how he "recently learned that the Iraqi leader has ordered that maternity hospital incubators [in Kuwait], used for treating premature babies, be turned off, allowing these infants to die of exposure."[24]

On September 29, in a meeting between Kuwaiti leader Sheik Jabbar al Ahmed al Sabah and president George Bush Sr., the exiled emir told the president that Iraqis were "going into hospitals, taking babies out of incubators and people off life-support machines to send the equipment back to Iraq."[25][26]

In his remarks following the discussion, Bush stated that "Iraqi aggression has ransacked and pillaged a once peaceful and secure country, its population assaulted, incarcerated, intimidated, and even murdered" and that "Iraq's leaders are trying to wipe an internationally recognized sovereign state, a member of the Arab League and the United Nations, off the face of the map."[27]

On September 28, Kuwait's planning minister, Sulaiman Mutawa reported that 12 babies had died as a result of incubator looting.[28]

On September 30, U.S. News & World Report reported that that it had obtained secret US government cables based on eyewitness accounts that revealed "shocking acts of brutality inflicted by the Iraqis against innocent citizens at Kuwaiti hospitals."[29]

The cables stated that on the sixth day of Iraqi invasion, Iraqi soldiers "entered the Adan Hospital in Fahaheel looking for hospital equipment to steal" and that "they unplugged the oxygen to the incubators supporting 22 premature babies and made off with the incubators" thus killing the 22 children.[29]

On October 9, at a Presidential news conference, Bush stated:

I thought General Scowcroft [Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs] put it very well after the Amir left here. And I am very much concerned, not just about the physical dismantling but of the brutality that has now been written on by Amnesty International confirming some of the tales told us by the Amir of brutality. It's just unbelievable, some of the things at least he reflected. I mean, people on a dialysis machine cut off, the machine sent to Baghdad; babies in incubators heaved out of the incubators and the incubators themselves sent to Baghdad. Now, I don't know how many of these tales can be authenticated, but I do know that when the Amir was here he was speaking from the heart. And after that came Amnesty International, who were debriefing many of the people at the border. And it's sickening.[30]

Advertising

Initially, most advertisers were ignoring the Middle East crisis in their ads.[31] It was noted that companies selling information, such as news organizations, were running advertisements for their coverage of the conflict.[31]

Citizens for a Free Kuwait

The Citizens for a Free Kuwait was a public relations committee set up by the Kuwaiti embassy, described by The Times News as a "Washington, D.C.- based committee comprised of concerned Kuwaitis and Americans".[32][33] Though the committee occupied embassy office space, they were to be working independently of the embassy.[32]

Hill & Knowlton

In 1990, after being approached by a Kuwaiti expatriate in New York, Hill & Knowlton took on "Citizens for a Free Kuwait."[34] The objective of the national campaign was to raise awareness in the United States about the dangers posed by Iraqi dictator, Saddam Hussein to Kuwait.[34]

Hill & Knowlton conducted a $1 million study to determine the best way to win support for strong action.[35] H & K had the Wirthington Group conduct focus groups to determine the best strategy that would influence public opinion.[36]

The study found that an emphasis on atrocities, particularly the incubator story, was the most effective.

Hill & Knowlton is estimated to have been given as much as $12 million by the Kuwaitis for their public relations campaign.[37]

Nayirah (testimony) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia < click




In 1992, it was revealed that Nayirah's last name was al-Ṣabaḥ (Arabic: نيره الصباح‎) and that she was the daughter of Saud bin Nasir Al-Sabah, the Kuwaiti ambassador to the United States. Furthermore, it was revealed that her testimony was organized as part of the Citizens for a Free Kuwait public relations campaign which was run by Hill & Knowlton for the Kuwaiti government. Following this, al-Sabah's testimony has largely come to be regarded as wartime propaganda.
 
