In 1 Peter 3.21 Peter makes it clear that it is a symbol or figure.
The word Peter used is anti-type.
OT type:---------------saved by water > verse 20
NT anti-type:----------saved by water > verse 21
In 1 Peter 3.21 Peter makes it clear that it is a symbol or figure.
Ephesians 5:26 (NKJV)
[SUP]26 [/SUP]that He might sanctify and cleanse her with the washing of water by the word,
This means water baptism, you cannot obey "the word of God" and not be baptized.
The ONE Name.... Rev 19:Rev 19:13 And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called: The Word of God.
The ONE NAME is the WORD OF GOD....
So here is the answer to ALL the three commands....
TEACH THEM WHAT? ............THE WORD OF GOD
BAPTIZE THEM IN WHAT? ....THE WORD OF GOD
OBSERVE WHAT?...................THE WORD OF GOD
The Word of God is God... John 1
The word of God was made flesh, Jesus.... John 1
The word of God is the Truth (Spirit of Truth)... John 17 in what we are SANCTIFIED IN!
The word Peter used is anti-type.
OT type:---------------saved by water > verse 20
NT anti-type:----------saved by water > verse 21
It's faith in His blood that saves; and the repentant thief on the Cross found it hard to be baptised.
Actually verse 11 makes it clear that the circumcision of the New Testament believer is spiritual. And it's the power of the Resurrection (verse 12), not baptism, that brings new life to the person who is born again.
Linking baptism with the new birth is plain wrong.
Eph 2:8-------------------faith>>>>>>>saves
1pet3:21------------------baptism>>>>saves
Only one way to be saved, so faith must include baptism.
The thief is not an example of NT salvation.
can i be baptized in water without trusting Christ for my salvation and still be saved?
This has always been the relevant question. Christ gave the parable of the wedding feast in which the guest without the wedding garment was cast into outer darkness. (Matt. 22:11-). Paul describes those that have been baptized as having "put on Christ" (Galatians 3:27). The Greek here (Strong's 1746) means to "sink into a garment" or to "invest with clothing".
Perhaps the question could asked: Do you want to be without your wedding garment at the necessary time?
No, MK 16:16 Jesus made belief a prerequsite to being baptized and baptism a prerequsite to salvation.
Water baptism is appeal to God for a good conscience.The very passage itself says that it's about a good conscience before God; and that the baptism is a figure, a symbol.
The thief is not an example of NT salvation.
Water baptism is appeal to God for a good conscience.
...and you know that the Lord Jesus says there: 'and he that believeth not shall be damned'; absence of baptism does not damn.
No, MK 16:16 Jesus made belief a prerequsite to being baptized and baptism a prerequsite to salvation.
...but it's not an automaton that supposedly replaces the need for the conscience to be purged before the symbol is administered.
then it is obviously not ritual water baptism alone that saves.
hmmmm this all seems to hinge on Christ, and trusting in Him.
The cleansing power of the word on our conscience does not mean baptismal regeneration.