This is fun on our KJV only basis

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
In the same way as you and your cult have set yourselves up to proclaim the King James is the final authority, based on a couple of verses twisted out of context and meaning?

It is the Absolute Final Authority whether you like it or not. And whether you submit to it or not. God gave us His word, and He gave us it to be our guide and help of how we should live and behave ourselves in this present evil world.


I have already explained at length numerous times why God does not require us to have a perfect version, with every comma full stop and capitalization in place that must not be changed, that is bondage and requires faith that it is correct which opens doors for all kinds of problems.

No it is not bondage to have an absolute Perfect Final Authority to submit to. You have to submit to something Agricola. The Bible is perfect because it is the word of God.


Your disgusting threats and accusations are blasphemy and heretical. How dare you label me and others who reject your cults teachings as having issues with our "heart". That is bang out of order and yet another piece of evidence that you are a member of a disgusting filthy cult.

But you do Agricola. Do you know what is really disgusting? It is the Alexandrian movement that denies all Final Authority. It is these "educated" highly "respected" seminarians who are "well schooled" in the so called "Originals" that want to have the supremacy over the laity. Over the common man and woman. Do you know what that is called? It is called the doctrine of the Nicolaitans which the Lord Jesus Christ hates:

4 Nevertheless I have somewhat against thee, because thou hast left thy first love. 5 Remember therefore from whence thou art fallen, and repent, and do the first works; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will remove thy candlestick out of his place, except thou repent. 6 But this thou hast, that thou hatest the deeds of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate. 7 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the tree of life, which is in the midst of the paradise of God.
8 And unto the angel of the church in Smyrna write; These things saith the first and the last, which was dead, and is alive; 9 I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan. 10 Fear none of those things which thou shalt suffer: behold, the devil shall cast some of you into prison, that ye may be tried; and ye shall have tribulation ten days: be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life. 11 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; He that overcometh shall not be hurt of the second death.
12 And to the angel of the church in Pergamos write; These things saith he which hath the sharp sword with two edges; 13 I know thy works, and where thou dwellest, even where Satan’s seat is: and thou holdest fast my name, and hast not denied my faith, even in those days wherein Antipas was my faithful martyr, who was slain among you, where Satan dwelleth. 14 But I have a few things against thee, because thou hast there them that hold the doctrine of Balaam, who taught Balac to cast a stumblingblock before the children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed unto idols, and to commit fornication. 15 So hast thou also them that hold the doctrine of the Nicolaitans, which thing I hate. 16 Repent; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will fight against them with the sword of my mouth. 17 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the hidden manna, and will give him a white stone, and in the stone a new name written, which no man knoweth saving he that receiveth it. - Revelation 2:4-17 (KJV)

All these puffed up proud professors that say "come to me and I will tell you what the Bible really says because you see in the Original Greek the verse was actually read this way."

Oh really? It does?

Sure and I suppose bugs bunny got married last night too.

I mean take a moment to think for yourself. It is time to get off the funny farm, alright?

Think about it. What kind of fruit does the Alexandrian
"no Bible is perfect" crowd produce?

It produces doubt, confusion and ultimately unbelief There are two different accounts of two different men who had their faith destroyed in the Bible because of what they learned at their
"seminarians."
And guess what happened to them, they went off and left Christianity and became Muslims!

You need to wake up Agricola. Stop treating this issue lightly This is a very important issue. Two men left Christianity altogether over it! And because of it, they are on the road to a burning Hell.

Of course I don't believe these two men were ever saved to begin with. But because of Alexandrian "Higher Textual Criticism" both of these men became Muslims.

And that is the kind of wicked and rotten spiritual fruit that the Alexandrian heretical movement produces.


 

No Rachel, we Bible believers hold the word of God up to the highest regard. At least we try to. People that truly honour the word of God, would not try to correct it Rachel.

And people that truly honour the word of God would believe that it is perfect and pure.

