What is the different between original sin and daily sin.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Nov 26, 2011
3,818
62
0
.
Correction of previous post #217:


Jesus disagrees with you in Lk 11:50, where he holds the present generation guilty of the sin of their forefathers all the way back to the beginning of the world.
The blatant twisting of reason that people like you resort to in order to uphold a fallacious religious dogma is truly a sight to behold. You are no different than the avowed materialist who insists that it is an absolute fact that life spontaneously generated from non-living material at some stage in the distant past.

You throw all reason right out the window, plug your ears, fuzz up your mind and just parrot the same thing over and over.

The text says...

Luk 11:46 And he said, Woe unto you also, ye lawyers! for ye lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers.
Luk 11:47 Woe unto you! for ye build the sepulchres of the prophets, and your fathers killed them.
Luk 11:48 Truly ye bear witness that ye allow the deeds of your fathers: for they indeed killed them, and ye build their sepulchres.
Luk 11:49 Therefore also said the wisdom of God, I will send them prophets and apostles, and some of them they shall slay and persecute:
Luk 11:50 That the blood of all the prophets, which was shed from the foundation of the world, may be required of this generation;
Luk 11:51 From the blood of Abel unto the blood of Zacharias, which perished between the altar and the temple: verily I say unto you, It shall be required of this generation.
Luk 11:52 Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered.

Jesus was speaking to religious hypocrites who were inwardly wicked...

Luk 11:39 And the Lord said unto him, Now do ye Pharisees make clean the outside of the cup and the platter; but your inward part is full of ravening and wickedness.

These evil people who were the religious authority of the day and these people persecuted those who contended for righteousness and heart purity. They opposed the truth in the same manner as their ancestors did before them and Jesus warned them that due to this that the physical judgement of these people was long overdue. It was THIS generation when things would be called into account and this was fulfilled when the Romans lay siege and eventually saved Jerusalem. A siege where the Jews even resorted to cannibalism in some cases, and were eventually butchered by the Romans when the city was sacked and burned.

Yet somehow in your mind you pull a verse out of that and use it as a proof text of Original Sin, in particular inherited guilt.

That you would compare wicked religious people who were opposing Jesus to an innocent baby who knows nothing is absolutely inane.

You have simply deactivated your brain when it comes to these very simple issues.

God is a just and holy God and justice demands that an innocent is not held guilty of a crime they did not commit. 1 + 1 = 2. It is only in the mind of people like you where 1 + 1 = 3.
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Elin said:
Jesus disagrees with you
in Lk 11:50, where he holds the present generation guilty of the sin of their forefathers
all the way back to the foundation of the world.
The text says...

Luk 11:46 And he said, Woe unto you also, ye lawyers! for ye lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers.
Luk 11:47 Woe unto you! for ye build the sepulchres of the prophets, and your fathers killed them.
Luk 11:48 Truly ye bear witness that ye allow the deeds of your fathers: for they indeed killed them, and ye build their sepulchres.
Luk 11:49 Therefore also said the wisdom of God, I will send them prophets and apostles, and some of them they shall slay and persecute:
Luk 11:50 That the blood of all the prophets, which was shed from the foundation of the world, may be required of this generation;

Luk 11:51 From the blood of Abel unto the blood of Zacharias, which perished between the altar and the temple: verily I say unto you, It shall be required of this generation.
And their blood was spilt when Jerusalem was destroyed in punishment for the murders from Abel to Zecharias.

What part of these two verses do you not understand?

As you do not understand Ro 3:10; 4:5, 5:18, 8:7-8; Eph 2:3.
 
Last edited:
Nov 26, 2011
3,818
62
0
Should any of us be surprised that the religious authorities of the modern era are just as deceived and wicked as those in the time of Jesus.

It is the pattern throughout history. The nation of Israel corrupted itself with false teaching and God sent prophets like Isaiah and Jeremiah, among many others, to bring reproof to the wickedness of the people.

Many years later Jesus came upon the scene and nothing had changed. It was the religious people who were the most fierce in their opposition of the truth.

Paul then warned the Ephesians...

Act 20:29 For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock.
Act 20:30 Also of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them.
Act 20:31 Therefore watch, and remember, that by the space of three years I ceased not to warn every one night and day with tears.

Paul cried out day and night for THREE YEARS warning the people of the false teachers who would infiltrate the church. These people would rise up amongst them.

Jude warned us...

Jud 1:3 Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.
Jud 1:4 For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.

It is very obvious to anyone who reads early church writings that all the systematic theology developed since those early days is an utter corruption of the truth.

The quibbles in regards to positions of seats of power grew in the early Catholic Church where DOGMA began to replace FAITH THAT WORKS BY LOVE whereby things were left ripe for a man like Augustine to come onto the scene and merge Gnostic philosophy with Christian terminology and therefore develop a totally new religion. This religion grew worse and worse until the Reformation where Martin Luther rejected the indulgences of the established church system and hierarchy and took things right back to Augustine and developed his FAITH ALONE dogma which is premised on the Gnostic notion of dualism (ie. the flesh can sin whilst the spirit remains pure).

