Climate Change Becoming Irreversible

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

TripleA

Banned
Jun 3, 2014
46
0
0
Global warming close to becoming irreversible-scientists | Reuters

I find this appalling, at least in a British society where climate change is taught in schools, where people understand the concepts of carbon footprint, and in so many Western countries who are part of the UN, and further afield. A recent report discovered that if every person on Earth lived like the average UK citizen, we would actually need three Earth's to sustain us. I imagine since the US food wastage rate is about 40%, and carbon footprint is about 25% of Earth's, that five or six Earth's might be needed.

Amazon Deforestation: Timelapse - YouTube

This deforestation video shows how about 15% of the Amazon has been deforested in the last 15 years. This is another big issue.

Anyone living in the UK should read the Green's Manifesto, because this is all now becoming very serious, irreversibly so. I read yesterday on National Geographic that extinction is happening 1000 times faster because of humans, too. I don't understand how the powers that be can be happy with making a superficial effort against climate change, teaching it in schools while simultaneously undermining the progress of climatic solutions in practice.
 
People used to talk about global warming.

Now they talk about climate change, because they can't even prove that the weather is actually getting warmer.

When the Berlin Wall came down, there was a consequent ideological discrediting of socialism, which supplied some kind of narrative used by politicians to justify the high taxation and high levels of government intervention that they collectively seem driven to promote. So the whole 'global warming or else climate change' narrative offers politicians a useful excuse to procrastinate, when it comes to failing to come to terms with runaway taxation and the creeping influence of expensive international organizations responsible to no one.

With the decline in religion also, people still need something to believe in, so the global warming or else climate change' narrative also offers unscrupulous politicians some supposed repository of alleged wisdom that can be presented in quasi-spiritual terms.
 
Yes. I believe in respecting the environment and doing all we can to look after it and each other but the global warming/climate change beliefs are absolute nonsense. It's just another way for mankind to worship the creation rather than the Creator.
 
Google climategate.

Its a fraud, global warming.

Proves a couple of things.

The socialist nature of the media, who are in bed with big government thinkers.

Schools becoming indoctrination centers. Like communism, the only support for it is not factual, its propaganda, started young enough to brainwash people.

The world is getting worse and worse, morally. I think we all agree on that?

How come the leftists do not realize the cause is their ideology? The world certainly is not getting more conservative.

The cry usta be, you sold your soul to the company store, now its you sold your soul for a welfare check.

Period.
 
It's amazing how easily people are taken in by this type of subterfuge. Of course the climate changes! It has for all of history. I saw a joke of a documentary on nat-geo that started out by saying we should be entering into an ice age that would cover most of Europe and North America with a mile of glacial ice and that man was altering this NATURAL phase, and how horrible it is that we are!! These buffoons can't even see how ludicrous their statement is! EVEN IF we are causing global warming, wouldn't that be a good thing? Longer growing seasons, much less energy usage to cool a house or business than heat it, less death caused by extreme cold, AND NO MILE OF ICE IN YOUR LIVING ROOM! Please don't be taken in by these cons. It's all about control over YOU and a transfer of wealth through taxation. THESE People want CONTROL over every aspect of your life, and they will stop at nothing to get it.
 
Oh dear, a whole FORUM of people who deny the deforestation of Earth, the rising temperatures, melting icecaps and multiple extinctions, in the face of MOUNTAINS of scientific evidence to back it all up.

We are in the dark ages, as far as you lot are concerned, never mind an ice-age.

The US media isn't socialist. The US media is a corporatist establishment :/

Scientific facts presented to children is not 'indoctrination', those kids are free to choose to believe what they like, however denying climate change, denying scientific analysis and proof, isn't being against indoctrination, it's living in a fantasy world. You can't deny fact, at least not if you still want to be seen as even remotely sane.

Nobody is saying don't believe in God, especially not me, who is worried about the carbon footprint, but at the same time, it's REALLY, REALLY, REALLY stupid to be totally against anything scientific out of your own narrow opinion that science and faith are mutually exclusive.

To the person who said religion is on the decline, last I checked, Islam and Christianity were growing faster than atheism was declining.

It's worrying when the majority of people who respond to a post are so out of touch with reality I don't even know where to begin the counter-argument.
 
Oh dear, a whole FORUM of people who deny the deforestation of Earth, the rising temperatures, melting icecaps and multiple extinctions, in the face of MOUNTAINS of scientific evidence to back it all up.

We are in the dark ages, as far as you lot are concerned, never mind an ice-age.

