Christian Reformed Church and Reformed Church In America consider joint resolution

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1still_waters
  • Start date Start date
  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
1

1still_waters

Guest
CRC, RCA to Consider Joint Resolution | Article | Christian Reformed Church

I have no idea why the more conservative CRC is now considering a joint resolution with the RCA. It's a resolution to partner together in areas of agreement. The RCA is slowly drifting toward more acceptance and condoning of homosexuality and the like.

Seems like a dumb move to me to partner with a denomination that's eventually going to morph into something like the leftist ELCA or PCUSA. The RCA isn't there yet, but it's moving in that direction.

I apologize for my comments looking like I spilled alphabet soup on your screen.

alphabet-soup.jpg


------------

After more than 150 years of separation, the Christian Reformed Church and the Reformed Church in America will be meeting together in June on the campus of Central College in Pella, Iowa to conduct at least one formal piece of business.

Although the CRC’s Synod 2014 and the RCA’s 2014 General Synod will be conducting their business separately for most of the time, they are set to worship and meet together and hold one plenary session to consider a joint resolution, says Rev. Peter Borgdorff, deputy executive director of the CRC.

“This is a great idea and a challenge,” said Borgdorff. “We never had a joint synod like this. We will now be coming together for at least this one joint session.”

The synods will meet in an officially convened session on Saturday evening, June 14 to discuss the “Resolution of Relationship Between the Reformed Church in America and the Christian Reformed Church in North America.” Delegates from each synod will vote on the resolution separately.

The resolution asks churches to “reflect on the costs of the lack of faithfulness that have marked the history of separation of our two denominations” and asks churches to “celebrate the new realities being created through expanding initiatives of partnership between the Reformed Church in America and the Christian Reformed Church in North America.”

In addition, the resolution asks the churches to “declare that the principle that guides us, and the intention that motivates us, is to ‘act together in all matters except those in which deep differences of conviction compel (us) to act separately’.”

It also instructs the Boards of Trustees of the CRCNA and the general Synod Council of the RCA, “in looking to the future relationship between our denominations, to be guided by this principle.” “We hope that this joint resolution will give spiritual energy to our partnership,” said Borgdorff.
Borgdorff emphasizes that the resolution is not one whose endpoint is a formal merger between the denominations. Instead, it is about the mission that the churches share now and for the future.

“This resolution is intended to convey to the community that we are serious about the journey we are on. We will have false starts, but we will learn and move forward. This is about the motif and not the details.”

In the last year, the denominations have launched what is called the Reformed Collaborative, an initiative that highlights the many ways that the CRC and RCA are already working together.

The denominations are sharing resources in some 60 areas, including disability concerns, disaster response and development, seminary education, leadership training, church planting and urban ministry, information technology services, employee health care services, and joint publications.

To spread the word about this collaboration, Rev. Joel Boot, executive director of the CRC, and Rev. Tom De Vries, general secretary of the RCA, traveled to 12 communities earlier this year to hold ‘spaghetti dinners’ at which they discussed the collaboration with churches.
The term ‘spaghetti dinner’ was a way of describing the informal nature of these meetings.

“We have been talking about the many places where engagement in missions is happening between us," said De Vries in late April at the Prince Center on the campus of Calvin College.

"Collaborations are significant. As we share in many activities, we are able to more clearly see our foundation and that we are committed to a common cause."

Also at these events, they shared stories and asked people to talk about their faith, touching on how by joining with members of the other denomination they can be “better together.”
In addition, they showed a video describing the Reformed Collaborative.

The CRC Synod 2014 and the RCA’s 2014 General Assembly open with a joint worship service on Thursday evening, June 12.
 
I don't understand why so many denominations put their integrity on the line when it comes to condoning sins like homosexuality. It doesn't gain them more members but causes them to lose the members who are serious about their faith. Look at the dying Episcopal Church.
 
Seems to be the Way of all synods and denominations, colleges etc..They start off usually conservative holding to Scripture tenaciouly and then slowly begin their slide (I like to see it as a slide downhill, not to the left, as that paints a picture of equals)
I imagine next victim will be something like the Calvary Chapel movement.

P.S. What's interesting it is invariably always the more conservative of the two that is expected to 'yield'.
 
Last edited:
and once again I am given reason to thank God for my church...........goodness.........these folks will surely have to answer......
 
Galatians 1:6) I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
7 .) Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
8 .) But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
9 .) As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.
 
