Well, working to love thy enemy, for example. Yeah, you might have to kill Him, but that is not quite murder as murder involves hatred. For example, a former soldier related a story about disarming a combatant, he didn't kill him, so it maybe argued that he didn't shoot with the intent to kill. Had he killed him, it may be argued that it was not his intent although it was a result. What governs whether he shot with at least a concern not to kill and shooting with "die $@#!" in his heart? That is the difference between guilt and innocence, and what sets apart the righteous from the unrighteous. Imo.