-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
They already banned 5.45 X 39 with a mild steel core, so it would only make sense for them to apply the (albeit silly) law evenly.
K
First not all Democrats want or don't care if guns get banned.
As a number of Democrats are for the public to keep their guns, the difference is that no regular civilian has the need nor should have automatic weapons. A lot of people who have stood up for the right to bear arms and keep guns in the possession of civilians has been Democrats.
Rights are not based on need. If a man has a right to own a firearm then he should be able to possess any firearm he chooses. We have the right to bear arms to protect us from the government.
Citizens have firearms subjects do not. We should be more like Israel and teach firearm safety to all our citizens. Every citizen should go through basic military training which must include firearms qualification. Besides the discipline would do our young people some good. Take their phones and game boys away for 8 weeks. Make it part of their basic education required for graduation from school.
Insulate them from the radical professors in college.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
Citizens have firearms subjects do not. We should be more like Israel and teach firearm safety to all our citizens. Every citizen should go through basic military training which must include firearms qualification. Besides the discipline would do our young people some good. Take their phones and game boys away for 8 weeks. Make it part of their basic education required for graduation from school.
Insulate them from the radical professors in college.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
M
I have a lot of family in law enforcement in the state here , my brother and uncle are both in the THP and we discussed this issue and I ask them if they thought law-enforcement would obey a government order to disarm the people? They both told me that the law-enforcement here in our State have already made clear they would not ever obey such orders that are against the constitution. As long as our law-enforcement and soldiers still serve the people and the constitution, the liberals will not be able to move against the people...
K
Then you have not been around the neighborhoods I have been in, as they are automatic and not semi-automatic.
And I know about semi-automatic weapons as I use to own a AK-47 and used it for dear hunting, as the semi-automatic function and removing the bayonet from it and using a slide clip made it legal for hunting.
Guns our fine to own and I support them being owned, just not in the automatic variety that I see in the neighborhoods I have grown up in and been to.
K
The context of labeling Democrats is out of sorts though just because a handful now days maybe against civilian ownership of guns. The Democrats in the majority have always supported gun ownership and backed NRA.
I live in a state with the most lenient gun laws in the U.S. because of the Democrats that live here. Thank God I live in Missouri......
OK, then you have nothing to worry about, since they are illegal to own without extensive federal licensing, they are already essentially as banned as the government can make them.
V
???
It doesn't come with a bayonet, unless you've been in the Soviet/Russian Federation Army! It isn't a military weapon as produced for consumers in over 20 countries today! It is a model of the original Soviet Kalashnikov combat rifle.
Oh, but I see on Wikipedia's entry for the AK-47, this sorry excuse for an "online encyclopedia" (of misinformation) shows a picture of what they call an AK-47 with a bayonet. The pic is actually a Kalashnikov. Hmmmm .... veddy int'resting.
So I have to wonder aloud ... "Really??" Sounds questionable at best.
It doesn't come with a bayonet, unless you've been in the Soviet/Russian Federation Army! It isn't a military weapon as produced for consumers in over 20 countries today! It is a model of the original Soviet Kalashnikov combat rifle.
Oh, but I see on Wikipedia's entry for the AK-47, this sorry excuse for an "online encyclopedia" (of misinformation) shows a picture of what they call an AK-47 with a bayonet. The pic is actually a Kalashnikov. Hmmmm .... veddy int'resting.
So I have to wonder aloud ... "Really??" Sounds questionable at best.
Last edited:
K
Being illegal to own does not mean one can not get one, and like I said in the neighborhoods I grew up in and been to they did have automatics. Which there is no need for a civilian to have, and if civilians did not have the automatic weapons then there would be no need to give our police forces the military equipment they are getting.
Well you would be wrong on that as my AK-47 did come with the bayonet on it when my dad bought it for me.
I had to remove it to make it legal for hunting, and my dad had the German SKS model version of this gun and it came with the bayonet to.
While hunting it can not have the bayonet, a banana clip or any other clip that holds more than 10 rounds....
Yes, there are illegally owned automatic weapons around. If you're not advocating a policy change, you might as well be lamenting the availability of cocaine, because neither of them are going away anytime soon no matter how illegal they are. I don't see how it has much weight in a gun control discussion...
K
Because pretty much all to most semi-automatic weapons that are legal to own, by gun enthusiasts who know what they are doing can easily make that semi-automatic weapon into a fully automatic one.
People live in too much fear about the government and what they might do, so they take and fight for these weapons to fight back in case this happens. Yet the Lord clearly says not to live in fear, and especially not to fear those who can kill the body. He says fear God who can and will destroy the body and soul in the lake of fire for those who are disobedient to His ways.
Semi-autos... like your AK?
You're right, advocating policy change out of fear is a silly thing-- you're an order of magnitude more likely to be killed by a drunk driver than by someone with any type of rifle. (Someone without a uniform on, that is.)
So what's up with all these people terrified of mass shootings when alcoholic beverages kill so many more?
I am not deluded into thinking that a few rifles could stop genocide, so I guess you could say I'm not scared of either.
You're right, advocating policy change out of fear is a silly thing-- you're an order of magnitude more likely to be killed by a drunk driver than by someone with any type of rifle. (Someone without a uniform on, that is.)
So what's up with all these people terrified of mass shootings when alcoholic beverages kill so many more?
I am not deluded into thinking that a few rifles could stop genocide, so I guess you could say I'm not scared of either.
Last edited:
