What of the dinosaurs?
- Thread starter Blain
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Your obsessive-compulsive posting of today is an incredible look into inner workings of a totally indoctrinated mind.
So what do you think of Ultra Conserved Elements?
Turtles and dinosaurs: Scientists solve reptile mysteries with landmark study on the evolution of turtles -- ScienceDaily
And please don't tell me not to go off topic like you do,
The word "dinosaurs" is in the article.
So what do you think of Ultra Conserved Elements?
Turtles and dinosaurs: Scientists solve reptile mysteries with landmark study on the evolution of turtles -- ScienceDaily
And please don't tell me not to go off topic like you do,
The word "dinosaurs" is in the article.
First, granite is a slow cooling macrocrystalline igneous rock. It forms in deep plutons. There are no "tracks" of any sort in granite.
Second, I doubt you know what tracks you are looking at. (I do. That was a 25 years younger me on the right. We were tagging, and putting a radio collar on an 18 month old mountain lion.)
Third, what tests did you conduct to determine the age of the "rock" you think you saw?
Fourth, show us the documented "tracks" and the geological segment and mapping.
Fifth, when will you stop posting these frauds? You have made people who might have believed you look stupid.
Second, I doubt you know what tracks you are looking at. (I do. That was a 25 years younger me on the right. We were tagging, and putting a radio collar on an 18 month old mountain lion.)
Third, what tests did you conduct to determine the age of the "rock" you think you saw?
Fourth, show us the documented "tracks" and the geological segment and mapping.
Fifth, when will you stop posting these frauds? You have made people who might have believed you look stupid.
That is why I put a / and the word rock after.....because it was set in rock/stone and there was about 25 meters of the tracks like the cat was stalking the deer.....it was an unusually dry period of drought and was usually under like 10 foot of water.....was rather surprised to find it....
I noticed that crack in the box and Dr. Spock Hurd didn't address the fact that there are deer and cat prints in granite/rock I wonder if they were being chased by a T. Rex some 65.9876453627236 million years ago??????
I noticed that crack in the box and Dr. Spock Hurd didn't address the fact that there are deer and cat prints in granite/rock I wonder if they were being chased by a T. Rex some 65.9876453627236 million years ago??????
First of all I do know what deer tracks and cat prints look like as I have trapped and or bow hunted deer for the last 30 years in a multitude of states all over this country.
Second I know what I was looking at, and there was about 25 meters of tracks WELL FORMED IN ROCK in an are that IS NORMALLY COVERED WITH WATER.
THIRD, you would mouth as what I have seen contradicts your false gospel
Fourth, come to my house in Missouri and call me a liar to my face!
Fifth...I would be more than willing to MEET YOU FACE TO FACE in MOUNTAIN HOME ARKANSAS and show you the tracks personally as it is only a three hour drive for ME......!
Second I know what I was looking at, and there was about 25 meters of tracks WELL FORMED IN ROCK in an are that IS NORMALLY COVERED WITH WATER.
THIRD, you would mouth as what I have seen contradicts your false gospel
Fourth, come to my house in Missouri and call me a liar to my face!
Fifth...I would be more than willing to MEET YOU FACE TO FACE in MOUNTAIN HOME ARKANSAS and show you the tracks personally as it is only a three hour drive for ME......!
Last edited:
Sid Roth and Bruce Malone are Tweedledumb and Tweedledeedumber.
If any of Bruce Malone's claims were legitimate, his claims would be published in reputable scientific journals.
Anybody who could prove Malone's claims would make money hand over fist.
You understand why, right?
Of course, Dr. Dino (Kent Hovind) made money hand over fist selling mindless drivel. Unfortunately for Dr. Dino, the rock billions of years old he hid the money under did not fool the IRS. You see, the IRS investigators did not believe his 6,000-year-old rock story.
If any of Bruce Malone's claims were legitimate, his claims would be published in reputable scientific journals.
Anybody who could prove Malone's claims would make money hand over fist.
You understand why, right?
Of course, Dr. Dino (Kent Hovind) made money hand over fist selling mindless drivel. Unfortunately for Dr. Dino, the rock billions of years old he hid the money under did not fool the IRS. You see, the IRS investigators did not believe his 6,000-year-old rock story.
C
A common misconception. Columbus was not the 1st person to believe that the earth was not flat.
Myth of the Flat Earth - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Myth of the Flat Earth - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Bruce Malone was a DOW Chemical chemist. His patents are all essentially the product of DOW Chemical teams, and even an administrator gets to "ride" on the patent. I have a friend who worked at Intel who had 15 patents in name. He was a primarily contributor to only a few.
Malone's patent history is further inflated by a common industry practice of stringing out applications. For example, Malone is listed on "US5527573 A" for the production of a closed cell polypropoylene foam. The application filed in 1996 was used to supersede applications filed in 1991, and 1992. The reason this is done is to delay the actual implementation of the Patent which has a fixed duration. By repeatedly filing continuations, the DOW company (or others) can claim a priority from 1991, but not worry about actually defending the patent. (And Malone's biographical notes get fluffed).
First big lie- 3:09-3:19 "in order to make a fossil you need to have something die, and be buried very deeply and very rapidly and then lots of water flush through the rock layers as the sediment is turned into rock."
There are several common fossilization mechanisms, none involve a rapid deep burial. If the sediment is carried by water, then there must be a very high velocity to carry large amounts of material. This creates what we call a "debris flow" and will more likely destroy any organic material than bury it intact. Below are short videos of a debris flow:
[video=youtube_share;k3W-wDIR-Os]http://youtu.be/k3W-wDIR-Os[/video]
Malone's patent history is further inflated by a common industry practice of stringing out applications. For example, Malone is listed on "US5527573 A" for the production of a closed cell polypropoylene foam. The application filed in 1996 was used to supersede applications filed in 1991, and 1992. The reason this is done is to delay the actual implementation of the Patent which has a fixed duration. By repeatedly filing continuations, the DOW company (or others) can claim a priority from 1991, but not worry about actually defending the patent. (And Malone's biographical notes get fluffed).
First big lie- 3:09-3:19 "in order to make a fossil you need to have something die, and be buried very deeply and very rapidly and then lots of water flush through the rock layers as the sediment is turned into rock."
There are several common fossilization mechanisms, none involve a rapid deep burial. If the sediment is carried by water, then there must be a very high velocity to carry large amounts of material. This creates what we call a "debris flow" and will more likely destroy any organic material than bury it intact. Below are short videos of a debris flow:
[video=youtube_share;k3W-wDIR-Os]http://youtu.be/k3W-wDIR-Os[/video]
Last edited:
Yes, a "circle" or "disk." There is a biblical Hebrew word for "sphere" or "ball." But that word was not used. Like other Mesopotamian cultures the early Hebrews believed in a disk shaped "mortal plain" with a limitless sea below.
Matthews, Victor H., Don C. Benjamin
2006 “Old Testament Parallels: Law and Stories from the Ancient Near East” New York: The Paulist Press.
Slifkin, Rabbi Natan
2006/2008 “The Challenge of Creation: Judaism’s Encounter with Science, Cosmology and Evolution” New York: Zoo Torah and Yashar Books
Sparks, Kenton L.
2005 “Ancient Texts for the Study of the Hebrew Bible” Peabody PA: Hendrickson Publishers
Speiser, E. A.
1962 "Genesis: Introduction, Translation and Notes" New York: Anchor Bible- Doubleday
And of course the standard lexical texts. Particularly useful is
Brown F., Driver S., Briggs C.
2007 (reprint from 1906) “Hebrew and English Lexicon: With an Appendix Containing the Biblical Aramaic: With Strong’s Numbering” Peabody Mass: Hendrickson Publishers (The Strong’s catalog #s was added by Hendrickson Publishers).
Matthews, Victor H., Don C. Benjamin
2006 “Old Testament Parallels: Law and Stories from the Ancient Near East” New York: The Paulist Press.
