I see the pictures above, but what makes a dino become a bird?
The pictures do not convince me .... to obscure
The pictures do not convince me .... to obscure
Last edited:
I see the pictures above, but what makes a dino become a bird?
The pictures do not convince me .... to obscure
I'm so over this thread. I bid thee adieu. May some of you learn to use your brains.
I'm so over this thread. I bid thee adieu. May some of you learn to use your brains.
Are you trying to suggest that Sir Isaac Newton was never wrong? Of course he was! He was an incredibly brilliant human being, but this doesn't mean he didn't hold any flawed views. Isaac Newton was also an alchemist, alchemy having been debunked and discredited long ago.
You'll find numerous men and women throughout history who were absolute geniuses, many of whom worshiped different gods and sometimes even no gods. Many of them made huge scientific breakthroughs while supporting other ideas that were completely wrong. This is common, but this is what makes science so amazing. Science allows us to distinguish good ideas from bad ideas, rather than assuming all ideas from someone are correct simply because that person made a single breakthrough.
"Would you exclude a global flood about 4,400 years ago as causing the dino extinction?"
If course
The dinos were all gone and were never replenished upon the earth 1000 years ago before the flood of Noah's day came
The dynos went extinct because of the Lord's judgment against Satan's rebellion
There's a book called "In Six Days" written by scientists, I thought it might interest GS.
Don't understand something? .... ''The Devil's work''.
Evolution says nothing about the origins of life itself. It only describes a process that happened after life was already established.
So you think that modern dinos are birds?
Do you have a picture of one?
I read it many years ago. I have even met some of the contributors. Something I found interesting was that they became Christian, and then rejected science. John Baumgardner is a typical example.
One of the prominent counter examples was Glenn Morton. He graduated with his "Creation Geology" degree from the Institute for Creation Research, and went to work in the petroleum industry. He wrote that he expected to find, and expose the "lies of secular geologists" about sedimentary basins, and the age of the Earth. Instead he found out that he had been lied to by the ICR instructors. Old Earth Creation Science Testimony - Why I Left Young Earth Creationism, by Glenn Morton
I think this is the key. Those who read creationist literature do so to have their beliefs reinforced. They do not want to view material that runs counter to those views. In saying this I speak from personal experience.The mathagisticsts presented by "Dr" Cupps cannot fool an actual expert. But they will fool people that want to be fooled.
The bird thing is a total hoax concocted by intellectual idiots trapped in their man made folly
Wisdom and intellect are not necessarily congruent
Can anyone see the agnostic evolutionist in scripture?
This is what the Lord says [Romans 1:16-23]
It would be VERY CONVINCING to see some reptiles with partially formed wings, some with partially formed beaks, and some with partially formed hollow bones. For evolution to work, there should be millions of intermediate steps between a dino and a completely formed bird. Wonder where they are?
It is funny how they place their trust into circular reasoning, carbon dating and the opinions of mere men who think they actually know something based upon a signed piece of paper or two that states that they are intellectual and that they know something.....
...Those who read creationist literature do so to have their beliefs reinforced. They do not want to view material that runs counter to those views. In saying this I speak from personal experience.
Not to be found as there is no such thing.....again they (the intellectuals who have a piece of toilet paper on the wall that states that they know something) keep regurgitating (theory) as fact. There is no missing link to be found as evolution as a fact is a farce....as a theory is exactly that...a theory! It is funny how they place their trust into circular reasoning, carbon dating and the opinions of mere men who think they actually know something based upon a signed piece of paper or two that states that they are intellectual and that they know something.....Instead they will reject a book that was written by 40 different men over a period of 1600 years with most not knowing each other and from every gambit of life, yet it all flows perfectly and through attempt after attempt to be discounted, burned out, killed out it is still the number 1 best seller of all time.....they fail to acknowledge the fact that it contains (scientific) data that could not have been known by mere men and it (the bible) reeks of divine inspiration.....like Isaiah written in circa 720 B.C. and how he BY NAME identifies Cyrus the Persian who some 180 to 190 years later would conquer Babylon and write the decree to let the Jews return to their home land and or how even ALEXANDER the GREAT was so impressed with the BOOK of DANIEL and his predicted rise to dominance that he spared Jerusalem and gave them 7 years without taxation......They will ride their (opinionated) theories straight to the gates of hell, and even the rich man while cooking in the flames of hell will still reject the one true God and ALL of the PROOF that testifies to the truth and validity of the scriptures.......!
The subject of this thread is dinosaurs.
Your incoherent rant establishes that the T. rex fossils discovered to date are 6,000 to 4,000 years old as opposed to more than 65 million years old exactly how?