Last edited:
Operation Orchard[2][3] (Hebrew: מבצע בוסתן‎, Mivtza bustan) was an Israeli airstrike on a nuclear reactor[4] in the Deir ez-Zor region[5] of Syria carried out just after midnight (local time) on September 6, 2007. The White House and Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) later confirmed that American intelligence had also indicated the site was a nuclear facility with a military purpose, though Syria denies this.[6][7] An International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) investigation reported evidence of uranium and graphite and concluded that the site bore features resembling an undeclared nuclear reactor. IAEA was initially unable to confirm or deny the nature of the site because, according to IAEA, Syria failed to provide necessary cooperation with the IAEA investigation.[8][9] Syria has disputed these claims.[10] In April 2011, the IAEA officially confirmed that the site was a nuclear reactor.[4]

According to news reports, the raid was carried out by Israeli Air Force (IAF) 69 Squadron F-15Is,[11] F-16Is, and an ELINT aircraft; as many as eight aircraft participated and at least four of these crossed into Syrian airspace.[12] The fighters were equipped with AGM-65 Maverick missiles, 500 lb bombs, and external fuel tanks.[2][13] One report stated that a team of elite Israeli Shaldag special-forces commandos arrived at the site the day before so that they could highlight the target with laser designators,[11] while a later report identified Sayeret Matkal special-forces commandos as involved.[14]

Operation Orchard - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia < click



In April 2011, the IAEA officially confirmed that the site was a nuclear reactor.




oh really?



IAEA: Syria tried to build nuclear reactor

Chief of UN nuclear agency says for first time that site destroyed by Israel in 2007 was reactor

Associated Press
Latest Update: 04.28.11, 18:10 / Israel News

The UN nuclear agency on Thursday said for the first time that a target destroyed by Israeli warplanes in the Syrian desert five years ago was a covertly built nuclear reactor, countering assertions by Syria that it had no atomic secrets to hide.

In 2008 meeting between Ehud Olmert, US senior officials, former prime minister said Syria placed long-range missiles with chemical warheads on high alert following attack on nuclear plant, WikiLeaks papers suggest

Previous reports by the International Atomic Energy Agency have suggested that the structure hit could have been a nuclear reactor. Thursday's comments by IAEA chief Yukiya Amano were the first time the agency has said so unequivocally

He made them during a news conference meant to focus on the Fukushima nuclear disaster after a visit to the Paris-based Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development to discuss clean-up efforts at Japan's tsunami-ravaged nuclear plant.

"The facility that was ... destroyed by Israel was a nuclear reactor under construction," he asked in response to a question from The Associated Press, repeating to the AP afterward: "It was a reactor under construction."

Israel has never publicly commented on the strike or even acknowledged carrying it out. The US has shared intelligence with the agency that identifies the structure as a nearly completed nuclear reactor that, if finished, would have been able to produce plutonium for the fissile core of nuclear warheads.

Syria denies allegations of any covert nuclear activity or interest in developing nuclear arms. Its refusal to allow IAEA inspectors new access to the bombed Al Kibar desert site past a visit four years ago has heightened suspicions that it had something to hide, !!!!!!!!!! :rolleyes: along with its decision to level the destroyed structure and later build over it. !!!!!!!:confused:

Drawing on the 2008 visit by its inspectors, the IAEA determined that the destroyed building's size and structure fit specifications that a reactor would have had. The site also contained graphite and natural uranium particles that could be linked to nuclear activities.

The IAEA is also trying to probe several other sites for possible undeclared nuclear activities linked to the bombed target but Damascus has been uncooperative on most counts, saying that most of the sites are restricted because of their military nature.

IAEA: Syria tried to build nuclear reactor - Israel News, Ynetnews < click


so what do we have?
we have Israel just flying into Syria and dropping bombs.

just like that. nobody says anything!

for 5 years the IAEA refuses to say with certainty the site was a nuke reactor or anything like that.

then the new guy from Japan comes in (right at Fukishima time) and says one sentence - It was a reactor under construction.

now, even if they DID find "graphite and natural uranium particles that could be linked to nuclear activities", uh....maybe the graphite and uranium particles were on the Israeli bombs:confused: LOL.

anyways....an overt, blatant act of war, total aggression against Syria over more BS - a building that might have been the right size and shape for nuke stuff.

where have we heard that junk before?

..............