A behemoth of systematic theology was then developed upon this turn of events and it then divided itself in two, on one side is the Calvinists, on the other the Arminians. Both sides teach Original Sin and therefore by default Gnostic Dualism.

Salvation has henceforth been viewed purely in the abstract, disconnected from the true condition of the heart. The Calvinists teach that the heart always remains corrupted due to the flesh, the Arminians teach that the corruption is purged through a second work of grace. BOTH SYSTEMS teach that one is saved and yet is still inwardly wicked WHICH IS EXACTLY what the Pharisees held to. The Pharisees sought their salvation in the rites, rituals, and rules of the law of Moses and yet they would not submit their hearts to the truth. The modern Pharisees see seek their salvation in dogmatic teachings and yet will not submit their hearts to the truth either.

We have got to wake up folks. The strong delusion is in full effect today. People argue in favour of sin and yet proclaim they love Jesus. We must not let ourselves be deceived. We must study to show ourselves approved, we must dig deep and diligently seek the truth. We then must be DOERS of the truth. If we refuse to do that because we like to be comfortable then we sell ourselves short because we don't appreciate the pearl of great price.
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
We must study to show ourselves approved,
we must dig deep and diligently seek the truth.
We must believe Lk 11:50-51; Ro 3:10; 4:5, 5:18, 8:7-8; Eph 2:3, which you do not.
 
Nov 26, 2011
3,818
62
0
And their blood was spilt when Jerusalem was destroyed in punishment for the murders from Abel to Zecharias.

What part of these two verses do you not understand?[/COLOR]
To be honest, you are not even worth responding to Elin. You are so deceived in your mind that even that which is simple is invisible to you. You have both eyes and ears and yet they fail you for you are both blind and deaf. Yet that is on you and I need not attempt to make a wild horse drink.

Your little one liners, out of context references and quips are completely without substance and only those choosing the comfort of a delusion find value in any of it. I am not really writing to you but to those who do not know much about these things yet have an honest heart of inquiry leading them. It is these people who can still be pulled from the fire, not those who have seared themselves through self deception.

When God judges this world in fire, the blood of all innocents will be demanded that day upon all those who burn. Not that they were considered guilty of the sin of Adam, no, they will be guilty of abiding in the methodology of rebellion in choosing evil.

The condemnation is that when light has come into the world men loved darkness rather than the light because their deeds were evil. It is not that they were "born evil" it is that they CHOSE evil and let evil consume them. That is the condemnation.

The theology of people like Elin utterly deny that and because it denies that it negates repentance. That is why these people vehemently contend against the necessity to forsake evil in turning to God.

If God actually requires sinners to forsake their wicked ways and thus stop all willful sin BEFORE He grants mercy then the salvation they believe in is but a fallacy. That is why if anyone posts anything on these forums that relates to heart purity being ESSENTIAL in salvation or that OBEDIENCE FROM THE HEART is mandatory as a requisite of salvation they will be vehemently opposed by the sin defenders, those who want a salvation without holiness and purity.
 
Last edited:
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Elin said:
Skinski7 said:
Luk 11:50 That the blood of all the prophets, which was shed from the foundation of the world, may be required of this generation;

Luk 11:51 From the blood of Abel unto the blood of Zacharias, which perished between the altar and the temple: verily I say unto you, It
shall be required of this generation.
And their blood was spilt when Jerusalem was destroyed in punishment for the murders from Abel to Zecharias.

What part of these two verses do you not understand?

As you do not understand or believe Ro 3:10; 4:5, 5:18, 8:7-8; Eph 2:3.
. . .if anyone posts anything on these forums that relates to heart purity being ESSENTIAL in salvation or that OBEDIENCE FROM THE HEART is mandatory as a requisite of salvation they will be vehemently opposed by the sin defenders, those who want a salvation without holiness and purity.
Non-responsive.
 

Cassian

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2013
1,960
7
0
We must believe Lk 11:50-51; Ro 3:10; 4:5, 5:18, 8:7-8; Eph 2:3, which you do not.
Seems you are stretching because you have nothing in scripture to support your errant interpretation. These texts are completely out of context regarding the why and how man sins. You exhibit the traits of proof texting hoping that if you throw enough verses around one might stick. It shows desperation and a lack of understanding of scripture.
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Elin said:
We must believe Lk 11:50-51; Ro 3:10; 4:5, 5:18, 8:7-8; Eph 2:3,

which you do not
.
Seems you are stretching because you have nothing in scripture to support your errant interpretation. These texts are completely out of context regarding the why and how man sins. You exhibit the traits of proof texting hoping that if you throw enough verses around one might stick. It shows desperation and a lack of understanding of scripture.
You've been previously invited to explain these verses in agreement with their words and with their context.

No explanation has yet been forthcoming from you.
 
Nov 26, 2011
3,818
62
0
You've been previously invited to explain these verses in agreement with their words and with their context.

No explanation has yet been forthcoming from you.
Yet Elin will always evade anything related to...


1. Heart purity as it pertains to salvation.
Mat 5:8 Blessed are the pure in heart: for they shall see God.
...Mat 5:20 For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.
Mat 5:21 Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment:
Mat 5:22 But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.
...
Mat 5:27 Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery:
Mat 5:28 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.
...
Mat 5:43 Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.
Mat 5:44 But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Mat 5:45 That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.
...
Mat 5:48 Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.


