Ok, now the "real" argument is becoming clear. It never was about the Jews having a right to expect a "homeland," it's all about a couple of things, or so, tied together.
1) Who today is God's chosen people?
[and this is a valid question]
2) End Times
[which I have no interest in discussing]
All the name calling and such aside, as I read the comments, this is where the real argument lies.
My only interest is in the 1st Point. These are my thoughts, and my thoughts only.
Under the First Covenant, God's chosen people were a Nation. The Nation of Israel
Under the New Covenant, God's chosen people are the Church.
All if this is fairly clear in various Scriptures. One of the best examples being Jesus as the Vine, and His children as the branches. Most Jews denied Christ, and this allowed Gentiles (the wild branches) to be grafted in, and Paul states that as God is able to graft in the wild branches, so is He able to graft in the natural, the Jews who denied Christ. However, one point of Paul's teaching that is most overlooked is the "condition" he added to this statement:
23 .) And they also, if they abide not still in unbelief, shall be graffed in: for God is able to graff them in again. When this occurs, the Jews must repent and confess Jesus as Lord and Savior in order to be "grafted in."
All this being said, this reality does not show that Israel today does not have the right to expect to have a "homeland."