If something came from nothing, this goes against science. If nothing came from nothing, then how did anything come to be, including this conversation? If this conversation is nothing, then how does it become anything without something first making something of it? If nothing different than nothing acts upon nothing, then nothing--according to science and logic-- different can be derived. If nothing is all that this conversation is, then it is nothing to continue or conclude. Or is it?
Perhaps, instead, this whole lot of nothing is really actually something, and perhaps the something really matters (if there such a thing). I ask, then, how did something come from apparently nothing? Someone can imagine no god, but where did the first of all Nothing-and/or-something first happen? And how did inertia (if real) or the ability (if real) to stop (if really happens) or the probability (if exists) to change (if variation of nothing can happen without something else) come from (implying something as having origin and/or being eternal)?
The reality is, science and logic is challenged as to why there is anything. This is where faith comes in... call it a crutch to explain what cannot be explained, I do not care. God does not make sense if one looks at the origin of things through man's understanding. Neither, though, does the nonexistence of God or gods or an original cause or co-causers. Thus, one cannot know without faith in something unknown; unless, one only puts faith in what is known. Still, if we base all of Nothing-and/or-something on our understanding (if exists), then how did that first point of so-called understanding come about ( implied as having origin and/or being eternal, or nonexistent)? Was it from self-will, another' s will, or happenstance? Or does anyone have any understanding?
Asking questions is easy. The answers are hard. Even harder is understanding the answers or knowing how to answer others' questions. I am glad that people know these answers (if they do), but I do not. I am too dumb to be part of this conversation. Therefore, like you will have guessed, I choose to put my faith or lack thereof in the idea of eternal deity. I do not doubt the deity that I do not understand but have faith in. I doubt my logic and understanding of Nothing-and/or-something, called life.
As I put my faith in God, I put my faith in the one called Christ Jesus. In both regards, my faith is not perfect. (if such a thing exists)
God knows our questions, actions, and motives.
"We know in part," the Bible says (1 Corinthians 13:9).
For the record, I know even less.
I pray that we all learn more and live better as needed.