In September 2008, the Japanese government announced that it had nominated Yukiya Amano to be the next Director General of the IAEA.[5] On 2 July 2009, he was elected by the Board of Governors as Director General for the IAEA in the sixth round of voting. He defeated South African representative Abdul Samad Minty, his primary rival.[6][7][8] On 3 July 2009 all 145 IAEA member states formally appointed Yukiya Amano "by acclamation".[7][9]

On 1 December 2009, Amano began his first term as Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency.[10]

In November 2010, British newspaper The Guardian reported on a U.S. diplomatic cable originating a year earlier in Vienna and supplied to the newspaper by WikiLeaks, detailing a meeting between Amano and an American ambassador. The author of the cable summarized a statement by Amano in which the latter offered that he "was solidly in the U.S. court on every key strategic decision, from high-level personnel appointments to the handling of Iran's alleged nuclear weapons program."[11] In March 2012, Amano was accused by several former senior IAEA officials of pro-western bias, over-reliance on unverified intelligence and of sidelining sceptics.[12]

Yukiya Amano - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia < click

do what you want with WikiPediaLeaks....LOL.

Nuclear Wikileaks: Cables show cosy US relationship with IAEA chief | World news | guardian.co.uk < click

.........

MY POINT IS:

UN tells Israel to let in nuclear inspectors

Associated Press
guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 4 December 2012

The resolution, approved by a vote of 174 to six with six abstentions, calls on Israel to join the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) "without further delay" and open its nuclear facilities to inspection by the International Atomic Energy Agency. Those voting against were Israel:rolleyes:, the US:confused:, Canada:(, Marshall Islands, Micronesia and Palau:rolleyes:.

Resolutions adopted by the 193-member general assembly are not legally binding but they do reflect world opinion and carry moral and political weight. And the resolution adds to pressure on Israel as it faces criticism over plans to increase settlement in the West Bank, a move seen as retaliation for the assembly recognising Palestinian statehood.

Israel refuses to confirm or deny possessing nuclear bombs though it is widely believed to have them.

It has refused to join the non-proliferation treaty along with three nuclear weapon states: India, Pakistan and North Korea.

UN tells Israel to let in nuclear inspectors | World news | guardian.co.uk < click


ya know?

who ya gonna trust these days:confused:

Marshall Islands, Micronesia and Palau?

ROTFLMHO
 
Here's the tip of the iceberg on Lesotho.
Link--> http://christianchat.com/miscellane...ed-lesotho-lasso-poor-nation-rules-world.html

Remember nothing is at it seems.

you were right Still:o
i posted on your Lesotho CT thread.


this is gonna take some adjustment.
but i think can work with it.

Lesotho.
Lesotho.
Lesotho.

hmmm


Still.

I had no idea. I thought all the Books I read were REAL.

but they were Disinfo 'parently.

To cover up the actual normal stuff that has nothing to do with CT.

Meaning there's no cover-up. Just normal Books.



i can not believe i was duped by Conspiracy Theorists.

It has taken me all morning to find the Truth.

I'm stunned I never saw this before.









BOOK 4 (2).jpg








WHO KNEW?

Thanks for you patient guidance Stillman. I feel silly now.

Please keep me informed as to the Lesotho Cabal (that doesn't exist).

BTW - This still doesn't rule out Bonny Harry as the Antichrist.








Prince+Harry+Sentebale+Polo+Cup+upYodkkBJdul.jpg


Prince Harry laughs with Prince Seeiso of Lesotho after playing in the Sentebale Cup at Coworth Park on June 12, 2011 in Ascot, England. Prince William was playing for the Tusk Trust team while Prince Harry played for the Sentebale side.




LOOK:

the date is 12 + 6 + 2011 = 2029

Harry's number is 2

2029 + 2 = 2031

2 + 3 + 1 = 6

read this post 3 times

6 6 6



plus there's that mark on the other side of his scalp not seen unless held up to a mirror.
plus i can just tell by the way Prince Seeiso of Lesotho's jacket is moving that was photoshopped.


Thanks Still
Love you man.
 
you were right Still:o
i posted on your Lesotho CT thread.


this is gonna take some adjustment.
but i think can work with it.

Lesotho.
Lesotho.
Lesotho.

hmmm
The Lesotho lobby book is by david LIZARD...
Reptilian...

Connect teh dotz.
 
and we have a winner.

th




Hillel Weiss, a professor at Bar-Ilan University, "preaches" the necessity of rebuilding the Temple and of Jewish rule over Greater Israel.
Heute gehört uns Eretz und morgen die ganze Welt?
 
  • Like
Reactions: zone
Heute gehört uns Eretz und morgen die ganze Welt?

LOL tm.


you know, the mind-numbing irony?
you have these sects of evangelicalism denying such a thing is possible, indignant that one would even suggest such a thing, screeching antisemite nazi! - yet giving everything they have to see it happen.



