Nothing new about the "new" covenant?

[prove-all]

There are only two possible and, therefore, acceptable answers--either "Yes" or "No."

If it's not an unequivocal "Yes," then it is a "No."

The answer you gave is a "No."

You are not an orthodox Christian, you belong to a non-Christian sect
which denies the deity of Jesus Christ.

so did you just make up this rule of youres

or is it writen in stone somewhere i dont know about, englighten me .


[If it's not an unequivocal "Yes," then it is a "No."]

what denomation are you Elin, if i may be so bold to ask ?

i current do not belong to a local church building in my area.

 

[prove-all]

Originally Posted by Elin

Specific deception discovered. . .former indication of deceptiveness proven to be true.


and i would love to hear youre view of charges againest me.

are do you assume things on youre own that you persieve ?

and i do thank you for all this typing pratice.

 

[just-me]

This is a quote from Post 336

Until you address post #288 here,
which shows your misunderstanding and misapplication of Heb 8,
and show withinthecontext of the book of Hebrews where that post is incorrect,
what you present regarding Heb 8 will continue to be misunderstanding and misapplication.

You're just going in circles.

The NT references to covenant, temple, sacrifices, etc. which you present do not refer to Heb 8.

Common terms do not related passages make.


BTW: Is Jesus God, equalwithGod the Father?

Yes, or No. . .

Now referring to post 339

Is Jesus God, equal with God the Father?

Yes, or No. . .

Originally Posted by just-me

This is what you quoted me as saying "Jesus Christ was fully endowed with the complete Spirit of His Father. Like maxed out completely."

There are only two possible and, therefore, acceptable answers--either "Yes" or "No."

If it's not an unequivocal "Yes," then it is a "No."

The answer you gave is a "No."

You are not an orthodox Christian, you belong to a non-Christian sect
which denies the deity of Jesus Christ.

Please refer to the post that has my answer “Jesus Christ was fully endowed with the complete Spirit of His Father. Like maxed out completely.”


I cannot find it.

 

[just-me]

so did you just make up this rule of youres

or is it writen in stone somewhere i dont know about, englighten me .


[If it's not an unequivocal "Yes," then it is a "No."]

what denomation are you Elin, if i may be so bold to ask ?

i current do not belong to a local church building in my area.

As you can see, I asked Elin to find the post that she is referring to as she quotes me as answering the question. It's amazing how the subject changed to "equal with God" after I answered her on post #337

 

[just-me]

There are only two possible and, therefore, acceptable answers--either "Yes" or "No."

If it's not an unequivocal "Yes," then it is a "No."

The answer you gave is a "No."

You are not an orthodox Christian, you belong to a non-Christian sect
which denies the deity of Jesus Christ.

The above is post 344 on another thread http://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/98078-new-covenant-christ-jesus.html
I invite all as I refer to posts 336, 338, 339 of this thread

Please refer to the post that has my answer “Jesus Christ was fully endowed with the complete Spirit of His Father. Like maxed out completely.”

I cannot find it.

I found my quote Elin made on another thread http://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/98078-new-covenant-christ-jesus-18.html#post1669411

The question was oriinally presented to chubbena on post #341 of the same thread

The answer to her question was given to her with scripture. Now why would a person ask an arbitrary question without first giving a reason if they are not argumentative?


Elin, you make it a habit of arguing with the Word of God as you write statements of accusation against people that quote scripture for the purpose of giving reason to their statements. You have a very bad habit of labeling people when they don't answer a question correctly 'in your opinion.'


Then to top that all off I ask for respect for the thread I started.
http://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/98078-new-covenant-christ-jesus-17.html#post1668840


And the very next post of Elin's # 329 shows character of total disrespect changing the heading of the thread like she wants it to be. Time to report.

 

[Elin]

POST #336:

Until you address post #288 here,
which shows your misunderstanding and misapplication of Heb 8,
and show within the context of the book of Hebrews where that post is incorrect,
what you present regarding Heb 8 will continue to be misunderstanding and misapplication.

You're just going in circles.

The NT references to covenant, temple, sacrifices, etc. which you present do not refer to Heb 8.

Common terms do not related passages make.

BTW: Is Jesus God, equal with God the Father?

Yes, or No. . .

POST #337:

As you requested I'm acknowledging post 288
I asked, "So if Hebrews 8:1-6 is not about the temple is there another place that the priests offered sacrifice?"

Then your answer was
"There is no "temple" stated in Heb 8.

The meaning of Heb 8 is abundantly clear and speaks for itself.

You just need to study it with comprehension."

So here is what I comprehend. To me the sanctuary, tabernacle is in clear comparison with the temple. It may be a matter of semantics.

POST #338:

As you requested I'm acknowledging post 288

I note you did not answer the question:

Is Jesus God, equal with God the Father?

