can we be justified without being saved??? can we be saved without being justified????
the first is yes,
The second is no.
It is the same for faith, for baptism.
can we be justified without being saved??? can we be saved without being justified????
Yep. . .every time it makes a ruling, it must get the vote of the people first.You cannot even give the equivalent analogy. The analogy you need is thatElin said:Like belief in the authority of the Supreme Court, but not in itself.
the Supreme Court operates on the authority of the people.
NOW we're down to your unbelief in the final authority of Scripture.how about this, what authority do you have INSIDE OF SCRIPTURE? Or
even of scripture itself?
You are quite Biblically uninformed.
What was man's side of the land covenant?
Mediator does not imply bilateral covenant.
It implies administration.
Where do you find anything bilateral in the promise of the new covenant in Jer 31:31-34?.
Non-responsive to the questions (which again demonstrates my charge of inadequate understanding).it seems that you have this same canned arrogant response to everybody that would dare to disagree with you. It is highly unprofessional and rude.Elin said:You are quite Biblically uninformed.
What was man's side of the land covenant?
Mediator does not imply bilateral covenant.
It implies administration.
Where do you find anything bilateral in the promise of the new covenant in Heb 8:8-12 and Jer 31:31-34?
You also do not know or understand the Scriptures well enough to represent them correctly.
You are wasting your time and ours here.
Just what do you hope to gain by saying this to other posters? Do you seriously think you will win anybody over with this attitude?
You are quite Biblically uninformed.
What was man's side of the land covenant?
look up mediator and see if you find your made up definition, a mediator mediates between two or more partiesMediator does not imply bilateral covenant.
It implies administration.
Where do you find anything bilateral in the promise of the new covenant in Jer 31:31-34?
You also do not know or understand the Scriptures well enough to represent them correctly.
You are wasting your time and ours here.
Yep. . .every time it makes a ruling, it must get the vote of the people first.
It is without authority in itself.
False premise: security in salvation means we can go on sinning without consequence.
False motive: we should do good works and not sin so we don't go to hell.
-------
True motive: we should do good works and not sin to show the love that our Savior has already shown us.
Yes, I believe that is what I stated.NOW we're down to your unbelief in the final authority of Scripture.
The Scriptures themselves give the origin of their authority, they are from God (2Tim 3:16), not men.
Agreed.The apostles themselves give evidence of viewing the apostolic writings as equal in authority
to the OT Scriptures, as is seen in
Peter's grouping of Paul's writings with the "other Scriptures" (2Pe 3:16), and
Paul's reference (1Tim 5:18b) to Luke's statement (Lk 10:7) as "Scripture says."
Not individual man, but the Body over which He is Head and to which He gave the Body authority with Him.God shares his power and authority over them with no fallen man.
Agreed. The Head and the Body.When it comes to God and his truth, there is no "balance of power" between the executive,
the legislative and the judicial, for he, and he alone, is all of them.
You can say that again. God outweighs individual man every time. My question is why do you depend on yourself, rather than God?Right, wrong or indifferent, the fact of the matter is that
we do not have the same final authority regarding the word of God written (2Tim 316).
My final authority is the Scriptures themselves
Which has been confirmed for 500 years now that Scripture in itself has no authority. It is either the giver and protector of the Gospel, Christ, or individual man has usurped the authority of Christ.
You don't have to be a rocket scientist to see the logic that
that leaves no bases for resolving differences between us.
If anyone is wasting time it must be you. You keep kicking against the pricks and just cannot refute scripture. It is hard to impose one's innovative ideas upon scripture, and no man has yet been successful after 2000 years. I don't think I need to worry about your efforts.So you are wasting your time and ours here.
What land covenant? this was a promise.
look up mediator and see if you find your made up definition, a mediator mediates between two or more parties
Jeremiah 31:33 (KJV) But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the Lord, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.
You see the law? the law is an agreement between God and His people.
I know how to read the scriptures in context, I know not to twist them as some here do, I know you constantly run into contradiction, that is what happens when one takes scripture out of context.
A covenant is between two or more.
All covenants are promises.What land covenant? this was a promise.
Aw, gee.look up mediator and see if you find your made up definition,
a mediator mediates between two or more parties
Are you messing with me?Jeremiah 31:33 (KJV) But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the Lord, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.
You see the law? the law is an agreement between God and His people.
Okay, what you do not understand (which is everything above), ask me and I will explain it to you.I know how to read the scriptures in context, I know not to twist them as some here do, I know you constantly run into contradiction, that is what happens when one takes scripture out of context.
A covenant is between two or more.
?????????Therein lies the authority of Christ.Elin said:You are wasting your time and ours here.
My final authority is Scripture, yours is not.Once again you cannot refute scripture.
Previously addressed. . .the church there is the "household" of God, all those in Christ.Yes, I believe that is what I stated.
The Gospel was given by the Holy Spirit. It was entrusted to the Body of Christ. Christ is the Head of the Body, wherein the Holy Spirit dwells. The Church is the pillar and ground of the Truth. I Tim 3:15.
Scripture in itself has no authority.
?????????
My final authority is Scripture, yours is not.
Without a common final authority to resolve opposing differences,
you are wasting your time and ours here.
can we be justified without being saved???
can we be saved without being justified????
????????restating unfounded assertions, even e]those already shown to be incorrect, does not help your cause. They just show your ignorance even more.Elin said:Cassian said:Scripture in itself has no authority.
My final authority is Scripture, yours is not.
We have no common final authority to resolve opposing differences.
Says you and your man made doctrine you follow, Your doctrine has a sinner saved, you say one is saved before baptism, the bible says baptism washes away sins :
Acts 22:16 (KJV)
[SUP]16 [/SUP]And now why tarriest thou? arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord.
Paul believed on the road to Damascus, his sins were not washed away until he was baptized...
You too have no room for repentance, it cannot be after you believe, because you would have a unrepentant man saved, it cant happen before he believed because he would not know he had to repent or what to repent of, so you see, your doctrine is full of holes... the only ones making sense on here, have only the bible and no man made doctrine, creed or manual to tell you what the bible means....