Obama Gives LGBT Speech - Openly Mocks God of Bible.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jun 18, 2014
755
3
0
I just want to know where the "Moral Burger" LOL. Burger Queenie is all about celebrating the sin of Sodom but where is the MORAL BURGER?

Burger King selling a
HTML:
http://www.latimes.com/food/dailydish/la-dd-burger-king-sells-a-proud-whopper-for-gay-pride-20140702-story.html


It would probably be made of farm-reared, non-corn fed beef from an animal that's legs didn't buckle under its own body weight. The slaughterhouse would employ underprivileged people working for a living wage who treated the animal with genuine respect. The burger would have bread buns from independent wheat farms given fair trade prices for their crop. It would also come without sawdust or paper.

And it would never exist in a fast food chain like Burger King because their business practices, just like McDonalds and the rest, are not moral.

People get offended because Burger King sells a 'gay whopper' but don't bat an eye when the companies keep livestock cramped, over-fed and in horrid conditions, then slaughter and mince in large batches (a practice that is a huge health risk for bacterial growth, thus for human consumption), wash with chorine solutions and also fund politicians and organizations that actively lobby against tougher food safety standards regulations that are at the end-of-the-line hugely detrimental to public health. Not only that, the companies have been known to employ illegal workers at a fraction of minimum wage, workers who have no choice but to comply to all the companies' demands to work unethically or face deportation, and these companies buy up livestock farmers then levy them with huge debts to keep them under the thumb. Independent farming is dying, and these immoral companies are what makes up the majority of meat production firms.

Seems it takes for something to be 'gay' about something before anyone wants to give a hoot.
 
Last edited:
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
You know, I agree. Obviously two wrongs do not equal a right. I'm going to amend my post to say that I want a moral vegetarian burger!

Great post Esanta!


It would probably be made of farm-reared, non-corn fed beef from an animal that's legs didn't buckle under its own body weight. The slaughterhouse would employ underprivileged people working for a living wage who treated the animal with genuine respect. The burger would have bread buns from independent wheat farms given fair trade prices for their crop. It would also come without sawdust or paper.

And it would never exist in a fast food chain like Burger King because their business practices, just like McDonalds and the rest, are not moral.

People get offended because Burger King sells a 'gay whopper' but don't bat an eye when the companies keep livestock cramped, over-fed and in horrid conditions, then slaughter and mince in large batches (a practice that is a huge health risk for bacterial growth, thus for human consumption), wash with chorine solutions and also fund politicians and organizations that actively lobby against tougher food safety standards regulations that are at the end-of-the-line hugely detrimental to public health. Not only that, the companies have been known to employ illegal workers at a fraction of minimum wage, workers who have no choice but to comply to all the companies' demands to work unethically or face deportation, and these companies buy up livestock farmers then levy them with huge debts to keep them under the thumb. Independent farming is dying, and these immoral companies are what makes up the majority of meat production firms.

Seems it takes for something to be 'gay' about something before anyone wants to give a hoot.
 
Jun 18, 2014
755
3
0
You know, I agree. Obviously two wrongs do not equal a right. I'm going to amend my post to say that I want a moral vegetarian burger!

Great post Esanta!
lol I am both shocked and very pleased at those two words.
 
Last edited:
S

Sirk

Guest
Capitofacism is what Esanta is referring too. After World War Two they had to find a way to keep the industrial machine going and with the new medium of tv they had their way of making good little consumers of us all. It is a little known fact that psychologists were employed to exploit the medium of tv and radio to make us into perpetual wanters. In some ways it has brought good things, in other ways it has greased the skids of the corporfacist machine and made it all about the profit....most often to the detriment of ethics and doing what is right.
 
Jun 18, 2014
755
3
0
Capitofacism is what Esanta is referring too. After World War Two they had to find a way to keep the industrial machine going and with the new medium of tv they had their way of making good little consumers of us all. It is a little known fact that psychologists were employed to exploit the medium of tv and radio to make us into perpetual wanters. In some ways it has brought good things, in other ways it has greased the skids of the corporfacist machine and made it all about the profit....most often to the detriment of ethics and doing what is right.
Actually I was talking about before the war. You know, the coupon work-credit scheme were the value of currency was based on the work done? That scheme that brought 6 million unemployed Germans back into work before the banks took offence and boycotted German trade?

They took offence because they had no power. The same way they took offence at Lincoln trying to create a central government bank.
 
T

ToMegaTherion

Guest
I don't know what book you've been reading but the Jesus I follow never condemned any homosexuals.
 
S

smithbr8

Guest
Deut 22:11

Deut 23:1

Lev 19:27

Even Lev 11:8

If you've done any of these things, you're in no place to judge just like the rest of us, so let people live their lives. Every action we do is a sin. You seem to be pretty proud of your stance on this. Pride. huh, isn't that a sin?
 