The purpose of Christians United For Israel (CUFI) is to provide a national association through which every pro-Israel church, parachurch organization, ministry or individual in America can speak and act with one voice in support of Israel in matters related to Biblical issues.

To Communicate Pro-Israel Perspectives to Elected Officials.

While it is important that we pray for Israel, it is also important that we put feet to our prayers and speak truth to power about the need to stand with Israel at this critical juncture in history. CUFI accomplishes these goals through:

• CUFI’s annual Washington Summit enables CUFI members to personally speak with their elected officials on behalf of Israel.

• CUFI’s Action Alerts mobilize CUFI’s over one million members to contact their members of Congress or the Administration on critical policy issues.

About CUFI - Christians United for Israel < click



here's the thing that makes me LAUGH MY HEAD OFF everytime i read it:






28 Tevet, 5768 / January 6, 2008

In the Name of the Lord, Eternal God

To The Honorable Mr. George W. Bush,
President of the United States of America,

Who comes seeking the presence of the Most High God, to Jerusalem, city of God, Divinely chosen site of the Holy Temple, eternal capital of our land, "the joy of the entire earth (Psalms 48:3)," may it be rebuilt and established speedily and in our days, Amen!

Esteemed Mr. George W. Bush, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal (Ezekiel 38:1), leader of the west!

Upon your arrival in Jerusalem you have the ability to make a declaration, as did Cyrus, King of Persia - whose memory is honored - who in the year 538 BCE returned the exiled nations to their lands and recognized the full right of the Jewish people to reestablish their Holy Temple, the "house of prayer for all nations" (Isaiah 56:7), and called upon them to return to their land,

And in the manner of Lord James Balfour of England, who in 1917, called upon the Jews to reestablish a national homeland in the Land of Israel.

And thus if you truly desire peace and benevolence, and you would be counted in the company of the truly righteous, we call upon you to declare to all the world:

The Land of Israel was bequeathed to the nation of Israel by the Creator of the world. Neither could I, as a son of my faith, nor the Muslims according to their faith, ever take away even the slightest grain from the Eternal's gift, which He gave to His people Israel, the eternal people. Thus I call upon all the nations to save themselves from certain doom, to return and recognize That this land is the exclusive rightful inheritance of the people of Israel, as is written in the Torah of Israel, which constitutes the very foundation of our faith, as well as that of Islam; and is the basis for the decisions of the community of nations. He who denies this truth endangers all life on earth.

I shall dedicate all my strength and resources towards settling the Jewish people throughout their entire land. I shall greatly encourage and empower the Jews all over the world to rise up to the Land of Israel and to settle it, to establish God's sanctuary in Jerusalem, to distance strangers from it and thus, I believe, I will be making a major contribution towards world peace.:rolleyes:

I cannot simultaneously support the establishment of a foreign state for an alien nation in the Land of Israel, and I will not lend my hand to this wrong.

Or - Heaven forbid - you can choose the second option - to willfully aid in the destruction, under the guise of peace!

You certainly know what the God of Israel did to Egypt and Assyria and to all Israel's enemies from time immemorial: Do you imagine that you will be able to save yourself if you have come to implement a plan that intends to steal the land of "the people that survived the sword" (Jeremiah 31:1), and to cut off those who survived the Holocaust, to rob the land that was given to them by the Creator?

All of the peace treaties and initiatives which have been based upon the decisions of the government of Israel, indeed the entire Oslo process, and the 'Disengagement,' and the establishment of a terrorist state within the Land of Israel known as 'Palestine' - regrettably, all of these agreements are the result of a lack of sufficient faith in the Divine promises that the Lord made to the patriarchs of our nation, and all that is written in the Torah of Israel. Understand this well: the nations of the world cannot excuse their actions and their decisions on account of the weakness of Israel and her government. God ordained that the role of the nations of the world is to strengthen the nation of Israel. This will benefit all humanity and bring about world peace, as the prophets have foretold.

Do you imagine you can escape from the struggles in Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Egypt, and Lebanon, by offering up sacrifices of the Jews who are slaughtered daily by their enemies who speak of peace but live by the sword?

Upon your arrival in our land we would anticipate that you bring Jonathan Pollard home with you. Bring him home to Israel. He is an emissary of the State of Israel, and he acted on behalf of our people. Authorize his immediate release while you are yet in Jerusalem, before you return to the United States. This will be a positive step that will build confidence.