Let me ask you Rachel, have you ever seen a street preacher out on the road preaching to sinners about Hell and their need for salvation?

And if you have seen a street preacher, let me ask you, what was he preaching from? Was it the Hebrew manuscripts? Was it a set of Greek Manuscripts? Or was he preaching from a Book?

people who honor the word of God do not think it would be 'great' if the word of God in hebrew and greek was totally destroyed...you king james only cultists don't really honor the word of God...you hate it and want it destroyed...
 
One other thing though Rachel, do you want to know who it is out there that hates the word of God? It is the roman catholic church. And by the way, that is where your NIV comes from. The NIV was partly translated at a university in Salamanca Spain. Under the supervision of the Vatican. And that is a documented fact.

Also let me get this straight Rachel, where can God's word be found today? In a mass of over 5,000 manuscripts?

Or can God's word be found in a Book?

you have already been shown several times that the textus receptus had strong roman catholic influences...but your cult serves the father of lies and won't listen to the truth...

and the translators of the king james version itself agree with me on where God's word can be found today..."Now to the later we answere; that wee doe not deny, nay wee affirme and avow, that the very meanest translation of the Bible in English, set foorth by men of our profession (for wee have seene none of theirs of the whole Bible as yet) containeth the word of God, nay, is the word of God."

you have been shown this quotation several times...establishing that the translators of the king james version themselves would have condemned your cult as heretical...but then cultists don't care to listen to godly teachers...
 
Do you know what is really disgusting? It is the Alexandrian movement that denies all Final Authority. It is these "educated" highly "respected" seminarians who are "well schooled" in the so called "Originals" that want to have the supremacy over the laity. Over the common man and woman. Do you know what that is called? It is called the doctrine of the Nicolaitans which the Lord Jesus Christ hates:

4 Nevertheless I have somewhat against thee, because thou hast left thy first love. 5 Remember therefore from whence thou art fallen, and repent, and do the first works; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will remove thy candlestick out of his place, except thou repent. 6 But this thou hast, that thou hatest the deeds of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate. 7 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the tree of life, which is in the midst of the paradise of God.
8 And unto the angel of the church in Smyrna write; These things saith the first and the last, which was dead, and is alive; 9 I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan. 10 Fear none of those things which thou shalt suffer: behold, the devil shall cast some of you into prison, that ye may be tried; and ye shall have tribulation ten days: be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life. 11 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; He that overcometh shall not be hurt of the second death.
12 And to the angel of the church in Pergamos write; These things saith he which hath the sharp sword with two edges; 13 I know thy works, and where thou dwellest, even where Satan’s seat is: and thou holdest fast my name, and hast not denied my faith, even in those days wherein Antipas was my faithful martyr, who was slain among you, where Satan dwelleth. 14 But I have a few things against thee, because thou hast there them that hold the doctrine of Balaam, who taught Balac to cast a stumblingblock before the children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed unto idols, and to commit fornication. 15 So hast thou also them that hold the doctrine of the Nicolaitans, which thing I hate. 16 Repent; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will fight against them with the sword of my mouth. 17 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the hidden manna, and will give him a white stone, and in the stone a new name written, which no man knoweth saving he that receiveth it. - Revelation 2:4-17 (KJV)

All these puffed up proud professors that say "come to me and I will tell you what the Bible really says because you see in the Original Greek the verse was actually read this way."

Oh really? It does?

Sure and I suppose bugs bunny got married last night too.

I mean take a moment to think for yourself. It is time to get off the funny farm, alright?

Think about it. What kind of fruit does the Alexandrian
"no Bible is perfect" crowd produce?

It produces doubt, confusion and ultimately unbelief There are two different accounts of two different men who had their faith destroyed in the Bible because of what they learned at their
"seminarians."
And guess what happened to them, they went off and left Christianity and became Muslims!

