Gun control becomes mind control in public schools

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
It wasn't meant as a strong analogy but rather used to demonstrate to you how far from reality your own analogous attempt was.

If you seriously think that a sectarian civil war in an Islamic country with 21 million people is representative of the entire world with respect to the issue of gun control, then you are as ignorant as the Manson "family" with respect to your own ability to reason.

Obviously Mexico is a much better environment to weigh the consequences of gun control in society. First of all, they actually implemented gun control so the consequences can be assessed. Secondly, their population and land mass are big enough to provide a reasonable analysis. Thirdly, their government collects statistics and allows independent organizations to collect statistics resulting in a rich amount of data to analyze. Fourthly, they are not at war with another nation or nations nor involved in a civil war by revolutionaries looking to overthrow the government which is necessary as a control.

I can see that speaking with you means I must continually repeat myself because apparently you do not read much of what I post.

Let's try this again:

"Mexico's population is just over 112 million or around a third of ours and has many more gun murderers per year than the U.S.. But this wasn't always so. Gun murder shot upward after the law abiding citizenry were disarmed by the government yielding exactly the opposite result intended."

Mexican criminal drug organizations have operated in Mexico since 1933 when prohibition came to an end and have been smuggling narcotics into the U.S. on a major scale since the 1960s. Read: Vulliamy, Ed. Amexica: War Along the Borderline. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2010.

It wasn't until 1971 that Mexico restricted, via Reformed Article 10, the lawful right of Mexican citizens to carry firearms outside of their home (e.g. in public) and began to severely restrict what kind of firearms they could own and over time this was interpreted by Mexican courts to be very restrictive.

The primary reason for the rise in Mexican gun violence occurred because the law abiding citizens of Mexico were almost completely disarmed by the government and no long able to act as a powerful deterrent and extension of justice in Mexico to the illegally armed criminals and criminal organizations.

They were disempowered by the government to the point that they are now powerless to the extent that the cartels simply snatch their children and harvest their organs for sale and they can't do anything to stop it.

As I stated, it's gotten so bad that Mexico has recently begun loosening up their strict gun policy and allowing some of their citizenry to arm themselves again. In the areas that has occurred, cartel activity went way down. Citizen militias actually helped capture two cartel leaders and put a number of cartel cells into prison and caskets.

The cartels certainly are not snatching children in those areas.

Read: The New Government War On U.S. Gun Owners ~ Help Fix America First

Pay attention to quotes like this:

"There has clearly been a long and well-documented history of arms smuggling from the U.S., Central and South American countries, China which is the 2nd largest manufacturer of firearms in the world, and other countries which include South Korea, Israeli, and Russia and the eastern bloc; however, it is important to recognize that while the U.S. is a significant source for certain classes of weapons and ammunition the U.S. is not the primary source for the military grade weapons used by Mexican cartels and illegally armed crime groups in Mexico which account for 50% of all gun murder in Mexico."

and this:

"For actual criminals (not to be confused with good people bad laws have criminalized) will always have access to firearms in a nation and populace the size of ours even if they have to make them. Fully automatic firearms can be made from hardware store items. A shotgun can be made with a construction stapler and pipe. Even minors have made zip guns from old door knobs.

And though prohibition doesn't work on a non-island large land mass with a population the size of the USA (even uber-totalitarian China where statistics are greatly masked to present the PRC in the best possible light, all private ownership of firearms are strictly prohibited, and to commit a crime with a gun usually results in a swift death sentence has a serious rising gun violence problem), if it did, criminals can simply resort to other weapons or make IEDs and bombs instead."

All people like you do is put good people at serious risk from very bad people. Nothing more.


Lol your example of the Manson Family is ignorant because the Manson Family wasn't even a family, it was a cult of unrelated members led by Charles Manson.

Lol and you calling my example of the Syria Civil War ignroant is likewise hilariously ironic because then you go onto use the Mexican Narco-Civil War as an example.

