New King James Version: Counterfeit

[ChosenbyHim]

The word of God comes from within? Chapter and Verse?


This is your whole problem, CBH, you're stuck on man-made guidance, and, I am speaking of the Spirit's guidance, and, yes, whatever we learn comes from within, from Him, who is within us.

Well GreenNnice, the Holy Spirit will lead us to His Book. He will bear witness to the word of God. And the word of God is not the 230+ modern translations out there which all contradict one another. God is not the author of confusion.

The word of God is the Authorized King James Bible.

The text of the Authorized King James Version is being affirmed more and more in these last days. And with the discovery of Bible Numerics, with the Numerical codes and patterns found in its text, it is clearly more evidence that God's hand is on the Authorized Version.

 

[XianCatalyst]

Well GreenNnice, the Holy Spirit will lead us to His Book. He will bear witness to the word of God. And the word of God is not the 230+ modern translations out there which all contradict one another. God is not the author of confusion.

The word of God is the Authorized King James Bible.

The text of the Authorized King James Version is being affirmed more and more in these last days. And with the discovery of Bible Numerics, with the Numerical codes and patterns found in its text, it is clearly more evidence that God's hand is on the Authorized Version.

The Authorized King James BiBLE that you own today is very CHANGED from the one that was first Authorized. So, saying it is the word of God and there is no confusion is confusing. Why don't you still have the Apocrypha in it? The original had it. Did or DID NOT God direct their hands.

What about all the self righteous words KJ LOVERS hold on to, that are an ok translation 400 years ago but mean something different today. That's confusion. WHY WOULD GOD SEE FIT TO GIVE US SCHOLARS if not to keep His Word translated in current language to be a clear message other than making every one twist their tounge into a tied "TH" sound at the end of every word, and use archaic phrasings?

Further, as for the Holy Spirit leading you to His Book, that is the opposite of what scripture says. But you are much to focused in the tunnel you look to see the truth around you. But I'm noting you contradict the scripture you say is God's word and that puts your words in an intrinsic state of challenge.

Sir, you worship a hunk of leather bound dead tree, not God. That and a Penney under your tongue will get you across the river Styx.

 

[Agricola]

Speaking of James White, he was soundly refuted in this video:

Just becuase there is a video on something on the internet dosnt mean its right.
OH and in reply to your last post, The Holy Spirit has said nothing to me for past 30 odd years about only using the 1611 King James.

This is what is so disgusting about your cult, the same how all cults operate, you claim God , Jesus and Holy Spirit for yourselves and make out that anyone who goes against your cult also goes against God, Jesus and Holy Spirit, and that the things we see as or think is from Holy Spirit is not the Holy Spirit. That is the disgusting evil practice of cults, which you do with almost every post.

 

[Praus]

Just becuase there is a video on something on the internet dosnt mean its right.
OH and in reply to your last post, The Holy Spirit has said nothing to me for past 30 odd years about only using the 1611 King James.

This is what is so disgusting about your cult, the same how all cults operate, you claim God , Jesus and Holy Spirit for yourselves and make out that anyone who goes against your cult also goes against God, Jesus and Holy Spirit, and that the things we see as or think is from Holy Spirit is not the Holy Spirit. That is the disgusting evil practice of cults, which you do with almost every post.

KJV-only is led by a spirit, and it's not holy. We already saw that problem here, where ChosenbyHim explains that the Holy Spirit (in him) can't even recognize His own words, then attempts to change the topic, which is exactly the behavior I expect from someone with a demon whispering into their ear.

Well Praus, I hope this helped. And in regard to 1 Corinthians 15:6, again I do not have an answer. But I think you are still straining at a gnat here with this one Praus.

Again, does a change in meaning occur in the passage in 1 Corinthians 15:6 between And and After?

 

[Praus]

Well GreenNnice, the Holy Spirit will lead us to His Book. He will bear witness to the word of God. And the word of God is not the 230+ modern translations out there which all contradict one another. God is not the author of confusion.

Actually you already wrote that God is the author of confusion here:

Well Praus, I hope this helped. And in regard to 1 Corinthians 15:6, again I do not have an answer. But I think you are still straining at a gnat here with this one Praus.

Again, does a change in meaning occur in the passage in 1 Corinthians 15:6 between And and After?

The word of God is the Authorized King James Bible.

How is it ChosenbyHim that the Holy Spirit in you can't even recognize the word of God?

 

[Agricola]

Thanks for posting that quote again, I laughed again at how intellectually stupid this cult is, anyone with half a brain cell and is not a cult member can see through the ridiculous failed attempt at backing "old text" simply by changing font face to something like Palace Script which was common in the Victorian age.

CHosenbyhim would have been nearer the mark had he used genuine 17th Century handwriting. Here is a sample of handwriting collated from the 1600s parish registers in England. Its the archaic words themselves which are the problem, not the handwriting or font. ALthough most people today would struggle trying to read hand writting from back then.

 

[Praus]

The Authorized King James BiBLE that you own today is very CHANGED from the one that was first Authorized. So, saying it is the word of God and there is no confusion is confusing. Why don't you still have the Apocrypha in it? The original had it. Did or DID NOT God direct their hands.

Even more interesting, the AV 1611 side-notes had references from the New Testament to verses in the Apocrypha. Here John 10:22 refers 1 Maccabees 4:59:



John 10:22 ¶ And it was at Hierusalem the * feast of the dedication, & it was winter.

*1.Macc.4. 59.

 

[Praus]

The word of God is the Authorized King James Bible.

In 1611 the KJV translators wrote in the THE TRANSLATORS TO THE READER.

"Now to the later we answere; that wee doe not deny, nay wee affirme and avow, that the very meanest translation of the Bible in English, set foorth by men of our profession (for wee have seene none of theirs of the whole Bible as yet) containeth the word of God, nay, is the word of God."

The KJV translators believe that even "the very meanest translation" by "men of [their] profession" is "the word of God".

Should we trust the KJV translators or the KJV-only advocates?

If the translators were lying, how can we accept the KJV at all?