Millions of years ago ! ?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Mar 23, 2014
435
1
0
I am against them also when it comes to challenging God's order. Believing only in the sciences is carnal thinking. Whosoever challenges God's ability & His order is a fool.

Isaiah 55:8-9 (KJV) [SUP]8 [/SUP]For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. [SUP]9 [/SUP]For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.
Whenever the creation challenges the Creator, that creation will be the Loser.
Your fundamentalism and fanaticism is emerging out of your ears,
Your argument was exactly the Argument of the Catholic inquisition in the days the earth was flat, and the universe rotated around the earth.

I know the only scientific book you read is the bible.... good luck.
 
Feb 16, 2014
903
2
0
Me. Because evolutionary teaching and/or uniformitarian beliefs became the mainstream and biblical creation was relegated to the understanding of myth. Thanks, 19th century German liberal Bible scholars! Those morons did a bang-up job of helping people disbelieve the Bible.
Evolution has nothing to do with uniformitarianism. That's like saying Christianity promotes the use of badgers as baseball bats when knocking down mailboxes.
 
Jan 24, 2012
1,299
15
0
Not correct, see the bones of the leg of a whale. they are there, but completely useless and absorbed in the body

you quite brilliant and correct about the stars and its light,
But that's exactly what I'm talking about. You can't have an animal that has legs and have it magically evolve overnight into a creature that doesn't have legs. There are in-between stages of the animal when you are talking about evolution. Years and years and years and years of in-between stages. Why do evolutionists think that a whale once had legs when they can't find the what should be millions of whale skeletons with leg sizes ranging from large and useful to uselessly small to none-existent. They can only find skeletons of the supposed unevolved animal (a prehistoric whale with large useful legs) and today's whale (a whale without legs.) Where are the skeletons of generations upon generations upon generations of the in-between states? The whales with uselessly small (and still shrinking) legs? It doesn't make sense.
 
Apr 11, 2015
890
1
0
No, that is not a good place to begin.

Can you provide a link to something published in a reputable scientific journal by any of these people you mention that indicates the world is around 6,000 years years old?

The answer is no isn't it?
not at all - see 'Thousands not Millions' by Dr,Don DeYoung and the RATE team of scientists - as to why they are few and far between via google see [Quick,,,,,lets discriminate]creationists and also [Slaughter of the Dissidents] by Bergman - wincam
 
Last edited:
Apr 11, 2015
890
1
0
No, that is not a good place to begin.

Can you provide a link to something published in a reputable scientific journal by any of these people you mention that indicates the world is around 6,000 years years old?

The answer is no isn't it?
not at all - see 'Thousands not Millions' by Dr,Don DeYoung and the RATE team of scientists - as to why they are few and far between via google see [Quick,,,,,lets discriminate]creationists and also [Slaughter of the Dissidents] - wincam
 
T

Tintin

Guest
Evolution has nothing to do with uniformitarianism. That's like saying Christianity promotes the use of badgers as baseball bats when knocking down mailboxes.
Rubbish! Uniformitarianism provides the long-ages needed to make evolution seem 'plausible'. Evolution is nothing without long-ages. I believe evolution is nothing with them either. It's a load of bollocks.

Jack H, I'm not going to play your game. I know full well that you don't believe anything, even from professional scientists if they hold to biblical creation. You know full well that peer-reviewed journals etc. won't give a foot-hold to God, let alone a biblical creation perspective, so there's no point continuing this discussion with you.

Biblical creationists are persecuted, not given a voice in the scientific community.

[video=youtube;x_ygt_mqzO8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_ygt_mqzO8[/video]

Review of his book: Slaughter of the dissidents - creation.com
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dec 18, 2013
6,733
45
0
But that's exactly what I'm talking about. You can't have an animal that has legs and have it magically evolve overnight into a creature that doesn't have legs. There are in-between stages of the animal when you are talking about evolution. Years and years and years and years of in-between stages. Why do evolutionists think that a whale once had legs when they can't find the what should be millions of whale skeletons with leg sizes ranging from large and useful to uselessly small to none-existent. They can only find skeletons of the supposed unevolved animal (a prehistoric whale with large useful legs) and today's whale (a whale without legs.) Where are the skeletons of generations upon generations upon generations of the in-between states? The whales with uselessly small (and still shrinking) legs? It doesn't make sense.
Lol, the supposedly vestigal leg and pelvic bones in whales and snakes and such are not vestigal at all. Nor are they former leg bones. Lol this is actually one of the easiest to disprove lies of the old earth mythology. Sadly like most of the old earth mythology that has been debunked, this one is still taught in schools and thus people become brainwashed even though this is disproven, even by some old earth mythology institutions.