That's the same as the Syria Civil War, its a Civil War, both sides got guns bro, both Mexican government and Cartel Forces. Crime is going to happen in your country regardless of gun ownership, and I suggest you look at gun crime statistics for America whom is not at Civil War compared to Australia, Britain, Scandanavian countries, etc., and other coutnries not at Civil War with stricter gun control policy and compare their gun crime and gun murder numbers.

Now in the Mexican Civil War, just like the Syrian Civil War both sides got guns. Merely in the Mexican Civil War, the cartels the illegal gun owners started shooting first. In the Syria Civil War the lawful gun owning citizens loyal to Assad started the Civil War by using guns they lawfully and legally own by their laws to shoot their own people. What they didn't expect was that their own people got guns and shot back. And the situation has gotten more turbulent as America and Russia been funnelling guns to both sides and international fighters from all over Earth pouring into the Syria Civil War around the globe to fight on both sides (in fairness to you Syria Civil War is not so much a Civil War like Mexico, moreso a World War inside one country at this point.)
 
Detroit police chief: "No question in my mind legal gun ownership deters crime."

Detroit police chief: 'No question in my mind' legal gun ownership deters crime - Washington Times

"Detroit has experienced 37 percent fewer robberies than it did last year, and Police Chief James Craig is crediting armed citizens for the drop. 'Criminals are getting the message that good Detroiters are armed and will use that weapon,' said Chief Craig, who has been an open advocate for private gun ownership, the Detroit News reported. 'I don’t want to take away from the good work our investigators are doing, but I think part of the drop in crime, and robberies in particular, is because criminals are thinking twice that citizens could be armed.'"
 
Detroit police chief: "No question in my mind legal gun ownership deters crime."

Detroit police chief: 'No question in my mind' legal gun ownership deters crime - Washington Times

"Detroit has experienced 37 percent fewer robberies than it did last year, and Police Chief James Craig is crediting armed citizens for the drop. 'Criminals are getting the message that good Detroiters are armed and will use that weapon,' said Chief Craig, who has been an open advocate for private gun ownership, the Detroit News reported. 'I don’t want to take away from the good work our investigators are doing, but I think part of the drop in crime, and robberies in particular, is because criminals are thinking twice that citizens could be armed.'"

Yup....a citizenry that defends itself has no need of of an overreaching corrupt greedy govt. Kudos to this Police Chief for being a patriot.
 
Unlike most public 'servants', this one has figured out that removing your front door doesn't keep the weather out of your house... lol.

Yup....a citizenry that defends itself has no need of of an overreaching corrupt greedy govt. Kudos to this Police Chief for being a patriot.
 
Oh no! Vaccinations! Vaccinate your child or keep it away from me and my family.
 
Surely the world would be a better place if society didn't have guns. I cant see anything wrong with a kid who says he hates guns. I think - yayy.
 
Surely the world would be a better place if society didn't have guns. I cant see anything wrong with a kid who says he hates guns. I think - yayy.
If we didn't have guns, we'd throw stones and javelins, or swing swords and knives at one another.

Guns are not what makes violence. People make violence. Guns just make violence easier and less personal.
 
The simple problem with guns is they make anarchy a lot more destructive when it breaks out.
If someone cuts you up while out on the road, and you pull up behind them at the lights, anger boiling, imagining blowing them away, what happens if you can actually do that because you have a gun to hand.

In countries where the guns are just not there, guess what, people do not die, because the opportunity is not there.

The counter balance is military take over, or armed violence in shops, the streets etc. I think you will find the availability of guns for use when people loose it far outweighs the threat through other means. Removing guns completely is never going to happen, but the feel a problem, grab a gun, needs to be addressed properly, not by giving both parties weapons so they just blast each other to death.

Take the case of the mother who stocked their house with guns to survive the coming apocalypse. Her son, who had serious problems, takes the guns, blows away the mother, goes to a school, and blows away a lot of kids.
So the crazy was actually in the house, who was armed by their mother because of an irrational fear of the doom that might never come. The problem is the fear, and the fear of being shot, not that life lived by love is more precious than anything else we have.
 
