Jesus is the "Messenger of the Lord" in the Old Testament.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
#21
How did He appear? As an angel?
The word "angel" could also be referred to as a "messenger" back in the 1600's. So he was not angel with wings as we would understand that concept, no. These were pre-incarnate appearances of Christ (Who is the second person of the Godhead). He was Spirit. He was like an angel in the sense that he could be solid enough to interact with our environment by eating the food given to Him by Abraham. But he did not have flesh and blood, though. It was God appearing in the form of a man but He was not flesh and blood, though.
 
Last edited:
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
#22
Scripturally elaborate on why you are stuck into thinking that Jesus was 'pre-incarnate' in the OT.
Because the Bible makes no mention that the Word made flesh before the incarnation as described to us in the beginning of the New Testament. No oher incarnation took place. If you believe otherwise, then you need to show Scripture that defends the idea that Christ took on flesh (or appeared to have flesh) in the Old Testament.
 
Nov 19, 2012
5,484
27
0
#23
Because the Bible makes no mention that the Word made flesh before the incarnation as described to us in the beginning of the New Testament. No oher incarnation took place. If you believe otherwise, then you need to show Scripture that defends the idea that Christ took on flesh (or appeared to have flesh) in the Old Testament.
I already provided this to you yesterday, in a separate thread, but you ignored it completely...

He was in the world, and the world came into being through Him, yet the world did not know Him. He came to His own, and His own did not receive Him. But as many as received Him, to them He gave authority to become children of God, to the ones believing into His name, who were born not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but were born of God. And the Word became flesh and tabernacled among us. And we beheld His glory, glory as of an only begotten from the Father, full of grace and of truth. John witnesses concerning Him, and has cried out, saying, This One was He of whom I said, He coming after me has been before me, for He was preceding me. And out of His fullness we all received, and grace on top of grace. For the Law was given through Moses, but grace and truth came through Jesus Christ. No one has seen God at any time; the unique God, who is in the bosom of the Father, that One declares Him.(John 1.10 – 18)

Scripture clearly informs the reader that the Word occupied flesh when He was in the world and that He was beheld as The Glory of God.


That the second person of the Trinity occupied flesh before being born of a woman and being referred to as God The Son, is made crystal clear by John’s proclamation that ‘He coming after me has been before me, for He was preceding me’.This is a full admission that The Son was manifest both before John’s time and after John’s time.
 
Last edited:
Nov 19, 2012
5,484
27
0
#24
Jason...?

I see that you are spreading yourself too thin by being logged into too many internet boards at the same time....
 

jb

Senior Member
Feb 27, 2010
4,940
591
113
#25
You can find a bit of a study Here on the "Angel of the Lord" and a short study Here on “ehyeh asher ehyeh" (I Am that I Am)...
 
K

Kerry

Guest
#26
Because the Bible makes no mention that the Word made flesh before the incarnation as described to us in the beginning of the New Testament. No oher incarnation took place. If you believe otherwise, then you need to show Scripture that defends the idea that Christ took on flesh (or appeared to have flesh) in the Old Testament.

Here

Joshua 5

13 And it came to pass, when Joshua was by Jericho, that he lifted up his eyes and looked, and, behold, there stood a man over against him with his sword drawn in his hand: and Joshua went unto him, and said unto him, Art thou for us, or for our adversaries?
14 And he said, Nay; but as captain of the host of the Lord am I now come. And Joshua fell on his face to the earth, and did worship, and said unto him, What saith my Lord unto his servant?
15 [FONT=Helvetica Neue, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]And the captain of the [/FONT]Lord[FONT=Helvetica Neue, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]'s host said unto Joshua, Loose thy shoe from off thy foot; [/FONT]for the place whereon thou standest is holy[FONT=Helvetica Neue, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]. And Joshua did so[/FONT]


[FONT=Helvetica Neue, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Angels were not [/FONT][FONT=Helvetica Neue, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]worshiped[/FONT][FONT=Helvetica Neue, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]. This is the preincarnate of Jesus Christ.[/FONT]
 
Nov 19, 2012
5,484
27
0
#27
You can find a bit of a study Here on the "Angel of the Lord" and a short study Here on “ehyeh asher ehyeh" (I Am that I Am)...

Again...why do you feel that Jesus was not incarnate in the OT...?
 
Nov 19, 2012
5,484
27
0
#28
Here

Joshua 5

13 And it came to pass, when Joshua was by Jericho, that he lifted up his eyes and looked, and, behold, there stood a man over against him with his sword drawn in his hand: and Joshua went unto him, and said unto him, Art thou for us, or for our adversaries?
14 And he said, Nay; but as captain of the host of the Lord am I now come. And Joshua fell on his face to the earth, and did worship, and said unto him, What saith my Lord unto his servant?
15 And the captain of the Lord's host said unto Joshua, Loose thy shoe from off thy foot; for the place whereon thou standest is holy. And Joshua did so


Angels were not worshiped. This is the preincarnate of Jesus Christ .

