A lot of foolishness in this thread.
ooooh Mr Pope is in trouble now, I have no problem with the gays but I do not support them being Priests. Also I hate the whole pope idea anyways, People seem to worship and respect a pope in the catholic chruch than God himself. Also never liked the idea he gets called father, as he is not our father God is
To Have a homersexual orientation means to have an attraction to the same sex rather than the opposite sex. This is not the sin. The sin is falling to that desire/temptation and committing the act. Just like someone who falls to the weakness of anger, doesn't control his temper and assaults someone. The same can be said about priests. A hetrosexual priest who falls to the temptation to sleep with a woman is JUST AS WRONG as the priest who sleeps with a man. All sins are the same, are they not? Pope Francis is right in not singling these men out. We are all called to stay strong in our faith and fight our temptation, whatever that might be. The article says Pope Francis DID NOT judge these men, which is something we can all learn from him. Indeed, it seems the only one being judged in this thread is PopeFrancis.
about all sins not being the same, you agree with Catholics on this. We also learned from Scripture that not all sins are equal. I was just pointing out what so many Protestants have said to me before about all sins being equal and I was trying to understand how your point made sense if you believed that too.His predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI, signed a document in 2005 that said men with deep-rooted homosexual tendencies should not be priests. But you're saying the last pope was wrong and this pope is right.
And contrary to your present opinion, not all sins are considered by God to be equal though I agree with you they are all damnable outside of Christ.
Jesus said there were "weightier matters of the law" (Matt. 23:23 KJV), such as, for example, mercy and justice over tithing. He also declared our love for God to be a higher duty than our love for human beings, calling the former "the first and greatest commandment" (Matt. 22:38). Jesus told Pilate that "the one who handed me over to you is guilty of a greater sin" (John 19:11).
The more severe eternal punishment for some is due to the heaviness of the sins they have committed (Rev. 20:12). John spoke of a sin so monstrous that God took the guilty person's life (1 John 5:16).
Paul said some were disciplined with death by God for partaking of the Lord's table in an unworthy manner (1 Cor. 11:29-30), indicating that this is a particularly substantial sin.
Etc...
Not only are some sins greater, there is also a "greatest" sin, the blasphemy of the Holy Spirit (Matt. 12:32).
All sins can be placed into two broad categories: sins of commission and sins of omission. This means that some sins are doing what we should not do, and others are not doing what we should do.
God singled out seven particular sins He cannot abide:
"There are six things the LORD hates, seven that are detestable to him: [l] haughty eyes, [2] a lying tongue, [3] hands that shed innocent blood, [4] a heart that devises wicked schemes, [5] feet that are quick to rush into evil, [6] a false witness who pours out lies and [7] a man who stirs up dissension among brothers. (Prov. 6:16-19).
Simply stated, these are pride, deceit, murder, plotting evil, quickness to do Wrong, false testimony, and troublemaking.
Etc...
Putting men with deeply-rooted homosexual tendencies or deeply-rooted pedophilia tendencies into positions of church leadership is a bad idea just like putting men with deep-rooted tendencies to embezzle in positions of political authority is a bad idea.
The former has already led to sweeping problems of sexual abuse around the world that they engaged in from their positions of authority within the Catholic church.
That's why the first pope signed a declaration stating it was a bad idea in 2005.
But new pope new message. Now it's all good to put men with deeply-rooted tendencies of gross sexual immorality into positions of authority in the Catholic Church.
It's not hard to see what comes next.
about all sins not being the same, you agree with Catholics on this. We also learned from Scripture that not all sins are equal. I was just pointing out what so many Protestants have said to me before about all sins being equal and I was trying to understand how your point made sense if you believed that too.
Brother, you're taking what both popes said out of context in order to suit your argument. Benedict said it was a bad idea for men with deeply rooted tendencies to be priests. He did not rule out ALL men with gay tendencies. He understood that even men with gay tendencies can be Godly. Pope Francis did NOT say its ok to put men with DEEPLY ROOTED tendencies as priests. You must remember that these men (popes) are shepherds to Christ's flock. How can they show Christ's love by singling out individuals for their unfortunate circumstances? Ok, tell me something. Do you think that a man with gay tendencies is incapable of teaching the Word of God? And another thing. Who do you think has a better chance of getting through to gay people when preaching about the sin of homersexuality acts? A priest/preacher who has experienced their desires, or a straight man who hasn't the slightest clue what they experience? Rest assured, if these priests with gay tendencies were to teach anything against God's law, they would be dealt with accordingly, just like any other priest. If you met a man with Gay tendencies who had such a great love for The Lord and never had sex with a man before, and was extremely well versed in Scripture and so obviously had the Holy Spirit working in him, would you deny him the chance to preach? C'mon people we are Christians. They'll know we are Christians by our love for one another. Every man and woman on this earth has a GOD GIVEN right to preach the Word, gay tendencies or not. God bless
brother Rick, I'm doing well praise God. How have you been?Hello 777-(nice to speak to you again),
It is not a good ideal for priests of a homosexual bent to be declared celibate and around alter boys.
This truth has been borne out before.
I can't believe the new 'Pontiff of Christ' would encourage that?
I mean,.......I don't care how big a fish hat he is wearing,he should know better.
- The princely state of being the 'Vicar of Christ" should have told him so.
- - I hope the 'New Peter' has not succumbed to politically correct pressures.