2. The cessation of the service of sin as it pertains to salvation.
Rom 6:4 Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.
Rom 6:5 For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection:
Rom 6:6 Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin.
Rom 6:7 For he that is dead is freed from sin.
...
Rom 6:16 Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?
Rom 6:17 But God be thanked, that ye were the servants of sin, but ye have obeyed from the heart that form of doctrine which was delivered you.
Rom 6:18 Being then made free from sin, ye became the servants of righteousness.


3. The escaping of the corruption that is in the world through lust.
2Pe 1:3 According as his divine power hath given unto us all things that pertain unto life and godliness, through the knowledge of him that hath called us to glory and virtue:
2Pe 1:4 Whereby are given unto us exceeding great and precious promises: that by these ye might be partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust.
...
1Pe 4:1 Forasmuch then as Christ hath suffered for us in the flesh, arm yourselves likewise with the same mind: for he that hath suffered in the flesh hath ceased from sin;
1Pe 4:2 That he no longer should live the rest of his time in the flesh to the lusts of men, but to the will of God.






As for the verses Elin references (Luk 11:50-51, Rom 3:10, 4:5, 5:18, 8:7-8, Eph 2:3)...

Luk 11:50 That the blood of all the prophets, which was shed from the foundation of the world, may be required of this generation;
Luk 11:51 From the blood of Abel unto the blood of Zacharias, which perished between the altar and the temple: verily I say unto you, It shall be required of this generation.

The context is clearly about judgement and condemnation upon the NATION of Israel. Yet people like Elin ignore that context in order to isolate the passage and use it as a proof text that an individual is guilty of the sin of another, a notion that both defies justice and logic.


Rom 3:10 As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:

The context of this verse is in the comparison of the Gentile PEOPLE to the Israelite PEOPLE that both PEOPLE fall under sin as a whole. Paul is quoting the sentiment in both Psalm 14 and Psalm 53 where there is "none who seek after God, none who understand" among the FOOLS who deny God. The Old Testament is replete with examples of righteous people like Abel, Job and Daniel. Even in the New Testament the parents of John the Baptist are called righteous and blameless before God.

In Romans 3 Paul is contending that the Jews need a saviour just as much as the Gentiles. He is not contending for Original Sin and that all people are "born evil" as Elin asserts. A simple reading of the text bears witness that Paul is not even close to such a subject as the "birth nature" of a human being.


Rom 4:5 But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.

A very true verse. Yet this verse is not to be understood in isolation where it is very easy to put a false meaning upon it. Paul also describes faith as "working by love" (Gal 5:6) and that love "works no ill" (Rom 13:10) and that therefore faith establishes the law (Rom 3:31). Those who "walk in the steps of faith" are reckoned as righteous by God (Rom 4:12) thus deeds are connected to faith just as James teaches (Jam 2:17-24) because a working faith necessitates fruit be born of that faith. Unrighteousness is the fruit of unfaithfulness whilst righteousness is the fruit of genuine faith.

People like Elin snip Rom 4:5 from its context and use it to teach that God justifies an individual whose heart is still wicked.


Rom 5:18 Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.

The context of this verse is by way of example. We know this because in Rom 5:12 is speaks of death passing upon all men because all sinned and then connects that death reigning even over those who sinned in a different way to Adam (Rom 5:14). Death is the result of sin (Jam 1:14-15, Rom 6:32) and everyone sinning results in their death (Rom 5:12-14).

It is death that is passed on, not sin that is passed on. If it is death that is passed on because all sinned and if some of those who died sinned in a different way to Adam (Rom 5:14) then it is simply IMPOSSIBLE to conclude that the actual "sin of Adam" is itself what automatically brought death to everyone who was born after.

Simple logic which many throw completely out the window.

The death spoken of in Romans chapter 5 is SPIRITUAL DEATH not physical death as many appear to think. Many babies die without sinning. A baby cannot sin in the same way as Adam (disobey a command) and a baby cannot sin in a different way to Adam (disobey the light of conscience). A baby can only do wrong ignorantly which is not a sin unto death.

Judgement came by the offense of one man on to all people by way of example because this judgement came upon who sinned in the same was as Adam as well as those who sinned in a different way. This clearly demonstrates that we are PERSONALLY RESPONSIBLE for our own sin, not Adam.

Eze 18:20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.


Rom 8:7 Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.
Rom 8:8 So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.

Romans 8:7-8 is not a proof text for inability. It is evidence that a human being remaining carnally minded (in service of the flesh) is an enemy of God because they are not subject or yielded to the law of God and simply cannot be whilst in that state.

That is why Paul taught that those who are Christ's have crucified the flesh with the passions and desires (Gal 5:24) through the Baptism of Repentance when the old man is crucified (Rom 6:4-7). It is through this process that the carnal mind is destroyed and the spiritual mind is birthed. It is then that the implanted word can save the soul.

Jas 1:21 Wherefore lay apart all filthiness and superfluity of naughtiness, and receive with meekness the engrafted word, which is able to save your souls.
Jas 1:22 But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves.