If we didn't have guns, we'd throw stones and javelins, or swing swords and knives at one another.

Guns are not what makes violence. People make violence. Guns just make violence easier and less personal.
Id rather you throw a rock at me than shoot me. Plus im pretty sure itd be hard to do a mass killing with a knife or a bag of rocks... The USA knows well what mass shootings are about. The UK Australia and New Zealand are examples where there is strict gun control and mass shootings dont exist or are very rare. The other thing is that in every western country, the most common origin of a shooting is coz of domestic violence. Now USA is not my country so its up to u guys.... but I think ive done a fair job at giving u reasons why gun control is not a bad thing.
 
Id rather you throw a rock at me than shoot me.
Ever here of Stephen? I don't think he would endorse rocks, either.
lol.gif


Plus im pretty sure itd be hard to do a mass killing with a knife or a bag of rocks...
And again, I doubt Stephen would agree. But serial/mass murderers weren't known in those times, either -- just Zealots and anarchists, who were crucified en masse by Rome rather than being stoned en masse by the sympathizing Sanhedrin who valued their power more than the freedom of their people

The USA knows well what mass shootings are about. The UK Australia and New Zealand are examples where there is strict gun control and mass shootings dont exist or are very rare.
They're actually very rare in the U.S., too. They are very rare everywhere. There simply aren't that many young men running around wanting to kill their classmates and teachers -- and the last couple years, those that do have been fodder for ISIS rather than the news media.

The other thing is that in every western country, the most common origin of a shooting is coz of domestic violence. Now USA is not my country so its up to u guys.... but I think ive done a fair job at giving u reasons why gun control is not a bad thing.
You're quite right about DV being a driving force behind not just gun violence, Zoii, but violence against spouses, significant others, in-laws, and children of all types. I wonder if you're aware that, regardless of what method a DV perpetrator who goes over the edge and commits murder, seventy percent of them go out and commit suicide within two hours.

We're talking a proven statistic that 1) domestic violence is the most common occurrence of gun violence throughout the world and 2) only 50% of DV homicides were committed with guns. Of 2,701 women killed in 2000, for example, 1,359 were not killed with guns. Those stats haven't shifted significantly in one direction or another in 15 years.

It isn't a simple matter of removing guns from the scene. Crimes of passion overcome the typical DV offender's normal human reaction to close-contact assault and murder.
 
This is from 2012. I think it is still relevant to the on-going battle to destroy the guns. A good example of how there are ways to peacefully disarm and silence and defeat the gun, but also testifying to the fact in America there's tons of guns. Even besides just the buyback policy, the no questions asked policy and no retribution seem good too and led to a large and successful removal of the gun from streets of America.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2t7cwR0spA
[video=youtube;r2t7cwR0spA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2t7cwR0spA[/video]
 
There will always be guns. Stating otherwise is a false assertion for the simple reason that guns can be created from items commonly available anywhere in the world including the local hardware store. Instructions and videos abound all over the Internet on how to easily assemble one from these parts. Kids even make zip guns from car antennas and door locks.

All you'll do is misuse the government to create a totalitarian society that imprisons far more of its citizens for attempting to protect themselves against criminals and criminal organizations that will ALWAYS possess and use guns even if they need to make them.

Putting the righteous at the mercy of the unrighteous to be victimized by them without adequate ability to defend themselves is evil.

Read the entire thread. Read my posts. Read this: The New Government War On U.S. Gun Owners ~ Help Fix America First

I'm always left scratching my head when people attempt to correlate islands with relatively small populations to large land masses with very large populations because the correlations break down rather rapidly. New Zealand is a cluster of islands with 4.5 million people and a very specific culture that doesn't extrapolate to 57,308,738 square land miles populated by 7.2 billion people.

