Hebrews 6:1-6

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
K

kennethcadwell

Guest
#61
He is a man pleaser and listener. Since God does not support his theories in the word. He left the catholic church, but he still is bound by many of their practices.

Once again stop your false bias allegations on me, as I give tons of scriptures to defend my stance that you constantly reject................So stop speaking for God as if you are always right and others are always wrong, that is called using foolish pride.....
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#62
By oldhermit

The Hebrew writer describes both the prior and latter states of those who had fallen away.
A.Their prior state - These had:

1. Been enlightened.
2. Had tasted the heavenly gift. (The word for tasted is γευσαμένους which means to experience. This is the same word that is used in 2:9 saying, Jesus "tasted" death for everyone. This is not a mere limited sampling, this is an embracing of the full experience.
3. Been made partakers of the Holy Spirit. These has received the indwelling of the Holy Spirit who serves as the Christian's seal of divine ownership.
4. Tasted the good word of God.

B. Present state - They have "fallen away." From what then have they fallen?

1. An enlightened state.
2. The experience of the heavenly gift.
3. The partaking or sharing of the Holy Spirit.
4. The good word of God.
5. They have crucified Christ all over again. Like those of 10:26-31, these have "trampled under foot the Son of God and regarded as unclean the blood of the covenant by which he WAS sanctified" (passed tense). In other words these now regard the blood that had once sanctified them as nothing more than the proverbial hog slaughtered on the altar.

C. The impossible dilemma - It is now impossible to renew them again to repentance. Why? Because they have fallen away from the very thing that brought them to repentance in the first place which was the word of God. It is now impossible to restore them to repentance. One cannot be RE-newed AGAIN to a state they have never occupied. Thus, having once been saved and then having fallen away, they cannot be brought back because they will no longer repent. This is of course representing the extreme case.

D. Their fate. Like the ground that yields thistles and thorns, they are cursed and they end up being burned. Just like those of 10:26-31, whose fate is to fall into the hands of a vengeful God who says, "I will repay." The parabolic illustration come out of Matthew 13:20-21, Mark 4:16-17, and Luke 8:13. They are worthless to the purposes of God and God discards them.

1. The writer is not saying they claimed to have tasted, but presents a statement of fact - "They had tasted." They had returned to the law. These had previously left the law in response to the gospel. Now, they are rejecting the cross and going back to the law. This is the foundation they were "laying again."
2. This is not a question. There is no "if" in the Greek. It simply says, παραπεσόντας - literally "having fallen away". This is a statement of fact based on actual cases, not a what if scenario. This is an aorist, passive, accusative verb. They had fallen away at some time in the past and that condition continues. They are still fallen away.
3. Under the law, sin was not forgiven based on those sacrifices, but based on what those sacrifices represented - the cross. Leviticus chapters 4 and 5 show us that they were indeed forgiven under the law but, it was not by the law. Even David understood this. "How blessed is the man whose transgression is forgiven, whose sins are covered...to whom the Lord does not impute iniquity," Psalms 32:1-2. He also knew those sacrifices were not the avenue through which forgiveness came. "Thou dost not delight in sacrifice or I would bring it." Psalms 51:1-2.
4. The inability to renew again is not linked to a supposition of "IF" they were to fall away. The impossibility is linked to the fact that after having been saved they have rejected the cross, not the old sacrifices, and in so doing had shamed Christ openly.
5. The writer does not say they cannot be saved again. He says that cannot be brought back to repentance again. This certainly renders them unable to remain saved since there is no longer repentance. These had once been in a saved relationship. Now that relationship has been severed; not by Christ but by them.
6. He is not comparing the crucifying of Christ again to the repetitious offering of O.T. sacrifice. Those who had rejected and fallen away were considering Christ worthy of the crucifixion. They were rejecting him and his sacrifice. Like those of 10:29, they were considering the blood of Christ "BY WHICH THEY HAD BEEN SANCTIFIED" an unclean thing, and had insulted the Spirit of grace.
7. The writer's point is that these had been sanctified - made holy - something that all of the sacrifices of the O.T. combined could never do. In verse 29, he even draws a contrast between the one's of whom he is speaking and those who died under the law for rejecting Moses. They rejected the blood after having been cleansed by it are now worthy of greater punishment than those who were under the Law. Verse 30 shows their fate.
This is a faulty view

The writter says for it is impossible, having falling away, to renew them to repentance.

It does not say they can fall away, it says if they could fall away, the impossible act is to renew to repentance.

vs 7-8 proves they can not fall away. "near to being cursed"


Non of the previous things say they were ever saved, One can taste the gift, partake of the benefits of the gift, and do all those things just by hanging out with Gods people. it is called blessing by association.
 
K

kennethcadwell

Guest
#63
Oh no, they gave the perfect word of God. They could not err..

At least thats what Ken thinks.

So you believe that the Apostles gave false teachings by the Holy Spirit ???
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#64
[SUP]6[/SUP] For if we sin willfully (rejecting God's grace and Salvation by faith through Jesus, rejecting God's forgivness for our sins is to wilfully sin) after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, (there is no more sacrifice for your sins cause Jesus already made the ultimate and final sacrifice. Therefore, you cannot be re-saved if you were to "wilfully sin" and fall away.)
[SUP]27[/SUP] But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.
[SUP]28[/SUP] He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses: (He that disobeyed the law of Moses died without mercy)
[SUP]29[/SUP] Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace? (Those who willfully sin by rejecting Jesus are rejecting God's mercy love and forgiveness for their sins and disobediences to the law. Disobeying the New Holy covenant of Grace and mercy and Truth is worse than disobeying the laws of Moses. God is offering you Grace, love and mercy and forgiveness for disobeying the laws and in rejecting Jesus they are rejecting God's grace love and mercy. That's why it's even worse than disobeying the old testament laws.)
[SUP]30[/SUP] For we know him that hath said, Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord. And again, The Lord shall judge his people.
[SUP]31[/SUP] It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.

4. If they reject the cross they are not saved. Anybody who is truly saved won't reject the cross, because he's already accepted it.

5. It takes somebody who doesn't believe in OSAS to continue to contradict themselves. You say that it does not say they cannot be saved again. It says they cannot be brought back to repentance. But this is a contradiction in itself since, in order to get saved, you have to repent of your sins. If you can't be brought back to repentance then you can't get re-saved. Nobody can sever your relationship with Christ, including yourself.

6.You're right, they were rejecting Jesus and His Sacrifice that's why their going to go to hell and can't get saved. They insulted the Spirit of Grace. What is the Spirit of Grace? Gift recieved at Christ's expense. They were rejecting God's free gift of Salvatiion, so, of course they're not going to get saved.

7. Exactly. but the discrepency is, did they hear the word of the Gospel and recieve it, got saved, then decided they didn't want to believe it then got unsaved, or did they hear the message of Salvation and the Good news of the Gospel of the Kingdom, but then rejected it without getting saved in the first place? At any rate, the message of the OP is still true and accurate, that is, if you were to lose your Salvation it would be impossible to get re-saved or be brought back to a place of repentance where your sins would need to be forgiven again, because in order for that to happen Jesus would have to come back and suffer and die for your sins again. Thus crucifying Him again and putting Him to an open shame. SHAME ON YOU!
Thanks, you went further than I did. I only used the other two verses about the earth and blessings, and near to being cursed. a sister passage to pauls words in corinthians about rewards. how one can have ALL his rewards burned, yet still be saved, even as through fire.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#65
I call it (salvation-messaged-to-death).......instead of steak and potato it is milk and diapers.......
amen, Like paul said, I need to feed you milk because you cannot handle meat (maturity or perfection)

some people need to grow up so they can enjoy that steak and potato!
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#66
So you believe that the Apostles gave false teachings by the Holy Spirit ???
Is it in the word of God?

No.

Why not?

Maybe God did not deem it actual truth?

There were false apostles in pauls day, you think there were not after he died?



 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
#67
Once again stop your false bias allegations on me, as I give tons of scriptures to defend my stance that you constantly reject................So stop speaking for God as if you are always right and others are always wrong, that is called using foolish pride.....
Your right...you do give tons of scriptures while ignoring Greek definitions, verb tenses, context all while promoting the writings of men who did not make that canon......What is amazing is the amount of scripture, verb tenses and context that has been given to you and you will go down in flames before you actually acknowledge the truth Kenneth<---now that is pride......

some examples....

eternal=temporary
not by works of righteousness=only by works of righteousness
all sin=I don't sin or just mess up
sin causes loss of salvation=I never sin enough to lose my salvation
justified equals rendered innocent=man made definition
sanctified forever in Christ=temporary sanctification based upon works
WHASOEVER GOD DOES IS ETERNAL=except salvation cause he is not strong enough to keep you saved
Sacrifice of Jesus good enough for the Father=not good enough and needs our help by works
Jesus died unto ALL SIN ONCE=not future sins committed...let's put Jesus back on the cross
God's grace out bounds our sin=no it doesn't as we have to repent or lose salvation
Salvation is eternal=temporary based upon self and what one does
Sins cause loss of salvation=but not with you as you don't sin and or have plenty of time to repent

and on and on and on........
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#68
Once again stop your false bias allegations on me, as I give tons of scriptures to defend my stance that you constantly reject................So stop speaking for God as if you are always right and others are always wrong, that is called using foolish pride.....
yet funny how you ALWAYS go to these books outside the word of God to support you view..

Thats what catholics do..


as I tell them, if the word of God supported you clearly and crisply, you would never have to go to outside sources.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#69
Your right...you do give tons of scriptures while ignoring Greek definitions, verb tenses, context all while promoting the writings of men who did not make that canon......What is amazing is the amount of scripture, verb tenses and context that has been given to you and you will go down in flames before you actually acknowledge the truth Kenneth<---now that is pride......

some examples....

eternal=temporary
not by works of righteousness=only by works of righteousness
all sin=I don't sin or just mess up
sin causes loss of salvation=I never sin enough to lose my salvation
justified equals rendered innocent=man made definition
sanctified forever in Christ=temporary sanctification based upon works
WHASOEVER GOD DOES IS ETERNAL=except salvation cause he is not strong enough to keep you saved
Sacrifice of Jesus good enough for the Father=not good enough and needs out help by works
Jesus died unto ALL SIN ONCE=not future sins committed...let's put Jesus back on the cross
God's grace out bounds our sin=no it doesn't as we have to repent or lose salvation
Salvation is eternal=temporary based upon self and what one does
Sins cause loss of salvation=but not with you as you don't sin and or have plenty of time to repent

and on and on and on........
thats why he has to act like the jews did with their extra books, Catholics do with their extra books. and Go outside scripture.

Because scripture does not support his view.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
#70
amen, Like paul said, I need to feed you milk because you cannot handle meat (maturity or perfection)

some people need to grow up so they can enjoy that steak and potato!
I fully agree......tragic for sure and one sign of spiritual immaturity or even a lack of spirituality is being easily offended.....<---sure sign of lacking the spirit and or spiritual growth....
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
#71
thats why he has to act like the jews did with their extra books, Catholics do with their extra books. and Go outside scripture.

Because scripture does not support his view.
I fully agree.......when taken in context, with an understanding of the words, verb tenses etc. the bible teaches eternal security while condemning a works based salvation......
 
K

kennethcadwell

Guest
#72
Is it in the word of God?

No.

Why not?

Maybe God did not deem it actual truth?

There were false apostles in pauls day, you think there were not after he died?




Yes there was false teachers/apostles in Paul's day, but Barnabas was not one of them.
For he was recognized as Paul as a fellow apostle and taught side by side with Paul, and Polycarp was an understudy to the Apostle John. Barnabas is recognized as a true Apostle in the the bible, yet you would still believe his writings to be false even though he would have been Spirit lead in the Word. Polycarp also who was taught by John, which in terms means was given the truth by the Holy Spirit as well. Both men had the Holy Spirit guided truth of the word, yet you and others still want to try and deem them as false teachers just because those writings are not in the bible.
Rather ones writings are in the bible or not does not make them a false teacher or true teacher of the word.
You believe Paul, John, Mark, and James to be true teachers don't you? They have other writings that are not in the bible to, so does that make what they said in those letters false? No, as that is just a faulty excuse to discredit those writings.
You do realize this lie of discounting these writings was started by the Catholics at the Nicene council, as just like other cover ups they tried to do that can be easily found in study.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#73
Yes there was false teachers/apostles in Paul's day, but Barnabas was not one of them.
For he was recognized as Paul as a fellow apostle and taught side by side with Paul, and Polycarp was an understudy to the Apostle John. Barnabas is recognized as a true Apostle in the the bible, yet you would still believe his writings to be false even though he would have been Spirit lead in the Word. Polycarp also who was taught by John, which in terms means was given the truth by the Holy Spirit as well. Both men had the Holy Spirit guided truth of the word, yet you and others still want to try and deem them as false teachers just because those writings are not in the bible.
Rather ones writings are in the bible or not does not make them a false teacher or true teacher of the word.
You believe Paul, John, Mark, and James to be true teachers don't you? They have other writings that are not in the bible to, so does that make what they said in those letters false? No, as that is just a faulty excuse to discredit those writings.
You do realize this lie of discounting these writings was started by the Catholics at the Nicene council, as just like other cover ups they tried to do that can be easily found in study.

and you know this ONLY because the books of the catholic church tells you this. you were not there, you can not get this from biblical support.

it is all based on what you are told by men.

again, listen tot he word of God not men, You were not there, so you ONLY reliable source is the inspired word of God.
 
K

kennethcadwell

Guest
#74
Your right...you do give tons of scriptures while ignoring Greek definitions, verb tenses, context all while promoting the writings of men who did not make that canon......What is amazing is the amount of scripture, verb tenses and context that has been given to you and you will go down in flames before you actually acknowledge the truth Kenneth<---now that is pride......

some examples....

eternal=temporary
not by works of righteousness=only by works of righteousness
all sin=I don't sin or just mess up
sin causes loss of salvation=I never sin enough to lose my salvation
justified equals rendered innocent=man made definition
sanctified forever in Christ=temporary sanctification based upon works
WHASOEVER GOD DOES IS ETERNAL=except salvation cause he is not strong enough to keep you saved
Sacrifice of Jesus good enough for the Father=not good enough and needs our help by works
Jesus died unto ALL SIN ONCE=not future sins committed...let's put Jesus back on the cross
God's grace out bounds our sin=no it doesn't as we have to repent or lose salvation
Salvation is eternal=temporary based upon self and what one does
Sins cause loss of salvation=but not with you as you don't sin and or have plenty of time to repent

and on and on and on........

Wrong again as I use the full definition of the Greek words and the context in which they are applied from the Strong's Greek Concordance. I do not use a shortened version of the definition or a twisted usage of it, as you and others do.
To make eternal life an immediate physical possession of ours right now, and not a mental possession of assurance of having it now then you make over 25 scriptures from Apostle Paul contradict those few you use for your stance.
The bible can not contradict itself so when Paul and Peter both show many times it is the ending result of our faith, and not a beginning possession, then those other few scriptures has to be looked into to find the right context so they don't contradict. The Holy Spirit has lead me to the truth in those scriptures and meanings.

Eternal life is eternal when we receive it at the gathering, when we are transformed into our eternal spiritual bodies at a twinkling of an eye. We are not in those eternal spiritual bodies yet, as we are still in mortal bodies of flesh and blood that can not inherit the kingdom of heaven....



Once again I do not base salvation on works, so please stop that false accusation as I have clearly refuted it many of times !!!

By what you and a few others deny is the clear scriptures that shows and says a person can fall away from the faith, as in go back to unbelief, and not end up with eternal life. Jesus, Holy Spirit, Paul, Peter, James, John, and Jude all agree with this and say it does happen. So I will agree with them in the bible and not how you and a few others have been taught.

The thing I think some of you are confused on to is that you might believe that unbelief just means our Lord Jesus or God does not exist. The bible however states continuing to, or returning to living in willful sin, and being disobedient to His word is also unbelief....
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
#75
thats why he has to act like the jews did with their extra books, Catholics do with their extra books. and Go outside scripture.

Because scripture does not support his view.
Notice what the men he quotes taught......

30-100 AD Clement of Rome "[We] are not justified by ourselves. Nor by our own wisdom, understanding, godliness, or works done in holiness of heart. But by that faith through which Almighty God has justified all men since the beginning." (Clement of Rome Corinthians chap. 32)

69-156 AD Polycarp
"Many desire to enter into this joy, knowing that 'by grace you are saved, not of works,' but by the will of God through Jesus Christ [Eph. 2:8]." (Polycarp Philippians chap. 1)

125 AD Barnabas "To this end the Lord delivered up His flesh to corruption, that we might be sanctified through the remission of sins, which is effected by His blood." (Barnabas Letter chap 5)

No works listed there......!
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
#76
Wrong again as I use the full definition of the Greek words and the context in which they are applied from the Strong's Greek Concordance. ....

Now you are just plain twisting the truth......I gave the complete definition of the word JUSTIFIED and you argued against it as a man made definition because it contradicted your self based salvation.....

So.......!
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
#77

and you know this ONLY because the books of the catholic church tells you this. you were not there, you can not get this from biblical support.

it is all based on what you are told by men.

again, listen tot he word of God not men, You were not there, so you ONLY reliable source is the inspired word of God.
Post 75 and the very men he quotes contradict his view......
 
K

kennethcadwell

Guest
#78

and you know this ONLY because the books of the catholic church tells you this. you were not there, you can not get this from biblical support.

it is all based on what you are told by men.

again, listen tot he word of God not men, You were not there, so you ONLY reliable source is the inspired word of God.

Again with the false Catholic accusations as I do not go by any of their books or their customs.
I only go by the Word of God and His Holy Spirit to guide me, you have been so badly lead in a hate doctrine toward the Catholic church that it blinds you to some truths the bible does give that they do teach in their churches. They teach a lot of things contrary to the bible, but they do have a few truths they do teach. Your hate doctrine toward them shows brightly in your responses, and the bible clearly warns of such doctrines as well. For we are called to love all people, and not just those who are brothers and sisters in Christ.

So once again I am not lead by men as you so falsely claim on me.
As I stated before those who are Holy Spirit lead Apostles mentioned in the bible we can not discount their writings, and the Holy Spirit will not disregard His own truth as well. He can not deny Himself !!!

Show me one scripture that says the words, "Once saved always saved."
You as a few others like to use word play when it suits you, so show me one scripture in the bible that has those exact words used. You will not because it was started by a man and not mentioned in the word of God.

Jesus

And then many will fall away..................


Holy Spirit through Paul

Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
126
63
#79
Yes there was false teachers/apostles in Paul's day, but Barnabas was not one of them.
For he was recognized as Paul as a fellow apostle and taught side by side with Paul, and Polycarp was an understudy to the Apostle John. Barnabas is recognized as a true Apostle in the the bible, yet you would still believe his writings to be false even though he would have been Spirit lead in the Word. Polycarp also who was taught by John, which in terms means was given the truth by the Holy Spirit as well. Both men had the Holy Spirit guided truth of the word, yet you and others still want to try and deem them as false teachers just because those writings are not in the bible.
Rather ones writings are in the bible or not does not make them a false teacher or true teacher of the word.
You believe Paul, John, Mark, and James to be true teachers don't you? They have other writings that are not in the bible to, so does that make what they said in those letters false? No, as that is just a faulty excuse to discredit those writings.
You do realize this lie of discounting these writings was started by the Catholics at the Nicene council, as just like other cover ups they tried to do that can be easily found in study.
The Epistle of Barnabas was not written by the Barnabas who was with Paul. It is dated about 135 AD by which time Barnabas would have been long dead. This is agreed by all reputable scholars.
 
J

Jasher

Guest
#80


It doesn't seem that people understand why the book of Hebrews was written. What was the historical situation behind the book? It was simple - the book of Hebrews was written to the Jewish Christians who lived in Rome. It was written just before Nero began his severe persecution in early 65AD. From 65-68AD he murdered an estimated 5,000 Christians. How do I know? It says in the text "You have not yet resisted unto blood." Christians in general were being persecuted to a lesser degree before Nero began. As a result the Messianic or Jewish Christians were abandoning their Christianity and reverting back to Judaism and the synagogues in order to avoid persecution. This whole book addresses that problem. At that time the Jews were not being persecuted but of course that began to change in 66AD when the rebellion began at Jerusalem.

[SUP]4[/SUP] For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost,
[SUP]5[/SUP] And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come,

Once enlightened - became Christians. Tasted of the heavenly gift and partook of the baptism of the Holy Spirit - day of Pentecost experience.

[SUP]6[/SUP] If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame. Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.

God set them free from the law and now they were returning to that bondage (falling away). In denying Christianity they were treading underfoot the spirit of Grace and the atonement of Christ. They were going backwards. So in order to return to Christianity they were crucifying Jesus all over again. It was a difficult situation.