Eph 2:3 Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others.

This verse is simply speaking about a PAST HISTORY not a "birth state." The natural disposition to sin is something that develops through long practiced habit and it is actually unnatural because God has given us the light of conscience where we can "by nature" choose to do the right thing (Rom 2:14).

Sin is against nature. It is not natural.



See folks how every single verse that Elin referenced in order to contend for the notion that all human beings are "born evil" and "born guilty" are all ripped from their context and teach no such thing.

The bottom line is that the teachings of people like Elin give an EXCUSE to keep sinning because an individual can claim "I cannot help it" and thus the burden of responsibility is put on God to "make them" stop sinning.

The truth though is that the grace of God is already present for all men to guide and empower us if we would but submit to it by faith and in doing so the sin stops. The grace of God that brings salvation teaches us to deny ungodliness and worldly lusts, to live soberly, uprightly, in the present age. That is the grace of God that abounds when sin abounds, God has not pulled back his guidance and influence from the hearts of men, for He wishes none to perish but ALL to come to repentance.

It is through repentance where we turn from our wicked ways and stop rebelling to God and yield to His whole counsel. This yielding to God brings with it transformation because we no longer resist the word of God in our heart thus we are saved by grace THROUGH faith and not of any works we do apart from such a dynamic.


People like Elin are wolves. There are many wolves on this forum who deny the simple teachings of Jesus and instead contend for a false gospel built upon a foundation of human rhetoric which deceptively uses isolated Bible verses and passages as proof texts.

Wake up folks to the real danger here and wholeheartedly abide in the truth. Jesus warned that only a FEW will be saved in comparison to the the MANY who would be deceived and rejected.
 
Last edited:
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
We must believe Lk 11:50-51; Ro 3:10; 4:5, 5:18, 8:7-8; Eph 2:3,

which you do not
.


You've been previously invited to explain these verses in agreement with their words and with their context.

No explanation has yet been forthcoming from you.
Yet Elin will always evade anything related to...

1. Heart purity as it pertains to salvation.
2. The cessation of the service of sin as it pertains to salvation.
3. The escaping of the corruption that is in the world through lust.

As for the verses Elin references (Luk 11:50-51, Rom 3:10, 4:5, 5:18, 8:7-8, Eph 2:3)...
Every explanation you gave of these verses is not in agreement with the words of the text,
and your only explanation for that is

the text cannot mean what it states, or
the text does not make sense, or
the text is not logical, etc,

all based in the foolish human reasoning of Skinski7ism.
 

Cassian

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2013
1,960
7
0
Elin,

I will be glad to explain these verses even though they have no relevancy to the discussion.

Luke 11:51-52 and context. This is about the judgment that will be coming. There are several mentions of this in scripture. For the generation to whom Jesus is addressing the judgment came in 70 AD. There will also be a final judgment at the end of time where all the sin will be accounted for each unbeliever and punishment meted out.

There is nothing in this context that says God is imputing someone else's sin to another. It is the accumulation of consequences of Israel, who forsook God several times, suffered several captivities for their sins.

Rom 3:10 Paul is in a discourse with the Judiazers. He makes several hypothetical questions from vs 1;9 and then answers them in vs 10. The sum is that all men sin, there are none righteous. The Jews disobeyed the Law of Moses the Gentiles disobeyed the natural law, all have sinned.

However, nothing in this context again is about God imputing sin to man, or that man is born a sinner. It clearly states that man must be disobedient, which is a choice of man.

Rom 4:5 this verse is simply establishing justification by faith. What this has to do with your view I have no idea because it again does not say man is born a sinner or that God imputes sin to man.

Rom 5:18 the first part deals with the fact that because of the sin of one man (Adam) judgment came to all men which resulted in condemnation (death) which is stated in Gen 3:19, Rom 5:12. The solution to this condemnation of death is a gift vs 15-16 and the solution the latter part of verse 18 which is life given to all men. This aligns with Rom 11:32, I Cor 15:12-22, I Cor 15:52-54 and many others.

Again, nothing in this verse that supports the theory of Original Sin.

Rom 8:7-8 The context is about the spiritual nature or difference between believers and unbelievers. Those who live according to the flesh, (give in perpetually to the desires of the flesh, Paul uses carnal mind) vs those who have believed and follow the Christ and are in the Spirit. Clearly showing man can choose, man can be in control over his sin. Man can with the help of the Holy Spirit combat sin.

The theory of Original Sin is categorically denied in this context. In fact under the theory, if man has a sin nature and can do nothing but sin, there would be no need for Christ to command us to not sin, or to be perfect as His Father is perfect.

Eph 2:3 We are all children of the flesh. Clearly referencing the fact that we are mortal beings and it is our fallen nature that causes us to sin. Aligns with I Cor 15:56. Being in Christ would be impossible under the theory of Original Sin. It is also why most who hold to the theory have accepted Augustine's Gnostic concept of man having a dual nature. That man can sin in the flesh and has no consequence because a person can be in the Spirit and the flesh has no bearing on the spirit of man.


None of these verses has anything to do with the false theory of Original Sin.
 