The US media isn't socialist. The US media is a corporatist establishment :/

Scientific facts presented to children is not 'indoctrination', those kids are free to choose to believe what they like, however denying climate change, denying scientific analysis and proof, isn't being against indoctrination, it's living in a fantasy world. You can't deny fact, at least not if you still want to be seen as even remotely sane.

Nobody is saying don't believe in God, especially not me, who is worried about the carbon footprint, but at the same time, it's REALLY, REALLY, REALLY stupid to be totally against anything scientific out of your own narrow opinion that science and faith are mutually exclusive.

To the person who said religion is on the decline, last I checked, Islam and Christianity were growing faster than atheism was declining.

It's worrying when the majority of people who respond to a post are so out of touch with reality I don't even know where to begin the counter-argument.

The doctrine of tolerance is adamantly preached by atheists and relativists, like TripleA, right up until the moment you disagree with them, lol.

Then they become very intolerent...
out flows the torrents of vitriol and insult.
: )

Yesterday this very tolerant fellow called me a bigot for asking him a simple question...
a question that he didn't like, lol.
 
Last edited:
Just what we need, a non-Christian to come lecture us.
 

Attachments

  • akdjbf.jpg
    akdjbf.jpg
    42.2 KB · Views: 44
Last edited:
Just what we need, a non-Christian to come lecture us.

''High and mighty, man! Can't ever listen to no non-christian, man, naw! Them's the devil! Praise the lord Jeebus for takin away our sins that the father deemed we have upon us, and for savin us from the hell he created for us unless we believe he'll save us from that hell!

Gawd I feel special!! I feel so special and thankful to ma Lord 'n Saviour that I'ma gonna be a separatist and just get all high and mighty and not follow no path of humility or servitude or charity or nuthin! Naw, brutha, I'll just spend my money on some Oakley sunglasses about a hunderd dollas and do me some travelin!

And even though my favourite verse from the epistle of Barnabus encourages against works of lawlessness and hating the deceptions of the age, well, I think I'll just be high and mighty and ignore the facts of Earth so I can live in fantasy land!

Praise brutha! I ain't gonna love no enemy or answer no genuine issue of God's green Earth on a chat forum! Not unless that damn enemy conforms to my beliefs and becomes a non-enemy!! Screw lovin' enemies!

Praise, Brutha!''


.... Please Photoss..... lol

All your faiths are about empty as your heads are.
 
Oh dear, a whole FORUM of people who deny the deforestation of Earth, the rising temperatures, melting icecaps and multiple extinctions, in the face of MOUNTAINS of scientific evidence to back it all up.

You clearly knew the sorts of replies you'd receive when choosing to submit this intentional prod of a post. The scientific consensus concerning the validity and reality of anthropogenic climate change notwithstanding, you're only attempting to elicit a response, and that's not too cool.
 
You clearly knew the sorts of replies you'd receive when choosing to submit this intentional prod of a post. The scientific consensus concerning the validity and reality of anthropogenic climate change notwithstanding, you're only attempting to elicit a response, and that's not too cool.

Actually I attempted to discuss it, and couldn't believe people still deny this like it's some conspiracy. The evidence is obvious. The CO2 level in air has, in the last 650,000 years, never gone above 300 parts per million, until today. Denying it won't make it disappear.
 
''High and mighty, man! Can't ever listen to no non-christian, man, naw! Them's the devil! Praise the lord Jeebus for takin away our sins that the father deemed we have upon us, and for savin us from the hell he created for us unless we believe he'll save us from that hell!

Gawd I feel special!! I feel so special and thankful to ma Lord 'n Saviour that I'ma gonna be a separatist and just get all high and mighty and not follow no path of humility or servitude or charity or nuthin! Naw, brutha, I'll just spend my money on some Oakley sunglasses about a hunderd dollas and do me some travelin!

And even though my favourite verse from the epistle of Barnabus encourages against works of lawlessness and hating the deceptions of the age, well, I think I'll just be high and mighty and ignore the facts of Earth so I can live in fantasy land!

Praise brutha! I ain't gonna love no enemy or answer no genuine issue of God's green Earth on a chat forum! Not unless that damn enemy conforms to my beliefs and becomes a non-enemy!! Screw lovin' enemies!

Praise, Brutha!''


.... Please Photoss..... lol

All your faiths are about empty as your heads are.

It's ok, I still love you (as a fellow human being, of course).
 
Show us the mountain of evidence for global warming...

from ONE scientist not employed by the government.

Follow the money.

Like I said google climategate....if that does not float your boat, google climategate 2.

Funny how the ice caps are melting...in -70 degree temps....eh?

