Sorry Chosen
you're wrong the NIV does make a distinction
Revelation 22:16
16 “I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you[a]this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”
Revelation 22:16 KJV
16 I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.
IT IS THE KJV THAT DOES NOT CAPITALIZE HIS TITLE.
Jinx,
Grace Community is a large church in Los Angeles. John MacArthur is an great preacher. For the most part he is right on, and though I do not agree with some of his doctrine he knows his stuff. Unfortunately, his church has been sarcastically coined the church without grace. They raise very intelligent and confidant Christians who bash you with graceless rhetoric about your lack of salvation in regards to you not agreeing with cessationism, KJV only, and dispensationism. Don't get me wrong. John MacArthur is brilliant. Just be cautious.
This church has affiliations all over. I knew my brother was a Christian for a long time but because he lived so far away I never got a chance to talk to him about it. When I did I was shocked. My question to him was not for him to approve of my salvation. I simply wanted to be forthright with establishing that we were on the same page where it was important and nothing else mattered if it was going to cause division.
When I was researching my brothers church I found it listed on a website of a group of Grace churches. There are many churches with similar names that do not have the same doctrine. Grce Community affiliates are dispensationalists, cessationists, have a well-trained mantra about their beliefs, and tend to be lacking in grace. When I had my run in with my brother many yrs ago it felt like I was debating a Mormon or JW. He'd been trained with a list of verses to combat every question. It was like he had memorized a script.
There is no error and there is no confusion. King James refers to Lucifer in Isaiah 14, thats the latin designation for morning star. King james also uses lower case when morning star is referenced.
I see no confusion, yet again its saying exactly the same thing, but different words. It is clear that morning star is not a unique title designated to one person, just as antichrist is not unique.
the only confusion is coming from your cult to promote its twisted perverted agenda and to allow your cult to worship the king james 1611 Bible.
We have tons of denominations in the world. We have had division in the church since the bible was first published. We have post tribbers, pre tribbers, futurists, preterists, some whacko in Florida who thinks he is Jesus, Benny Hinn, and the Westboro baptist church...... Yet you're biggest concern is satan is deceiving many because of the lack capitalization of two words?
Jinx,
Grace Community is a large church in Los Angeles. John MacArthur is an great preacher. For the most part he is right on, and though I do not agree with some of his doctrine he knows his stuff. Unfortunately, his church has been sarcastically coined the church without grace. They raise very intelligent and confidant Christians who bash you with graceless rhetoric about your lack of salvation in regards to you not agreeing with cessationism, KJV only, and dispensationism. Don't get me wrong. John MacArthur is brilliant. Just be cautious.
This church has affiliations all over. I knew my brother was a Christian for a long time but because he lived so far away I never got a chance to talk to him about it. When I did I was shocked. My question to him was not for him to approve of my salvation. I simply wanted to be forthright with establishing that we were on the same page where it was important and nothing else mattered if it was going to cause division.
When I was researching my brothers church I found it listed on a website of a group of Grace churches. There are many churches with similar names that do not have the same doctrine. Grce Community affiliates are dispensationalists, cessationists, have a well-trained mantra about their beliefs, and tend to be lacking in grace. When I had my run in with my brother many yrs ago it felt like I was debating a Mormon or JW. He'd been trained with a list of verses to combat every question. It was like he had memorized a script.
Okay. Those footnotes may be in the 1984 edition then. But still it is very evident that the NIV makes Jesus and Satan to be one. And it was shown that that is exactly what the NIV does in the previous post.
Well I already showed you that the NIV makes no distinction between whether morning star is capitalized or not, because I showed that in both 2 Peter 1:19 and Revelation 2:28, morning star is lower case and they are referring to Jesus in both passages, hence the NIV makes Jesus and Satan one. And that is a fact.
Well there are thousands of Bible believing Christians, both pastors, preachers, and other students of the Bible who know that the NIV makes Jesus and the Lucifer one by replacing Lucifer with morning star in Isaiah 14:12. And I already told you Sarah, the NIV is a satanic bible. It is subtit in how it changes the doctrine of salvation, it is subtil in how it carries catholic doctrine into its text, and it also subtil in how it attacks the deity of the Lord Jesus Christ. And it is to no surprise because Satan is subtil ( see Genesis 3:1).
I mean you can try to justify the NIV all you want, but at least if you don't come to the truth on this issue, at least you and every other Christian will get to see which side was right at the Judgement Seat of Christ.
Well Sarah, what I was referring to is the following:
You claim that the NIV is talking about a different morning star in Isaiah 14:12 because it is lowercase. What I pointed out to you is that that is not the case because in 2 Peter 1:19 morning star is not capitalized, its all lowercase:
2 Peter 1:19 NIV
19 We also have the prophetic message as something completely reliable, and you will do well to pay attention to it, as to a light shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts.
So why didn't they capitalize it here Sarah?
I mean who is it that rises in out hearts?
Are you starting to see the confusion here?
God is not the author of confusion Sarah. Read 1 Cor. 14:33.
And why isn't morning star capitalized in Revelation 2:28?
Revelation 2:28-29 (NIV)
28 I will also give that one the morning star. 29 Whoever has ears, let them hear what the Spirit says to the churches.
So which morning star are they talking about now?
Again, if the NIV makes a distinction between the two, then surely they would have at least capitalized morning star in this passage. So if they didn't capitalize it here, then that just mean that according to the NIV it was Jesus who fell from Heaven. That's what I was referring to when I said distinction, you just misunderstood what I was saying. In other words, the NIV calls Jesus both the morning star (lowercase) and the Morning Star (capitalized). So the NIV (Non Inspired Version) doesn't make a distinction between Lucifer or Jesus, and the reason it does not is because the NIV makes Jesus and Lucifer one.
