If it is beyond your consciousness this means it is not proven and if you believe in things not proven requires faith.
sounds good... let's see what cycel says...
If it is beyond your consciousness this means it is not proven and if you believe in things not proven requires faith.
are you saying that there is a code you must follow ....the scripture says....
Acts 2:38-39King James Version (KJV)
[SUP]38 [/SUP]Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
[SUP]39 [/SUP]For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call
......those are simple instructions.....you refuse to follow them but you want to follow some imaginary code....
I don't know who you are agreeing with, but it is not me. We are talking about religious faith here, not the kind of faith or trust that I place in my dentist. I know that my dentist is not infallible. He might make a serious mistake, but I trust that most of the time all will go well on my visits. I also know that my views on evolution, for example, are open to modification. I do not have locked-in beliefs, in fact I fully expect changes and revisions and even completely new discoveries that will require that I modify my outlook or interpretation. You, on the other hand, don't expect to modify your religious beliefs at all. You don't expect that new findings will ever require you to dump some aspect of your beliefs about God. Your faith is locked-in because it is a religious faith.I agree that your atheist belief is based upon faith...
Welcome to the discussion Watty.Satan's new trick with the Word is to change the definition of the word.
Watty said:If it is beyond your consciousness this means it is not proven and if you believe in things not proven requires faith.
Hi Dan,sounds good... let's see what cycel says...
I don't know who you are agreeing with, but it is not me. We are talking about religious faith here, not the kind of faith or trust that I place in my dentist. I know that my dentist is not infallible. He might make a serious mistake, but I trust that most of the time all will go well on my visits. I also know that my views on evolution, for example, are open to modification. I do not have locked-in beliefs, in fact I fully expect changes and revisions and even completely new discoveries that will require that I modify my outlook or interpretation.
Welcome to the discussion Watty.
The problem with this claim of yours is that languages are constantly evolving. We have no need of Satan to explain how words change. They change all the time so you have no way of confirming this claim. It becomes something you must simply believe on faith.
First, the codes in the Bible are not for salvation. They merely support the truth of God's written Word which testifies of Jesus Christ (Who is salvation - 1 John 5:12). Second, read Revelation 13:18. Does it not tell you to count a number as a part of wisdom? What do you think passage tells you to do? Third, what are the odds that each number in the Bible has a specific repeatable meaning?
I will end with Hebrews 11:1 – “And what is faith? Faith gives substance to our hopes, and makes us certain of realities we do not see.” The problem is, if we can’t see a specific reality then for all we know we are simply imagining it. There is enough disagreement in Christian theology to make it clear religious truth is not as obvious as some believers would have us believe. For us atheists, on the other hand, the simple absence of belief leaves little for us to quarrel about.
Hi Dan,
I spotted my name so thought I would jump in. I don't know what the discussion was about, but it seems to me Watty might be correct. If something lies beyond our consciousness then that says to me it is beyond our awareness, but is it beyond our ability to detect it? If so then belief in the thing in question must be grounded in faith. What were you guys talking about?
say, Cycel, would you agree that acceptance of anything beyond our own conscieousness requires belief?
If it is beyond your consciousness this means it is not proven and if you believe in things not proven requires faith.
sounds good... let's see what cycel says...
back in post #79, I put up a question
watty commented in post #80
which brought about my comment #81
and, here we are... so, I'm interested in what comments you have on "would you agree that acceptance of anything beyond our own consciousness requires belief?"
also, nice to meet you!
Is God's word so weak that it needs support?God's word is truth without code support.... is your faith so little that you need support? then ask God to increase your faith...what can a code tell you that God cannot? You say you trust God but your confidence is in man's devices... Count a number does not mean to look or a code.....or follow a code...
I don't know who you are agreeing with, but it is not me. We are talking about religious faith here...
If so that's a very sad state of affairs.i suspect that you are more religious about your dental care than many Christians are about their souls.
If something is beyond our consciousness that says to me we are unaware of it. I am not sure how we could form a belief about something, the existence of which we are not aware. Perhaps I am not understanding what you mean by "beyond our consciousness"?... so, I'm interested in what comments you have on "would you agree that acceptance of anything beyond our own consciousness requires belief?"
Watty, words do evolve. Language evolves. We don't need a supernatural explanation to explain why this happens. Are you really unaware of this phenomena? The evolution of the English language is very well documented. You can look it up.Cycel, you took my post the wrong way. Satan deceives us through changing the definition of words. Words do not evolve.
First of all the word ‘gay’ did not exist in biblical days. According to my 3 vol. Oxford Dictionary the earliest appearance of the word gay in English (meaning mirth or joy, light hearted or carefree) was in the late 17th century.watty said:Example: The word gay in biblical days meant happy, joy, and celebrate, homosexuality was not a part of the definition as it is now. Most young people only know the word gay to mean homosexuality, people under 35 years of age. Do your own survey ask various people from different age groups what does gay mean.
I completely disagree with you. Also, you have failed to address most of my argument. However, I am out of time this evening.No Cycel, you are talking about religious faith. I'm talking about a great many things which include both faith in general and the faith that you've chosen to willfully exercise.
Atheism is a metaphysical worldview which requires faith to assert a certainty about the falseness of all transcendent religious assertions and the non-existence of God.
As someone who interacts with God and experiences the supernatural, I know that your atheistic worldview is false. But that's a result of actual experience at present and not faith though initially my journey began by exercising my will in a saving faith toward what turned out to be the correct worldview in which case faith became an instrument and not a fruitless exercise like your own faith in the false atheistic worldview is.
And you're continuing misunderstanding of how faith is used in the bible needs to be constantly corrected. In the bible, faith is a word that refers both to intellectual belief and to relational trust or commitment. Biblical faith certainly is not the unsupported belief in flying spaghetti monsters you atheists misrepresent it as.
Let me ask you my friend. Does this topic make you feel emotional? Are you basing your thinking here on God's Word and the passage that I have shown you? Do you think truth outside the Bible that agrees with the Bible is bad? Then why did Jesus quote the truth of real world examples?
If you say God is truth why do you need man's truth to tell you that God is true.....If a man does not believe God's truth do you think he will believe man's truth about God? ...I am convinced of God I need no other truth outside the scriptures ....that does not mean they are bad or good....they just don't measure up to the faith that God has given me... so to even consider them would be a retrograde step ......