I read your post (or in general) and I start to analyze, to try and understand if you mean one thing or the other. lol I can break this post and have so many questions brought up of what you are trying to say, and it could be something really obvious but I process every possibility of what you are trying to convey, and sometimes miss the obvious.
One understanding that I get when I read your post is the following:
You firmly believe that the proper attitude we should have in disagreements PERTAINING TO SCRIPTURE is:
The side that IS IN ACCORD with scripture will be vindicated, while the other is forgiven FOR NOT BEING IN ACCORD.
and for the remainder of your post I completely broke it down that I rather not state my understanding
Is this what you mean, or by disagreements you mean on trivial things? haha.
Sorry, I probably did not make any sense. It is late.
I suppose the issue is, can a doctrine be in accord with Scripture, yet also not necessary?
Abstaining from meat is in accord with Scripture, yet not necessary.
Abstaining from all forms of alcohol is in accord with Scripture, yet not necessary.
Most of the issues we debate on CC have both sides claiming to be in accord with Scripture.
Perhaps many times we are only seeing one side of a multi-sided object. In this way, we are in accord with Scripture, but are focusing on one part over another. This issue of focus is generally what bring disagreements.
A Wesleyan will say, "if we do not persevere, then we are not saved."
And a Calvinist will say "if we are not saved, then we would not persevere."
2 sides of the same object. Both are right.
Both accuse the other foolishly.
A Lutheran will say "Baptism and Communion are sacraments, commanded in Scripture, and required for salvation".
A Baptist will say "If we are saved, we will desire to follow Christ, and will desire to participate in Baptism and Communion".
2 sides of the same object. Both are right.
Both accuse the other foolishly.
Some arguments come with legalism verses antinomianism.
A "legalist" says "Faith without works is dead, if we don't do works, then we're not saved".
And an "antinomian" says "saved by faith, not by works. But if we are saved, then we will do good works by the Spirit".
In practicality, both have faith, and both do good works,
but both think the other is wrong.