You need to wake up Agricola. Stop treating this issue lightly This is a very important issue. Two men left Christianity altogether over it! And because of it, they are on the road to a burning Hell.

Of course I don't believe these two men were ever saved to begin with. But because of Alexandrian "Higher Textual Criticism" both of these men became Muslims.

And that is the kind of wicked and rotten spiritual fruit that the Alexandrian heretical movement produces.


the truth is that -anyone- can become familiar with the original hebrew and greek text of the bible...you can get a hebrew or greek bible...and you can get lexicons and grammars to learn what it means...in fact anyone with a strong's concordance can have a decent understanding of the hebrew and greek...so this doesn't give the 'experts' any supremacy over ordinary people...

if you want to talk about wicked prideful people usurping supremacy over laypeople...you need look no further than the leader of your cult...the heresiarch peter ruckman...who claims to have found hundreds of 'new truths' in the bible that nobody was able to see before he came along...

you have also been shown how your own nehushtanized version follows the alexandrian text in places...so your calling someone else an 'alexandrian' is hypocritical...

and you are no better than the two who became muslims...because you king james only cultists are also members of an idolatrous false religion that leads to hell...
 
It is the Absolute Final Authority whether you like it or not. And whether you submit to it or not. God gave us His word, and He gave us it to be our guide and help of how we should live and behave ourselves in this present evil world.




No it is not bondage to have an absolute Perfect Final Authority to submit to. You have to submit to something Agricola. The Bible is perfect because it is the word of God.




But you do Agricola. Do you know what is really disgusting? It is the Alexandrian movement that denies all Final Authority. It is these "educated" highly "respected" seminarians who are "well schooled" in the so called "Originals" that want to have the supremacy over the laity. Over the common man and woman. Do you know what that is called? It is called the doctrine of the Nicolaitans which the Lord Jesus Christ hates:

4 Nevertheless I have somewhat against thee, because thou hast left thy first love. 5 Remember therefore from whence thou art fallen, and repent, and do the first works; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will remove thy candlestick out of his place, except thou repent. 6 But this thou hast, that thou hatest the deeds of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate. 7 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the tree of life, which is in the midst of the paradise of God.
8 And unto the angel of the church in Smyrna write; These things saith the first and the last, which was dead, and is alive; 9 I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan. 10 Fear none of those things which thou shalt suffer: behold, the devil shall cast some of you into prison, that ye may be tried; and ye shall have tribulation ten days: be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life. 11 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; He that overcometh shall not be hurt of the second death.
12 And to the angel of the church in Pergamos write; These things saith he which hath the sharp sword with two edges; 13 I know thy works, and where thou dwellest, even where Satan’s seat is: and thou holdest fast my name, and hast not denied my faith, even in those days wherein Antipas was my faithful martyr, who was slain among you, where Satan dwelleth. 14 But I have a few things against thee, because thou hast there them that hold the doctrine of Balaam, who taught Balac to cast a stumblingblock before the children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed unto idols, and to commit fornication. 15 So hast thou also them that hold the doctrine of the Nicolaitans, which thing I hate. 16 Repent; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will fight against them with the sword of my mouth. 17 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the hidden manna, and will give him a white stone, and in the stone a new name written, which no man knoweth saving he that receiveth it. - Revelation 2:4-17 (KJV)

All these puffed up proud professors that say "come to me and I will tell you what the Bible really says because you see in the Original Greek the verse was actually read this way."

Oh really? It does?

Sure and I suppose bugs bunny got married last night too.

I mean take a moment to think for yourself. It is time to get off the funny farm, alright?

Think about it. What kind of fruit does the Alexandrian
"no Bible is perfect" crowd produce?

It produces doubt, confusion and ultimately unbelief There are two different accounts of two different men who had their faith destroyed in the Bible because of what they learned at their
"seminarians."
And guess what happened to them, they went off and left Christianity and became Muslims!

