Cycel said:
You side-stepped the question, but I suspect you agree with me that the burden of proof would not lie with either of us to disprove the existence of Ganesh or leprechauns, and I think that answers the other half of the question I might pose.
Didn't mean to make it sound like I was avoiding. Thought you had read enough from me to understand where I am. All creation testifies of a creator. God is the only reasonable explanation for us, and everything else, being here. I know you don't accept that proof, and as I have said, God has proven Himself to me by answering several very pointed prayers in a miraculous manner. I know God is.
I know you feel this way. Probably more than a few feel the same way for Ganesh. Maybe even some feel this way about leprechauns.
Cycel said:
On the other hand, you can offer no proof of any kind of leprechauns. There has been a lot of people look at the end of the rainbow and none of them has come up with that pot of gold yet.
We both know that leprechaun gold is said to be very elusive. And besides, I don't believe in leprechauns either, and I know neither of us believes in Ganesh, but that's not the point.
You posted the quote from Ravi Zacharias, stating that, “To sustain the belief that there is no God, atheists must demonstrate infinite knowledge.” Clearly you felt this was legitimately stated, or you would not have posted it. I am asking, if you substituted Ganesh for God, would the statement still be true?
“To sustain the belief that there is no Ganesh, non-believers must demonstrate infinite knowledge.” Can you truly prove there is no Ganesh? Can you prove there are no leprechauns? Do you not need infinite knowledge to reject belief in the existence of both these beings? That’s the argument Zacharias made and that you put forward.
You have told me you are absolutely convinced of the existence of God. You seem equally convinced leprechauns do not exist, but you didn’t mention Ganesh. I wonder, without infinite knowledge, how do you sustain belief Ganesh and leprechauns don’t also exist?
Do you now see the problem with Zacharias’ statement? We don’t need to sustain disbelief in Ganesh because the elephant-headed god has no validity in our minds and for the atheist Yahweh feels no more real than either Ganesh or leprechauns. We don’t require infinite knowledge to disprove those things we know don’t exist. You’d agree with that, yes? Does this make sense to you?