Your missing the whole point Agricola.
And yes the NIV's rendering of Heylel as morning star is in error and creates much confusion. Because here you have lowercase "morning star" falling from Heaven in Isa. 14:12, but then you have the "morning star" (also lowercase) in 2 Peter 1:19 rising in our hearts. So which morning star is it?
That is confusion.
And no, it is not saying the same thing.
The NIV makes Jesus and Lucifer one. That is why they don't bother to capitalize morning star in 2 Peter 1:19 or Revelation 2:28.
Morning Star is a title for the Lord Jesus Christ. So, rendering of the Hebrew word Heylel as Lucifer in the King James Bible is correct. Because you can see who it is that is falling from Heaven. It is clear. Plus, it is really the only account of the Fall of Lucifer.
Go and ask any Christian you know who the morning star is, and see how they respond.
And then ask them who Lucifer is. And see the difference.
The only twisted agenda here Agricola is Satan's attack on the word of God. Satan does not want you to have a perfect Final Authority. Satan rather have you ignorant on the Bible Version Issue. It looks like he has you right where he wants you. And you are definitely ignorant in regard to this issue, if you don't see the serious issue that the NIV creates in Isaiah 14:12, then you lack spiritual discernment.
We have tons of denominations in the world. We have had division in the church since the bible was first published. We have post tribbers, pre tribbers, futurists, preterists, some whacko in Florida who thinks he is Jesus, Benny Hinn, and the Westboro baptist church...... Yet you're biggest concern is satan is deceiving many because of the lack capitalization of two words?
Elizabeth,
If I am catching what he is really saying if taken to the end result is that none of the new translations will point to Jesus,that He is the way the truth and the life,our desperate need of a savior,that Jesus is the Christ,who died and rose from the dead on the third day. That all the new translations will keep us from God,because they are Satanic versions. Somehow that the new translations don't point to Jesus deity,but somehow remove that from Him. That the new translations are NOT God's Words. To be a two edged sword,to teach us God's ways,and anyone who uses them are deceived and do not have the truth. And it is impossible for those using them to come to the truth using those versions because they are Satanic versions.
As I said before Chosenbyhim, anyone with half a brain cell can work out which morning star is being referred to, its not an exclusive title, just as King is not an exclusive title. As pointed out before, the study bible versions of the NIV actully point this out, so they are not hiding anything. You and your cult are seeing things that are not there, you are paraniod deleduded fools who see Satan behind every change in punctuation , every upper and lower case change, every word change that differs from the 1611, including later re-writings of the King James.
The problem with cults and the same which your cult does, is take verses out of context and tell people what they really mean. people are not allowed to think for themsleves, with help of study notes and aids and the ability to read several versions of the Bible, people can see what the real message is.
I would just let you get on with it, but like all cults only you do things right dont you. You only read the correct Bible and everyone else must follow your cult leaders and read King James, otherwise if people do not read King James, well we have our salvation questioned and by reading another Bible we are condemning our souls and following Satan.
This is the rubbish that I object to and is dangerous and miss-leading which will drive people into bondage.
I do not see Satan behind NIV or anything else, I see Satan behind King James Only Cult, as forcing people to read a Bible which is difficult for them to understand will just make them give up and not bother reading Gods Word.
We have tons of denominations in the world. We have had division in the church since the bible was first published. We have post tribbers, pre tribbers, futurists, preterists, some whacko in Florida who thinks he is Jesus, Benny Hinn, and the Westboro baptist church...... Yet you're biggest concern is satan is deceiving many because of the lack capitalization of two words?
We have tons of denominations in the world. We have had division in the church since the bible was first published. We have post tribbers, pre tribbers, futurists, preterists, some whacko in Florida who thinks he is Jesus, Benny Hinn, and the Westboro baptist church...... Yet you're biggest concern is satan is deceiving many because of the lack capitalization of two words?
What I showed Sarah in regard to the NIV not capitalizing morning star in 2 Peter 1:19 and Revelation 2:28 is that the NIV makes no distinction between Satan and Jesus.
In Isaiah 14:12, morning star is not capitalized in the NIV, but wait, it is not capitalized in 2 Peter 1:19 either!! So that must mean that according to the NIV, the one who fell from heaven in Isaiah 14:12, is the one who arises in our hearts?! Can't you all see the utter blasphemy which the NIV commits?
The point Sarah was trying to make was that because morning star is capitalized in Revelation 22:16, that the NIV must be making a distinction between Jesus and Satan. But what I said to Sarah was; if that were truly the case, then the NIV would have also capitalized morning star in 2 Peter 1:19 and also Revelation 2:28. Look at the sequence here in the NIV. And just see how confusing it is.
Isaiah 14:12
New International Version (NIV)
12 How you have fallen from heaven,
morning star, son of the dawn!
You have been cast down to the earth,
you who once laid low the nations!
2 Peter 1:19
New International Version (NIV)
19 We also have the prophetic message as something completely reliable, and you will do well to pay attention to it, as to a light shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts.
Revelation 2:28-29
New International Version (NIV)
28 I will also give that one the morning star. 29 Whoever has ears, let them hear what the Spirit says to the churches.
Revelation 22:16
New International Version (NIV)
16 “I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you[a] this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”
So why didn't the NIV also capitalize morning star in 2 Peter 1:19?
Because obviously the one who arises in our hearts in 2 Peter 1:19 is the Lord Jesus Christ.
So if the NIV wanted to be consistent and truly make a distinction between our Lord Jesus Christ and Satan, then they would have capitalized morning star also in 2 Peter 1:19. It is that simple. And that was the point I was making to Sarah; showing her that the NIV does not make a distinction between the Lord Jesus Christ and Satan, but in fact, makes them one and the same!!