You need to wake up Agricola. Stop treating this issue lightly This is a very important issue. Two men left Christianity altogether over it! And because of it, they are on the road to a burning Hell.

Of course I don't believe these two men were ever saved to begin with. But because of Alexandrian "Higher Textual Criticism" both of these men became Muslims.

And that is the kind of wicked and rotten spiritual fruit that the Alexandrian heretical movement produces.



What a load of bull.

There you go again, claiming that everyone will go to hell or end up becoming muslims because they reject the King James 1611. utter turd.

I know Jesus, I know Holy Spirit, we have been through a very harsh path and life, I am not goign to convert to Islam, and God is certainly not going to be tutting me or wagging a finger at me for reading an NIV Bible. As I had said countless times, why does the Holy SPirit have nothing to say on the matter to me direct? If I was picking up something that was supposedly written by Satan, then wouldnt Holy Spirit say "here dont touch it"

Chosenbyhim, you have been utterly brainwashed by this cult, your behaviour and the comments you make all stick out like sore thumb that you are a member of a cult and a dangerous misguided cult at that.

I am just glad that most people have the common sense to see how utterly ridiculous the claims that King James 1611 is the "final" Bible.
 
Interesting about the refining of silver. I was a silversmith for 7 years, and I can assure you that it needs to be refined over and over. Then it continues to need care and cleaning, because it reacts with sulfur, which tarnishes it. I always wondered whether the Biblical references to sulfur are a bit metaphorical. God wants silver to be pure, and sends sulfur to punish Sodom and Gomorrah, as well, as it being used in Revelation as a sign of hell.

"Then the Lord rained on Sodom and Gomorrah sulfur and fire from the Lord out of heaven." Gen. 19:24

"he also will drink the wine of God's wrath, poured full strength into the cup of his anger, and he will be tormented with fire and sulfur in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb." Rev. 14:10

In Hebrew class this year, one of the things we did with every verse translated in the Old Testament was compare it to modern (and I include KJV) and see what the differences were. ESV was consistently the closest to the Hebrew both in meaning and word order.

In the end, we have to go back to the fact that all our English Bibles (or any other language besides the originals) are translations and you cannot totally convey the whole meaning, denotations and connotations perfectly.

I did find it rather scary the KJV cult wants to destroy the Greek and Hebrew manuscripts. That is exactly what the Muslims did with the Qur'an because there were different versions in existence, right back after Muhammed dictated it. They gathered all the leaves, and bits and pieces of paper of Allah's supposed word and burned it and kept the version that supported the regime in power (something to do with Shi'ites and Sunnis, I suppose).

Seems like the KJV cult would turn us into a cult in order to get perfection. I prefer to stick to what I have already said - the Bible is about REVEALING Jesus Christ. That is who the WORD is. Any version that reveals the truth of Jesus is a good version. Any version that people worship instead of Jesus, is a bad one!
 
I did find it rather scary the KJV cult wants to destroy the Greek and Hebrew manuscripts. That is exactly what the Muslims did with the Qur'an because there were different versions in existence, right back after Muhammed dictated it. They gathered all the leaves, and bits and pieces of paper of Allah's supposed word and burned it and kept the version that supported the regime in power (something to do with Shi'ites and Sunnis, I suppose).

it is also similar to what the roman catholic church did...prohibiting anyone from reading any bible except for the latin vulgate for hundreds of years...even burning the 'illegal' translations...

which is ironic because the king james only cult is always attacking the roman catholic church...
 
people who honor the word of God do not think it would be 'great' if the word of God in hebrew and greek was totally destroyed...you king james only cultists don't really honor the word of God...you hate it and want it destroyed...

No Rachel, we King James Bible believers have the pure and perfecte word of God. It is the Authorized Version.

It is the "elite" highly "respected," highly "educated" blind scholars who make their living out of lying to people who really do not honour the word of God. These educated proud men would have you deny the perfection of a Book that has been in common use for over 400 years, but then they say that the word of God can be found in the 5000 plus manuscripts?

