Mike Bickle's "Israel Mandate"

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
V

Viligant_Warrior

Guest
#21
I think you just ended our friendship, VW. (Notice, no smiley face.)
Sorry, Willie, didn't know I was stepping on toes, especially friendly ones, but I can't appease you by retracting what I believe to be true. Rather than ending the friendship, why don't we discuss why I feel that way, and if I'm wrong, I'll be happy to admit it. God bless.
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
#22
Willie,

I don't know much about Vineyard. From what I've seen of your posts I've had few disagreements with you.

I personally find VW to be quite sound and I am usually predisposed to accept what he says as informed opinion.


I would like to know what is at issue so I can form an informed opinion of my own.
VW posted that the Vineyard follows false gospels (you can easily go read his post # 6, for yourself.)

That is an outright lie, and I said a few posts later that he could go online, and read pages of what the Vineyard believes in. I guess he cannot admit to shooting off his mouth, and being completely wrong, when he really has no idea what the Vineyard believes.
 
V

Viligant_Warrior

Guest
#23
VW posted that the Vineyard follows false gospels (you can easily go read his post # 6, for yourself.)

That is an outright lie, and I said a few posts later that he could go online, and read pages of what the Vineyard believes in. I guess he cannot admit to shooting off his mouth, and being completely wrong, when he really has no idea what the Vineyard believes.
Does, or does not, the Vineyard movement place a premium on "experience-based" worship?

Does, or does not, the Vineyard Movement endorse the use of the "signs and wonders" ministries of tongues, prophecy, laying on of hands for healing, and the casting out of demons?

Does, or does not, the Vineyard Movement's willingness to "let the Holy Spirit move in ways we do not expect" with no limitation as outlined in several biblical restrictions -- particularly the writings of Paul -- allow for spiritual excess inventiveness to enter into and possibly mislead immature or "baby" believers?

Those are my concerns. If I am wrong, then please forgive me, but it is my position that the purpose of these "sign and wonders" was fulfilled at the close of the apostolic age. It is therefore difficult for me to see worship and ministry done when the focus is experience rather than Christ. That's just the way I see it, and I'm willing to admit I might be wrong.
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
#24
VW, do you even understand what "gospel" means? All you are talking about is a difference in worship.
 
R

Rudimental

Guest
#25
Brilliant! Let's go and do some miracles in front of them. No problem right!?

I mean that sarcastically I guess. My point is that even if you was to show them miracles. Some still wouldn't believe.
 
Last edited:
E

ember

Guest
#26
My denomination is the one VW said followed false gospels. (It's in his post #6.)
Vinyard? I find there is a diff from Vinyard to Vinyard church...and of course like any church, it is depending on both the leadership and the congregation...at any rate, I really loved the house meetings with the Vinyard church I attended
 
E

ember

Guest
#27
Does, or does not, the Vineyard movement place a premium on "experience-based" worship?

Does, or does not, the Vineyard Movement endorse the use of the "signs and wonders" ministries of tongues, prophecy, laying on of hands for healing, and the casting out of demons?

Does, or does not, the Vineyard Movement's willingness to "let the Holy Spirit move in ways we do not expect" with no limitation as outlined in several biblical restrictions -- particularly the writings of Paul -- allow for spiritual excess inventiveness to enter into and possibly mislead immature or "baby" believers?

Those are my concerns. If I am wrong, then please forgive me, but it is my position that the purpose of these "sign and wonders" was fulfilled at the close of the apostolic age. It is therefore difficult for me to see worship and ministry done when the focus is experience rather than Christ. That's just the way I see it, and I'm willing to admit I might be wrong.
I believe in following scripture...I disagree with those who go over the edge and anything goes...but the Holy Spirit is still infilling believers and signs do follow and I have experienced some things that I would have to call extra-ordinary

and I guess here we go with the whole tongues thing again? I hope not

ps...I certainly do not agree with crowing like a rooster or barking like a dog...the Toronto blessing may have started off ok, but IMO, they need discerning of spirits....no, I was never there but I mean I am aware of course...the interwebs are chock full of info...some accurate and some not

Ask me how much I like sitting in some churches for an hr with everyone checking their watches...not wanting to start anything, but it is what it is

well, regarding the bold type above, Christ has always been the center of any Vinyard churches I have gone to...