What's interesting it is invariably always the more conservative of the two that is expected to 'yield'.

not always...the history of the relationship between the lutheran church missouri synod and the evangelical lutheran synod and the wisconsin evangelical lutheran synod is an interesting example of the opposite...
 
not always...the history of the relationship between the lutheran church missouri synod and the evangelical lutheran synod and the wisconsin evangelical lutheran synod is an interesting example of the opposite...
When Pres. Barry of the LCMS passed unexpectedly a new president was elected and promptly started implementing his 'liberal' programs that most of the 'orthodox' LCMS'ers protested but to no avail...election after election. I haven't followed since 2005 hopefully things have turned around.
WELS and ELS joined up with each other, a small compromise on ELS' part but probably for survival as Lutheranism was shifting Liberal. I take it your point that WELS/ELS is standing firm against LCMS's slow slide downhill?
You probably have updated news, I threw in the towel with the whole scene hoping to learn historical Lutheran teaching from the BOC in a 'confessional' church but all it boiled down to was political squabbles.
 
When Pres. Barry of the LCMS passed unexpectedly a new president was elected and promptly started implementing his 'liberal' programs that most of the 'orthodox' LCMS'ers protested but to no avail...election after election. I haven't followed since 2005 hopefully things have turned around.
WELS and ELS joined up with each other, a small compromise on ELS' part but probably for survival as Lutheranism was shifting Liberal. I take it your point that WELS/ELS is standing firm against LCMS's slow slide downhill?
You probably have updated news, I threw in the towel with the whole scene hoping to learn historical Lutheran teaching from the BOC in a 'confessional' church but all it boiled down to was political squabbles.

the wisconsin synod in the mid 1800s was on the liberal side...obviously not liberal by today's standards...but their first president john muehlhaeuser was a missionary from the united rhine mission society and he followed that society's embrace of doctrinal vagueness... in those days the missouri synod was more doctrinally conservative...their first president c.f.w. walther was frequently critical of the wisconsin synod's disregard for doctrine...

that changed when muehlhaeuser retired and john bading became the wisconsin synod's second president...he steered the synod towards taking a stronger stand on doctrine and he received support in his efforts from a growing majority in his synod... shortly after bading's election the synod separated itself from the liberal leaning mission societies in germany that had contributed to its founding... the wisconsin synod also withdrew from the liberal leaning general council...

eventually the wisconsin and missouri synods found that they no longer had any doctrinal differences between them...so the two synods and a few others joined together in the synodical conference...

the synodical conference stayed united for decades until the missouri synod began to liberalize...beginning with missouri seeking unity with a liberal leaning lutheran church that eventually ended up in the ELCA... the attempted union eventually fell through but the missouri synod continued to liberalize until the evangelical lutheran synod broke fellowship with them in the 1950s and the wisconsin synod did the same and withdrew from the synodical conference in the early 1960s... missouri attempted to replace the synodical conference with a lutheran council that included its new liberal leaning allies...though the lutheran council was disbanded when missouri's partners merged to form the ELCA... the WELS continued to protest missouri's descent into more and more liberalism...

in the 1970s j.a.o. preus became president of the LCMS in an electoral upset and began to steer the synod back towards a more conservative direction...a doctrinal controversy led to preus forcing out the liberal president of the seminary and provoking a walkout of several professors and students who later found their way into the ELCA...

as you know LCMS president barry died in office in 2001 and was replaced by gerald kieschnick who was supported by those in the liberal wing of the synod that hadn't left with the seminex professors...

kieschnick's controversial presidency ended in 2010 when he was defeated in his fourth election by LCMS world relief director matthew harrison...harrison is the most conservative LCMS president in years...much like preus president harrison has been working against great adversity to steer a still deeply divided LCMS back in a conservative direction... though some of harrison's actions provoked indignant responses from the liberal wing...his leadership seems to have been mostly well received because he was reelected against a liberal candidate in 2013 with a larger margin than in 2010...actually the largest margin in thirty years... there was some speculation that many of the synod's liberal members simply did not participate which if true would suggest that the liberal wing of the synod may be in the process of giving up and moving towards disengagement rather than continued conflict...

with harrison clearly working to bring the LCMS back in a conservative direction...the WELS has begun contacts with the LCMS...discussing doctrinal issues and gently encouraging conservative doctrine in the LCMS...though nobody seems to have any illusions that a resumption of fellowship between the two synods is coming soon... for his part harrison seems to be listening to WELS's critiques with a spirit of humility and gratitude and without defensiveness...

so ironically LCMS steadfastly encouraged WELS to turn away from liberalism in the 1800s...and now WELS is likewise encouraging LCMS to turn away from liberalism nowdays...
 
Umm...if you read the article, the Joint Resolution is on the relationship of the two denomination. In essence, it's nothing more than an overture of Christian solidarity, not on all issues but that they are joined in the Body of Christ. Let's not put the cart before the horse.
 
Paul once said that the time would come when they would no longer endure sound doctrine...apparently...that time has come...