C
Celsus
Guest
This is a very interesting thread but I have no time for ignorant academic types who just want to slander the Judeo/Christian faiths.
What? All I'm doing is presenting facts. Is there something wrong with facts?
This is a very interesting thread but I have no time for ignorant academic types who just want to slander the Judeo/Christian faiths.
Here's an interesting tidbit. Some scholars believe the "asherah" was a cultic object
while others have reason to conclude that the inscription refers to the goddess.
Either way....
cultic object - "Thou shalt not make any graven image" - Exodus 20:4-6
goddess - "Thou shalt have no other gods before me" - Exodus 20:3
Plus all these "monotheistic" verses:
What Does the Bible Say About Monotheism?
So Bowman, how does it feel to believe in a form of evolved polytheism?
It's really no different than Greek mythology. At least the Greeks had
better stories. Rotftol!!!
Well, if you'd take an honest look at the evidence one might be inclined to ask
"which God?"
[video=youtube;laOzwFA5k60]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=laOzwFA5k60
finding Ashereh idols in Israel actually confirms the Bible. Manasseh even put one in the temple. (2 Kings 21)
i thought you said you've read the Bible?
when you read the Bible, what do you remember about why God had Babylon take Israel into captivity?
there's a lot of evidence for the Exodus presented in the video i posted.
this guy in your video ^
is arguing that because he doesn't find permanent structures built in the wilderness by a nomadic people who built no permanent structures while they wandered for 40 years in the desert, it didn't happen.
lack of discovered archaeological remains cannot prove non-existence. especially when talking about a wandering people that you would not expect to leave evidence. 4,000 years later and there are no footprints in the sand? well, duh. Egyptians who regularly erased all records of military defeats of the Pharoahs did not leave a record of the Exodus? well, duh.
anyway it sounds like he has never heard of Joshua's altar on mount Ebal, which is odd, because it's very well documented and directly refutes his skeptical suppositions.
have a look (did you not watch the video i posted? it refutes what this guy has to say 10x over) --
http://www.bible.ca/archeology/bible-archeology-altar-of-joshua.htm
All of this is off topic by the way. How do we know that Mount Ebal wasn't just a cult place of worship?
Even if it was Joshua's altar so what?
Here's an interesting tidbit. Some scholars believe the "asherah" was a cultic object
while others have reason to conclude that the inscription refers to the goddess.
Either way....
cultic object - "Thou shalt not make any graven image" - Exodus 20:4-6
goddess - "Thou shalt have no other gods before me" - Exodus 20:3
Plus all these "monotheistic" verses that were written later:
What Does the Bible Say About Monotheism?
So Bowman, how does it feel to believe in a form of evolved polytheism?
It's really no different than Greek mythology. At least the Greeks had
better stories. Rotftol!!!
I see. Secret identity chaffing behind a screen.I feel like this is a one way street.
Celsus, obviously you are not of the christian faith, so what are you? Atheist? Agnostic? Buddhist? etc.
Just a thought.....The two things our bodies do without us thinking about it and that are needed for life are..
1. Heart Beat
2. Breath
The breath of every living thing is in the hand of God.....To me, the fact that I do not have to use my thought to keep the above two listed working, testifies to a higher power in control of my life. If we were totally in control of our lives and what is needed to keep us alive...we would all die the first night we closed our eyes in sleep.
You believe in AIR which you cant see.....yet you can feel it on your skin, see the results of it in the billowing clouds and in the trees, see the results of it in the waves of the ocean and or dust blown in a dust storm etc. Same is true with God to those who believe the simple truths outlined in the word.
Quoting other sources mean nothing at the end of the day and just because someone has a piece of paper that states that they know something is a farce at best.....
Your cited sources<----taught by this man with a piece of paper that said he knew something<---taught by this man that had a piece of paper that said he knew something<----so on and so forth all the way down to the first man that had a piece of paper that said he knew something<------WHO SIGNED HIS PIECE OF PAPER that said HE knew something......what a joke for sure! Lets just write ourselves a degree and what do you know.....we actually know something......sounds like a degree from IMA MO University and the college of STOOPIDVILLE<----yeah I know how to spell STUPID!

I'm still waiting for you to defend just ONE of your googled assertions....and yet, you keep jumping around like you are about to get banned.
Defend your googled wiki reference.
Don't run from what you posted...
Well, if you'd take an honest look at the evidence one might be inclined to ask
"which God?"
By the way, how can you hate something that you don't believe in? That doesn't
make any sense.
Well, your on here right. and your arguing against it, that's kind of a foolish question isn't it
According to your worldview why would you care if we believe? Do you think it improves your survival ability to question us, or is it just to make yourself feel better about the burning question in your own soul, that you cannot answer, or that you can answer it, that there is a God, that you must account to in the end, so for your "survival" you get on here an argue away what you hate
Right....
View attachment 88790
because it is radically different than Phoenician altars, and other altars of other pagan peoples in the area at the time. it is built exactly as described in the Bible narrative.
and it dates to exactly the time that the Bible's internal chronology indicates, and is located in exactly the place that the Biblical narrative says it should be.
because it is Joshua's altar, is exactly where Joshua's book says it should be, and dates from the time Joshua's book says it should, it corroborates the narrative in Joshua. this turns the 'no exodus' hypothesis squarely on it's head.
you really ought to watch the video i posted. it was made 2 years after Propp's book, and details findings (such as the altar at Ebal) made after he wrote it, findings which specifically refute the claim that there is "zero evidence" for Hebrew occupation of Canaan.