S

smithbr8

Guest
No your brother is making his life harder because of his choosing
to sin. You are just a victim of circumstances of his choice.
If you have to watch his suffering perhaps you can give him scripture
to help him be freed of the bondage to the sinful lifestyle he is in.
Don't blame another for speaking truth. Lay the blame where it
belongs... Followers of perversion. I pray he will be freed so he
can know peace and you also. In Christ our Lord Jesus I pray.Amen
You can't actually believe that, can you? How can you call yourself Christian? Am I worthy of love then? Do I deserve to be stoned to death? (no, I'm not homosexual)
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
We're reading the Bible. You should try it sometime. In there you would find that Jesus did, in fact, speak against homosexuality.

On numerous occasions, Jesus condemned the sins of adultery (Matthew 19:18), sexual immorality (Matthew 19:9) and fornication (Matthew 15:19). These terms describe any type of sexual intercourse that is not within the confines of a marriage ordained by God. Jesus then proceeded to define exactly what God views as a morally permissible marriage. He stated:

"Have you not read that He who made them at the beginning made them male and female, and said, “For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh”? So then, they are no longer two but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let not man separate" (Matthew 19:4-6).

By defining marriage as between one male and one female, Jesus effectively condemned all other arrangements, including but not limited to one man and two women, one woman and two men, three men and one woman, three men and three women, one man and one man, one woman and one animal, etc. You can see the overwhelming logic of such.

For Jesus to have to explicitly condemn every assortment of genders and numbers would be absurd. When He defined marriage between one man and one woman, He clearly showed that such an arrangement is the only one authorized by God.

Now is the time of repentance, forgiveness, salvation, and sanctification. But there IS coming a time when Jesus is going to judge and condemn everyone who willfully rejected God's holiness to live lives of wanton sexual immorality.

"Then I will tell them plainly, 'I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!'" -Matthew 7:23

My friend Bryan was a hard partying militant atheist who like to mock Christians and play mind games with them. He had a very near death experience in which he died of cholera and found himself before Christ. He said at that moment, before holy God Himself without the covering of Christ's salvation and sanctification: you know exactly how filthy you are. He said you're like a beast that cannot possibly be allowed into heaven for you would corrupt the place in your unregenerate immoral state. He said it was the most terrifying experience of his entire life. He's a Christian evangelist today.

[video=youtube_share;h2X5uAB692A]http://youtu.be/h2X5uAB692A[/video]


I don't know what book you've been reading but the Jesus I follow never condemned any homosexuals.
 
S

smithbr8

Guest
We're reading the Bible. You should try it sometime. In there you would find that Jesus did, in fact, speak against homosexuality.

On numerous occasions, Jesus condemned the sins of adultery (Matthew 19:18), sexual immorality (Matthew 19:9) and fornication (Matthew 15:19). These terms describe any type of sexual intercourse that is not within the confines of a marriage ordained by God. Jesus then proceeded to define exactly what God views as a morally permissible marriage. He stated:

"Have you not read that He who made them at the beginning made them male and female, and said, “For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh”? So then, they are no longer two but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let not man separate" (Matthew 19:4-6).

By defining marriage as between one male and one female, Jesus effectively condemned all other arrangements, including but not limited to one man and two women, one woman and two men, three men and one woman, three men and three women, one man and one man, one woman and one animal, etc. You can see the overwhelming logic of such.

For Jesus to have to explicitly condemn every assortment of genders and numbers would be absurd. When He defined marriage between one man and one woman, He clearly showed that such an arrangement is the only one authorized by God.

Now is the time of repentance, forgiveness, salvation, and sanctification. But there IS coming a time when Jesus is going to judge and condemn everyone who willfully rejected God's holiness to live lives of wanton sexual immorality.

"Then I will tell them plainly, 'I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!'" -Matthew 7:23

My friend Bryan was a hard partying militant atheist who like to mock Christians and play mind games with them. He had a very near death experience in which he died of cholera and found himself before Christ. He said at that moment, before holy God Himself without the covering of Christ's salvation and sanctification: you know exactly how filthy you are. He said you're like a beast that cannot possibly be allowed into heaven for you would corrupt the place in your unregenerate immoral state. He said it was the most terrifying experience of his entire life. He's a Christian evangelist today.

[video=youtube_share;h2X5uAB692A]http://youtu.be/h2X5uAB692A[/video]
....but I don't want to die.... why do I have to?
 
S

Sirk

Guest
Kenny Chesney put it this way...."I wanna go to heaven, I just don't wanna go right now".
 
Mar 1, 2012
1,353
7
0
sin hurts

it hurts everyone equally

what is worse than sin?

saying sin is ok to do because some do not believe it is sin.

to deny Christ before men, Christ will deny you before the Father.

to say sin is...ok, live and let live.....is not love, it is not christian and it is luke warm and God will spit you out of His mouth.

