Ha, that is only 5 of the same 14 skulls. But thanks.
Hi timeline...do you think that there is an conflict between the creation account of Genesis and the theories put forward in an attempt to support the theory of evolution. Isn't it funny how the obvious genetic adaptation of the horse is put forward as evidence of evolution. I too would be intrigued to find an exhibit in a museum displaying evidence of evolution....let me know how you get on.I keep finding the same 14 skulls and some "well-founded evolution of the horse" (featuring hand-drawn pictures). As well as a several sites offering a bunch of "information" and no pictures of fossils.
Timeline, I'm not sure what you're getting at. Most museums perpetuate an evolutionary understanding.
I know what your saying Tintin but do you know of any that have actual scientific evidence, I think that's what Timeline is getting at. What do you feel about the Genesis account of creation and how do you feel theories of evolution have an impact on the gospel?Timeline, I'm not sure what you're getting at. Most museums perpetuate an evolutionary understanding.
Hi timeline...do you think that there is an conflict between the creation account of Genesis and the theories put forward in an attempt to support the theory of evolution. Isn't it funny how the obvious genetic adaptation of the horse is put forward as evidence of evolution. I too would be intrigued to find an exhibit in a museum displaying evidence of evolution....let me know how you get on.
I know what your saying Tintin but do you know of any that have actual scientific evidence, I think that's what Timeline is getting at. What do you feel about the Genesis account of creation and how do you feel theories of evolution have an impact on the gospel?
I fully agree, in fact I personally feel that a belief in Theistic Evolution requires you to park the scriptures on one side and rely on the imagination of man. Einstein made an interesting a very thought provoking statement when he said "imagination is more powerful than knowledge". Certainly in today's' openly God hating society when it comes to theories on mans origin the imagination of man seems to have deluded many. It's really hard to believe (and sad to see) that so many otherwise rational people seem to e prepared to stake so much on a theory which has no concrete evidence to back it up and what little evidence there is, is so shot through with holes that were it about any other subject, would be completely dismissed as fantasy.Oh, it's constant source of frustration to me. I'm a biblical creationist and I absolutely believe that evolutionary beliefs (theistic or not) create huge stumbling blocks for people who may consider Christ, for new Christians and even for the mature Christians. Theistic evolution requires great compromise. It's not necessarily a salvation issue (although, it can quickly become as slippery-slope to unbelief) but nor is creation/evolution a secondary issue within the Church.
I understand that what is proven and what is not are the same to you.If hard science based upon the proven laws of physics can't be ignored, then neither can the fact that the Earth is older than 6000 years old.
Keeping in mind that its impact on the gospel is not the basis for the truth or falsehood of evolution.I know what your saying Tintin but do you know of any that have actual scientific evidence, I think that's what Timeline is getting at. What do you feel about the Genesis account of creation and how do you feel theories of evolution have an impact on the gospel?
You're right Elin....it's truth we are all seeking....but as Gods word is Truth and bearing in mind that scripture should always be used to interpret scripture, a man made theory such as evolution which attacks the very foundations of scripture's veracity is something to be guarded against. Personally I can't see how a position of "theistic evolution " is sustainable......it's lukewarm and we all know about lukewarm?Keeping in mind that its impact on the gospel is not the basis for the truth or falsehood of evolution.
Elin, are you involved at all in evangelistic work?Keeping in mind that its impact on the gospel is not the basis for the truth or falsehood of evolution.
I totally agree.You're right Elin....it's truth we are all seeking....but as Gods word is Truth and bearing in mind that scripture should always be used to interpret scripture, a man made theory such as evolution which attacks the very foundations of scripture's veracity is something to be guarded against. Personally I can't see how a position of "theistic evolution " is sustainable......it's lukewarm and we all know about lukewarm?
I hear you loud and clear, and understand.Elin, are you involved at all in evangelistic work?
my experience of working with young folk, especially in the student community is, that
evolutionary theories are one, if not in fact the biggest, stumbling block to any serious acceptance of the Truth of Gods word.
NO CREATION, SO NO FALL, SO NO SIN, SO NO NEED FOR SALVATION AND NO TRUST THAT THE BIBLE IS NOT JUST A FAIRY STORY.
This I also understand very well.Ps I accept that only the Spirit moves a sinners hardened sinful heart to see through Satan's lies......I speak from experience.
NO CREATION, SO NO FALL, SO NO SIN, SO NO NEED FOR SALVATION AND NO TRUST THAT THE BIBLE IS NOT JUST A FAIRY STORY.
That is not the only scenario if evolution is true.
Humanity can still be a sinner, and still be in need of salvation, and Jesus can still come to earth as a savior if it so happens that the earliest humans were more then two and did not come into existence through some supernatural process (such as being formed from dirt and rib).
I believe it is self evident already that we are a fallen species, since we can see so much evil in the present day (and also in the past), that we are in need of a savior. And I don't think it rests on whether or not sin came into the world through two individuals. Because if humans first went against God's wishes at a time period in which there was more then just two of us, does that negate our sinful nature and necessity of Jesus? I think not.