I really dislike when Christians pull apart the Bible and try to chop it and compartamentalize what is and what is not still valid

There is much I disagree with regarding so called prophets and healers...but we have always had charlatans no doubt
 

Yonah

Senior Member
Oct 31, 2014
1,074
103
48
#28
part of being a wise and discerning child of the most high is the ability and maturity to compare what it taught or said with scripture as a standard and discard the parts that are in error and let the truth remain... many spend too much time looking at the messenger instead of the message, each stand or falls before the one who called, and each choses to believe and put into practice what they have learned , many read but few it seems actually study, as we are admonished to do (2 Timothy 2:15) and this is why many are deceived and led to believe and follow both false doctrine and false teachers, prophets, pastors or whatever, theres no need to be angry at the false teachers, they will give account as we all must, but rather be angry at the one who have resources available to study the word but do not use them, each will be judged according to what they have not what they don't have.
 
Mar 10, 2015
1,174
18
0
#29
I believe in following scripture...I disagree with those who go over the edge and anything goes...but the Holy Spirit is still infilling believers and signs do follow and I have experienced some things that I would have to call extra-ordinary

and I guess here we go with the whole tongues thing again? I hope not

ps...I certainly do not agree with crowing like a rooster or barking like a dog...the Toronto blessing may have started off ok, but IMO, they need discerning of spirits....no, I was never there but I mean I am aware of course...the interwebs are chock full of info...some accurate and some not

Ask me how much I like sitting in some churches for an hr with everyone checking their watches...not wanting to start anything, but it is what it is

well, regarding the bold type above, Christ has always been the center of any Vinyard churches I have gone to...

I really dislike when Christians pull apart the Bible and try to chop it and compartamentalize what is and what is not still valid

There is much I disagree with regarding so called prophets and healers...but we have always had charlatans no doubt
The issue for cessation doctrine seems to always be tongues. Then the USA AOG comes along in 1915 and says tongues are the initial evidence and later on stated you cannot be saved with out the "baptism" and started going down the road of works based salvation and righteousness and that you could lose it.

Jesus said that the Holy Spirit upon you was for power to witness. There are other gifts besides tongues as well. The things that bothers me about cessation doctrine, is that they thrive on just tongues. It also refuses to acknowledge that the ministry of the Holy Spirit is within and upon believers.

I also agree that revivals as the Toronto Blessing and especially the Brownsville revival here in the USA did need someone with enough discernment to say stop. Barking like dogs throwing gold glitter around and rooting like farm animals is not the Holy Spirit.

I have encountered the Holy Spirit in many ways as well, that some would find questionable. I am not about to quench the Spirit now, when we need him the most.
 
E

ember

Guest
#30
yeah...I know...of course you are saved ... I was saved for years before I spoke in tongues...saying you cannot be saved if you don't speak in tongues is ADDING to scripture...we those in the NY who were saved and received AFTER

I thank God for His Spirit...He makes Jesus so real and brings scripture alive!
 
E

ember

Guest
#31
part of being a wise and discerning child of the most high is the ability and maturity to compare what it taught or said with scripture as a standard and discard the parts that are in error and let the truth remain... many spend too much time looking at the messenger instead of the message, each stand or falls before the one who called, and each choses to believe and put into practice what they have learned , many read but few it seems actually study, as we are admonished to do (2 Timothy 2:15) and this is why many are deceived and led to believe and follow both false doctrine and false teachers, prophets, pastors or whatever, theres no need to be angry at the false teachers, they will give account as we all must, but rather be angry at the one who have resources available to study the word but do not use them, each will be judged according to what they have not what they don't have.
I honestly do not want to be angry at anyone...but if I were, it would be the false teachers who USE the fact that those who do not study can be manipulated and emotionally charged to benefit the false propher
 
V

Viligant_Warrior

Guest
#32
VW, do you even understand what "gospel" means? All you are talking about is a difference in worship.
Spreading the Gospel through so-called "power evangelism" emphasizing the miraculous is, in my opinion, not the Gospel of Christ. He did not say "Go and do signs and wonders ... " He said "Go and make disciples ... "
 
Mar 10, 2015
1,174
18
0
#33
Spreading the Gospel through so-called "power evangelism" emphasizing the miraculous is, in my opinion, not the Gospel of Christ. He did not say "Go and do signs and wonders ... " He said "Go and make disciples ... "
SO when he sent out the 12 and then the 70 how did he send them? powerless?
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
#34
Spreading the Gospel through so-called "power evangelism" emphasizing the miraculous is, in my opinion, not the Gospel of Christ. He did not say "Go and do signs and wonders ... " He said "Go and make disciples ... "
And, what did the disciple come back, astonished and amazed about? Did they come back saying, "Yeah we stood on some street corners, and talked to the crowds awhile."? No, they came back with their eyes wide in wonder at the things they had done.