Love....its a verb.

Love....disciplines those who are loved.

Love....says sin is sin, helps, and most of all...

reconciles.

Love says homosexuality is a sin, God says it is a sin...

how can I not?
 
J

J-Kay-2

Guest
You can't actually believe that, can you? How can you call yourself Christian? Am I worthy of love then? Do I deserve to be stoned to death? (no, I'm not homosexual)

Smithbr8.... These questions you ask of me are legitimate. I know it
is difficult to understand Gods Word and the things He calls SIN. But
that does not mean we don't love the one who has sinned.

I have sinned before salvation and would or could be an X-rated book.
I would not put anyone down for not having the knowledge of Gods
Word. I believe we all have sinned as the Word of God said, and fall
short the Glory of God. He has given us the conviction which actually
is His spirit allowing us to be uncomfortable with a sinful lifestyle.

You and I are different in age. But that does not make us different.
I was saved at about age 23. But still sinned not knowing what I was
doing. But, God would not let me get away with being ignorant about
what sins I was committing and it took a little while to finally be delivered.

Then I hungered to know Jesus as my Savior in a more intimate way.
I wanted to love Him because He came to Earth and became human
to grow up and be our Sacrificial Lamb, "SAVIOR". It was His blood
that was shed for my sins, and every human being to be saved once
we repent.

You see God can't look upon sin. He is pure and Holy. He wants us
to share with others His love for them. So you must understand we
aren't perfect, but through Christ we can be His disciples and tell others
about Him

If I knew you, I am sure I would love you. I would like to know you better
so you can know you are loved by the Lord Jesus, and we can be called
Christian because we follow Christ.

God help you understand YOU ARE LOVED. In Christ, I am J~Kay~2
 
Mar 7, 2013
50
0
0
The height of offense to black people to compare the color of ones skin to a sexual activity one CHOOSES to engage in. Note I said engage in. Obviously we are ALL born with different sinful proclivities, BUT it is our CHOICE whether or not we engage in them. Thank you Jesus for freeing us to choose NOT to engage in them. And please, stop YOUR hatred against Bible-believing Christians. I know it is a just a tactic to try and quash dissent against speaking the truth about this perversion, but it really belies YOUR hatred against Christians.
I'm a Christian. Go lie about someone else somewhere else.
 
Mar 7, 2013
50
0
0
I wonder if the gays know Obama could care less about them and he is using them to further his ideology.

They are as much pawns for the democrat party as the palistinians were pawns of Yassar Arafat.

Idiots.
Yeah, because far right "Christians" weren't pawns to George W. Bush. Okay.

Also, nice racist undertones comparing Obama to a hate-mongering leader. You're so cool, man.
 
Mar 1, 2012
1,353
7
0
Yeah, because far right "Christians" weren't pawns to George W. Bush. Okay.

Also, nice racist undertones comparing Obama to a hate-mongering leader. You're so cool, man.
Most far right christians I knew did not like Bush, since he was, at best a moderate.

How does hate mongering leader equate to racism? You have to be black to be a hate mongerer? Blacks are stereotyped as hate mongers?

I don't get the racial component....but then I don't care about race. Maybe that is what has you confused.
 
S

Sirk

Guest
Most far right christians I knew did not like Bush, since he was, at best a moderate.

How does hate mongering leader equate to racism? You have to be black to be a hate mongerer? Blacks are stereotyped as hate mongers?

I don't get the racial component....but then I don't care about race. Maybe that is what has you confused.
It seems the gay community just wants everyone to pat them on the back and tell them:

"you are so special Timmy...you should be so very proud of the courage it took for you to stand up and just be who you are. What a brave person you are and way to go. It doesn't matter what you choose in life as long as you are happy and you get to live your life the way you want to without anyone else stepping on you......you are special....don't let anyone stamp out your most glorious light."

If they hear anything other than that they assume persecution and hatred toward them and then use all the tools at their disposal (many of which they learned from the TV) to point the finger of blame and hatred toward those who they accuse of doing the same. Militant gays, feminists and a whole host of societies "victims" are nothing more than violent emotional thugs who emotionally abuse the general population into silence and even acceptance of their anti-life "lifestyle choices".
 
Mar 1, 2012
1,353
7
0
With the combination of promotion of their agenda and the influences politics has on a principle, I think the homosexuals are trapped now.

They have become victims.

Look how that turned out for african americans. The only factor in favor of homosexuality was their income was statistically higher than the norm.

I expect that to change with their new classification as persecuted minority.

Sad, they fell for liberalism too. It will destroy them probably faster than homosexuality will
 

PennEd

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2013
12,999
8,698
113
You can't actually believe that, can you? How can you call yourself Christian? Am I worthy of love then? Do I deserve to be stoned to death? (no, I'm not homosexual)

Read your bio. Why don't you believe you can never be saved?