The attack of the KJV

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Feb 9, 2010
2,486
39
0
Maybe it is leading up to the interpretation of the Bible that God said would be in the last days by a slow process like playing a song on the piano and then only changing one note one in a while until it becomes a whole new song down the road.

The Bible says that in the latter times some will depart from the faith giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of devils,which means that the devil will use a false interpretation of the Bible to deceive the world,an interpretation that exalts people based on nature worship and recognizes the God of forces whihc is the beast's agenda to establish a kingdom that is all about people with no governmental or religious authority above them,which will pave the way for the man of sin to appear.

This will be an interpretation that all religions will accept for Jesus is not the Savior but a good teacher as well as other good teachers of spiritual enlightment.

During the reign of the one world goverment and religious system the spiritual leader of the one world religious system will display that interpretation to all religions therefore effecting all religions and therefore effecting all nations.

During the reign of the one world religious system people can practice any religion they want but cannot try to convert someone to their religion or they will be guilty of a hate crime punishable in the international court system because all religions are valid for spiritual enlightment which the spiritual leader will cause all religions to heed to the interpretation of the Bible that exalts people.

So this means that whoever is the spiritual leader of the one world religious system has to be a person that confesses the Bible and is very well known throughout the world.

I wonder who that could be Hmm.

It is obvious who it will be who also says that anybody that seeks the will of God on earth has salvation even if they do not accept Christ and wants to unify all Christian denominations as well as all religions.

So it is obvious why this happened and that is because they have been infiltrated at there headquarters to change it from within,get in the cardinal positions and elect the Pope of their choosing,so they have been slowly changing to that false interpretation of the Bible that will deceive the world,but they are a blending of paganism and Christianity so it would not hard for them to change and it would be easy for the religions to accept them especially since Jesus is not the Savior.

I believe that interpretation is already out there in it's completed form believed by people like the New Age religion,which I do not know if the new versions of the Bible will go to it's completed form,but it could be used by little things in the Bible to get people to think in that direction.

So there will be an attack on the KJV for it has to be which that interpretation of the Bible that exalts people will eventually overtake the world and fundamental Christianity will no longer be tolerated.

Which goes along with this scripture,for the time will come when they will not endure the truth of the Bible,but according to their own lusts will they heap teachers to themselves having itching ears,and they will turn from the truth and be turned on to fables.

Notice it says they will want to believe the Bible according to their own lusts,their own lusts,which means they want personal power,which that interpretation that exalts man and believes you can get power through nature will give them,or so they believe but when they get to the beast kingdom and the beast and they take the mark they will find out there is no power that a person can get through nature.

Attack on the KJV of the Bible is inevitable and cannot be thwarted for it is close to the time for God to give the world their way for 7 years to rebel against the truth so He can put them down,which the devil will use a false interpretation of the Bible to decieve the world,and pave the way for the man of sin to appear claiming to be God.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
The verses in the bible that talk about unicorns are not talking about animals at all... the unicorn is Christ.
While there are spiritual aspects or parallels that can be made in Scripture (Especially with Jesus Christ because the volume of the book speaks of Him), there is also the general main intended meaning of what the text is actually saying, too. For example: Scripture says, "Christ our passover is sacrificed for us." Without a real reference to what an actual passover actually is, we would have no frame of reference to what Paul was talking about to the Corinthians. For the passover is a lamb. Just as unicorn is a unicorn or one horned animal.
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
Maybe it is leading up to the interpretation of the Bible that God said would be in the last days by a slow process like playing a song on the piano and then only changing one note one in a while until it becomes a whole new song down the road.

The Bible says that in the latter times some will depart from the faith giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of devils,which means that the devil will use a false interpretation of the Bible to deceive the world,an interpretation that exalts people based on nature worship and recognizes the God of forces whihc is the beast's agenda to establish a kingdom that is all about people with no governmental or religious authority above them,which will pave the way for the man of sin to appear.

This will be an interpretation that all religions will accept for Jesus is not the Savior but a good teacher as well as other good teachers of spiritual enlightment.

During the reign of the one world goverment and religious system the spiritual leader of the one world religious system will display that interpretation to all religions therefore effecting all religions and therefore effecting all nations.

During the reign of the one world religious system people can practice any religion they want but cannot try to convert someone to their religion or they will be guilty of a hate crime punishable in the international court system because all religions are valid for spiritual enlightment which the spiritual leader will cause all religions to heed to the interpretation of the Bible that exalts people.

So this means that whoever is the spiritual leader of the one world religious system has to be a person that confesses the Bible and is very well known throughout the world.

I wonder who that could be Hmm.