Last edited:
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Elin said:
Cassian said:
Elin said:
Skinski7 said:
We must study to show ourselves approved,
we must dig deep and diligently seek the truth.
We must believe Lk 11:50-51; Ro 3:10; 4:5, 5:18, 8:7-8; Eph 2:3, which you do not.
Seems you are stretching because you have nothing in scripture to support your errant interpretation. These texts are completely out of context regarding the why and how man sins. You exhibit the traits of proof texting hoping that if you throw enough verses around one might stick. It shows desperation and a lack of understanding of scripture.
You've been previously invited to explain these verses in agreement with their words and with their context.

No explanation has yet been forthcoming from you.
Elin,

I will be glad to explain these verses even though they have no relevancy to the discussion.
You are the one who entered this particular discussion, to which they are relevant.

Luke 11:51-52 and context. This is about the judgment that will be coming. There are several mentions of this in scripture. For the generation to whom Jesus is addressing the judgment came in 70 AD. There will also be a final judgment at the end of time where all the sin will be accounted for each unbeliever and punishment meted out.

There is nothing in this context that says God is imputing someone else's sin to another. It is the accumulation of consequences of Israel, who forsook God several times, suffered several captivities for their sins.

Rom 3:10 Paul is in a discourse with the Judiazers. He makes several hypothetical questions from vs 1;9 and then answers them in vs 10. The sum is that all men sin, there are none righteous. The Jews disobeyed the Law of Moses the Gentiles disobeyed the natural law, all have sinned.

However, nothing in this context again is about God imputing sin to man, or that man is born a sinner. It clearly states that man must be disobedient, which is a choice of man.

Rom 4:5 this verse is simply establishing justification by faith. What this has to do with your view I have no idea because it again does not say man is born a sinner or that God imputes sin to man.

Rom 5:18 the first part deals with the fact that because of the sin of one man (Adam) judgment came to all men which resulted in condemnation (death) which is stated in Gen 3:19, Rom 5:12. The solution to this condemnation of death is a gift vs 15-16 and the solution the latter part of verse 18 which is life given to all men. This aligns with Rom 11:32, I Cor 15:12-22, I Cor 15:52-54 and many others.

Again, nothing in this verse that supports the theory of Original Sin.

Rom 8:7-8 The context is about the spiritual nature or difference between believers and unbelievers. Those who live according to the flesh, (give in perpetually to the desires of the flesh, Paul uses carnal mind) vs those who have believed and follow the Christ and are in the Spirit. Clearly showing man can choose, man can be in control over his sin. Man can with the help of the Holy Spirit combat sin.

The theory of Original Sin is categorically denied in this context. In fact under the theory, if man has a sin nature and can do nothing but sin, there would be no need for Christ to command us to not sin, or to be perfect as His Father is perfect.

Eph 2:3 We are all children of the flesh. Clearly referencing the fact that we are mortal beings and it is our fallen nature that causes us to sin. Aligns with I Cor 15:56. Being in Christ would be impossible under the theory of Original Sin. It is also why most who hold to the theory have accepted Augustine's Gnostic concept of man having a dual nature. That man can sin in the flesh and has no consequence because a person can be in the Spirit and the flesh has no bearing on the spirit of man.

None of these verses has anything to do with the false theory of Original Sin.
Cassian, your explanations are not true to the words of the text.

You've left many of the words on the table unexplained.

Non-responsive.
 
Last edited:

Cassian

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2013
1,960
7
0
You are the one who entered this particular discussion, to which they are relevant.


Cassian, your explanations are not true to the words of the text.

You've left many of the words on the table unexplained.
It is not surprising that you are true to form. If one has no substantive refutation or just cannot explain their own view, they always revert to this kind of remark.

Where is your evidence that they are not true to the text? Empty assertions seem to be your bread and butter?
 
Last edited:
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Elin said:
You are the one who entered this particular discussion, to which they are relevant.

Cassian, your explanations are not true to the words of the text.

You've left many of the words on the table unexplained
.
Where is your evidence that they are not true to the text?
I. Your words are not true to the text in:

Ro 5:18 - You are using the same refutation resource as is Skinski7, which are not true to the NT meaning of "condemnation," as seen in

Jn 3:18: Whoever does not believe stands condemned already,
because he has not believed in the name of God's one and only Son."

The condemnation for unbelief is eternal death, eternity under the wrath of God, it is not physical death.
In the NT, "condemnation" is to eternal death.

Jn :36: "whoever rejects the Son will not see life, for God's wrath remains on him."

Whoever rejects the Son is denied eternal life, not physical life.
God's wrath is condemnation to eternal death.

In the NT, "condemnation" is to eternal death, not physical death.

Your words not true to the NT meaning of "condemnation," thereby misinterpreting Ro 5:18.

Ro 8:7-8 - establishes that unbelievers (the sinful unregenerate nature) are
rebellious,
insubordinate,
spiritually powerless and
cannot please God, and

therefore, prior to regeneration (rebirth) cannot perform any works as a condition of eternal life.

Your words are not true to the total spiritual inability of unregenerate man in Ro 8:7-8,
rendering man unable to perform works as a condition of salvation.