So what is the purpose of these bones then? Well, they are found in the males. It appears the reason is for the "be fruitful and multiply" blessing that God granted to all the creatures of the waters and land.

Whale Pelvic Bones Actually Do Have a Purpose (Hint: Sex) : Discovery News
(Note: Discovery is an old earth mythological institution.)
 
Apr 11, 2015
890
1
0
not at all - see 'Thousands not Millions' by Dr,Don DeYoung and the RATE team of scientists - as to why they are few and far between via google see [Quick,,,,,lets discriminate]creationists and also [Slaughter of the Dissidents] - wincam
also via google see [Academic Freedom under threat] - wincam
 
T

Tintin

Guest
Evolution: One Lie to rule them all, One Lie to find them; One Lie to bring them all
and in the darkness bind them.
 
P

psychomom

Guest
still not about my birthday, though.
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
613
113
70
Alabama
Thanks! I only had to add one word at the beginning, to Tolkien's poem, and change another word. It still kept the same meaning.
LOL. I've got to remember that one. The more I have thought about it I cannot think of a more fitting description of collective evolutionary theories.
 
P

popeye

Guest
I bet humans and their shorts sure stunk bad until valves just happened to form in the rectum.The human body must have little tiny 'comitties" that meet deep inside the chest cavity that decide "Wouldn't an eyeball and a tongue be nice to have"
They all look at each other and say "Whats a what? An eyetonge?,is that what we need? what does it do?"

Uh,where did the organ/function decciders come from? did they evolve?
 
Mar 23, 2014
435
1
0
Rubbish! Uniformitarianism provides the long-ages needed to make evolution seem 'plausible'. Evolution is nothing without long-ages. I believe evolution is nothing with them either. It's a load of bollocks.

Jack H, I'm not going to play your game. I know full well that you don't believe anything, even from professional scientists if they hold to biblical creation. You know full well that peer-reviewed journals etc. won't give a foot-hold to God, let alone a biblical creation perspective, so there's no point continuing this discussion with you.

Biblical creationists are persecuted, not given a voice in the scientific community.

[video=youtube;x_ygt_mqzO8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_ygt_mqzO8[/video]

Review of his book: Slaughter of the dissidents - creation.com
he doesn’t present one valid argument in his whole presentation, this is why he was dismissed, for incompetent.
 
Jun 5, 2014
1,750
6
0
Rubbish! Uniformitarianism provides the long-ages needed to make evolution seem 'plausible'. Evolution is nothing without long-ages. I believe evolution is nothing with them either. It's a load of bollocks.

Jack H, I'm not going to play your game. I know full well that you don't believe anything, even from professional scientists if they hold to biblical creation. You know full well that peer-reviewed journals etc. won't give a foot-hold to God, let alone a biblical creation perspective, so there's no point continuing this discussion with you.

Biblical creationists are persecuted, not given a voice in the scientific community.

[video=youtube;x_ygt_mqzO8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_ygt_mqzO8[/video]

Review of his book: Slaughter of the dissidents - creation.com
Dr. Jerry Bergman is a professional scientist?

Bergman is right up there on the loon scale with Dr. Dino (Kent Hovind).

Dr. Bergman got a Ph.D. from an unaccredited correspondence school that was shut down.

Are you prepared to debate Bergman's positions on creationist issues?
 
P

popeye

Guest
[h=1]John 1 King James Version (KJV)[/h]1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
2 The same was in the beginning with God.
3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
 
T

twotwo

Guest
I am against them also when it comes to challenging God's order. Believing only in the sciences is carnal thinking. Whosoever challenges God's ability & His order is a fool.

Isaiah 55:8-9 (KJV) [SUP]8 [/SUP]For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. [SUP]9 [/SUP]For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.
Whenever the creation challenges the Creator, that creation will be the Loser.
In order to develop the next generation of scientists, I recommend that all schools use the bible to teach them physics, chemistry, genetics... This way science would surely progress rapidly...
 
Apr 11, 2015
890
1
0
Dr. Jerry Bergman is a professional scientist?

Bergman is right up there on the loon scale with Dr. Dino (Kent Hovind).

Dr. Bergman got a Ph.D. from an unaccredited correspondence school that was shut down.

Are you prepared to debate Bergman's positions on creationist issues?
he is credited and acknowledged as "knowing his stuff" beyond a doubt - even you as others, it seems are unable to deny this - wincam
 
Apr 11, 2015
890
1
0
In order to develop the next generation of scientists, I recommend that all schools use the bible to teach them physics, chemistry, genetics... This way science would surely progress rapidly...
all schools should teach exactly how everything came from nothing and that big bangs destroy not create and that disease, death, dust is not evolution - this way pseudo science would progress to real science - wincam