Do you know it would take over 240,000 50 megaton nuclear bombs ( the biggest we have ) to raise the polar ice cap temp...one degree?

Funny how those ''scientists'' who went to the polar ice fields, got stuck in them. They didn't think the ice was there. Guess what, they were wrong.

The data for global warming was not only PROVEN to be false, it was proven to be purposefully false.

Scientists Rebut White House Global Warming Claims

Separating Science From Spin on the Global-Warming 'Pause' - NationalJournal.com

ya want numbers? Try this on for size....

31,000 scientists reject ‘global warming’ agenda
 
We have reason not to trust scientists and their conclusions on climate.

This is from a 1974 article in Time magazine. I did a nifty Google search and found it.
It sounds like the same rhetoric with a different title to it.
Another Ice Age? - TIME

In Africa, drought continues for the sixth consecutive year, adding terribly to the toll of famine victims. During 1972 record rains in parts of the U.S., Pakistan and Japan caused some of the worst flooding in centuries. In Canada's wheat belt, a particularly chilly and rainy spring has delayed planting and may well bring a disappointingly small harvest. Rainy Britain, on the other hand, has suffered from uncharacteristic dry spells the past few springs. A series of unusually cold winters has gripped the American Far West, while New England and northern Europe have...
time1.jpg

From Science magazine March 1976
The Surface of the Ice-Age Earth

[h=1]The Surface of the Ice-Age Earth[/h]

  • [*=left]CLIMAP Project Members


In the Northern Hemisphere the 18,000 B.P. world differed strikingly from the present in the huge land-based ice sheets, reaching approximately 3 km in thickness, and in a dramatic increase in the extent of pack ice and marine-based ice sheets. In the Southern Hemisphere the most striking contrast was the greater extent of sea ice. On land, grasslands, steppes, and deserts spread at the expense of forests. This change in vegetation, together with extensive areas of permanent ice and sandy outwash plains, caused an increase in global surface albedo over modern values. Sea level was lower by at least 85 m.The 18,000 B.P. oceans were characterized by: (i) marked steepening of thermal gradients along polar frontal systems, particularly in the North Atlantic and Antarctic; (ii) an equatorward displacement of polar frontal systems; (iii) general cooling of most surface waters, with a global average of –2.3°C; (iv) increased cooling and up-welling along equatorial divergences in the Pacific and Atlantic; (v) low temperatures extending equatorward along the western coast of Africa, Australia, and South America, indicating increased upwelling and advection of cool waters; and (vi) nearly stable positions and temperatures of the central gyres in the subtropical Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian oceans.

I think we've been blinded with science. And not in the good way.

This is truly leftist propaganda. The proof is in the fact the likes of Al Gore don't practice what they preach.
It's like a man standing in the middle of the road yelling at everyone not to stand in the middle of the road because it's dangerous.

al-gore-404_682507c.jpg
 
Oh this one is priceless!
Science magazine July 1971.

This one argues that increase of carbon dioxide increases cooling when coming from aerosol entities. Bwahahahahaha.
Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Aerosols: Effects of Large Increases on Global Climate

Effects on the global temperature of large increases in carbon dioxide and aerosol densities in the atmosphere of Earth have been computed. It is found that, although the addition of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere does increase the surface temperature, the rate of temperature increase diminishes with increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.For aerosols, however, the net effect of increase in density is to reduce the surface temperature of Earth. Because of the exponential dependence of the backscattering, the rate of temperature decrease is augmented with increasing aerosol content. An increase by only a factor of 4 in global aerosol background concentration may be sufficient to reduce the surface temperature by as much as 3.5 ° K. If sustained over a period of several years, such a temperature decrease over the whole globe is believed to be sufficient to trigger an ice age.

BIGLOL25257E18.GIF
 
Here i showed that they said in 1971 that carbon dioxide would cool the planet.
http://christianchat.com/christian-...change-becoming-irreversible.html#post1561092

Here the current government website says the opposite.
How much will Earth warm if carbon dioxide doubles pre-industrial levels? | NOAA Climate.gov

Scientists say that doubling pre-industrial carbon dioxide levels will likely cause global average surface temperature to rise between 1.5° and 4.5° Celsius (2.7° to 8.1° Fahrenheit)
 
heh, I see the loony leftists are busy today...
They sho iz!

Can't make up their mind.

In the 1970s they were like put on a sweater.

Now they're like..put on a tank top.

I jus don't no wut two due!

It's so bad the male models are even confused.

_7546187.jpg





THANKS AL GORE!