Slifkin, Rabbi Natan
2006/2008 “The Challenge of Creation: Judaism’s Encounter with Science, Cosmology and Evolution” New York: Zoo Torah and Yashar Books
Sparks, Kenton L.
2005 “Ancient Texts for the Study of the Hebrew Bible” Peabody PA: Hendrickson Publishers
Speiser, E. A.
1962 "Genesis: Introduction, Translation and Notes" New York: Anchor Bible- Doubleday
And of course the standard lexical texts. Particularly useful is
Brown F., Driver S., Briggs C.
2007 (reprint from 1906) “Hebrew and English Lexicon: With an Appendix Containing the Biblical Aramaic: With Strong’s Numbering” Peabody Mass: Hendrickson Publishers (The Strong’s catalog #s was added by Hendrickson Publishers).
The next major lie is that there are "enormous gaps- you find single celled animals and then starfish with nothing in between." (4:00 - 4:10).
The oldest exposed rock with a physical fossil was in Australia. It is a bacterial cell from a flint bed dated to 3.5 billion years ago. See:
Schopf, J. William
1999 "Cradle of Life: The Discovery of Earth's Earliest Fossils," Princeton University Press
For a detailed study of the geology and dating, see:
UENO, YUICHIRO, HIDEYOSHI YOSHIOKA, SHIGENORI MARUYAMA, and YUKIO ISOZAKI
2004 "Carbon isotopes and petrography of kerogens in ~3.5-Ga hydrothermal silica dikes in the North Pole area, Western Australia" Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Vol. 68, No. 3, pp. 573–589.
As far as we know, there were no critters more sophisticated for nearly another billion years. Then there was a period from about 2.5 billion years ago, to about 800 million years ago when more complex cells existed but there were still no multicelled animals. Instead there are a billion years of sediments with fossilized colonies of bacteria, and early yeasts. But something important did happen at 2.5 billion years ago- the oxygen levels of the seas and air started to raise. By the time we have found the first multicelled fossil, oxygen was near 20% of today's levels.
Then following nearly 200 million years of soft-body development, the levels of dissolved calcium carbonate became high enough to trigger the "Cambrian Explosion." See:
Erwin, Douglas H., James W. Valentine
2013 "The Cambrian Explosion: The Construction of Animal Diversity" New York: Roberts and Company Publishers
What the video people are trying to say is that there is no "geological column." There is. In truth, petroleum companies have found dozens of basins with the entire column intact, and in sequence.
The oldest exposed rock with a physical fossil was in Australia. It is a bacterial cell from a flint bed dated to 3.5 billion years ago. See:
Schopf, J. William
1999 "Cradle of Life: The Discovery of Earth's Earliest Fossils," Princeton University Press
For a detailed study of the geology and dating, see:
UENO, YUICHIRO, HIDEYOSHI YOSHIOKA, SHIGENORI MARUYAMA, and YUKIO ISOZAKI
2004 "Carbon isotopes and petrography of kerogens in ~3.5-Ga hydrothermal silica dikes in the North Pole area, Western Australia" Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Vol. 68, No. 3, pp. 573–589.
As far as we know, there were no critters more sophisticated for nearly another billion years. Then there was a period from about 2.5 billion years ago, to about 800 million years ago when more complex cells existed but there were still no multicelled animals. Instead there are a billion years of sediments with fossilized colonies of bacteria, and early yeasts. But something important did happen at 2.5 billion years ago- the oxygen levels of the seas and air started to raise. By the time we have found the first multicelled fossil, oxygen was near 20% of today's levels.
Then following nearly 200 million years of soft-body development, the levels of dissolved calcium carbonate became high enough to trigger the "Cambrian Explosion." See:
Erwin, Douglas H., James W. Valentine
2013 "The Cambrian Explosion: The Construction of Animal Diversity" New York: Roberts and Company Publishers
What the video people are trying to say is that there is no "geological column." There is. In truth, petroleum companies have found dozens of basins with the entire column intact, and in sequence.