Remember our forefather Abraham, who pursued the world's four greatest kings in order to redeem his nephew from captivity. We cannot forget the deeds of our patriarchs, whose example guides us through every generation.

We are the loyal representatives of the Jewish people, the New Jewish Congress, and its court of law, the Sanhedrin, as well as the Temple and Temple Mount movements, but we merely reiterate herein what is public knowledge.

No government in Israel and no representative of the Jewish people has the power or right to alter, by even the slightest degree, our covenant with God and the words of our holy Torah, which are everlasting, as expressed by the prophets of Israel and even by the wicked prophet Balaam: "Then he looked on Amalek, and uttered his oracle, saying: 'First among the nations was Amalek, but its end is to perish for ever' (Numbers 24:20). Thus any desire, plan or agreement that challenges the eternal sovereignty and active possession of the nation of Israel over her entire land is utterly worthless, and has no basis in reality.

Therefore it behooves you to declare: "I, George Bush, Commander in Chief of the armies of the United States of America, will instruct all of my troops to protect the Divine rights of the nation of Israel, and remove from her any threat."

Before you is a choice: You can merit to eternal life, or be inscribed for eternal disgrace. Your fate and that of all those with you hangs in the balance of the destiny of our land.

"and you shall choose life!" (Deut. 30:19).

In Sincere Supplication - In the name of the Jewish people

Rabbi A Even Yisrael Steinzaltz
The Sanhedrin

Dr. Gadi Eshel
The New Jewish Congress

Rabbi Chaim Richman
The Holy Temple and Temple Mount Movements


The Temple Institute: Megillat Bush < click


oh look - what a coincidence...and a typical THREAT.
disgusting.

January 6, 2008

Do you imagine you can escape from the struggles in Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Egypt, and Lebanon, by offering up sacrifices of the Jews who are slaughtered daily by their enemies who speak of peace but live by the sword?
 
Last edited:
NYC Mayoral Candidate: Zero Tolerance for Anti-Semitism

Sal F. Albanese, candidate for Mayor of New York City, tells Arutz Sheva: Anti-Semitism will not be tolerated under my administration.

[video=youtube;BPQ31SZULWQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=BPQ31SZULWQ[/video]

First Publish: 6/13/2013, 12:15 AM

Sal F. Albanese, a Democratic candidate for Mayor of New York City and former New York City Council member, says that anti-Semitism must be eradicated.

Albanese, who is very close to the New York Jewish community, spoke to Arutz Sheva during a special conference in the city.

“We’re going to have zero tolerance for anti-Semitism or any prejudice against any group,” he stated. “New York City has a tremendous amount of people from different countries, so anti-Semitism or anti-anything will not be tolerated under my administration.

“We’re going to prosecute people to the fullest extent of the law and we’ll educate people in our schools that anti-Semitism is an ugly thing,” said Albanese. “We have to work with our children to make sure that they realize that we’re all the same and no group should be discriminated against.”

NYC Candidate: Zero Tolerance for Anti-Semitism - Jewish World - News - Israel National News < click


We’re going to have zero tolerance for anti-Semitism or any prejudice against any group
We’re going to prosecute people to the fullest extent of the law
we’ll educate people in our schools that anti-Semitism is an ugly thing

..........


Criticism of the Israeli government, often referred to simply as criticism of Israel[1][2][3] is an ongoing subject of journalistic and scholarly commentary and research within the scope of International relations theory, expressed in terms of political science. Within the scope of global aspirations for a community of nations, Israel has faced international criticism since its declaration of independence in 1948 relating to a variety of topics,[4][5][6][6][7] both historical and contemporary.

International criticism of Israeli government policies is usually expressed within the discipline of international law and various obligations, real or perceived, that Israel is accused of not complying or fulfilling as a member of United Nations and other international organisations.

Criticism of contemporary policies usually relates to issues in the Palestinian territories such as Israeli settlements, human rights of Palestinian Arabs, the conduct of Israeli Defense Forces during conflicts and accusations of economic strangulation[8][9] of Palestinian territories.

Criticism of historical Israeli government policies relate to issues with ongoing consequences such as the refusal to allow post-war Palestinian refugees to return to their homes, and the invasion, occupation and annexation of neighbouring territories and the construction of settlements therein.

