Scott, i won't argue scripture with you.
i do believe in 'total depravity'.
and i thank God for the righteousness that is Christ's,
yes, imputed righteousness.
here's a verse from Phil 3 you left out:
(v.9)
and may be found in Him, not having a righteousness of my own derived from the Law, but that which is through faith in Christ, the righteousness which comes from God on the basis of faith.
i'm out.
Of course you won't discuss the specific points I made because they are the actual words of Jesus, Paul and Peter. It is much easier to ignore them and say "i'm out."
As pertaining to Php 3:9 that verse does not undo anything I said. I quoted Paul's words in Philippians where he plainly uses the word perfect (morally perfect) and describes himself as being perfect.
Was he lying about that? It is a hard question for you to answer isn't it because you either have to deny Paul or deny your position of moral perfection (via a faith that works by love) being an impossibility for the Christian.
You doctrine is at odds with what the Bible plainly teaches. What people like you do is snip isolated verses out of their context and use them as proof texts to support a theology, a theology which the context of those verses refutes.
Php 3:9 is not an isolated verse either...
Php 3:1 Finally, my brethren, rejoice in the Lord. To write the same things to you, to me indeed is not grievous, but for you it is safe.
Php 3:2 Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision.
Php 3:3 For we are the circumcision, which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh.
Php 3:4 Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more:
Php 3:5 Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee;
Php 3:6 Concerning zeal, persecuting the church; touching the righteousness which is in the law, blameless.
Php 3:7 But what things were gain to me, those I counted loss for Christ.
Php 3:8 Yea doubtless, and I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and do count them but dung, that I may win Christ,
Php 3:9 And be found in him, not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith:
Php 3:10 That I may know him, and the power of his resurrection, and the fellowship of his sufferings, being made conformable unto his death;
Paul is at first peaking about his diligence to adhering to the traditions of Jewish law. He was physically circumcised, he was of one of the tribes, he was a Pharisee who who loved the letter of the law and went about persecuting those whom he perceived as violating that letter. He was acting just like the Pharisees who accused Jesus of violating the law by healing on the Sabbath.
Paul was zealous in his deeds and adhered to the letter of the law blameless and thus viewed himself as righteous. Yet when confronted with Christ and converted he counted all of that as dung, as a loss, so as to win Christ. Christ was the opposite of all that stuff because Christ was about inward reformation and not outward reformation.
Inward reformation is through the faith of Christ. What was the faith of Christ? It is a faith that works by love that upholds the righteousness of the law within the heart. Thus it was not Paul's own righteousness but the righteousness of God. It has NOTHING to do with a forensic transfer, it has EVERYTHING to do with a MANIFESTATION.
Your version of imputed righteousness is a forensic transfer. You view of imputed righteousness is a cloak for a sinful state.
You alluded to these verses in your first post...
Mat 5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Mat 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
Mat 5:19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
Jesus came to fulfill the law. Jesus also spoke of DOING the commandments.
Paul writes...
Rom 8:4 That
the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
The righteousness of the law being fulfilled in us is connected to walking after the Spirit. This is exactly what Peter teaches...
1Pe 1:22 Seeing
ye have purified your souls in obeying the truth through the Spirit unto unfeigned love of the brethren, see that ye love one another with a pure heart fervently:
1Pe 1:23 Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever.
Unfeigned love (which fulfills the righteous requirements of the law) is a product of obedience to the truth through the Spirit. Again it has NOTHING to do with a legal transfer.
Paul speaks of the cross...
Rom 6:3 Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death?
Rom 6:4 Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.
Rom 6:5 For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection:
Rom 6:6 Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin.
Rom 6:7 For he that is dead is freed from sin.
Where is the forensic transfer in that? It doesn't exist.
The righteousness of God is manifested in us via us dying with Christ whereby the body of sin is destroyed that we no longer serve sin. We are then raised up to WALK in newness of life as servants of righteousness. Thus the righteousness of God is fulfilled IN us. Isn't this what Jesus taught?
Joh 15:4 Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine; no more can ye, except ye abide in me.
Joh 15:5 I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing.
This magic transfer of a forensic righteousness is a mental fiction. No one can quote any verse which states it. The early church didn't teach it. It isn't true.
Look at this passage...
Rev 22:11 He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still: and he that is righteous, let him be righteous still: and he that is holy, let him be holy still.
Rev 22:12 And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be.
Being judged according to our deeds is connected to one being just or unjust. Your doctrine can have someone doing evil and yet considered righteous because they "trust in Jesus" and are thus covered in the magic cloak of the "righteousness of Christ." Your doctrine totally throws the reality of a transformed heart completely out the window.
It is not hard to understand.