Hey I know, let's use Catalina Island as the justification to leave the aggregate of righteous people defenseless from the victimization of the unrighteous in the world. Ludicrous. If you're looking for a large land mass with a sizable population to conduct gun control studies on, look no farther than Mexico and read my posts that address it.

In any event, all strict gun control did for England was make it the most violent country in Europe: How Gun Control Made England The 'Most Violent Country In Europe' - Breitbart

The World Health Organization (WHO) 2012 'Inter-country Comparison of Mortality for Selected Cause of Death' European Detailed Mortality Database (DMDB) statistics show that guns aren't even the issue. For example, Norway has a gun ownership rate many times that of the United Kingdom: yet Norway has a much lower gun murder rate than the United Kingdom has. Many nations with far higher gun ownership rates have lower gun murder rates than the United Kingdom which has some of the strictest gun control laws in the world.

And though the United States doesn't list in the top ten countries by firearm-related death rate, we do have a problem with black males murdering black people. Close to half of all gun homicide in the U.S. is statistically attributable to black males which represent only 6% of the population.

The logical answer is not to disarm 330 million people leaving them defenseless to victimization from millions of criminals, street gangs, organized crime, domestic and foreign cartels, etc..., which is an evil and immoral act to take, but rather to adequately address the handful of areas responsible for the bulk of the problem.

Gun control is a very bad thing when it leaves righteous people defenseless and victimized by the unrighteous. In fact, it's evil. But I'll allow gun control for the unrighteous. The problem is, of course, that it doesn't work. Criminal felons who've committed serious crimes are not lawfully permitted to own or possess firearms but statistics show those laws aren't working because career criminals simply obtain or make their own guns and continue committing crimes anyways.


Id rather you throw a rock at me than shoot me. Plus im pretty sure itd be hard to do a mass killing with a knife or a bag of rocks... The USA knows well what mass shootings are about. The UK Australia and New Zealand are examples where there is strict gun control and mass shootings dont exist or are very rare. The other thing is that in every western country, the most common origin of a shooting is coz of domestic violence. Now USA is not my country so its up to u guys.... but I think ive done a fair job at giving u reasons why gun control is not a bad thing.
 
Last edited:
AgeofKnowledge and vigilant warrior you don't have to convince me. Its your country. The FBI does say the number of mass shooting incidents has dramatically risen over the last decade Number of mass shootings in US has risen sharply, FBI report says | World news | The Guardian
I used NZ and Aust and UK as examples but if you don't like these as examples there are plenty others. The FBI also say there is a relationship between gun ownership levels and shootings. But like i said, its your country so i don't want my comments to come off as offensive.
 
This is from 2012. I think it is still relevant to the on-going battle to destroy the guns. A good example of how there are ways to peacefully disarm and silence and defeat the gun, but also testifying to the fact in America there's tons of guns. Even besides just the buyback policy, the no questions asked policy and no retribution seem good too and led to a large and successful removal of the gun from streets of America.
Buyback policies and "no questions asked" collection days do nothing to even dent the local gun supply, much less offer any hope of police really getting guns off the streets and out of the hands of thugs and gangstas.

Is a local "unlicensed" gun dealer going to sell the police a gun for $10, or sell it to a 14-year-old wannabe who needs to earn his street creds for $50? The answer is obvious. As to "no questions asked," the majority of guns that get turned in at the collection points either don't work and can't be fixed, or they are "heritage guns," weapons that were willed to someone who doesn't want them. Sure, you get the occasional magnanimous donation, but they are few and far between..

Your vision of a gun-free America might be admirable in some ways, but law-abiding citizens legally licensed to have guns aren't going to give them up, and neither are the unlaw-abiding citzens who have them and refuse to surrender them. It's a lost cause. Better to encourage ways in which the gang mentality can be undermined and the thugs turned into productive citizens before they even become thugs.

And no, I don't mean a federal spending program.

I mean the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
 
Last edited: