G
GaryA
Guest
My "write novels" comment in post #139 was intended in a 'general' sense - and was not referring to JesusistheChrist.

My "write novels" comment in post #139 was intended in a 'general' sense - and was not referring to JesusistheChrist.
![]()
Precisely.He did not say that Paul was "least esteemed" --- he said that Paul thought himself to be "least esteemed"...
Hey, GaryA.I do not know for sure if any of this is actually intended to include me, but - for what it is worth... :
I do not know about others, but - I do not have the "luxury" of having the time that it would take to write the 25,000 words a day that it would take to "keep up" with some here who seem to be able to "write novels" - "right off the fingers into the keyboard" - in every post.
It "takes me forever to write anything" ( exaggerated "just a bit" to make a point ) - a "side-effect" of some things I will not discuss here and now.
I write [ relatively ] short posts because I really do not have the time to write long ones.
If I get "drowned out" -- it is because others are more "at liberty" to "drown me" by simply being able to produce more words / posts than I am able to produce in the same time frame - or, from hour to hour - or, from day to day.
Otherwise, I have decided that it is not worth my while to try to explain myself [ thoroughly enough ] ( which would take 10,000 words or whatever - hence, too much time... ) --- so --- I usually write short posts, because - it would take too much time to write enough words to explain - or address - every last detail...
I have said "plenty enough" in this post.
( It took me over a half an hour to write this post. )
![]()
I'll take you at your word, but it wouldn't be a problem either way. IOW, I've regularly been criticized on forums for the lengths of my posts, but here's the thing:My "write novels" comment in post #139 was intended in a 'general' sense - and was not referring to JesusistheChrist.
![]()
He said that he wasn't referring to me, so I'll just take him at his word and, as I said, it wouldn't bother me either way anyways.I dont think he writes novels, so Im not sure what you mean by that.
Hey, part of my "trademark commentary" is an occasional "zinger" just to keep things lively.Although I will say this (which I never said to him before either) he does tend to blow my mind in how he can sleep so little, work so much and still bring so much to the table (with the time available to him). And do so more thoughtfully (when he keeps it just scriptures) minus just a little of his unecessary trademark commentary (lol) but we are always at odds on that cause it gives me agita.
Those who had no standing in the Church were those judges who were outside the Church. Verse four is a question, to the Corinthian Church. Paul was asking them why they were doing such a shameful thing.
He said that he wasn't referring to me, so I'll just take him at his word and, as I said, it wouldn't bother me either way anyways.
Ironically, though, as I've told you before over the years, I HATE writing and it's somewhat laborious for me, but God's grace is sufficient for me. Furthermore, in even more irony, I've actually felt the call of God to write a book (or books) for years and I've struggled greatly with the same and I've never made it past the first few chapters on any work which I've sought to undertake at what I believe to be God's prompting. I do believe that I'll eventually get to the place where God affords me the much needed grace to accomplish the task, but I'm simply not there yet. Part of the problem is my time restrictions due to my long work hours and other responsibilities, but, again, I'm hoping that such will change for the better somewhere down the line.
Well, I do need to get ready for work.
Have a blessed day in the Lord.
Hey, part of my "trademark commentary" is an occasional "zinger" just to keep things lively.
lol.
Gotta run...
Thank you. I do always try to aim for 'substance' over 'length'...I think you do just fine on your posts GaryA, besides its not the length of the post is the substance.
I understand -- my more "lengthy" posts ... usually because of scripture added to the post.The bulk of my posts' lengths is normally SCRIPTURE...
Here is only ONE other rendering of the same passage......
1 Corinthians 6 GOD’S WORD Translation (GW)
Settling Disagreements between Christians
6 When one of you has a complaint against another, how dare you go to court to settle the matter in front of wicked people. Why don’t you settle it in front of God’s holy people? 2 Don’t you know that God’s people will judge the world? So if you’re going to judge the world, aren’t you capable of judging insignificant cases? 3 Don’t you know that we will judge angels, not to mention things in this life? 4 When you have cases dealing with this life, why do you allow people whom the church has a low opinion of to be your judges? 5 You should be ashamed of yourselves! Don’t you have at least one wise person who is able to settle disagreements between believers? 6 Instead, one believer goes to court against another believer, and this happens in front of unbelievers.
7 You are already totally defeated because you have lawsuits against each other. Why don’t you accept the fact that you have been wronged? Why don’t you accept that you have been cheated? 8 Instead, you do wrong and cheat, and you do this to other believers.