Yes, or No. . .

And "acknowledging" is not addressing or showing anything.

POST #339:

Is Jesus God, equal with God the Father?

Yes, or No. . .

Jesus Christ was fully endowed with the complete Spirit of His Father. Like maxed out completely.

There are only two possible and, therefore, acceptable answers--either "Yes" or "No."

If it's not an unequivocal "Yes," then it is a "No."

The answer you gave is a "No."

You are not an orthodox Christian, you belong to a non-Christian sect
which denies the deity of Jesus Christ.

I asked Elin to find the post that she is referring to as she quotes me as answering the question. It's amazing how
the subject changed to "equal with God" after I answered her on post #337

Let the denial and deception begin.

The record speaks for itself.

 

[achduke]

There are only two possible and, therefore, acceptable answers--either "Yes" or "No."

If it's not an unequivocal "Yes," then it is a "No."

The answer you gave is a "No."

You are not an orthodox Christian, you belong to a non-Christian sect
which denies the deity of Jesus Christ.


Let the denial and deception begin.

The record speaks for itself.

It sounds like you are trying to trap this person. Not everything is a yes or no.


Mat 22:17 Tell us then, what is your opinion? Is it right to pay taxes to Caesar or not?"

 

[Elin]

Is Jesus God, equal with God the Father?

Yes, or no. . .

He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning.
For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.

"My Father is greater than I" (John 14:28).

“Why do you call me good?” Jesus answered. “No one is good—except God alone. mark10:18

Jesus Christ came to Earth to declare the Father (John 1:18)

Jesus Christ said He came specifically to “reveal” the Father(Matthew 11:27; Luke 10:22).

“I speak to the world those things which I have heard of him” (John 8:26).

For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me,
he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak.John 12:49

the word which you hear is not Mine but the Father's who sent Me" (John 14:24).

Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father:
but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father;
and to my God, and your God. (John 20:17 KJV)

That is not an unequivocal "Yes," and is, therefore, a "No."

You are not an orthodox Christian. You belong to a non-Christian sect, which denies the deity of Jesus Christ.

and you say i deny Jesus Christ, with out one word of my own

how do you come to this conclusion from verses from bible i posted

Specific deception discovered. . .former indication of deceptiveness proven to be true.

i posted this verse and others to elin

"My Father is greater than I" (John 14:28).

then she gave the same responce as here,

saying we deny Christ.

Let the deception and denial begin.

The record speaks for itself.

 

[prove-all]

Let the deception and denial begin.

The record speaks for itself.

let the lies and condemnation from you continue.


happy Sabbath

 

[Elin]

It sounds like you are trying to trap this person. Not everything is a yes or no.

Let the denial and deception begin.

The record speaks for itself.

 

[Elin]

let the lies. . .from you continue.

The record speaks for itself.

 

[just-me]

There are only two possible and, therefore, acceptable answers--either "Yes" or "No."

If it's not an unequivocal "Yes," then it is a "No."

The answer you gave is a "No."

You are not an orthodox Christian, you belong to a non-Christian sect
which denies the deity of Jesus Christ.


Let the denial and deception begin.

The record speaks for itself.

You obviously read the scripture that records the conversation with Philp and Jesus or didn't you? John 14:8-9

 

[prove-all]

The record speaks for itself.

i ask again what charges do you have againest me

 

[just-me]

It sounds like you are trying to trap this person. Not everything is a yes or no.


Mat 22:17 Tell us then, what is your opinion? Is it right to pay taxes to Caesar or not?"

The question was originally to Chubbena in another thread, and so was my answer by quoting scripture that answers her question better than I can

 

[just-me]

Let the denial and deception begin.

The record speaks for itself.

Got that right, we have your name and your number. It just takes time to know the division that you purposefully create, including changing the thread names according to your personal liking.

 

[just-me]

The record speaks for itself.

Why haven't you commented to my post #337 answering your continuous question wanting me to answer your post # 288 rather than start a controversy on this thread that you started on another thread? Let the record speak for itself.

 

[just-me]

It sounds like you are trying to trap this person. Not everything is a yes or no.


Mat 22:17 Tell us then, what is your opinion? Is it right to pay taxes to Caesar or not?"

All I did was quote scriptuer and automatically my answer is no? Elin, do you have ghosts speaking to you that aren't holy?

 

[achduke]

Let the deception and denial begin.

The record speaks for itself.

If it's not an unequivocal "Yes," then it is a "No."

You were answered with scripture. Now because you did not accept the answer you answered for them.

 

[Elin]

You were answered with scripture. Now because you did not accept the answer you answered for them.

Answered with Scripture irrelevant to the point.

 

[just-me]

Answered with Scripture irrelevant to the point.

So what's the point? Or should I ask what's your point? If the point can be discussed without divisive innuendos then it will work.