Are bikinis immodest?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Are bikinis immodest

  • yes

    Votes: 56 72.7%
  • no

    Votes: 21 27.3%

  • Total voters
    77
D

DesiredHaven

Guest
This starts on page 9, and is all over MarcR being honest about googling a bikini before he commented on something given he hasnt seen what passed for one today (verses 10 years ago) as he didnt consider all of them immodest. He also stated that he changed his mind concerning them because of a certain kind he ran into on a google search.

MarcR got slammed with a tempting God (verse himself) by Phil and Jeff_56 come in to rescue MarcR from judgment and Jeff now is the big judger in the end.

Im learning to follow threads much better now lol
 
J

JesusIsAll

Guest
Sounds like you are getting a little upset here are some cookies to help you calm down....
UOTE]

they are probably as upset as you would be if someone claimed from your post that you were offering a child drug-spiked cookies. see? a so-called 'christian' on a so-called 'christian' forum made a very false claim about him..... perhaps the so-called 'christian' is really a christian, no problem there -- they will be corrected when they make such grievous mistakes, hopefully.
Thing is, here you have this guy who is extolling all the things of the world, the flesh and the devil that are preeminent of his perception of existence, for all people, he presumes. Some like alcohol, some like drugs, porn is God's creation, blah, blah, blah, that this is my paradigm, who he doesn't even know? No, what he's really saying, "This is my life." This is what he sees as reality. Then, as lowbrow as it can get, he moves on to some kind of completely ignorant projection on to my sexual history he knows exactly zero about, saying, "Seriously, you're going to tell me you have been with a woman and once was enough?" Tells me to read Song of Solomon, which I know, thoroughly, finished that study about 25 years ago.

This is embarrassing to see a 59 year old man going on like this in a Christian forum, knowing nothing of me, the only evidence I see that he's been apparently so deprived as to still have his seat of consciousness raging between his legs, often symptomatic of people who've not gotten it out of their system sufficiently: this is the thinking of a frustrated virgin.

Then the denouement, that the world, flesh and the devil reigns supreme, and, because his seat of consciousness has not relocated from between his legs at this late date in his life, everything is like what's on TV to his perception, all people are this way, and I quote that sexual tension, that flesh preeminence, seething, "It has a draw to it more powerful than anything man has made. Kingdoms have been destroyed over it, lives lost, marriages broken, children abandoned......incredible." Yeah, right, devil still has somebody overpowered by testosterone and an undisciplined, reprobate mind of the world, a 59 year old Christian, whose genitals are still potential nuclear destruction or something?

This is in the dictionary under the arrested development I was speaking of, a 59 year Christian, projecting all that? That's a personal problem, the major flaw of his post is that none of that problem is mine. What I see is just pathetic, like a baby Christian, filled with the world still, a 59 year old bawling boy, calling me silly, calling me "son." Pathetic. That's all. Just pathetic.

 
Dec 26, 2014
3,757
19
0
This starts on page 9, and is all over MarcR being honest about googling a bikini before he commented on something given he hasnt seen what passed for one today (verses 10 years ago) as he didnt consider all of them immodest. He also stated that he changed his mind concerning them because of a certain kind he ran into on a google search.

MarcR got slammed with a tempting God (verse himself) by Phil and Jeff_56 come in to rescue MarcR from judgment and Jeff now is the big judger in the end.

Im learning to follow threads much better now lol
almost..... don't you agree that you see marc getting slammed ....(falsely accused)....
and
if you did read on voilet did on hearsay (she said she had marc on ignore) continue to accuse marc
and
i continued to point out to voilet and jesusisall pointed out to phil the error/mistake/sin/missed the mark(sic) of their false assumptions and accusations('slamming')

so.... and you "judged" the same as me and jesusisall -- seeing the correct way that phil (and later violet) 'slammed' marc without just cause and got worse doing so when it was pointed out...
 
Dec 26, 2014
3,757
19
0
who is this little man?....Angry at women..over a bathing suit? Ludicrous!
you seem to have missed everything. nobody's angry at women here.

the woman, not women, made a false accusation/post about another poster,
and she got worse and worse trying to defend her false accusation when it was pointed out..... why she
didn't take back the false accusation you'll have to ask her....

same as jesusisall pointed out about ph.... (another one who made vicious and false posts about jesusisall).
 
C

cmarieh

Guest
I believe that bikini's are immodest because they show too much skin. In fact I believe bathing suits in general are immodest anyway. When people go shopping for any type of clothing they really need to think about if they wear that item would they give people the wrong idea. Our bodies are the temple of the holy spirit and what we wear or put on our bodies should reflect on who is inside our hearts. Granted, I don't know how to swim however when I do wear a bathing suit I wear a one piece an wear shorts and a t-shirt over top because of modesty. By the way I never wear shorts and if I do it is usually for pajamas and that is really rare.
 