I would say that this was the Incarnate Jesus.
 
Jun 4, 2014
1,849
9
0
#29
The word "angel" could also be referred to as a "messenger" back in the 1600's. So he was not angel with wings as we would understand that concept, no. These were pre-incarnate appearances of Christ (Who is the second person of the Godhead). He was Spirit. He was like an angel in the sense that he could be solid enough to interact with our environment by eating the food given to Him by Abraham. But he did not have flesh and blood, though. It was God appearing in the form of a man but He was not flesh and blood, though.
Doesn't matter what definition you use, He still was made better than one.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
#30
Here

Joshua 5

13 And it came to pass, when Joshua was by Jericho, that he lifted up his eyes and looked, and, behold, there stood a man over against him with his sword drawn in his hand: and Joshua went unto him, and said unto him, Art thou for us, or for our adversaries?
14 And he said, Nay; but as captain of the host of the Lord am I now come. And Joshua fell on his face to the earth, and did worship, and said unto him, What saith my Lord unto his servant?
15 And the captain of the Lord's host said unto Joshua, Loose thy shoe from off thy foot; for the place whereon thou standest is holy. And Joshua did so


Angels were not worshiped. This is the preincarnate of Jesus Christ.
Not sure how you think I don't believe Jesus did not appear in Joshua 5. Please go back and read this thread. I actually talked about this already.
 
Last edited:
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
#31
Doesn't matter what definition you use, He still was made better than one.
Actually, Jesus (His physical body) was made a little lower than the angels. This physical body did not exist until the incarnation as mentioned in the beginning of the New Testament.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
#32
I already provided this to you yesterday, in a separate thread, but you ignored it completely...

He was in the world, and the world came into being through Him, yet the world did not know Him. He came to His own, and His own did not receive Him. But as many as received Him, to them He gave authority to become children of God, to the ones believing into His name, who were born not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but were born of God. And the Word became flesh and tabernacled among us. And we beheld His glory, glory as of an only begotten from the Father, full of grace and of truth. John witnesses concerning Him, and has cried out, saying, This One was He of whom I said, He coming after me has been before me, for He was preceding me. And out of His fullness we all received, and grace on top of grace. For the Law was given through Moses, but grace and truth came through Jesus Christ. No one has seen God at any time; the unique God, who is in the bosom of the Father, that One declares Him.(John 1.10 – 18)

Scripture clearly informs the reader that the Word occupied flesh when He was in the world and that He was beheld as The Glory of God.


That the second person of the Trinity occupied flesh before being born of a woman and being referred to as God The Son, is made crystal clear by John’s proclamation that ‘He coming after me has been before me, for He was preceding me’.This is a full admission that The Son was manifest both before John’s time and after John’s time.
John the Baptist is saying two things here. One, Jesus came before him by way of birth. Jesus was born first and then John was born. John is not saying Jesus was born another time. Two, John is also saying Jesus existed in Spirit long before he came into existence.
 
Last edited:
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
#33
John the Baptist is saying two things here. One, Jesus came before him by way of birth. Jesus was born first and then John was born. John is not saying Jesus was born another time. Two, John is also saying Jesus existed in Spirit long before he came into existence.
Sorry about that. I am actually not feeling well. So I am not thinking clearly. Actually, John the Baptist was born first (Luke 1:26-31). So John was referring to Christ as existing before Him as Spirit. There is no indication that John said that Christ pre-existed before John as flesh. This was a reference to how He was Spirit because Christ is God.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
#34
Jason...?

I see that you are spreading yourself too thin by being logged into too many internet boards at the same time....
I have been logged in at TOL the past few weeks. But since I have came here, I haven't posted or read anything there besides my own posts. I posted a long time there trying to reach folks. I left TOL because there was more darkness than light there. I will strive to keep many of them in my prayers.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
#35
I already provided this to you yesterday, in a separate thread, but you ignored it completely...

He was in the world, and the world came into being through Him, yet the world did not know Him. He came to His own, and His own did not receive Him. But as many as received Him, to them He gave authority to become children of God, to the ones believing into His name, who were born not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but were born of God. And the Word became flesh and tabernacled among us. And we beheld His glory, glory as of an only begotten from the Father, full of grace and of truth. John witnesses concerning Him, and has cried out, saying, This One was He of whom I said, He coming after me has been before me, for He was preceding me. And out of His fullness we all received, and grace on top of grace. For the Law was given through Moses, but grace and truth came through Jesus Christ. No one has seen God at any time; the unique God, who is in the bosom of the Father, that One declares Him.(John 1.10 – 18)

Scripture clearly informs the reader that the Word occupied flesh when He was in the world and that He was beheld as The Glory of God.