It is obvious who it will be who also says that anybody that seeks the will of God on earth has salvation even if they do not accept Christ and wants to unify all Christian denominations as well as all religions.

So it is obvious why this happened and that is because they have been infiltrated at there headquarters to change it from within,get in the cardinal positions and elect the Pope of their choosing,so they have been slowly changing to that false interpretation of the Bible that will deceive the world,but they are a blending of paganism and Christianity so it would not hard for them to change and it would be easy for the religions to accept them especially since Jesus is not the Savior.

I believe that interpretation is already out there in it's completed form believed by people like the New Age religion,which I do not know if the new versions of the Bible will go to it's completed form,but it could be used by little things in the Bible to get people to think in that direction.

So there will be an attack on the KJV for it has to be which that interpretation of the Bible that exalts people will eventually overtake the world and fundamental Christianity will no longer be tolerated.

Which goes along with this scripture,for the time will come when they will not endure the truth of the Bible,but according to their own lusts will they heap teachers to themselves having itching ears,and they will turn from the truth and be turned on to fables.

Notice it says they will want to believe the Bible according to their own lusts,their own lusts,which means they want personal power,which that interpretation that exalts man and believes you can get power through nature will give them,or so they believe but when they get to the beast kingdom and the beast and they take the mark they will find out there is no power that a person can get through nature.

Attack on the KJV of the Bible is inevitable and cannot be thwarted for it is close to the time for God to give the world their way for 7 years to rebel against the truth so He can put them down,which the devil will use a false interpretation of the Bible to decieve the world,and pave the way for the man of sin to appear claiming to be God.
I would say your post nailed it!
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
While there are spiritual aspects or parallels that can be made in Scripture (Especially with Jesus Christ because the volume of the book speaks of Him), there is also the general main intended meaning of what the text is actually saying, too. For example: Scripture says, "Christ our passover is sacrificed for us." Without a real reference to what an actual passover actually is, we would have no frame of reference to what Paul was talking about to the Corinthians. For the passover is a lamb. Just as unicorn is a unicorn or one horned animal.
In other words, if unicorns were mythological, and you were trying to make a parallel with that passage involving Jesus Christ, then you would be comparing Jesus to something that is not real. This is wrong. And it is what many are starting to do with the Scriptures already as "M-Paper-345" has said. They are turning the Scriptures into fables. Sorry, I don't believe unicorns are fables. They exist today. Not the unicorns of mythology. But there are unicorns (one horned animals) according to Science.
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
In other words, if unicorns were mythological, and you were trying to make a parallel with that passage involving Jesus Christ, then you would be comparing Jesus to something that is not real. This is wrong. And it is what many are starting to do with the Scriptures already as "M-Paper-345" has said. They are turning the Scriptures into fables. Sorry, I don't believe unicorns are fables. They exist today. Not the unicorns of mythology. But there are unicorns (one horned animals) according to Science.
I disagree, I think the unicorn verses are stumbling block verses for those who bash the KJV. The carnal mind sees unicorn and knows unicorns don't exist therefore the KJV is not the inerrant word of God. The spirit led person investigates to find out what the unicorn represents... one horn.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,408
113
Why would the translators employ the use of mythical creatures like "unicorn" for wild ox, "satyr" for "wild goat", "cockatrice" for common viper, when they knew what the real name of these creatures are?
Because they wasn't inspired HAHAHA
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
I disagree, I think the unicorn verses are stumbling block verses for those who bash the KJV. The carnal mind sees unicorn and knows unicorns don't exist therefore the KJV is not the inerrant word of God. The spirit led person investigates to find out what the unicorn represents... one horn.
Are unicorns mythological to you in the Bible?

Are dragons mythological to you in the Bible?

Yes, there may be spiritual parallels being made about both of these creatures but the moment you say they are fables is to say that the Bible can't be read literally or trusted.

For where does God compare Himself to something fictional?
What does that say about God if He does compare Himself to something that is not real?
 
Last edited:
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
Because they wasn't inspired HAHAHA
Well, it is just silly to claim that unicorns are just a reference to mythological creatures.

We have Science books on Unicorns today. They are not talking about mythological unicorns, but they are talking about real unicorns (one horned animals) that exist today or in recent history.

Although, I seen one Science book that said "Unicorns" on it with a Rhino on the cover; here are two of other books that you can check out or purchase at Amazon:

The Natural History of Unicorns - Kindle edition by Chris Lavers. Politics & Social Sciences Kindle eBooks @ Amazon.com.
Unicorns are an Endangered Species: John Tobias: 9781595944245: Amazon.com: Books
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,408
113
Well, it is just silly to claim that unicorns are just a reference to mythological creatures.

We have Science books on Unicorns today. They are not talking about mythological unicorns, but they are talking about real unicorns (one horned animals) that exist today or in recent history.

Although, I seen one Science book that said "Unicorns" on it with a Rhino on the cover; here are two of other books that you can check out or purchase at Amazon:

The Natural History of Unicorns - Kindle edition by Chris Lavers. Politics & Social Sciences Kindle eBooks @ Amazon.com.
Unicorns are an Endangered Species: John Tobias: 9781595944245: Amazon.com: Books
You don't have to convince me bro....I believe there are things found in the bible that would melt the average person's brain if they actually comprehended what is being said.....

Do a complete study on chariots as applied unto the angels and GOD....
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
Are unicorns mythological to you in the Bible?

Are dragons mythological to you in the Bible?

Yes, there may be spiritual parallels being made about both of these creatures but the moment you say they are fables is to say that the Bible can't be read literally or trusted.

For where does God compare Himself to something fictional?
What does that say about God if He does compare Himself to something that is not real?
Can we literally read this verse? If so could you please explain how we take this literally.

Jdg 9:15 And the bramble said unto the trees, If in truth ye anoint me king over you, then come and put your trust in my shadow: and if not, let fire come out of the bramble, and devour the cedars of Lebanon.
 

Angela53510

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2011
11,786
2,958
113
king james used changed words that are NNOT CORRECT but that now can have 5 different meanings

and the last is divorce


Where the original king james version says DIVORCE
and all other translations say DIVORCE

the kjv changed the word DIVORCE to say
PUT AWAY

which allows people to argue that it isnet divorce they are talking about
but DEATH

Or SEPARATION
or TRAVELING
or NOT THINKING ABOUT ONE ANOTHER

why did they do this?

becasue king henry 8th divorced and all his children are ILLEGITIMATE
and so king james
an ILLIGITIMATE SON HAD to get rid of DIVORCE and make it ok to divorce

so they invented this

ONCE YOU ARE WAVED YOU ARE ALWAYS SSAVED< a little thig you do such as divorce doesnt remove kingship
and
Divorce is really ok because it doesnt mead divorce it means DEATH which king henry did 6 times with his wives/....

king henry was a prevert
he was a DIVORCEE
and he REMARRIED 6 times
and all his heris inculding the whole english monarchy is illigitimate


now that is hot news

it is not about kjv

it is about a english pervert king and his illigitimate sones.



so put your strawman away

the KJV is the word of God

the enlgish words use are the word of God

but the word choices allow armgument
false doctrine to exist
and allow
rediculaous doctrines to exist

(God does not torture beings for eternity, that is rediculaous
he is not marquis di sade/


so King james is not attacked

King HENRY is attacked

because he was a pervert.
This is historically inaccurate. King Henry the VIII had one daughter by his first wife, Catherine of Aragon, who became Mary 1, Queen of England. Although he divorced his first wife, you would have to agree that the daughter of his first wife was legitimate.

However, the nick-name for Mary was "Bloody Mary." She came to the throne and attempted to bring back Catholicism to England. She killed so many Protestants, that the Tower of London ran red with blood.

Before Mary came to the throne, Edward VI was king from Oct. 1537 to July 1553. He was the son of Henry VIII and Jane Seymour, the first British monarch raised as a Protestant. The Regency Council which ruled because Edward VI was a minor, devised a line of succession to prevent Catholics from becoming Monarchs which ultimately was overturned. Edward VI abolished clerical celibacy and the Mass in favour of more Biblical practices.

Mary I 1553- 1558 "Bloody Mary" See above.

Elizabeth I 1558-1603 Also called "Good Queen Bess," she master minded the defeat of the Spanish Armada, establishing England as a world naval power. Her reign is also known as the "Elizabethan Era, " for the flourishing of English drama, including Shakespeare and Christopher Marlowe. Her 44 years as Queen provided stability for the kingdom and helped establish and English identity! She never married, and had no children.

The Tudor Dynasty ended with her reign.

THUS, THE END OF THE CHILDREN OF HENRY VIII!!!

James I was also James VI of Scotland. 1603-1625
He inherited the throne as the son of Mary, Queen of Scots, the granddaughter of Margaret Tudor, the sister of Henry VIII.

However, the thing that convinces me that James I was NOT a godly man, is his known reputation as a homosexual.

"His education, although thorough, was weighted with strong Presbyterian and Calvinist political doctrine, and his character – highly intelligent and sensitive, but also fundamentally shallow, vain, and exhibitionist – reacted violently to this. He also sought solace with extravagant and unsavoury male favourites who, in later years, were to have a damaging effect on his prestige and state affairs."

King James I

While he did bring about the writing of the KJV 1611, he certainly was a man of low moral character, which really turns me away from the Bible he had translated.

Again, James I, was NOT the son of Henry VIII. His only touching point with Henry, was that his great-grandmother was Henry's sister! I think James was quite capable of being a sinner in his own right, just like the rest of us!
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
You don't have to convince me bro....I believe there are things found in the bible that would melt the average person's brain if they actually comprehended what is being said.....

Do a complete study on chariots as applied unto the angels and GOD....
Then why did you laugh like it was talking about mythological unicorns when it was not?
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
Can we literally read this verse? If so could you please explain how we take this literally.

Jdg 9:15 And the bramble said unto the trees, If in truth ye anoint me king over you, then come and put your trust in my shadow: and if not, let fire come out of the bramble, and devour the cedars of Lebanon.
You're not getting it, my friend. In order for me to understand this allegory, there needs to be real things in it for me to compare it to something else. For example. It says trees. If I did not know what a tree was, or if trees were based off something that didn't exist, then there really is no frame of reference for me to understand the meaning of the allegory.
 
Last edited:
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
Why would the translators employ the use of mythical creatures like "unicorn" for wild ox, "satyr" for "wild goat", "cockatrice" for common viper, when they knew what the real name of these creatures are?
What is a satyr?

satyr (n.)
woodland deity, companion of Bacchus, late 14c., from Latin satyrus, from Greek satyros, of unknown origin. In pre-Roman Greek art, a man-like being with the tail and ears of a horse; the modern conception of a being part man, part goat is from Roman sculptors, who seem to have assimilated them to the fauns of native mythology. In some English bibles used curiously to translate Hebrew se'irim, a type of hairy monster superstitiously believed to inhabit deserts.

Are satyr's real? Absolutely not. A satyr is the physical representation of the spiritual Baphomet. Baphomet is the fusion of opposites... Yin and Yang, black and white, Democracy and Communism, truth and lies, Christianity and Islam, KJV and modern translations. The spirit of Baphomet is unleashed on a nation when the nation turns their back on God

Isa_13:21 But wild beasts of the desert shall lie there; and their houses shall be full of doleful creatures; and owls shall dwell there, and satyrs shall dance there.
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
You're not getting it, my friend. In order for me to understand this allegory, there needs to be real things in it for me to compare it to something else. For example. It says trees. If I did not know what a tree was, or if trees were based off something that didn't exist, then there really is no frame of reference for me to understand the meaning of the allegory.
You know what a unicorn is... it is a one horned horse whether it exists or not makes no difference, it's existence has no affect on your understanding of what the unicorn is.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
You know what a unicorn is... it is a one horned horse whether it exists or not makes no difference, it's existence has no affect on your understanding of what the unicorn is.
It makes all the world of difference. For God is not compared to something mythological. That would be sending the wrong message about Himself.
 

Nick01

Senior Member
Jul 15, 2013
1,272
26
48
I disagree, I think the unicorn verses are stumbling block verses for those who bash the KJV. The carnal mind sees unicorn and knows unicorns don't exist therefore the KJV is not the inerrant word of God. The spirit led person investigates to find out what the unicorn represents... one horn.
Deuteronomy speaks of the Lord as having horns like that of the unicorn/wild ox. There is nothing in the Hebrew text to indicate a one horned animal - this comes from the use of monokeros in the Septuagint, which became unicornos in the Latin, which became unicorn in the KJV. Basically each of these translations came about in reference to an obscure animal that no one really knew anything about, and so they shoved the closest thing they could come up with in.
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
Deuteronomy speaks of the Lord as having horns like that of the unicorn/wild ox. There is nothing in the Hebrew text to indicate a one horned animal - this comes from the use of monokeros in the Septuagint, which became unicornos in the Latin, which became unicorn in the KJV. Basically each of these translations came about in reference to an obscure animal that no one really knew anything about, and so they shoved the closest thing they could come up with in.
The KJV is not a direct translation of the copies of the originals, words were added and words were changed. The KJV gives greater revelation than the copies of the originals.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
Two words.

Time Machine.

The only way we can know is by observable evidence.

People uss the word "unicorn" today in Science.
 
Last edited:
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
Two words.

Time Machine.

The only way we can know is by observable evidence.

People uss the word "unicorn" today in Science.
It doesn't matter if you could see the originals, the verses about the unicorn were not revealed in the Hebrew scriptures. Those verses weren't revealed until the word was changed to unicorn.