9 Don’t you know that wicked people won’t inherit God’s kingdom? Stop deceiving yourselves! People who continue to commit sexual sins, who worship false gods, those who commit adultery, homosexuals, 10 or thieves, those who are greedy or drunk, who use abusive language, or who rob people will not inherit God’s kingdom. 11 That’s what some of you were! But you have been washed and made holy, and you have received God’s approval in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God.[/QUOTE/ I don't personally like this interpretation. It changes the meaning of vs. 4. In my bible vs.4 is basically saying that even the least esteemed with the Holy Spirit is more than capable of judging matters, And that, as today we put highly esteemed with a tinge of respect of persons in charge. But I don't think Paul is saying "why do you set the least esteemed to judge? " as your translation is saying,in that it is a bad thing. far to often denomination have a click group that are highly esteemed that dominate the group and the Spirit inspired way of every member adding his measure of Christ is ,thrown out the window and a clergy/ laity type system is used. We forget that the Spirit in us is more than capable, which is usually thrown to the dogs in some denominations. Paul was being sarcastic in a way, but was also very serious. In another place Paul speaks of the least esteemed members being more needful to the body. Says although your heart is not esteemed with out ward comeliness, yet it is a very important member of the body to the point that we could not even live without this unseen member. Thanks
Paul is making a simple observation. The church is claiming to live in humbleness and love, yet rather than practising it between each other they are going to court. He is not suggesting churches should set up courts, but rather both parties should resolve the issue themselves. How it is resolved is up to the people involved, but this is fruit of the failure of forgiveness and love in the fellowship. We are not a legalistic body with rights of authority over each other, but a free community of people giving where there is need. The fruit of knowing things are going wrong is such a dispute, which indicates further investigation and questioning is required, which by ready corinthians is obvious.[/QUOTEwe should judge among ourselves now least we be judged latter.But if we read farther Paul says why don't you take being defrauded rather than going before the world or suffer wrong. this is suffering for the gospels sake, which Jesus spoke much about, giving your coat, going two miles, turn the other cheek, for this is what Jesus did,and we are to be like him.If Jesus had not turned the other cheek we would not be saved now. Although swaying of the straight and narrow and going from handling disputes in love to a domineering shunning or cultish permanency would be par for the course of fleshly led people.thanks
( Or, to try to get others to believe that they said something they did not actually say. )Precisely.
It's amazing how some people regularly twist other people's words in order to avoid what they've actually said.
To him - but, not only to him...And I know this is to him...
You didn't...Anyway, sorry I didnt mean to butt in there.
You need not be concerned about your comments -- I am not offended in the slightest. On the contrary -- I very much appreciate it when others give a voice to defend against the "uselessness" of the kind of thing you are speaking of in the quote above.Hey, GaryA.
My comment wasn't meant specifically for you (it was more general in nature), but I've obviously agreed with the posts of yours that I've actually read on this thread. DesiredHaven and I have known each other for about 10 years or so and we've both participated on 4 (at least) different forums together and she knows what I thought of the posters on the other forums. IOW, I doubted if any of them were saved...they really were a God-hating, scripture-hating bunch. Here, however, I've been happily surprised to encounter quite a number of people who seem to know what they're talking about and who seem to actually know Christ. At the same time, however, there is a rather large group of individuals here whom I believe don't know Christ, but have a headful of "knowledge" just the same and they pretty much disrupt most threads with their repeated errors. They are the ones whom I seem to regularly clash with and they are the ones who "drown out" others by repeatedly hijacking threads with their error.
Anyhow, believe me, I understand your time limitations. I was off the last two days, so I had a little more time than usual, but I had just finished working nine 16 hour days prior to that, so I really have to make time to post here myself normally. In fact, today I'll be leaving for work at about 6:00 a.m. and I won't get home until about 10:00 p.m., so it's "business as usual" again for me.
I hope that this helps to clarify my earlier comments a bit.
Have a blessed day in the Lord.
Please understand that - it was not so much the length of other people's posts that I was "lamenting" about in post #139; but rather, my inability to "keep up" with all of the ideas and details that are generally presented in ( some ) other people's "long" posts...I'll take you at your word, ...
Some of what you have said here is very familiar to me -- especially the idea of being called by God to do something ( write ) that is - "to say the very least" - "not my strong-suit"...He said that he wasn't referring to me, so I'll just take him at his word and, as I said, it wouldn't bother me either way anyways.
Ironically, though, as I've told you before over the years, I HATE writing and it's somewhat laborious for me, but God's grace is sufficient for me. Furthermore, in even more irony, I've actually felt the call of God to write a book (or books) for years and I've struggled greatly with the same and I've never made it past the first few chapters on any work which I've sought to undertake at what I believe to be God's prompting. I do believe that I'll eventually get to the place where God affords me the much needed grace to accomplish the task, but I'm simply not there yet. Part of the problem is my time restrictions due to my long work hours and other responsibilities, but, again, I'm hoping that such will change for the better somewhere down the line.
Well, I do need to get ready for work.
Have a blessed day in the Lord.