I mean have some common sense. If God was able to inspire the original autographs then He is able to preserve them.

We Bible believers honour the word of God by uplifting it and by submitting to it. We don't attack the word of God. It is proud, puffed up people like you who attack the word of God. And the proud scholars do as well. Blind scholars that want the suremacy over the laity.
 
you have already been shown several times that the textus receptus had strong roman catholic influences...but your cult serves the father of lies and won't listen to the truth...

and the translators of the king james version itself agree with me on where God's word can be found today..."Now to the later we answere; that wee doe not deny, nay wee affirme and avow, that the very meanest translation of the Bible in English, set foorth by men of our profession (for wee have seene none of theirs of the whole Bible as yet) containeth the word of God, nay, is the word of God."

you have been shown this quotation several times...establishing that the translators of the king james version themselves would have condemned your cult as heretical...but then cultists don't care to listen to godly teachers...

Rachel the translators who translated the Authorized Version were great men, but they are not the Final Authority. It is God's Book that is the Final Authority. And God sovereignly guided the King James Translators through the translation process. And I believe that is how they were able to select the correct readings.

Now Rachel, you do realize that the King James Bible was translated not just from the Textus Receptus don't you? The King James Bible was translated from an eclectic text.

Now you say that the textus receptus has some strong Roman Catholic influence, well Prove it.

And by the way, if it had such strong catholic influences then why don't they use the text today?
 
Look at the language being used, cult speak to the extreme
"We Bible Beleivers"
um.... oookay.
and anyone who opposes the cult...
"It is proud puffed up people who attack the word of GOd"....

The sooner this cult is put to death and silenced the better.
 
No Rachel, we King James Bible believers have the pure and perfecte word of God. It is the Authorized Version.

It is the "elite" highly "respected," highly "educated" blind scholars who make their living out of lying to people who really do not honour the word of God. These educated proud men would have you deny the perfection of a Book that has been in common use for over 400 years, but then they say that the word of God can be found in the 5000 plus manuscripts?

I mean have some common sense. If God was able to inspire the original autographs then He is able to preserve them.

We Bible believers honour the word of God by uplifting it and by submitting to it. We don't attack the word of God. It is proud, puffed up people like you who attack the word of God. And the proud scholars do as well. Blind scholars that want the suremacy over the laity.

This is so irrational. So you're saying anyone that doesn't think like you about the KJV being God's only inspired translation aren't true followers of God? Wow. By the way, when did Jesus ever say anything about reading a specific English translation?

I honestly have to wonder if this type of thinking isn't indicative of an unbalanced mind. It's such irrational thinking from about every vantage point one looks at it from.
 
the truth is that -anyone- can become familiar with the original hebrew and greek text of the bible...you can get a hebrew or greek bible...and you can get lexicons and grammars to learn what it means...in fact anyone with a strong's concordance can have a decent understanding of the hebrew and greek...so this doesn't give the 'experts' any supremacy over ordinary people...

if you want to talk about wicked prideful people usurping supremacy over laypeople...you need look no further than the leader of your cult...the heresiarch peter ruckman...who claims to have found hundreds of 'new truths' in the bible that nobody was able to see before he came along...

you have also been shown how your own nehushtanized version follows the alexandrian text in places...so your calling someone else an 'alexandrian' is hypocritical...

and you are no better than the two who became muslims...because you king james only cultists are also members of an idolatrous false religion that leads to hell...

No Rachel, you say that someone can get an idea of what the original Greek says by getting a concordance and some Greek lexicons. Well hey you want to use those tools, then go ahead. Now Rachel there is still a problem though with your statement. Which one of the 27 Greek texts do we study to try to get an idea of what the original autographs said?

Which one?