That the second person of the Trinity occupied flesh before being born of a woman and being referred to as God The Son, is made crystal clear by John’s proclamation that ‘He coming after me has been before me, for He was preceding me’.This is a full admission that The Son was manifest both before John’s time and after John’s time.
Okay, let's look at the verse again.

"He coming after me has been before me, for he was preceding me,"

Please note that this passage does not say Jesus was before John in the flesh. Like I said before it is merely saying that Christ or the Living Word existed as Spirit before John.

For in this passage, John is merely talking about existence.

He coming after me [Jesus being born in the flesh] has been before me [John's birth], for he [Christ or the Word] was preceding me, [John].

For if you will notice, another passage says that

"John witnesses concerning Him."

How did John witness Jesus?

Well, when Mary came to visit Elizabeth, John the Baptist as a baby inside Elizabeth had tumbled for joy within her womb.

John also forerunnered Jesus' ministery by baptizing Him, as well (Bearing witness before God the Father, Himself (the Son), and the Holy Spirit) before men.

Let's look at the other passage.

"No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him."

"No one has seen God at any time:"

So how can nobody see God at any time and yet Christ existed as God or the Son before His physical birth?

The first half of the passage is talking about God the Father and not God the Son. It is saying, no man has seen God the Father at any time, the only begotton Son (i.e. God the Son), which is in the bosom of the Father, He (Christ) has declared him.

Nowhere does this passage say that He was flesh before either.

I believe it's possible that God could have made a spiritual body similar to an angel so as to react with our phsyical world or He could do anything He wants because He is God. Anyways, angels have been reported as being able to touch this physical world. For example: Demons can actually effect a person physically and manifest their evil appearance thru the body of a person. They are touching an effecting the physical world. People have gotten scars or scratches from demons. These are fallen angels. It's why Nephilim existed before and after the flood. It's why Christ and the two other angels were able to eat food before Abraham in Genesis 18:8.

Anyways, the verse you provided is too ambidgous and not clear. It doesn't specifically say Christ was flesh before his physical birth thru Mary. You need a verse that says something like, "before he was born into this world thru Adam, he also was flesh before that."

Plus, the Bible testifies of itself with more than one verse or witness. One-verse-ism is a dangerous way of building a Theology or Truth within the Scriptures. In other words, if what you say is true, then there should be at least several verses or witnesses in Scripture telling us that Christ was in the flesh before he was born thru Mary.
 
Last edited:
Nov 19, 2012
5,484
27
0
#36
John the Baptist is saying two things here. One, Jesus came before him by way of birth. Jesus was born first and then John was born.

What?!!!

Jason...have you never read the account of Luke?

John the Baptist' mother Elizabeth was already 6 months pregnant with him BEFORE Mary conceived of the Holy Spirit.

Come on...

 

tourist

Senior Member
Mar 13, 2014
42,598
17,062
113
69
Tennessee
#37
What?!!!

Jason...have you never read the account of Luke?

John the Baptist' mother Elizabeth was already 6 months pregnant with him BEFORE Mary conceived of the Holy Spirit.

Come on...

Yeah, I don't get it either.
 
Nov 19, 2012
5,484
27
0
#38
Sorry about that. I am actually not feeling well. So I am not thinking clearly. Actually, John the Baptist was born first (Luke 1:26-31). So John was referring to Christ as existing before Him as Spirit. There is no indication that John said that Christ pre-existed before John as flesh. This was a reference to how He was Spirit because Christ is God.

Whoa Jason....

For a minute I thought that Alzheimer's had taken hold on you....hope you feel better... :)

So....if John was born first, then that eliminates option one of your two options...that's a 50% reduction, already.




So John was referring to Christ as existing before Him as Spirit.
Option two is eliminated here...

This One it is who has come after me, who has been before me, of whom I am not worthy that I should loose the thong of His sandal. These things took place in Bethabara beyond the Jordan, where John was baptizing. On the morrow, John sees Jesus coming toward him and said, Behold! The Lamb of God, taking away the sin of the world! This is He about whom I said, After me comes a Man who has been before me, for He was preceding me.(John 1.27 – 30)


See how John refers to Jesus existing as a MAN before Him?

This is proof positive that Jesus was incarnate in the flesh in the OT.




 
Nov 19, 2012
5,484
27
0
#39
I have been logged in at TOL the past few weeks. But since I have came here, I haven't posted or read anything there besides my own posts. I posted a long time there trying to reach folks. I left TOL because there was more darkness than light there. I will strive to keep many of them in my prayers.
I can understand that....TOL has a lot of people who have little more than a pulse and an internet link.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
#40
What?!!!

Jason...have you never read the account of Luke?

John the Baptist' mother Elizabeth was already 6 months pregnant with him BEFORE Mary conceived of the Holy Spirit.

Come on...

Please read my next post. Soon as I posted it, I realized I was in error. I said I was not feeling well. I couldn't go back and re-edit my post because I am only allowed 5 minutes to re-edit a post at this site.