This article does a lot of relating things that can be discounted as irrelevant, unsourced, unverified or just plain conspiratorial for the sake of it.
For instance, it talks about the MMR vaccine, manufactured by the UK Pharma company, GlaxoSmithKline. It relates it to outbreaks of 'reactions' in Japan. It's literally as vague as that. It also cites outbreaks of 'Chrohn's Disease' in Sweden.
I've had the MMR, so have my whole family, all my friends, my friends friends, practically everyone at my school, and I've NEVER known anybody to have had a reaction of any kind to it other than the kind of skin reaction that vaccinations create. I've also had the BCG injection, the polio injection, diptheria, etc etc. Never had so much as a cough from them.
The article also does a lot of building up negatives about people and then making a point that otherwise, without being sucked into their negative aura, isn't at all difficult to rationalize logically. For instance, the Dr Salisbury, who is overseeing the H1N1 vaccination protocol (allegedly), had been the advisor to the relevant UK health councils concerning the 'risk' that a strain of MMR jab containing the Urabe mumps virus allegedly held according to reports that are, again, un-referenced in the article. It does not specifically say what those 'concerns' were. They could have been the general concerns that a country's Health Organizations might have before they legalize release of fluid that is going to be pumped into hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of citizens bloodstreams .. y'know?
It tries to relate past conspiracies (unproven ones) to its newfound conspiracy, as some kind of 'proof' where no proof exists.
I've also had a look at the author's other books, and each one of them is virtually without references or any form of proof. It's just reams of unsubstantiated, blunt, direct claims on people. No ideology. No seeming morality, empathy or any form of emotion that I belive a person writing about such horrific 'atrocities' would need to display for the 'victims'.
Also, he has no qualifications in historical subjects that I can find whatsoever, but claims to be a 'historian'.
Sorry Zone, I don't believe it.
This, however, is magically delicious:
Atavism, A 9/11 Anniversary Waltz | Global Research