- - - (Hey, how are you doing bud?)
this is directly from the article in the link you posted:His predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI, signed a document in 2005 that said men with deep-rooted homosexual tendencies should not be priests. But you're saying the last pope was wrong and this pope is right.
And contrary to your present opinion, not all sins are considered by God to be equal though I agree with you they are all damnable outside of Christ.
Jesus said there were "weightier matters of the law" (Matt. 23:23 KJV), such as, for example, mercy and justice over tithing. He also declared our love for God to be a higher duty than our love for human beings, calling the former "the first and greatest commandment" (Matt. 22:38). Jesus told Pilate that "the one who handed me over to you is guilty of a greater sin" (John 19:11).
The more severe eternal punishment for some is due to the heaviness of the sins they have committed (Rev. 20:12). John spoke of a sin so monstrous that God took the guilty person's life (1 John 5:16).
Paul said some were disciplined with death by God for partaking of the Lord's table in an unworthy manner (1 Cor. 11:29-30), indicating that this is a particularly substantial sin.
Etc...
Not only are some sins greater, there is also a "greatest" sin, the blasphemy of the Holy Spirit (Matt. 12:32).
All sins can be placed into two broad categories: sins of commission and sins of omission. This means that some sins are doing what we should not do, and others are not doing what we should do.
God singled out seven particular sins He cannot abide:
"There are six things the LORD hates, seven that are detestable to him: [l] haughty eyes, [2] a lying tongue, [3] hands that shed innocent blood, [4] a heart that devises wicked schemes, [5] feet that are quick to rush into evil, [6] a false witness who pours out lies and [7] a man who stirs up dissension among brothers. (Prov. 6:16-19).
Simply stated, these are pride, deceit, murder, plotting evil, quickness to do Wrong, false testimony, and troublemaking.
Etc...
Putting men with deeply-rooted homosexual tendencies or deeply-rooted pedophilia tendencies into positions of church leadership is a bad idea just like putting men with deep-rooted tendencies to embezzle in positions of political authority is a bad idea.
The former has already led to sweeping problems of sexual abuse around the world that they engaged in from their positions of authority within the Catholic church.
That's why the first pope signed a declaration stating it was a bad idea in 2005.
But new pope new message. Now it's all good to put men with deeply-rooted tendencies of gross sexual immorality into positions of authority in the Catholic Church.
It's not hard to see what comes next.
about all sins not being the same, you agree with Catholics on this. We also learned from Scripture that not all sins are equal. I was just pointing out what so many Protestants have said to me before about all sins being equal and I was trying to understand how your point made sense if you believed that too.
Brother, you're taking what both popes said out of context in order to suit your argument. Benedict said it was a bad idea for men with deeply rooted tendencies to be priests. He did not rule out ALL men with gay tendencies. He understood that even men with gay tendencies can be Godly. Pope Francis did NOT say its ok to put men with DEEPLY ROOTED tendencies as priests. You must remember that these men (popes) are shepherds to Christ's flock. How can they show Christ's love by singling out individuals for their unfortunate circumstances? Ok, tell me something. Do you think that a man with gay tendencies is incapable of teaching the Word of God? And another thing. Who do you think has a better chance of getting through to gay people when preaching about the sin of homersexuality acts? A priest/preacher who has experienced their desires, or a straight man who hasn't the slightest clue what they experience? Rest assured, if these priests with gay tendencies were to teach anything against God's law, they would be dealt with accordingly, just like any other priest. If you met a man with Gay tendencies who had such a great love for The Lord and never had sex with a man before, and was extremely well versed in Scripture and so obviously had the Holy Spirit working in him, would you deny him the chance to preach? C'mon people we are Christians. They'll know we are Christians by our love for one another. Every man and woman on this earth has a GOD GIVEN right to preach the Word, gay tendencies or not. God bless
I think some may have misinterpreted the pope. This question of homosexuality was one of many questions that he answered while he was on a plane. I dont think he was trying to "promote" the idea of homosexual priest being accepted in Catholic Church, he was just simply saying he cannot judge everyone. Everyone has tendencies that do not line up with Christ, does that disqualify us from serving God..no. We must keep these tendencies/habits/thoughts in check and ask God for forgiveness. I think there is a difference in having homosexual tendencies, and living an outright homosexual lifestyles without any shame or guilt. With that being said, I do think that they should allow priest to marry. There is nothing in scripture that says a man..priest or otherwise cannot marry. I think it would draw more heterosexual men to the priesthood. Those are my thoughts on the matter.
The Catholic Church is the number one religious institution for molestation of children.
Please stop creating it (foolishness) with posts like this one. Thank you.
So dumb. So false. So utterly ignorant.
Ignorance reigns supreme at Christianchat.com
I have a multitude of problems with the catholic church, however this pope's statement is being a little misunderstood. We have to be consistent. Homosexuality is a sin, so is lust, pride, drunkenness and so on. If someone has homosexual feelings, just as if someone has lustful feelings toward women, or other sinful thoughts, and confess their sin AS SIN, and truly try to refrain from acting on it, by feeding the Spirit, then I don't have a problem with them in ministry. There are no sinless, perfect clergy out there. Homosexuals, like other sinners, who confess their sin and repent, are just as much my brother in the Lord than the man who has lived, what WE would consider, a righteous life.
So dumb. So false. So utterly ignorant.
Ignorance reigns supreme at Christianchat.com