........................MarcR got slammed with a tempting God (verse himself) by Phil and Jeff_56 come in to rescue MarcR from judgment and Jeff now is the big judger in the end.............................
.............................i continued to point out to voilet and jesusisall pointed out to phil the error/mistake/sin/missed the mark(sic) of their false assumptions and accusations('slamming')
so.... and you "judged" the same as me and jesusisall -- seeing the correct way that phil (and later violet) 'slammed' marc without just cause and got worse doing so when it was pointed out...
Maybe I
should go back and read threads after all. This is too funny. Slammed? What does that even mean? Marc must not have had a problem with me. He has repped me, and I him, since then.False assumptions? Accusations?
jeff, you'd be much better off, and make a better conservationalist, if you would just log off for a few days and actually read your bible.
Marc uses a computer. He sees suggestive advertising daily. I still believe he wasn't so clueless that he actually had to google bikini to find out what they are like. Is there anyone in America over the age of 12 years that
doesn't know what someone is talking about when they say thong underwear or G-string bikini?
Sure, I suppose it's possible, but it would be surprising.
I don't doubt that Marc saw some things he probably
wasn't prepared for, especially if his search content was not set to moderate, but to believe he really had
no idea is just hard to swallow. Questioning someone is not slamming them. You folks should use words that convey exactly what you mean, if you want to be understood. Lots of words in this wonderful english language, try learning some more......oh, wait..did I just "slam" someone?