As a reminder, there is your claim. And here was my question :
Can you please name three books on the subject that you have read that, in your assessment, were nothing more than conjecture and assumptions?
Tell you what, I'll answer your question when you answer the questions I asked of you some pages back.
I'll add this: If you can't, because you haven't actually read that many, then how many books do you think a person should read on a subject before they can make a claim like the one you've made above?
Or maybe I'm not answering you becuase you evade my questions. Oh that's right, I forgot that your arrogance doesn't allow for possibilities like that, because that goes outside the view that your perception is correct.
So what you're asking for a scientific experiment, performed in a lab, that will demonstrate a change in species that scientists suggest would take millions of years. But you want to see it happen in real time. Can you guess why we haven't provided you with a link to that? You're asking for the impossible because you don't want your belief to be shown false.
It has nothing to do with "Waa, I don't want me belief to be shown false" as you so dishonestly claim. All I'm asking for is scientific evidence for something that claims to be scientific. If you don't have that evidence, that's fine, but that means the evolutionist claims are not scientific. But since you obviously don't have said evidence, rather than accept that your beliefs have holes, you try to use the typical dishonest tactic of pushing those problems back on to Christians with your whole "you're afraid to lose you faith" nonsense.
However, such a request is unreasonable.
Please tell me why it's unreasonable for me to request scientific evidence for something that claims to be scientific (this explaination ought to be good).
Not only is it impossible, but you can't demonstrate creationism with this kind of evidence, either. Can you link to a scientific experiment, performed in a lab, that demonstrates God creating different species in real time? The problem with your observation of nature and saying "God did that" is that there's no control group to compare it to, which makes it unscientific... you criticized me for explaining the scientific method, but I think you take liberties with its meaning when it benefits you.
Yep, all I do is question evolution, and instead of actually answering the question, you go off on this nonsensical tangent, attacking an arguement that I never made. Yet another typical dishonest tactic, but then again, they wouldn't be evolutionists without those.
"Millions of years" is not a valid excuse either. Millions of years is just your catch-all vauge answer evolutionists hide behind when they can't provide answers to valid questions about evolution. Where's the scientific evidence that millions of years is capable of such feats that you claim it is? Oh yeah, there is no evidence, just believe in the millions of years, don't question the religion any further and just accept the vauge millions of years cop-out we're given, and then act surprised when people don't believe in evolution. You accuse us of the "God of the gaps" argument, when you sit there and use the same thing, with you millions of years of the gaps.