II. You left words on the table unexplained:

Lk 11:50 - This generation will be held responsible for the blood of all the prophets that has been shed
since the beginning of he world.

Eph 2:3 - You did not address the words "
by nature objects of wrath," where the Greek word
for "nature" means "born as such," or "naturally born."

The blue texts have not been explained.

III. The following verses were never presented as support for original sin, and were inadequately addressed by you:

Ro 3:10 - establishes that no one, apart from faith in Jesus Christ, has any righteousness;
and performs any kind of works as a condition for salvation.

Ro 4:5 - establishes that God
justifies the wicked, that justification is not conditioned on any kind of works.

So your words are not true to the text in Ro 5:18, 8:7-8,

and you left words on the table in Lk 11:50; Eph 2:3.
 

Cassian

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2013
1,960
7
0
I. Your words are not true to the text in:

Ro 5:18 - You are using the same refutation resource as is Skinski7, which are not true to the NT meaning of "condemnation," as seen in

Jn 3:18: Whoever does not believe stands condemned already,
because he has not believed in the name of God's one and only Son."
he and I are correct. John 3:18 has absolutely nothing to do with the condemnation of Rom 5:18, In fact the condemnation of John 3:18 is an absolute impossibility unless Christ first gives life to the world, to all mankind so that each individual could be judged by faith. The Condemnation of Rom 5:18 is referencing death due to the fall, the sin of Adam. The text states it twice and the context states it several more times. How could you possibly miss such a clear statement regarding the work of Christ by his Incarnation and resurrection. I even give you a list of about 10 other texts that support Rom 5:18.


The analogy is that your view has a judge passing judgement on a dead man. What good would 30 years in jail do, it he is already dead.

The condemnation for unbelief is eternal death, eternity under the wrath of God, it is not physical death.
In the NT, "condemnation" is to eternal death.
agreed when the subject is about a person's faith. This context is about what Christ accomplished for us in reversing the fall of man, the condemnation to physical death.
: "whoever rejects the Son will not see life, for God's wrath remains on him."
Irrelevant unless a man has life so that he can either be given eternal life based on faith or damnation if rejects Christ.

Whoever rejects the Son is denied eternal life, not physical life.
God's wrath is condemnation to eternal death.
Agreed but irrelevant to the topic/context. The context is about what Christ accomplished for us, not what man does relative to faith.

In the NT, "condemnation" is to eternal death, not physical death.
ONLY if the context says so. All the texts I listed earlier all very specifically are either referring to physical death or physical, (eternal existence). In Rom 5:12, Rom 5:18 the word "condemnation" is referring to the consequences of the fall, and the work of Christ in overcoming the fall, or condemnation of death.

Your words not true to the NT meaning of "condemnation," thereby misinterpreting Ro 5:18.
which you have yet to prove outside of your assertion. it has been the meaning of scripture for 2000 years unchanged. It is the biblical support for the Incarnation of Christ and what Christ accomplished for the world/mankind. To prove me incorrect you need to prove that the Incarnation is not a scriptural teaching. You also need to show that man was created fallen, mortal, rather than became mortal as the consequence of Adam's sin.

- establishes that unbelievers (the sinful unregenerate nature) are
rebellious,
insubordinate,
spiritually powerless and
cannot please God, and

therefore, prior to regeneration (rebirth) cannot perform any works as a condition of eternal life.
which is not scriptural either. It is taken right the annuls of Calvin's Institutes.

Your words are not true to the
total spiritual inability of unregenerate man in Ro 8:7-8,
rendering man unable to perform works as a condition of salvation.
that may be the understanding of Calvin and Reformed proponents but cannot be proven by scripture without his presuppositions.

You left words on the table unexplained:

Lk 11:50 - This generation will be held responsible for the blood of all the prophets that has been shed
since the beginning of he world.
have you ever read about the reason for the captivity of the Israelites twice in their history? Did you read of Christ prophecy for the destruction of Jerusalem and the historical record of its occurance in 70AD

That generation suffered the sum total of all the disobedience of the entire nation. Three strikes and out. It was the entire nation, not just individuals who rebelled against God. I think this has been explained to you twice already. An nothing to show why you think scripture is incorrect?

- You did not address the words "
by nature objects of wrath," where the Greek word
for "nature" means "born as such," or "naturally born."
we are all born mortal beings because of the one sin of Adam for which the judgment was death. Unfortunately, all men sin and under that condemnation there was no hope. It was dust to dust. Which is why Christ gave life to all men, all men are saved by grace vs5 backs up Rom 5:18, I Cor 15:12-22 and all the other texts I cited.
blue texts have not been explained.

III. The following verses were never presented as support for original sin, and were inadequately addressed by you:

- establishes that no one, apart from faith in Jesus Christ, has any righteousness;
and performs any kind of works as a condition for salvation.
The text says nothing about works. all it says is that all are unrighteous, meaning all are sinners.

- establishes that God
justifies the wicked, that justification is not conditioned on any kind of works.
absolutely correct but it applies to mankind. This is exactly what Rom 5:6-10 restates as does Rom 5Z:18. Christ justified, reconciled, redeemed, made the world right with God. But this has nothing to do with justification by faith.