J

JesusIsAll

Guest
almost..... don't you agree that you see marc getting slammed ....(falsely accused)....
and
if you did read on voilet did on hearsay (she said she had marc on ignore) continue to accuse marc
and
i continued to point out to voilet and jesusisall pointed out to phil the error/mistake/sin/missed the mark(sic) of their false assumptions and accusations('slamming')

so.... and you "judged" the same as me and jesusisall -- seeing the correct way that phil (and later violet) 'slammed' marc without just cause and got worse doing so when it was pointed out...
It was just such a bizarre, freakish and worldly sliming going on. People are projecting their own inner demons.
 
D

DesiredHaven

Guest
almost..... don't you agree that you see marc getting slammed ....(falsely accused)....
and
if you did read on voilet did on hearsay (she said she had marc on ignore) continue to accuse marc
and
i continued to point out to voilet and jesusisall pointed out to phil the error/mistake/sin/missed the mark(sic) of their false assumptions and accusations('slamming')

so.... and you "judged" the same as me and jesusisall -- seeing the correct way that phil (and later violet) 'slammed' marc without just cause and got worse doing so when it was pointed out...
Sorry Jeff I didnt mean to leave that hanging and leave that open to intepretation there. I just meant you didnt really enter into this thing judging so much but rather for the rescuing of MarcR from judgment (Phil's in this case). Whereas in the end you are being perceived more as the judger given the back and forths that come between you and violet for the most part. I love both Phil and MarcR, but they are two different personalities types. You also are different from them, you have this firey passion in you, that was something I didnt understand at first, but over time I understand you as actually meaning well. The Lord would rather one be hot or cold, and I cannot ever point my finger at you and say, there is a lukewarm fella right there.

I was going to stay out of this, but I had no problems with MarcR being honest that he googled a bikini for the reasons he did I goggled bathing suits and that is what come up quite naturally in a search (whether for men or women) and this is a thread for it. I actually understood what you meant when you were speaking of stumbling the other, I think Violet also misunderstood your passion, you can come off rather strong there Jeff_56 but I did like the fact that she took a breath and looked back over how you could have meant it.

I dont know where this will go, but I dont judge MarcR for googling a bikini but I dont agree with Phil on coming down so hard on him, and I only saw you trying to rescue MarcR from what can be perceived as Phil's harsher words on this. Then Violet taking up for whatever gap she saw between the two of you.

So just different folks who have an opinion (even strong ones) but I understood where you were coming from.

I have no fingers to point
 
Dec 26, 2014
3,757
19
0
It was just such a bizarre, freakish and worldly sliming going on. People are projecting their own inner demons.
sadly, and for those who get to this thread late, yes, they seemed to project their own sin onto you and me and the other one they falsely accused,
then
kept trying to defend such absurdly with more and more error...... perhaps they, one or more, was hurt before by someone , maybe badly, and haven't learned that others don't automatically or always think the same way whoever hurt them did/does/

and they haven't learned instead to hope for the best(in others when possible) and ask first (if it matters) when they don't understand someone instead of making unjust accusations based on their own false views and/or feelings.
 
Dec 26, 2014
3,757
19
0
...... I have no fingers to point
no worries at all, you have been given the grace to see it accurately.... (a few facts got turned around, but no worries about that either - it doesn't effect the spirit of it all; which you grasped rather well.)

thanks be to yahweh for his "new and fresh every morning" LOVINGKINDNESS !
 
J

JesusIsAll

Guest
sadly, and for those who get to this thread late, yes, they seemed to project their own sin onto you and me and the other one they falsely accused,
then
kept trying to defend such absurdly with more and more error...... perhaps they, one or more, was hurt before by someone , maybe badly, and haven't learned that others don't automatically or always think the same way whoever hurt them did/does/

and they haven't learned instead to hope for the best(in others when possible) and ask first (if it matters) when they don't understand someone instead of making unjust accusations based on their own false views and/or feelings.
What was most disappointing, to hear from a Christian, was mockery of being in opposition to these things of the world, the flesh and the devil we are supposed to be separated from, a most basic tenant of the faith, not that everybody's genitals have to rule supreme. Sorry, but that was exactly what he was saying, offended by a very real differing view and experience, in Christ! I mean, I didn't think this was the Playboy website.
 
D

DesiredHaven

Guest
no worries at all, you have been given the grace to see it accurately.... (a few facts got turned around, but no worries about that either - it doesn't effect the spirit of it all; which you grasped rather well.)

thanks be to yahweh for his "new and fresh every morning" LOVINGKINDNESS !
Amen they certainly are, Our God and Father be blessed through Christ Jesus our Lord!

Peace be with you.
 
