-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
N
Its not my credentials , that I based what I say on, its what Evolutionist say of the facts for you, so lets just focus there . I gave you some facts to study your self, I don't have credentials other then I'm honest .
I'm asking you to go and see what your Own beliefs have to say about the evidence I posted in my other letters here.
What do those who you feel have "credentials" have to say about the fossils I mentioned before ? And some of the questions I raised before in my other post ?
I mean after all, that is what matters to you. So go see how they explain it, and see if their " answers" are satisfactory to you .
I'm asking you to go and see what your Own beliefs have to say about the evidence I posted in my other letters here.
What do those who you feel have "credentials" have to say about the fossils I mentioned before ? And some of the questions I raised before in my other post ?
I mean after all, that is what matters to you. So go see how they explain it, and see if their " answers" are satisfactory to you .
Last edited:
K
Ya know, I guess my point is, any thinking /reasoning being, could look at a lowly little ant and wonder....if you have an inkling of an iota of mass/energy, the relationship between the 2, ya gotta wonder, what or who is keeping all things from destroying each into the other, what keeps it all together? The properties of water..is..water defies the laws of nature, look closely at just 1 element, I mean to study in great detail, just 1 of all the magnificent creatures on this planet. But you can also be led by the nose in agreeing with just about anyone. You owe it to yourself to find the truth. There is truth ya know. Are you curious about truth?
M
Give to Obama what is Obama's, right? I don't even think his head is on any of your coins or paper. So morally, I don't see any reason to pay taxes, unless voluntarily or to honour a promise to pay taxes.
Practically, though (from a worldly sense), the taxes are really tribute, right? And with those who don't pay tribute, the king usually takes offense, and throws them in a dungeon or worse. Just look at Kent Hovind.
So the righteousness of paying tribute to Obama is the same as paying protection to the Mafia, from both a moral and a practical sense (from my perspective as a fallen, sinful man, anyway). Now back to discussion of the absurdity of the evolutionary (Kabalistic?) religion.
Practically, though (from a worldly sense), the taxes are really tribute, right? And with those who don't pay tribute, the king usually takes offense, and throws them in a dungeon or worse. Just look at Kent Hovind.
So the righteousness of paying tribute to Obama is the same as paying protection to the Mafia, from both a moral and a practical sense (from my perspective as a fallen, sinful man, anyway). Now back to discussion of the absurdity of the evolutionary (Kabalistic?) religion.
uh.....among other frauds too numerous to go into (Piltdown Man; Peking Man):
"...Increasing discoveries in the years that followed, and particularly after the 1990s, made it clear that no such evolutionary process as the tree of descent, proposed by evolutionists, ever took place. In terms of their age, geographical regions and anatomical features, the fossils discovered could not be placed in any evolutionary sequence. Increasingly, therefore, the idea that Peking Man was to the missing link lost support, and evolutionists abandoned hope of having found any missing link.
In the present day, there are no longer frequent claims of intermediate forms imputed to Homo erectus, under which Peking Man had been classified. Many anthropologists emphasise that H. erectus (and therefore Peking Man) was no different from modern humans. H. erectus is not an intermediate form, but an extinct human race.
This view was generally accepted at a conference attended by well-known palaeontologists and anthropologists in Germany.
American Scientist magazine reported the developments at the conference:
...most of the participants at the Senckenberg conference got drawn into a flaming debate over the taxonomic status of Homo erectus started by Milford Wolpoff of the University of Michigan, Alan Thorne of the University of Canberra and their colleagues. They argued forcefully that Homo erectus had no validity as a species and should be eliminated altogether.
- American Scientist, November- December 2000, p. 491
see, evolutionists can be duped for decades by guys like Arthur Conan Doyle...just cuz dey lookin at monkey skulls; or downright cheezy frauds, and believe it
...now dat's evolution.
btw SoWhat...the theory of evolution is logically flawed: Devolution would be the result of natural selection...can't unnerstand that? LOL
"...Increasing discoveries in the years that followed, and particularly after the 1990s, made it clear that no such evolutionary process as the tree of descent, proposed by evolutionists, ever took place. In terms of their age, geographical regions and anatomical features, the fossils discovered could not be placed in any evolutionary sequence. Increasingly, therefore, the idea that Peking Man was to the missing link lost support, and evolutionists abandoned hope of having found any missing link.
In the present day, there are no longer frequent claims of intermediate forms imputed to Homo erectus, under which Peking Man had been classified. Many anthropologists emphasise that H. erectus (and therefore Peking Man) was no different from modern humans. H. erectus is not an intermediate form, but an extinct human race.
This view was generally accepted at a conference attended by well-known palaeontologists and anthropologists in Germany.
American Scientist magazine reported the developments at the conference:
...most of the participants at the Senckenberg conference got drawn into a flaming debate over the taxonomic status of Homo erectus started by Milford Wolpoff of the University of Michigan, Alan Thorne of the University of Canberra and their colleagues. They argued forcefully that Homo erectus had no validity as a species and should be eliminated altogether.
- American Scientist, November- December 2000, p. 491
see, evolutionists can be duped for decades by guys like Arthur Conan Doyle...just cuz dey lookin at monkey skulls; or downright cheezy frauds, and believe it
...now dat's evolution.btw SoWhat...the theory of evolution is logically flawed: Devolution would be the result of natural selection...can't unnerstand that? LOL
Last edited:
Strange that it says this
As there are thousands of fossils, mostly fragmentary, often consisting of single bones or isolated teeth with complete skulls and skeletons rare,[SUP][1][/SUP] this overview is not meant to be complete, but does show some of the most important finds. The fossils are arranged by approximate age as determined byradiometric dating and/or incremental dating and the species name represents current consensus - if there is no clear scientific consensus the other possible classifications are indicated. Deprecated classifications may be found on the fossil's page.
Most of the fossils shown are not considered direct ancestors to Homo sapiens but are closely related to direct ancestors and are therefore important to the study of the lineage.
In other words what they are saying is they are putting together puzzles not knowing if they have all the pieces or even if the puzzle pieces belong together in the first place.
As there are thousands of fossils, mostly fragmentary, often consisting of single bones or isolated teeth with complete skulls and skeletons rare,[SUP][1][/SUP] this overview is not meant to be complete, but does show some of the most important finds. The fossils are arranged by approximate age as determined byradiometric dating and/or incremental dating and the species name represents current consensus - if there is no clear scientific consensus the other possible classifications are indicated. Deprecated classifications may be found on the fossil's page.
Most of the fossils shown are not considered direct ancestors to Homo sapiens but are closely related to direct ancestors and are therefore important to the study of the lineage.
In other words what they are saying is they are putting together puzzles not knowing if they have all the pieces or even if the puzzle pieces belong together in the first place.
Strange that it says this
As there are thousands of fossils, mostly fragmentary, often consisting of single bones or isolated teeth with complete skulls and skeletons rare,[SUP][1][/SUP] this overview is not meant to be complete, but does show some of the most important finds. The fossils are arranged by approximate age as determined byradiometric dating and/or incremental dating and the species name represents current consensus - if there is no clear scientific consensus the other possible classifications are indicated. Deprecated classifications may be found on the fossil's page.
Most of the fossils shown are not considered direct ancestors to Homo sapiens but are closely related to direct ancestors and are therefore important to the study of the lineage.
In other words what they are saying is they are putting together puzzles not knowing if they have all the pieces or even if the puzzle pieces belong together in the first place.
As there are thousands of fossils, mostly fragmentary, often consisting of single bones or isolated teeth with complete skulls and skeletons rare,[SUP][1][/SUP] this overview is not meant to be complete, but does show some of the most important finds. The fossils are arranged by approximate age as determined byradiometric dating and/or incremental dating and the species name represents current consensus - if there is no clear scientific consensus the other possible classifications are indicated. Deprecated classifications may be found on the fossil's page.
Most of the fossils shown are not considered direct ancestors to Homo sapiens but are closely related to direct ancestors and are therefore important to the study of the lineage.