If you want to know what the originals said, then get yourself a copy of the 1611 Authorized Version. Abd read it and believe it. And you will know what the original text said. It's that simple :)

Just believe the Book Rachel. Stop trying to make things so complicated for yourself. Learn to trust and believe the Book. Read and believe the Book which God has blessed and used for over 400 years.

How many books retain their popularity after 400 years?

God has blessed the Authorized Version. It is also the best selling Book in history and that is a fact. What Dr. Peter Ruckman does is he shows Christians why they can trust and believe their Bible. Peter Ruckman doesn't correct the Book. The Alexandrian apostates do.

Rachel you are part of a ridiculous system that is based on pride and ego. I mean it takes a lot of pride and egotism for someone that thinks they can correct the word of God.

And Rachel, the reason why those two men left Christianity and became Muslims is because of the wicked and ridiculous system of the Alexandriam school of thought. It was the Alexandrian higher textual criticism that destroyed these men's faith in the word of God.

And that is the wicked fruit of the system which you are a part of. The whole Alexandrian "no Bible is perfect" heretical movement is a satanic and a very wicked system that turns young men and women into apostates.

And Bryan Denlinger has done a good job to expose the Vatican Alexandrian movement that denies Final Authority.

I suggest you leave the Alexandrian movement Rachel. It is a heretical movement that rejects God's perfect word.
 
With every post of chosenbyhim we see more and more of this cults true colours emerging. its filthy and perverted.
 
All jokes aside; Ruckmanism is dangerous and has a long history of producing poisonous fruit

having said that, the KJV family of translations is superior to all the others based on corrupt texts
 
All jokes aside; Ruckmanism is dangerous and has a long history of producing poisonous fruit

having said that, the KJV family of translations is superior to all the others based on corrupt texts

I have always said that the King James is a good translation, its just that I do not worship it or hold in some special light that prompts me to declare it as the final word of God and that it must be the only Bible we ever use and all Bibles before and after are Satans perversions of the Bible.
 
[TABLE="class: MsoNormalTable, width: 373"]
[TR]
[TD="width: 96"] 408 [e][/TD]
[TD="width: 128"] ’al-[/TD]
[TD="width: 96"]
אַל־​
[/TD]
[TD="width: 168"] not[/TD]
[TD="width: 258"] not[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 96"] 3372 [e][/TD]
[TD="width: 128"] tî·rā[/TD]
[TD="width: 96"]
תִּירָא֙​
[/TD]
[TD="width: 168"] fear[/TD]
[TD="width: 258"] fear thee[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 96"] 3588 [e][/TD]
[TD="width: 128"] kî[/TD]
[TD="width: 96"]
כִּ֣י​
[/TD]
[TD="width: 168"] for[/TD]
[TD="width: 258"] because[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 96"] 5973 [e][/TD]
[TD="width: 128"] ‘im·mə·ḵā-[/TD]
[TD="width: 96"]
עִמְּךָ־​
[/TD]
[TD="width: 168"] with[/TD]
[TD="width: 258"] with thee[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 96"] 589 [e][/TD]
[TD="width: 128"] ’ā·nî,[/TD]
[TD="width: 96"]
אָ֔נִי​
[/TD]
[TD="width: 168"] I[/TD]
[TD="width: 258"] I am[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 96"] 408 [e][/TD]
[TD="width: 128"] ’al-[/TD]
[TD="width: 96"]
אַל־​
[/TD]
[TD="width: 168"] not[/TD]
[TD="width: 258"] not[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 96"] 8159 [e][/TD]
[TD="width: 128"] tiš·tā‘[/TD]
[TD="width: 96"]
תִּשְׁתָּ֖ע​
[/TD]
[TD="width: 168"] look[/TD]
[TD="width: 258"] thee look away from me[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 96"] 3588 [e][/TD]
[TD="width: 128"] kî-[/TD]
[TD="width: 96"]
כִּֽי־​
[/TD]
[TD="width: 168"] for[/TD]
[TD="width: 258"] because[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 96"] 589 [e][/TD]
[TD="width: 128"] ’ă·nî[/TD]
[TD="width: 96"]
אֲנִ֣י​
[/TD]
[TD="width: 168"] I[/TD]
[TD="width: 258"] I am[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 96"] 430 [e][/TD]
[TD="width: 128"] ’ĕ·lō·he·ḵā;[/TD]
[TD="width: 96"]
אֱלֹהֶ֑יךָ​
[/TD]
[TD="width: 168"] your God[/TD]
[TD="width: 258"] your god[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 96"] 553 [e][/TD]
[TD="width: 128"] ’im·maṣ·tî·ḵā[/TD]
[TD="width: 96"]
אִמַּצְתִּ֙יךָ֙​
[/TD]
[TD="width: 168"] will strengthen[/TD]
[TD="width: 258"] I will strengthen you[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 96"] 637 [e][/TD]
[TD="width: 128"] ’ap̄-[/TD]
[TD="width: 96"]
אַף־​
[/TD]
[TD="width: 168"] surely[/TD]
[TD="width: 258"] and what is more[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 96"] 5826 [e][/TD]
[TD="width: 128"] ‘ă·zar·tî·ḵā,[/TD]
[TD="width: 96"]
עֲזַרְתִּ֔יךָ​
[/TD]
[TD="width: 168"] will help[/TD]
[TD="width: 258"] help I will you[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 96"] 637 [e][/TD]
[TD="width: 128"] ’ap̄-[/TD]
[TD="width: 96"]
אַף־​
[/TD]
[TD="width: 168"] Surely[/TD]
[TD="width: 258"] and even more[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 96"] 8551 [e][/TD]
[TD="width: 128"] tə·maḵ·tî·ḵā[/TD]
[TD="width: 96"]
תְּמַכְתִּ֖יךָ​
[/TD]
[TD="width: 168"] will uphold[/TD]
[TD="width: 258"] I will uphold you[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 96"] 3225 [e][/TD]
[TD="width: 128"] bî·mîn[/TD]
[TD="width: 96"]
בִּימִ֥ין​
[/TD]
[TD="width: 168"] right[/TD]
[TD="width: 258"] in right hand[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 96"] 6664 [e][/TD]
[TD="width: 128"] ṣiḏ·qî.[/TD]
[TD="width: 96"]
צִדְקִֽי׃​
[/TD]
[TD="width: 168"] my righteous[/TD]
[TD="width: 258"] my righteous[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

Fear thee not because I am with thee. Look thee not away from me because I am thy God. I will strengthen thee and, what is more, I will help thee and, even more, I will uphold thee in my righteous right hand.

This is a comprehensive literal translation from Hebrew into English.

The KJV does an admirable job.

Isa 41:10 Fear thou not; for I am with thee: be not dismayed; for I am thy God: I will strengthen thee; yea, I will help thee; yea, I will uphold thee with the right hand of my righteousness.

Can you find any other version that even comes close???????
 
This is a comprehensive literal translation from Hebrew into English.

The KJV does an admirable job.

Can you find any other version that even comes close???????

No one is doubting that the King James is on the whole a good Bible. What many of us are against are the King James Only Cult who claim that there should only be one Bible, that all other texts and Bibles should be destroyed as the King James is Gods final perfect version, when clearly its not.

That verse you give, maybe a good translation, but the King James also has its not so good translations, which created problems for the Cult of King James Only. One example is "Nose Ring",
Look at this webpage
The New King James Bible: Counterfeit

Genesis 24:47: The "old" KJV reads: "I put the earring upon her face". But the NKJV has different plans for beautiful Rebekah: "I put the nose ring on her nose". Where did it get the ridiculous idea to "cannibalize" Rebekah? Just take a peek at the NIV, NASV, RSV, NRSV!

See the King James translated it as Earring and Face, but Nose Ring is the more accurate translation, but of course that is lost on the intellectually challenged cult leaders and MUST be the work of Satan.