Dec 26, 2014
3,757
19
0
yes... believers and unbelievers have posted that they cannot stop sinning.... and sometimes (or often) they attribute the same sinfulness to others who have become free from the sin that keeps them trapped or kept them trapped for some time.... we all once were subject of the prince of the power of the air (the devil) who rules the world's population, as itg is written in Ephesians, but give praise every day to the father in heaven for the grace poured out through jesus christ to purchase us by his blood and to overcome every day the sin that once so easily beset us ---
as it is written "overcome by the word of our testimony (in jesus/of jesus faithfulness) and by the BLOOD OF THE LAMB WHO WAS SLAIN"..... overcome. entirely different meaning than succumb .....
 
Last edited:
G

Galahad

Guest
What about the women who bikini yet the man does not stumble ?
He was watching his step! Whatever is right, whatever is pure . . . think on these things. Philippians 4:8.

If you live near a So. Cal beach, you know this to be true: it's all about the flesh. From top to bottom. Front to back.
 
G

Galahad

Guest
I have a friend that thinks its a sin for men and women to go swimming together...that it's akin to bathing together. I love him but he's a dork.

ROFL. Especially, I love him but he's a dork. Sirk, this is too funny. ROFL.

Air! I can't breath! LOL.

I know I'm going to get roasted for laughing.

Sirk, post it again. You've broken the humor scale. It's 10.0!
:rolleyes:
 
G

Galahad

Guest
I have a friend that thinks its a sin for men and women to go swimming together...that it's akin to bathing together. I love him but he's a dork.
Glad Utah likes it.

Oh, too funny.

I'm going to read it again. Thank you Sirk.
 
G

Galahad

Guest
I have a friend that thinks its a sin for men and women to go swimming together...that it's akin to bathing together. I love him but he's a dork.
ROFL.

No more. No more. No more. Bye.
 
G

Galahad

Guest
Dude, you make no sense. Remember, according to your previous posts you say there is no beginning or end. "Started wearing cloths (I'm assuming you meant CLOTHES)" means that there evidently was a beginning of something.
VR
Simiel's posts are vain babblings.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
My grandmother about had a cow the first time they showed a woman on tv in a bra.......now they have devolved from panties to skimpy bikinis to shows about sex and nudity......I am in Australia and yesterday on T.V. they had (Fifty Shades of GAY).......the world is definetly spiraling down the proverbial tubes of immorality!
 
P

phil112

Guest
........................MarcR got slammed with a tempting God (verse himself) by Phil and Jeff_56 come in to rescue MarcR from judgment and Jeff now is the big judger in the end.............................
.............................i continued to point out to voilet and jesusisall pointed out to phil the error/mistake/sin/missed the mark(sic) of their false assumptions and accusations('slamming')

so.... and you "judged" the same as me and jesusisall -- seeing the correct way that phil (and later violet) 'slammed' marc without just cause and got worse doing so when it was pointed out...
Maybe I should go back and read threads after all. This is too funny. Slammed? What does that even mean? Marc must not have had a problem with me. He has repped me, and I him, since then.False assumptions? Accusations?
jeff, you'd be much better off, and make a better conservationalist, if you would just log off for a few days and actually read your bible.

Marc uses a computer. He sees suggestive advertising daily. I still believe he wasn't so clueless that he actually had to google bikini to find out what they are like. Is there anyone in America over the age of 12 years that doesn't know what someone is talking about when they say thong underwear or G-string bikini?

Sure, I suppose it's possible, but it would be surprising.

I don't doubt that Marc saw some things he probably wasn't prepared for, especially if his search content was not set to moderate, but to believe he really had no idea is just hard to swallow. Questioning someone is not slamming them. You folks should use words that convey exactly what you mean, if you want to be understood. Lots of words in this wonderful english language, try learning some more......oh, wait..did I just "slam" someone?
 

kodiak

Senior Member
Mar 8, 2015
4,995
290
83
Maybe I should go back and read threads after all. This is too funny. Slammed? What does that even mean? Marc must not have had a problem with me. He has repped me, and I him, since then.False assumptions? Accusations?
jeff, you'd be much better off, and make a better conservationalist, if you would just log off for a few days and actually read your bible.

Marc uses a computer. He sees suggestive advertising daily. I still believe he wasn't so clueless that he actually had to google bikini to find out what they are like. Is there anyone in America over the age of 12 years that doesn't know what someone is talking about when they say thong underwear or G-string bikini?

Sure, I suppose it's possible, but it would be surprising.

I don't doubt that Marc saw some things he probably wasn't prepared for, especially if his search content was not set to moderate, but to believe he really had no idea is just hard to swallow. Questioning someone is not slamming them. You folks should use words that convey exactly what you mean, if you want to be understood. Lots of words in this wonderful english language, try learning some more......oh, wait..did I just "slam" someone?
I don't know what you are talking about.....I won't look it up though....