So your words are not true to the text in Ro 5:18, 8:7-8,
As true as they will ever be. You have presented nothing that refutes what I stated.

and you left words on the table in Lk 11:50; Eph 2:3.
Answered above as well as answered before by me and Skinski7, I see.
 
Last edited:
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
John 3:18 has absolutely nothing to do with the condemnation of Rom 5:18,
Non-responsive.

The issue is not the relation of Jn 3:18 to Ro 5:18, the issue is the NT meaning of "condemn/condemnation."

Your words not true to the NT meaning of "condemnation," thereby misinterpreting Ro 5:18.
which you have yet to prove outside of your assertion. it has been the meaning of scripture for 2000 years unchanged
The NT consistently uses condemn to mean eternal death:

Mt 12:7, 37, 41, 42, 27:3; Lk 11:32; Jn 3:17, 18, 19, 5:24; R
Ro 8:1; 1Co 11:32, 34; 2Co 3:9; 1Tim 3:6; Jas 3:1, 5:9, 12; 2Pe 2:6; Jude 4.

It means physical death only when the word "death" is attached--"condemned to death."

Please show where "condemn/condemnation" without the word "death" attached
means the physical death to which all the sons of Adam must come.


"the sinful mind is hostile to God (rebellious),
it does not submit to God's law (insubordinate),
nor can it do so (spiritually powerless).
Those controlled by the sinful (unregenerate) nature cannot please God."

Therefore, prior to regeneration (rebirth) mankind cannot perform any works as a condition of eternal life.
which is not scriptural either.
Non-responsive.

The text speaks for itself. . .you just refuse to believe it.

Lk 11:50 - This generation will be held responsible for the blood of all the prophets that has been shed
since the beginning of the world.
That generation suffered the sum total of all the disobedience of the entire nation.
Does that cover all the way back to the beginning of the world?
If so, then they paid for sin they did not do, but which was imputed to them,
as Adam's sin is imputed to all men (Ro 5:18).


And if your explanation does not include sin all the way back to the beginning of the world, then you are

Non responsive. . .and do not address Jesus' specific words.

Eph 2:3 - You did not address the words "by nature objects of wrath," where the Greek word for "nature" means "born as such," or "naturally born."

God's wrath is condemnation to eternal death, not physical death
we are all born mortal beings because of the one sin of Adam for which the judgment was death.

Non-responsive.


 
Last edited:

Cassian

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2013
1,960
7
0
Non-responsive.

The issue is not the relation of Jn 3:18 to Ro 5:18, the issue is the NT meaning of "condemn/condemnation."



The NT consistently uses condemn to mean eternal death:

Mt 12:7, 37, 41, 42, 27:3; Lk 11:32; Jn 3:17, 18, 19, 5:24; R
Ro 8:1; 1Co 11:32, 34; 2Co 3:9; 1Tim 3:6; Jas 3:1, 5:9, 12; 2Pe 2:6; Jude 4.

It means physical death only when the word "death" is attached--"condemned to death."

Please show where "condemn/condemnation" without the word "death" attached
means the physical death to which all the sons of Adam must come.



Non-responsive.

The text speaks for itself. . .you just refuse to believe it.


Does that cover all the way back to the beginning of the world?
If so, then they paid for sin they did not do, but which was imputed to them,
as Adam's sin is imputed to all men (Ro 5:18).


And if your explanation does not include sin all the way back to the beginning of the world, then you are

Non responsive. . .and do not address Jesus' specific words.


Non-responsive.


so nothing substantive to either support your view, or to refute what scripture means and what I explained.

You are still asserting that Rom 5:18 is about imputing sin. Where is your corroborating texts that says God imputes sin in any man, let alone in Rom 5:18 when it is death that is passed to all men.

If you hold to any view of the Incarnation, could you explain just how Christ could be a man like us in every way, when you hold that all men are born sinners. Adam's sin is passed on to all men. Either Christ was a man with our human nature or He was not. What is your view?

Could you explain just how the punishment for sin means that God imputes sin in man. You have yet to produce any text that says God imputes sin to any man. Your context in Luke 11 is about punishment, not imputing sin. It seems you hold that God first needs to impute sin in man so that He can then punish man. Where is that taught in scripture?
 
Nov 26, 2011
3,818
62
0
so nothing substantive to either support your view, or to refute what scripture means and what I explained.

You are still asserting that Rom 5:18 is about imputing sin. Where is your corroborating texts that says God imputes sin in any man, let alone in Rom 5:18 when it is death that is passed to all men.

If you hold to any view of the Incarnation, could you explain just how Christ could be a man like us in every way, when you hold that all men are born sinners. Adam's sin is passed on to all men. Either Christ was a man with our human nature or He was not. What is your view?

Could you explain just how the punishment for sin means that God imputes sin in man. You have yet to produce any text that says God imputes sin to any man. Your context in Luke 11 is about punishment, not imputing sin. It seems you hold that God first needs to impute sin in man so that He can then punish man. Where is that taught in scripture?
You are speaking to a dogmatic brick wall and that is why all you get are vacuous and dismissive dogmatic responses.