Another source of criticism is the friction generated by the conversion issue between Israel's orthodox rabbinate and non-orthodox segments of the Jewish diaspora. At one end of the spectrum, these criticisms support attempts to delegitimize[10][11][12] Israel's right to exist.

This has led to an ongoing debate regarding at what point criticism of Israel crosses the line to antisemitism.


Criticism of Israel regarded as antisemitism

See also: New antisemitism

Some criticisms of Israel or Israeli policies have been characterized as anti-Semitic. Proponents of the concept of New anti-Semitism, such as Phyllis Chesler, Gabriel Schoenfeld and Mortimer Zuckerman, argue that, since the 1967 Six day war, many criticisms of Israel are veiled attacks on Jews and hence are essentially antisemitic. Abba Eban, Robert S. Wistrich, and Joschka Fischer focus on criticism of Zionism, and contend that some forms of anti-Zionism, particularly attacks on Israel's right to exist, are anti-Semitic in nature.

Critics of this view often portray this view as an "equation" of criticism with anti-Semitism. Some critics of Israel or Israeli policies, including Ralph Nader, Jenny Tonge, Noam Chomsky, and Desmond Tutu suggest that equating criticism of Israel with antisemitism is inappropriate or inaccurate. Other critics, such as John Mearsheimer, Alexander Cockburn, Norman Finkelstein, and William I. Robinson, claim that supporters of Israel sometimes equate criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism in a deliberate attempt to prevent legitimate criticism of Israel and discredit critics.

However, proponents of the view usually argue that the equation of criticism with antisemitism is rarely made. For example, Alvin H. Rosenfeld considers this argument to be disingenuous, dismissing it as "the ubiquitous rubric 'criticism of Israel,'" He states that "vigorous discussion of Israeli policy and actions is not in question," but rather statements that go well beyond legitimate criticism "and call into question Israel's right to continued existence." [84]

Alan Dershowitz claims that some enemies of Israel pretend to be victimized by accusations of anti-Semitism, in order to garner support for their position.

Dina Porat (head of the Institute for Study of Anti-semitism and Racism at Tel-Aviv University) characterizes some anti-Zionist ideals as anti-Semitic, because they amount to singling-out Jews for special treatment, while all other comparable groups of people are entitled to create and maintain a homeland. She contends that anti-Zionism is anti-semitic because it is discriminatory: "...antisemitism is involved when the belief is articulated that of all the peoples on the globe (including the Palestinians), only the Jews should not have the right to self-determination in a land of their own.[85]

Hannah Rosenthal of the United States State Department said UN double standards against Israel constitute "profound anti-semitism". [86]

However, many commentators have suggested singling out Israel for disproportionate criticism is warranted as a result of Israel's actions.[87][88][89][90][91][92]

Criticism of the Israeli government - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia < click



duct-tape-mouth.jpg


We’re going to prosecute people to the fullest extent of the law
 
Released picture of a Pro-Erdogan demonstration in Ankara appears to be photoshopped

June 10 2013

SMALL_erdoganrallyphotoshop.jpg





th


i do...not...care!
get somebody who knows what they are doing.
fire everybody that put that junk out.
GET IT TOGETHER.
okay....ya...ya...i......i know most will never notice.
i know.

but come on! sooner or later they're going to SEE this stuff!
clean it up or you'll all be driving cabs.

CLICK
where did you get the photo?,,,most links have a www,,,link to click on but this one does not?,,,,i always recearch the things posted before i comment but this one does not have any link to the original photo,,,by law if a news agency put this in the news they must put their license agreement with the fcc or they will have their license pulled. fined ect. but it doesn't as i said give any source to a credible news agency i.e. a.b.c.,n.b.c.,,fox ect.

on the other hand i would not assume it came from any credible religious affiliation because of it's political nature if it's origin was from an church,synagog ect. in the u.s. it would fall under 114a tax exempt status and because of it's political nature disqualify them from tax exempt status meaning they would then be audited and held liable to pay taxes on property,tithes ect.

if though it is from a private individual then if they just copied and pasted the photo it is not required that it be accurate,,unless proven to be intentional slander,manipulation ect.,,,,as if they conspired to discredit those concerned. ,,,,,,,,,,,but the short of it is will you please give us the "original source where you found the photo",,, thank you