We need to wake up. Just about EVERYTHING Jesus did (and said we were also going to do) was all about "experiencing" the power that lived in Him, that WAS Him.
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
#35
VW,
Google a video by typing in "Robby Dawkins Marcy".

THIS is the "authority" Jesus passed along to us, to go and do in His name, to spread His kingdom.

Pay attention to the change in Marcy, the Jewess, on the airplane.
 
Mar 10, 2015
1,174
18
0
#36
Spreading the Gospel through so-called "power evangelism" emphasizing the miraculous is, in my opinion, not the Gospel of Christ. He did not say "Go and do signs and wonders ... " He said "Go and make disciples ... "
Well I hate to go Bible on you, but Matt 10.5-8 says:
[SUP]5 [/SUP]These twelve Jesus sent out after instructing them: “Do not [SUP][f][/SUP]go [SUP][g][/SUP]in the way of the Gentiles, and do not enter any city of the Samaritans; [SUP]6 [/SUP]but rather go to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. [SUP]7 [/SUP]And as you go, [SUP][h][/SUP]preach, saying, ‘The kingdom of heaven [SUP][i][/SUP]is at hand.’ [SUP]8 [/SUP]Heal the sick, raise the dead, cleanse the lepers, cast out demons. Freely you received, freely give. [SUP]9

So you tell me, where doe sit say go and make disciples at in this passage?

For your edification and benefit, I also used the NASB.




[/SUP]
 
P

popeye

Guest
#37
My denomination is the one VW said followed false gospels. (It's in his post #6.)
I have had this happen to me many times on CC. It really stings to have a fellow believer stop just short of calling you satan.

I have issues with bickle,never ever listen to him,but to demonise the body of christ is guaranteed to bring unnecessary division. He is a believer. The dominion thinggy is error. But cessationists attack anything HS empowered.
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
#38
I have had this happen to me many times on CC. It really stings to have a fellow believer stop just short of calling you satan.

I have issues with bickle,never ever listen to him,but to demonise the body of christ is guaranteed to bring unnecessary division. He is a believer. The dominion thinggy is error. But cessationists attack anything HS empowered.
Thank you. It just seems to hurt a little more when it come from someone you didn't realize was so ........
 
P

popeye

Guest
#39
The issue for cessation doctrine seems to always be tongues. Then the USA AOG comes along in 1915 and says tongues are the initial evidence and later on stated you cannot be saved with out the "baptism" and started going down the road of works based salvation and righteousness and that you could lose it.

Jesus said that the Holy Spirit upon you was for power to witness. There are other gifts besides tongues as well. The things that bothers me about cessation doctrine, is that they thrive on just tongues. It also refuses to acknowledge that the ministry of the Holy Spirit is within and upon believers.

I also agree that revivals as the Toronto Blessing and especially the Brownsville revival here in the USA did need someone with enough discernment to say stop. Barking like dogs throwing gold glitter around and rooting like farm animals is not the Holy Spirit.

I have encountered the Holy Spirit in many ways as well, that some would find questionable. I am not about to quench the Spirit now, when we need him the most.
I also agree that revivals as the Toronto Blessing and especially the Brownsville revival here in the USA did need someone with enough discernment to say stop. Barking like dogs throwing gold glitter around and rooting like farm animals is not the Holy Spirit.
This is a lie.
I lived there in pensacola for 8 years.Moved there just for the revival.Saw thousands saved.Never,ever one time,in thousands of hours of meetings,in glorious wonderful outpouring of the HS in massive power,did i ever witness your false claims.
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
#40
Popeye,

You raise a legitimate issue. It is what motivates my several attempts to cool down the rhetoric on the forum.

IMO VW was more concerned about things being done in a manner consistent with 1Co chapter 14.

He seems to have encountered a disorderliness which may or may not be pervasive in the denomination.

It may have come across as more abrasive than he intended. I am not troubled by any manifestation of the Spirit; but I believe that the Holy Spirit does not lead congregations to be disorderly by the standards of 1Co chapter 14.