Elin cannot think effectively because her mind is enslaved to dogmatism and therefore she cannot think outside the box. That is why you can go through here Christianchat.com post history and NEVER find any reference to the Biblical concepts of heart purity, being set free from the service of sin, and escaping the corruption that is in the world through lust. Instead she operates from the Calvinist world view which puts many issues completely off limits.

She will only respond within the confines of her boxed dogmatism and therefore certain subjects as well as interpretations of verses must be utterly avoided. Thus if you try and reason with her external to her paradigm all she can do is attempt to draw you into that paradigm.



Subjects Off Limits to Most People
Off limits because they contradict the false paradigm of being "born evil" and "disabled from yielding to God" whereby if "you cannot do something" then you simply "do not have to do anything." Which is why "not of works" to these people means "do nothing," instead of the true meaning which is "not of works done apart from grace through faith" "grace THROUGH faith" being an active dynamic, not passive trust in a provision.
1. Heart purity as it pertains to salvation.
Mat 5:8 Blessed are the pure in heart: for they shall see God.
...Mat 5:20 For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.
Mat 5:21 Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment:
Mat 5:22 But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.
...
Mat 5:27 Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery:
Mat 5:28 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.
...
Mat 5:43 Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.
Mat 5:44 But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Mat 5:45 That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.
...
Mat 5:48 Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.


2. The cessation of the service of sin as it pertains to salvation.
Rom 6:4 Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.
Rom 6:5 For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection:
Rom 6:6 Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin.
Rom 6:7 For he that is dead is freed from sin.
...
Rom 6:16 Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?
Rom 6:17 But God be thanked, that ye were the servants of sin, but ye have obeyed from the heart that form of doctrine which was delivered you.
Rom 6:18 Being then made free from sin, ye became the servants of righteousness.


3. The escaping of the corruption that is in the world through lust.
2Pe 1:3 According as his divine power hath given unto us all things that pertain unto life and godliness, through the knowledge of him that hath called us to glory and virtue:
2Pe 1:4 Whereby are given unto us exceeding great and precious promises: that by these ye might be partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust.
...
1Pe 4:1 Forasmuch then as Christ hath suffered for us in the flesh, arm yourselves likewise with the same mind: for he that hath suffered in the flesh hath ceased from sin;
1Pe 4:2 That he no longer should live the rest of his time in the flesh to the lusts of men, but to the will of God.
 
Nov 26, 2011
3,818
62
0
Here is what we find in Ezekiel...

Eze 12:2 Son of man, thou dwellest in the midst of a rebellious house, which have eyes to see, and see not; they have ears to hear, and hear not: for they are a rebellious house.

Why couldn't the referenced folk see or hear? It was due to rebellion. Rebellion brings blindness and deafness.

Those who teach Original Sin believe that rebellion is a birth state that cannot be turned from because it is natural.

Thus when they teach that one does not have to forsake rebellion in approaching God they are in effect dooming those who buy into that to being perpetually blind and deaf. If one believes they cannot yield themselves to God by choice then they won't do it because such an endeavour has already been neutralised in the mind.

Satan is a deceiver which means he works upon the mind. Babylon means confusion and that is why the false religious system can be likened to Mystery Babylon the Mother of Harlots. Systematic theology is a mass of confusion and contradictions which serves the purpose to completely avoid the plain teachings of Jesus Christ.

Jesus Christ taught that we must strive, do, dig deep, count the cost, die to self, pick up our cross, abide in Him, keep His commandments, do what He said, endure to the end and much, much more. All that is negated by the systematic theology these people believe in. They are the modern Pharisees beholden to a false religion and this false religion is everywhere, the seminaries, the book stores, television, radio, local churches. The delusion is complete and very FEW can see it.

Rev 13:7 And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations.
Rev 13:8 And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.
Rev 13:9 If any man have an ear, let him hear.
 

Cassian

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2013
1,960
7
0
You are speaking to a dogmatic brick wall and that is why all you get are vacuous and dismissive dogmatic responses.

Elin cannot think effectively because her mind is enslaved to dogmatism and therefore she cannot think outside the box. That is why you can go through here Christianchat.com post history and NEVER find any reference to the Biblical concepts of heart purity, being set free from the service of sin, and escaping the corruption that is in the world through lust. Instead she operates from the Calvinist world view which puts many issues completely off limits.

She will only respond within the confines of her boxed dogmatism and therefore certain subjects as well as interpretations of verses must be utterly avoided. Thus if you try and reason with her external to her paradigm all she can do is attempt to draw you into that paradigm.



Subjects Off Limits to Most People
Off limits because they contradict the false paradigm of being "born evil" and "disabled from yielding to God" whereby if "you cannot do something" then you simply "do not have to do anything." Which is why "not of works" to these people means "do nothing," instead of the true meaning which is "not of works done apart from grace through faith" "grace THROUGH faith" being an active dynamic, not passive trust in a provision.
I believe that you are very correct in your assessment. I understand that she is moving within the confines of the false paradigm of Calvinism. However, as the Berlin Wall fell, no wall is so hard that even a truly hardened heart could not be changed.