In other words what they are saying is they are putting together puzzles not knowing if they have all the pieces or even if the puzzle pieces belong together in the first place.
ROTFLMHO.
it's embarrassing.
Australopithecus
Evolutionists have recovered the skeletal remains of several extinct apes in southern Africa that differ slightly from their modern counterparts. The scientists have naturally concluded that the differences provide evidence that the ancient apes were preparing to change into men. However, careful study by well known anatomists have proved that these once promising links are nothing more than extinct apes.
- Gish, op. cit., p. 120. The two scientists were Lord Zuckerman, a famous British anatomist, and Dr. Charles Oxnard, a professor at the University of Chicago.
the ancient apes were preparing to change into men.
LOLOLOL
Can you or anyone else for that matter explain how two different species that have very different life spans remain in a symbiotic relationship without killing off both? IE Bees and flowers,insects and plants? Especially insects that have life cycles of less then a week and trees that have life cycles of decades.
Java Man
The proof that we have descended from monkey ancestors has now been reduced to two, Java Man and Peking Man. Let us see how reliable they are.
A Dutch physician, Eugene Dubois, discovered the Java Man fossils in 1891. These consisted of two ape-like teeth, one skullcap with the brain case missing (and therefore impossible to determine which category it belonged to), and one human thigh bone, found fifty feet away. Without any justification, he claimed that this meager collection of bones was from the same individual and called it Pithecanthropus-Java Man. As with the Piltdown Man, he estimated the age to be about 500,000 years and, again as with the Piltdown Man, there was fraud involved, because the doctor concealed the fact that he also discovered two human skulls at the site.
Dr. Dubois revealed the human skulls in 1921, and seventeen years later he announced his conclusion that the Java Man was a gibbon. But it was too late; the Java Man was firmly enthroned in the pantheon of missing links.
...
With the Java and Piltdown frauds at the height of their influence, Dr. Davidson Black, a professor of anatomy in Peking, in 1926 added to the growing list of evidence – one tooth – and called it the Peking Man (Sinanthropus Pekinensis). After he received a substantial sum of money from the Rockefeller Foundation.....
How the Missing Links are Still Missing
there's the Monkey Family Connection again (i say that affectionately since they apparently think they are "ASCENDED from apes" and maybe they are
actually, the idea is to have US think WE are...devaluing life..and has it not succeeded?
life begins when a baby takes it's first breath - outside the womb?..it's NOT REALLY HUMAN UNTIL....
same APEFAMILY origin
The proof that we have descended from monkey ancestors
has now been reduced to two, Java Man and Peking Man. Let us see how reliable they are.A Dutch physician, Eugene Dubois, discovered the Java Man fossils in 1891. These consisted of two ape-like teeth, one skullcap with the brain case missing (and therefore impossible to determine which category it belonged to), and one human thigh bone, found fifty feet away. Without any justification, he claimed that this meager collection of bones was from the same individual and called it Pithecanthropus-Java Man. As with the Piltdown Man, he estimated the age to be about 500,000 years and, again as with the Piltdown Man, there was fraud involved, because the doctor concealed the fact that he also discovered two human skulls at the site.
Dr. Dubois revealed the human skulls in 1921, and seventeen years later he announced his conclusion that the Java Man was a gibbon. But it was too late; the Java Man was firmly enthroned in the pantheon of missing links.
...
With the Java and Piltdown frauds at the height of their influence, Dr. Davidson Black, a professor of anatomy in Peking, in 1926 added to the growing list of evidence – one tooth – and called it the Peking Man (Sinanthropus Pekinensis). After he received a substantial sum of money from the Rockefeller Foundation.....
How the Missing Links are Still Missing
there's the Monkey Family Connection again (i say that affectionately since they apparently think they are "ASCENDED from apes" and maybe they are
actually, the idea is to have US think WE are...devaluing life..and has it not succeeded?
life begins when a baby takes it's first breath - outside the womb?..it's NOT REALLY HUMAN UNTIL....
same APEFAMILY origin
Last edited:
