Crimes of the Elite Against Children

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.
No this is what I mean:

[video=youtube_share;wFNO2sSW-mU]http://youtu.be/wFNO2sSW-mU[/video]

From the makers of 'Monty Python'... such fun... :D

my-boyfriend-just-told-me-that-his-love-for-is-inversely-related-to-the-amount-average-population-expect-spanish-inquisition-because.gif
 
Yes and time for an Allinvalid commercial:

[video=youtube;jyYFoXV6iAs]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyYFoXV6iAs[/video]
 
AgeofKnowledge still sowing his disinformation and covering up? Too bad. It's all bound to fully surface, and because lies are founded on truth, truth must win inevitably even if at the very end. The Bible says, "I urge you, brothers and sisters, to watch out for those who cause divisions and put obstacles in your way that are contrary to the teaching you have learned. Keep away from them" (Rom. 16:17). People like AgeofKnowledge can freely run around trying to bully and intimidate people because most churches and Christian organizations and sites don't practice this.

Meanwhile, ThomistColin can't seem to stop checking out my posts. ThomistColin, there is no light in the Vatican or in authentic Catholic practice. I find it such a dismay that in religion and tradition, people are fond of being loyal to intangible things (religion and tradition) that are not loyal to them in return. Better to be loyal to Christ Himself instead of a dead religion that compulsively hates and persecutes Him.
 
LOLOL... if you would post something other than ridiculous nonsense Allin, you might have a chance. Find some dirt on Barack Hesoinsane Obama. How many kids is he barbecuing? Does the Pope and Queen Elizabeth II snack with him? What brand of sauce do they like?
 
Oh this is rich...british royals hunting children like animals? where do you find this junk?

well i can believe it, ive heard that they are great barbecued with a vidalia onion sauce but are so hard to clean it just isnt worth the effort. i guess when you have as many servants as the royals it wouldnt matter. (PLEASE do not take this seriously.)
 
LOLOL... if you would post something other than ridiculous nonsense Allin, you might have a chance. Find some dirt on Barack Hesoinsane Obama. How many kids is he barbecuing? Does the Pope and Queen Elizabeth II snack with him? What brand of sauce do they like?

What you don't understand is that many more people know about and believe these things than just a few years ago. Don't be angry if I take you to school in the summer. Come with me:

Your method, as you all apply, in this thread and the other like it (http://christianchat.com/conspiracy...orum/97103-crimes-elite-against-children.html) is several-fold. Let me share some, not with you but with people who are not accustomed to the way disinformation and damage control worse:

1. If it was up to you, you would have these threads of mine closed down. Since you can't do that, the best thing you can do is attack my person and character and try to discredit me as a person. Unfortunately, most Americans believe that if a person is on drugs or 'mentally unstable', whatever that means, then they cannot be believed. In order to suppress the truths that I've presented, that is your focus, because to discredit a person is the fastest way to disqualify anything they say.

2. You want to further discredit me by drawing me into a fight. Again, a lot of people unfortunately believe that if a person retaliates against attack, the person who reacted, rather than the instigator, is in the wrong. It's backward, but it's how many people see things. You have gone so far in trying to draw me into a fight, and so discredit what I say here which is very important to you, that when you attacked me on this thread (http://christianchat.com/conspiracy...orum/97103-crimes-elite-against-children.html) and I answered by saying, "God bless you", you then went and dragged up a recent thread of mine (and you have been doing a lot of research just to discredit this thing about satanism and child abuse among the elite and to discredit me) about ebola and colloidal silver: http://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/96907-recent-ebola-threat-cure.html. You attacked the thread out of nowhere with your own brand of disinformation about colloidal silver, a cure for many ailments which the government has worked and works to suppress from the people.

Because I shared articles about the global elite's mostly unknown crimes, you became hostile and overly aggressive, trying to indimidate me to shut up (don't waste your time). You act 100% like the people who take part in the article in the OP and perpetrators of ritual abuse. I believe that if people were to read my threads and then contrast what I say with your hostile personal attacks and the way you try to cover for people who've been accused by the International Court (not by Allin) of high crimes of a satanic, sexual, and abusive nature against innocent children, the real question really is this: who is it that you work for? You have the right to plead the fifth, but don't try to convince anyone that 'Allin is crazy'. You apparently have seen many Christians and people crumble under constant and sustained attacks of a malicious nature. Welcome to a new breed.
 
I want to re-post this about Queen Elizabeth's and the Pope Francis' child trafficking and the cover-ups they employed:

More recently, from this past March, the UK High Court Justice Fulford, a long time advisor to Queen Elizabeth, was named as a co-defendant along with Pope Francis, in international court proceedings looking into their involvement in cleric child abuse, trafficking rings and evidence cover ups. Judge Fulford threw out 22,000 pieces of evidence in a 2011 Hague ICC International court that implicated the former Pope Joseph Ratzinger to child rapists. This same Brussels international court issued arrest warrants on Queen Elizabeth and former Pope Joseph Ratzinger after finding them guilty, along with 38 other global elites, in the rape, torture and murder of over 50,000 missing Canadian indigent children. Did you know that Queen Elizabeth was actually convicted on February 28, 2013 in the disappearance of ten native children from the British Columbia Catholic Kamloops residential school on October 10, 1964? Pope Ratzinger resigned from office that same day on February 28, 2013. So, how does the Queen retain her title and stay out of prison? Pope Francis’, Pope Benedict’s and Queen Elizabeth’s use of a Vatican agreement called “Crimen Sollicitationas” prevented release of information to legal authorities for prosecution of crimes against an estimated millions of priest child abuse victims.

Also, International Common Law Court of Justice Action Units ready to prevent schedule occult torture and rituals and sacrifices planned to take place in Catholic churches on Aug. 15, 2014 (first article):
http://itccs.org/

And ThomistColin, don't forget to read this:
"Dr. Alberto Rivera" Ex Jesuit Father Fr. Priest
 
Well, I don't think we should be too hasty in throwing away this claim. There is sadly a bit a of truth to this claim. However, I am not too sure on whether Pope Francis, Queen Elizabeth, or George Bush are involved in such stuff. I have not heard such things about those three people. So it is prudent to have a little bit of caution when examining such claims.

After all we all know the catholic church has famously been infiltrated by foul pagans and witches for centuries, and in recent times the rampant molestation cases tied to the catholic church is appalling. Though I personally have never seen any sort of proof to take this up to the level of Pope. Therefore I would reason the molesters in the catholic church are in all likelihood low-level infiltrators.

In terms of national/international leaders though, this is where things get tricky. Due to their status, many prominent politicians are able to hde their crimes for decades. Even more disheartening is when they are caught there is typically no reprisal or else a small slap on the wrist.

For an example of this I think we really need look no further than Silvio Berlusconi of Italy.

Now I'm not saying all national leaders are pedos, but I certainly don't think we should be too quick to dismiss such claims especially when there is real cases of this occuring. We also shouldn't pursue vain rumors with no substance. Therefore let us watch and be vigilant.
 
Allin, when it comes down to the two of us. I have stopped responding, or tried to since I'm posting this. Do I check posts that I've posted in? Yes. More often than not, I simply click "view first unread" on the most recent page. Believe it or not, I'm more interested in the posts by AgeofKnowledge than yours. So, Allin, when it comes down to you and me, I ask only one thing, will you kindly shut up.
 
Allin, when it comes down to the two of us. I have stopped responding, or tried to since I'm posting this. Do I check posts that I've posted in? Yes. More often than not, I simply click "view first unread" on the most recent page. Believe it or not, I'm more interested in the posts by AgeofKnowledge than yours. So, Allin, when it comes down to you and me, I ask only one thing, will you kindly shut up.

C'mon: be a man and just add him to your ignore list
(if he bothers you that much.)
 
Oh I'm not attacking you Allin; I'm laughing at your ridiculous posts, and since you are serious, wondering how deep your mental health issue runs.

Schizophrenia is a challenging disorder that makes it difficult to distinguish between what is real and unreal, think clearly, manage emotions, relate to others, and function normally.

For example, schizophrenia sufferers assert firmly-held delusions that are not true. Delusions are extremely common in schizophrenia and occur in more than 90% of those who have the disorder.

Obviously asserting that the pope and Queen Elizabeth are cannibals that feed on children and other such insanities are obvious delusions.

Posting a few debunked sources to support your delusions only also shows that you are not properly educated and cannot distinguish between a valid scholarly source and a debunked one.

But that doesn't mean there isn't hope for you Allin. Though a chronic disorder, schizophrenia can be successfully managed.

Unfortunately, many who suffer from schizophrenia don't actually want help. They think they're "fine." LOL.

I've had the pleasure to know some of these and I've watched them do some very entertaining things. Probably the most entertaining was a schizophrenic I met in my college years that stopped taking his medicine and came to believe that he was Jeff Spicoli from the movie 'Fast Times at Ridgemont High.'

I tried to tell him that he was NOT Jeff Spicoli but it was too late. He was convinced that he was. Needless to say, it was just a matter of time... lol.

After crashing through the gate of Sean Penn and Madonna's house and running around their property peeking in the windows looking for them, he finally found them. They were not amused and gave chase. My friend jumped back in his truck and tried to get away but Sean Penn's race car was just too fast and eventually Sean Penn tackled him as he dumped the truck and tried to make a run for it and made a citizen's arrest.

The ensuing drama made the papers and fostered a television episode on DC Follies in which Sean Penn went around making citizen's arrests on all of the politicians displayed in effigy through puppetry.

My friend was convicted of some misdemeanors, placed on probation, and ordered by the court to TAKE HIS MEDICINE. LOL.

I hope when you finally spin off the rails Allin, it's as amusing as that was and nobody gets hurt.
 
I'm wondering why you're posting, AK........ the way you've been hammering away at him says more about you than him. What's gotten into you lately? You don't even seem like the same person....
 
Nothing's changed here. I'm just responding to someone who delusionally believes completely insane things like the pope and Queen Elizabeth II get together and barbecue and eat children because he read it on the Internet and in a debunked book. Of course, he likes Obama so Obama isn't hosting any such barbecues. He has to not like them before they become baby eaters and whatnot.

If you want to go along with this nonsense, go ahead. But it's obviously total nonsense.

[video=youtube_share;BXWvKDSwvls]http://youtu.be/BXWvKDSwvls[/video]

I'm wondering why you're posting, AK........ the way you've been hammering away at him says more about you than him. What's gotten into you lately? You don't even seem like the same person....
 
I'm wondering why you're posting, AK........ the way you've been hammering away at him says more about you than him. What's gotten into you lately? You don't even seem like the same person....

I don't read anything either AgeofKnowledge or ThomistColin writes anymore. Someone suggested the ignore button, but I don't even have to use it. If you visit my page, you will see that there's no one's thread or posts that I follow, so I don't need an ignore button. However, I will continue to reiterate the truth and encourage others to learn more rather than discourage it, so I won't refrain from replying. AgeofKnowledge wants to use double-binds (which is exactly how cult-connected criminals are trained to operate). One of these double-binds is to put heat on a person so that they are trapped whether or not they respond: if they respond, then they are supposedly on the defensive and therefore in the wrong; if they don't respond, then they are basically giving up and saying the aggressor is right. It's set up so that the aggressor is right either way. Some of these people employ the most destructive double-binds that are simply hostile to life itself. But due to my own personal experiences with them, I understand double-binds. AgeofKnowledge is simply covering for criminals. I believe he is supposed to do it, so he has little choice in the matter.
 
And ThomistColin, unfortunately, seems to be very aggressively covering for the Catholic church. I think it's sad that before hundreds of priests were exposed as pedophiles, anyone who mentioned or implied it would come under fire; but now that everyone knows it as fact, even Catholics have to admit it. However, when something isn't public knowledge, members, followers, and supporters of that thing will cover for its crimes and abuses. Even Christians do this, but not near the level that Catholics do in my experience. Christian pastors run defense for fellow pastors and ministers who are in sin. It's an unspoken agreement that they cover for each other (not all the time but overall). Eli is a good example in the Bible of the lesser level of covering for fellow ministers: his sons were ministers under him and were in sin, and he refused to hold them accountable.

Because we like to believe we are good people and that people are basically good (and people are basically good, but they are basically bad too), we can't see the obvious: heated and violent defense of something tends to prove (not always, but most of the time) that whatever is being defended is actually guilty. There are too many examples of this to list, but the bank robbery and hold up in Stockholm, Sweden, after which the victims vigorously defended their captors, is an excellent example. From that instance, they coined the term 'Stockholm Syndrome', a form of traumatic bonds in which the abused identifies with the abuser in such a way as to vigorously defend the abuser beyond normal zeal. Abused spouse syndrome follows the same line of reasoning as well as does the effect of brainwashing on POWs who defend their abuser-captors with uncommon fervency. It ties into the vigorous defense that some people employ when defending something or someone that is in fact guilty or that they know is in fact guilty. With proper explanation of this anomalous type of behavior, more people would find it much easier to discern truth regarding matters considered as 'conspiracy theories' and other issues without having to be convinced by 'the better argument' or the more believable side.
 
Well, I don't think we should be too hasty in throwing away this claim. There is sadly a bit a of truth to this claim. However, I am not too sure on whether Pope Francis, Queen Elizabeth, or George Bush are involved in such stuff. I have not heard such things about those three people. So it is prudent to have a little bit of caution when examining such claims.

After all we all know the catholic church has famously been infiltrated by foul pagans and witches for centuries, and in recent times the rampant molestation cases tied to the catholic church is appalling. Though I personally have never seen any sort of proof to take this up to the level of Pope. Therefore I would reason the molesters in the catholic church are in all likelihood low-level infiltrators.

In terms of national/international leaders though, this is where things get tricky. Due to their status, many prominent politicians are able to hde their crimes for decades. Even more disheartening is when they are caught there is typically no reprisal or else a small slap on the wrist.

For an example of this I think we really need look no further than Silvio Berlusconi of Italy.

Now I'm not saying all national leaders are pedos, but I certainly don't think we should be too quick to dismiss such claims especially when there is real cases of this occuring. We also shouldn't pursue vain rumors with no substance. Therefore let us watch and be vigilant.

Definitely need to avoid the ditches on both sides: total disbelief and blind belief. It requires:

1. the exercise of one's intuition (your 'knower' or the perceiving part of you; this is the part of you that feels people's emotions)

2. the exercise of your intelligence (where you reason things out, put two and two together, process of elimination, etc.)

3. personal research about the issue (put action to your wondering and speculating), and

4. the input of the Holy Spirit (He has a way of 'enlightening' your own understanding or what you know, broadening things so you see farther, clearer, and with a much wider panoramic view).

Ps. 119:105 says God's Word is a light and lamp which shines on the path (the truth) with each step forward you take. Ps. 119:130 says that when God's light/lamp is allowed to lead the way, even the most unintelligent and youngest will see the truth. If you do your part (the first three above), He will do His part (the fourth above) which seals in the truth you learn with an assurance that's pretty much unshakable.
 
Conspiracy theories wouldn't have a leg to stand on if not for the real conspiracies that got them started in the first place.:rolleyes:

and yet conspiracy theorists never actually have anything to do with exposing any of the -real- conspiracies...

watergate? the media exposed that one...
NSA wiretapping? revealed by a whistleblower and widely reported in the media...
and so on...

conspiracy theorists have never actually exposed a real conspiracy...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.