Here are the Strongs entry, you can cearly see that the original words used have duel meanings. When you look into context of what happened and tradition of time, it is clear that the correct use should be Nose and nosering. This also is evidence that the translators were not being divinly inspired to create the final perfect version of the Bible. It simpy shows that the person translating that passage was not aware of the customs that a woman betrothed to be married had a ring placed in her nose. This still continues in India.

Strong's Number: 05141
Original Word Word Origin
~n from an unused root of uncertain meaning
Transliterated Word TDNT Entry
Nexem TWOT - 1338a
Phonetic Spelling Parts of Speech
neh'-zem Noun Masculine
Definition

ring, nose ring, earring
nose ring (woman's ornament)
earring (ornament of men or women



This is another translation which differs, obviously using the word Satraps in later versions is the work of Satan himself, why would Satan want this word changed to its correct use?


Ezra 8:36: The KJV reads, "And they delivered the king's commissions unto the king's lieutenants. . ." The "much clearer" NKJV reads, "And they delivered the king's orders to the king's satraps. . ." Who in the world thinks "satraps" is "much clearer" than lieutenants? The NIV, NASV, NRSV, RSV - they do! They put in the same "much clearer" word!


this one shows again how the King James is not the final authority, the King James translator decides to use Lieutenant instead of the correct word.

How is this a perfect translation? It is not. Infact the King James confuses the passage, what is a lieutenant ? Today most people will say "A junor commissioned officer rank", the King James should have used the correct word as used by NIV etc, that is Sartraps , or simply given its definition instead, Govenor of Persian province.

So what is more important a lieutenant or Govenor, when we see its the Govenors the letters were sent to, it makes more sense and shows how important it is. Lieutenant does not convey this.



Strong's Number: 0323
Original Word Word Origin
!prdXxa of Persian derivation
Transliterated Word TDNT Entry
'achashdarpan TWOT - 69
Phonetic Spelling Parts of Speech
akh-ash-dar-pan' Noun Masculine
Definition

satrap, a governor of a Persian province

King James Word Usage - Total: 4
lieutenants 4






A few more disgusting evil perverted changes that Satan made to later versions, these are vile changes which the Cult of King James Only claim we will be judged by GOd for reading. Seriously, can you not see how stupid this cult is ?

John 14:2: (NKJV 1979 edition) change "mansions" to "dwelling places" (NIV, NASV, RSV, NRSV)

Acts 12:4: change "Easter" to "Passover" (NIV, NASV, RSV, NRSV)

John 14:2: (NKJV 1979 edition) change "mansions" to "dwelling places" (NIV, NASV, RSV, NRSV)

Phil. 3:8: change "dung" to "rubbish" (NIV, NASV, NRSV)

Matthew 12:40: change "whale" to "fish" (ditto NIV) I don't guess it matters (what's the truth got to do with it?), the Greek word used in Matthew 12:40 is ketos. The scientific study of whales just happens to be - CETOLOGY - from the Greek ketos for whale and logos for study! The scientific name for whales just happens to be - CETACEANS - from the Greek ketos for whale!
 
Last edited:
There is not such thing as a "perfect Bible". Islam of course has its original Quaran which every copy is copied identically, but that is not how the Christian church rolled. The message of salvation and Jesus Christ son of God risen from dead that we can only get into heaven through him is what is important. It matters not if one copy of a Bible mentions, Easter or Passover, its the same thing, people are not going to suffer in spiritual life for reading NIV, RSVP Good News for example.

Actually, easter and Passover are not the same thing

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ēostre

Easter / Eastre - Philosopedia

eastre - Wiktionary

Those are just a few starter pages, it's even deeper than that. Historical fact
 
So you are saying that Easter is actully Satans doing, so why is it in the King James ! As your links point out, Easter was not in existence until long after Acts was written, therefore the use of PAssover is the correct one.