I give up. . .why?Why was there not one sigle female priest ever Whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
I give up. . .why?Why was there not one sigle female priest ever Whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
(they are dealing with a domestic context, NOT church practice,....
to be perfectly honest, your track record doesnt mean anything if you deny the gospel and call it foolish. which is exactly what you did when you said "the bear falling out of his chair laughing his head off at the foolishness that's about to take place"You see who this is...... really?
Did I say the Gospel is foolish?
I've been called in the preaching ministry for over 30 years..... I'm just curious if you saw that.
That's not bragging, mind you, but just making the point if you "discerned" by the Spirit of God that you know who I am, seems to me you shoulda' known something about that too.
No evidence either internal or external to even suggest this.
thats what im saying, oldhermit. it gives clear instructions. they have to not want to understand to not understand.34The women are to keep silent in the churches; for they are not permitted to speak, but are to subject themselves, just as the Law also says. 35If they desire to learn anything, let them ask their own husbands at home; for it is improper for a woman to speak in church. 36Was it from you that the word of God first went forth? Or has it come to you only? 37If anyone thinks he is a prophet or spiritual, let him recognize that the things which I write to you are the Lord’s commandment. 38But if anyone does not recognize this, he is not recognized.
1Ti 2:11 Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.
1Ti 2:12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
1Ti 2:13 For Adam was first formed, then Eve.
1Ti 2:14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.
1Ti 2:15 Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.
No one can read the simplicity of these two texts and misunderstand. To misrepresent these texts one must either be taught to misunderstand them or have an alternative agenda.
are you saying God is contradicting in His teachings?Guys like you are going to be silent for a 1,000 years or so, when Paul greets you on the new earth and soundly slaps you for being so silly in your interpretation to what and why he was saying, what he did in 1 Cor 14 and 1 Tim 2.
Guys like you are going to be silent for a 1,000 years or so, when Paul greets you on the new earth and soundly slaps you for being so silly in your interpretation to what and why he was saying, what he did in 1 Cor 14 and 1 Tim 2.
its not a risk. people who think the instructions are not clear are turning a blind eye to the plain text. and now they are judging.. this is not looking good.I'll risk it.
to be perfectly honest, your track record doesnt mean anything if you deny the gospel and call it foolish. which is exactly what you did when you said "the bear falling out of his chair laughing his head off at the foolishness that's about to take place"
so you said the people who will be behind the gospel will be foolish.. which is implying the gospel is foolish, in a indirect way.
you seem to be of the pack that has conformed to the patterns of the world. and not sticking to the scripture.
its not a risk. people who think the instructions are not clear are turning a blind eye to the plain text. and now they are judging.. this is not looking good.
1Ti 2:12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
no? so what im saying is wrong? then what did you mean when you said the foolishness in here would have the bear falling off his chair laughing... it seems as if you are dodging bullets with insults.Now I'm denying the Gospel & a part of a pack.....
The foolishness of this thread has nothing to do with the Gospel of Christ. The Gospel itself isn't even the subject here.
You seem to have a better knack of judging people than you do rightly handling the truth. Why did you start this thread, anyway?
34The women are to keep silent in the churches; for they are not permitted to speak, but are to subject themselves, just as the Law also says. 35If they desire to learn anything, let them ask their own husbands at home; for it is improper for a woman to speak in church. 36Was it from you that the word of God first went forth? Or has it come to you only? 37If anyone thinks he is a prophet or spiritual, let him recognize that the things which I write to you are the Lord’s commandment. 38But if anyone does not recognize this, he is not recognized.
1Ti 2:11 Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.
1Ti 2:12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
1Ti 2:13 For Adam was first formed, then Eve.
1Ti 2:14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.
1Ti 2:15 Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.
No one can read the simplicity of these two texts and misunderstand. To misrepresent these texts one must either be taught to misunderstand them or have an alternative agenda.
God would resurrect Luke to claim authorship of Hebrews before anything else happens.Gee ,I wonder what will be if it turns out, that Priscilla, IS actually the author of Hebrews![]()
This would suggest that scripture is culturally and temporally contingent. It Isn't.Why is this not in any other of Paul's epistles? Careful sir, it may mean you have to actually understand the culture of the times and epseically what pagan influences had invaded the churches at Corinth & Ephesus...
You are allowing you own experiences within your culture to determine how you read this book rather than allowing scripture to examine your culture.My dear brothers, Long before Saul, became Paul, that guy named Jesus had several women disciples, his own mother was in the upper room, so spare us all, the need to protect your male ego and dominance in the church.
Maybe if so many men in the late 70's, through the 80's and 90's had not let the Wife and Mother became the spiritual leader, we would not have seen God turn to who he could to become PASTORS! Men gave up being spiritual leaders in their homes 40 years ago and stopped becoming pastors and teachers of the word.
There is not gender discrimination in the word of God! The only discrimination in the word of God is silly interpretations of man, saying silly things like, oh gee a woman cannot be a pastor.
Well look around my fellow brothers, there is a reason why God had to use women in the pulpit, because our gender decided 40 years ago to stop being the high priests.
show me scripture of mary being a disciple.Why is this not in any other of Paul's epistles? Careful sir, it may mean you have to actually understand the culture of the times and especially what pagan influences had invaded the churches at Corinth & Ephesus...
My dear brothers, Long before Saul, became Paul, that guy named Jesus had several women disciples, his own mother was in the upper room, so spare us all, the need to protect your male ego and dominance in the church.
Maybe if so many men in the late 70's, through the 80's and 90's had not let the Wife and Mother became the spiritual leader, we would not have seen God turn to who he could to become PASTORS! Men gave up being spiritual leaders in their homes 40 years ago and stopped becoming pastors and teachers of the word.
There is not gender discrimination in the word of God! The only discrimination in the word of God is silly interpretations of man, saying silly things like, oh gee a woman cannot be a pastor.
no? so what im saying is wrong? then what did you mean when you said the foolishness in here would have the bear falling off his chair laughing... it seems as if you are dodging bullets with insults.
what lies have i told. be specific.