N
nathan3
Guest
[video=youtube;0CgAP_gBEPQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CgAP_gBEPQ[/video]
Could have been president . Too bad .
Could have been president . Too bad .
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
J
jimmydiggs
Guest
J
jerusalem
Guest
if you really check it doesn't take long to figure out that we have launched stage 1 of world war 3
M
MatthewMichael
Guest
This country doesn't want a wise man as its president. This country wants a handsome "cool" man as its president. Big mistake.
A
Anonimous
Guest
It seems to me that Israel made the same mistake. They wanted Saul because he was handsome, strong, etc. We all know how that worked for them. What makes the US any better? Nothing...
G
Grey
Guest
Another distortion, (getting used to it).
He wants the rights to his name.
RonPaul.com
Hardly "all his followers".
How many people own that domain name 'ya think?
G
Grey
Guest
Certainly a group of people at the least someone using my name in a website title has he rights to do whatever they want with the site, whether or not you support him its ridiculous. It would have been interesting to see his VP choice though.
G
Grey
Guest
It's called a "domain name", not a website title.
People are sued every day over this stuff... because using another person's business name, or personal name, as the name of YOUR OWN BUSINESS, to either make a profit off of their name recognition, or to slander them, is ILLEGAL.
I don't care in the least about Ron Paul one way or the other... but it is perfectly legal for a public figure to protect the rights to his own name.
G
Grey
Guest
Legal perhaps but he didn't seem to care until they offered to sell it to him. My point is he's flawed, though he is in some aspects veteran informed than both candidates.
I don't care if he's flawed or not... but if you understood the law, or the normal polices and procedures of ICANN, you would understand what these people did was illegal. What Ron Paul did was legal, and ethical, and public figures, and corporations, do it every day.
I'm sure there are plenty of things wrong with Ron Paul.
You should try something else.
thing about the News and Conspiracy Forums...certain topics inevitably come up.
then you find out who just consistently works that Hasbara Manual.
G
Grey
Guest
Quite a bit has changed since I came out saying that Israel, the modern state was a holy tool of god or something like that frankly I really don't see a flawless good side anymore. Are you referring to classic liberalism or modern? Im not sure what I am politically anymore.
well grey, that's quite an amazing remark.
it's encouraging - not because we shouldn't look for the good (and there's LOTS of good in Israel and Jewish culture) - but because of this astounding delusion (coming from Christianity) of special wombs or special blood or dual covenants or any of that.
PASSES on crime, etc. for various illogical reasons.
i'm happy that we don't have do deal with that impenetrable wall of denial about this issue.
, grey.what happened grey - what brought about a change in your thinking?
that would be modern - the term itself is another one that has been so sand misapplied it's virtually useless
classical liberalism was actually quite conservative in the beginning.
modern liberalism when i use it or think about is just Political Correctness Syndrome - and PRO everything destructive (abortions; etc).
k...thx.
zone
G
Grey
Guest
well grey, that's quite an amazing remark.
it's encouraging - not because we shouldn't look for the good (and there's LOTS of good in Israel and Jewish culture) - but because of this astounding delusion (coming from Christianity) of special wombs or special blood or dual covenants or any of that.
PASSES on crime, etc. for various illogical reasons.
i'm happy that we don't have do deal with that impenetrable wall of denial about this issue.
what happened grey - what brought about a change in your thinking?
that would be modern - the term itself is another one that has been so sand misapplied it's virtually useless
classical liberalism was actually quite conservative in the beginning.
modern liberalism when i use it or think about is just Political Correctness Syndrome - and PRO everything destructive (abortions; etc).
k...thx.
zone
What changed? Hard question, hm, I suppose a lot changed when I started to reexamine religion itself. I suppose it can't hurt to view things from a third unbiased perspective. I just dont know politically.
UMM Are you aware that his wife and daughter are members of the OES? His father also was a mason and if I remember correctly OES members only marry Masons.