They did exactly what they should have done. You do teach confusion.
I agree with the first sentence, you should leave a place like that, the second sentence, however, is erroneous. They did not recognize truth.
They did exactly what they should have done. You do teach confusion.
we are seeing this now, the church of the world has put Christ out of the church and doing their own there prophecy being fulfilled
Yep, they surely have. He said things like...
Mat 5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Mat 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
Mat 5:19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
And they teach the Law is done away.
He said...
Luk 16:17 And it is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than one tittle of the law to fail.
And they teach the Law has passed away.
He said...
Mat 19:17 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.
Adn they teach you don't have to keep those old "Jewish" Commandments.
I agree with the first sentence, you should leave a place like that, the second sentence, however, is erroneous. They did not recognize truth.
The disagreements that seem to be escalating now can clearly help us to see a "falling away" from the truth if we search for the truth to expose the deception. Read the comments that are somewhat adversarial against what I have presented, and search the scriptures as the Bereans did so you can see the truth by all the Word instead of part of the Word.
By the way, the Bereans (both Jews and Gentiles who lived in Greece) had the writings of Moses and the Prophets (from the Jewish synagogue) to compare the teachings of Paul with, for the records of the New Testament, as we know it today, had not been published yet. All they had was what we know as the Old Testament scripts. I’ll post the scripture from Acts so you don’t have to look it up.
Acts 17:10-12 (KJV)
[SUP]10 [/SUP]And the brethren immediately sent away Paul and Silas by night unto Berea: who coming thither went into the synagogue of the Jews.
[SUP]11 [/SUP]These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.
[SUP]12 [/SUP]Therefore many of them believed; also of honourable women which were Greeks, and of men, not a few.
The Gentiles, in most if not all, the places Paul ministered to, had nothing but Paul’s letters and the writings of Moses and the Prophets. If Jesus would have done away with the law and Phrophets, Paul would have had nothing in writing to prove the truth. Good thing Jesus said Matthew 5:17-19 (KJV)
[SUP]17 [/SUP]Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
[SUP]18 [/SUP]For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
[SUP]19 [/SUP]Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
The problem is. People have been teaching licentiousness even in Pauls day. And people have been teaching adding the law to the gospel since Pauls day.
the falling away would not be any of these, Since they have been taught since the beginning.
The falling away is things like we are seeing today. Churches which are mixing, and saying ALL religions are ok. Like Christian science or other churches. Things like saying There was not flood. And denying creation, while enabling evolution etc..
It is not things which have been done since the beginning.
They did exactly what they should have done. You do teach confusion.
If the law led you to Christ, and then when you tell others that the law is eradicated, it is ludicrous. For to tell the unsaved that it’s negated, takes away the very tool God has given you to bring you to Christ.”
Continuing to explain this truth I asked “How then are the unsaved able to come to Christ the way you did?”
Good scripture my friend. I would like to add to John's scripture that you posted.
1 John 2:18-22 (KJV)
[SUP]18 [/SUP]Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.
[SUP]19 [/SUP]They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.
[SUP]20 [/SUP]But ye have an unction from the Holy One, and ye know all things.
[SUP]21 [/SUP]I have not written unto you because ye know not the truth, but because ye know it, and that no lie is of the truth.
[SUP]22 [/SUP]Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.
If one says they trust Jesus, then they have to trust God the Father in all things also. Thank you.
I guess my point is if they permanently leave it shows they were not of us in the first place.
You are identifying non-believers, I am speaking of the quasi-church, but the the true church.
2 Timothy 3:5
King James Version (KJV)
5 Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.
isn't this prophecy being fulfilled even in this forum? i will explain it to you if you don't know what this means, having a form of godliness you haven't receive the holy spirit, your being self righteous and showing forms of Godliness and when someone comes to you with the power of the holy spirit with things you can't understand you deny it and say that it is false, also a form of godliness is you think you are righteous in your own eyes when in reality you are very far from it some people don't even understand what the holy spirit is or what happens when you receive it that is the problem
Are we laying the groundwork for the tribulation,
justme
Guess what ? We are in it NOW !
where do you get this? we are not in the tribulation.
I like it and do see what it says:Sin is deceiving. It’s seductive. It kills, but it always has to have an occasion, or a starting point. So what can we do to identify it? Identification of the beginning of sin is accomplished by authoritive instructions. Use these instructions for they have a great purpose for us to identify deception by knowing the truth.
Here is a verse that can easily be used to deceive. It can be used for deception if verses 12-14 are neglected.
Romans 7:11 (KJV)
[SUP]11 [/SUP]For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it slew me.
Italicized added, not in the original translation.
I have been enlightened on this verse more times than I can count, trying to put me in the category of a pharisee by the works of the law. It could have been with good intentions, but lately it has been presented with great animosity. The presentation was to prove that the law produces the sin of works without faith if we don’t throw it away. So I thought I would break it down and look up some of the words in the concordance to see if I was really missing something.
Taking=grabbing
Occasion=starting point
Commandment=authoritive instructions
Deceived=seduced
It=the situation
Slew=destroyed
It has always been presented as if the commandment causes us to sin, just like some say that God created sin, relating that to the tree of the knowledge of good and evil in Eden. I can’t buy that either. The evil is the judgment of God against the sin. Anyway, this is the way it would read using the definitions above. For your edification keep the principle of Revelation 22:18 in mind.
Romans 7:11
[SUP]11 [/SUP]For sin, grabbing a starting point by the authoritive instructions, seduced
me, and the situation destroyed.
It appears that sin is the seducer leading to destruction rather than the authority of the commandment. I wondered about that some, but not very long, because the presentation was filled with a rather unloving nature labeling me as a self-righteousness hypocrite, because I esteem the law as holy, good and Spiritual and very useful to me.
Now, to repeat, because this is very important, every time I have been given this scripture to correct my corrupt way of thinking, verse 12 thru 14 was never mentioned.
Romans 7:12-14 (KJV)
[SUP]12 [/SUP]Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.
[SUP]13 [/SUP]Was then that which is good made death unto me? God forbid. But sin, that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good; that sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful.
[SUP]14 [/SUP]For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.
Why would anyone ever try to make Christians believe that what is holy, just, and good produces self-righteous works without faith? The truth is that the law identifies this corruption because we cannot be righteous by it. We are the ones that are weak, NOT the law that comes from God.
All scripture, not just some of scripture.I really like people like you who love all of God's Word. It is so uplifting.
Matthew 4:3-4 (KJV)
[SUP]3 [/SUP]And when the tempter came to him, he said, If thou be the Son of God, command that these stones be made bread.
[SUP]4 [/SUP]But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.
During that time of temptation, have you ever wondered who was there to record those events? I suppose Jesus told His disciples what the deal was.