Marijuana?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
W

wwjd_kilden

Guest
yup, that was pretty much how I felt the first time too

actually I was at a festival, sitting in a large sofa we got from the people living there because they were going to throw it away !
we got lots of visitors in that sofa....
 
C

Cako53

Guest
You use alcohol as an example to compare to marijuana. Okay, then lets look at the scriptures (since they're never wrong). Jesus said it's okay to drink, but not to get drunk. Why? Because when you're drunk (not when you nessisarly drink, but in the drunk state) you do not have full control over your mind. You are agreeing that being drunk is a sin, right? We are in agreement? We know why it's a sin? Okay. Now lets look at marijuana. If Jesus said, you can smoke marijuana, but only if you dont get high- well...you can't smoke marijuana without getting high. Its a sin to get high the same reason it's a sin to be drunk: You dont have full control of your mind. And if you do smoke marijuana and do have full control of your mind, well then you're not really high now, are you?
If you have an alternative reason for the reason Jesus said "dont get drunk" please let me know. Otherwise, this is irrefutable.
Agreed!
wrong zeppelin

you CAN smoke marijuana without getting high... The first time I tried it, it affected me LESS than an average cigarette!
I also agree with this to an extent, but I would like to pose you a question. How many people take a few tokes and then put out the joint? Or take a few tokes then put out the pipe? In fact I don't know one pot smoker that smokes it just for smoking it. The either are doing it to get high, or doing it tolessen pain. Both altering the state of mind.
 
C

Cako53

Guest
Okay, so you drink only one beer, now the question....why do you drink that one beer, for what reason do you drink it?
Maybe because she enjoys the taste of it? I dunno.
 
W

wwjd_kilden

Guest
well yes, and I believe that is the reason why many drink too

I mean, honestly: a drink does NOT taste better with alcohol in it
 
C

Cako53

Guest
well yes, and I believe that is the reason why many drink too

I mean, honestly: a drink does NOT taste better with alcohol in it
I find that totally false. I don't know one person that does that. I also live in like a pot capital, lol. So I find that IMPOSSIBLE to believe.
lol, I knew you'd say something like that.
 
A

Artbox

Guest
First, I did check Robinson's book--no citation. Lowe was a botanist, Latimer a PhD and Mozeson was an Edanist. None are qualified in the Hebrew. The "Hebrew University" thing appears to be an urban myth.
I apologize for assuming you didn't, then. :] I'm curious, do you own the book? I tried to look online to see whether I could check the book for citations, but I couldn't find anywhere to check for such a thing, short of buying the book itself. Of course it was 4 in the morning so I wasn't thinking very clearly and might have missed a way to do so.

A botanist should be an entirely legitimate source about plants in ancient text.

Just because Latimer was not Jewish or an etymologist doesn't dismiss his point of view. People are entirely capable of doing research and learning, are they not? :]

Mozeson's a professor of Jewish and Biblical Literature who's also chairman of the Hebrew Language Fellowship of the Root and Branch Association [not sure what his being an Edenist (not Edanist, btw. Those are people looking to create a homeland for Autistic and Aspergic people) has do with dismissing his opinion and research on the matter.]. A perfectly legitimate and credible source.

If you like, here's a Jewish person :]
Anthropologist Vera Rubin (Jewish, so she knows the language and is certainly qualified to comment on it) stated that cannabis "appears in the Old Testament because of the religious and sacred aspect of it." (Rubin 1978)

I'm still not sure why the big deal on the matter of cannabis being an incense is. Myrrh, frankincense, ambergris, even calamus if you reject cannabis as the translation, all are common incense ingredients in the Bible, and all are drugs that can have psychotropic effects. Even cinnamon and cassia, also incense ingredients, are mild stimulants. Cannabis being added to that list hardly suddenly introduces some sort of sinful drug effect that wasn't there before.
 
M

Matthew

Guest
alcohol should be banned... it causes accidents, fights and crimes... way more than cannabis does
When it comes to discussing the evils of various substances it's easy to read statistics about rates of crime/accidents related too it's use and say it causes these things to happen.

To me that's the problem with statistics, they leave out the human component, it's always a human responsible for using poor judgement or none at all, it's not the substance, like Dread Zeppelin said she knows more than one beer compromises her so she drinks only one.

I get really sick seeing alcohol related illness cripple the UK health service because booze britain lives on it's alcohol but I don't think alcohol is too blame, it is sadly indicative of a much wider problem, banning alcohol would do no good except cause major civil strife, in England anyway.

As for marijuana, just the same as cigarettes to me, out of sight out of mind each can do what they like with their own body but in my ideal world it wouldn't go on.
I hear the arguments it's relaxing etc..I think it's a bit sad when you need to alter your mind to get by in life, for youngsters I get it is part of growing pains but every older adult I have known using marijuana is doing so to battle depression/for an escape, the exact same reasons many people binge drink.

It all points to a bigger issue needs dealing with.
 
M

monikah028

Guest
ok im a christian of course right, but i believe that God put marijuana on earth i mean we all know that it comes from the earth; planted and grows. So with that being said i honestly dont think there's nothing wrong with smoking it. However, what you might do to get it or the people you might have to hang around you might not be positive, you have to just be in good judgement at all times i do believe that it is most defineitly a path down tempation where the devil can lower you in.
 
Last edited:
S

SeaGlass1111

Guest
I agree with Definition_Christ. I am surprised too...

:(
 
C

Cako53

Guest
ok im a christian of course right, but i believe that God put marijuana on earth i mean we all know that it comes from the earth; planted and grows. So with that being said i honestly dont think there's nothing wrong with smoking it. However, what you might do to get it or the people you might have to hang around you might not be positive, you have to just be in good judgement at all times i do believe that it is most defineitly a path down tempation where the devil can lower you in.
A lot of plants are on the earth, doesn't mean they are fine to smoke or use. The coca plant is all natural, yet it makes cocaine. It wouldn't be the smartest things to be eating those seeds, we all know that. Or perhaps Morning Glory? It's a plant that is found in a lot of peoples gardens, it seeds are HIGHLY hallucinagenic, it's a plant on this earth, doesn't mean it is fine to use.
 
C

charisenexcelcis

Guest
I apologize for assuming you didn't, then. :] I'm curious, do you own the book? I tried to look online to see whether I could check the book for citations, but I couldn't find anywhere to check for such a thing, short of buying the book itself. Of course it was 4 in the morning so I wasn't thinking very clearly and might have missed a way to do so.

A botanist should be an entirely legitimate source about plants in ancient text.

Just because Latimer was not Jewish or an etymologist doesn't dismiss his point of view. People are entirely capable of doing research and learning, are they not? :]

Mozeson's a professor of Jewish and Biblical Literature who's also chairman of the Hebrew Language Fellowship of the Root and Branch Association [not sure what his being an Edenist (not Edanist, btw. Those are people looking to create a homeland for Autistic and Aspergic people) has do with dismissing his opinion and research on the matter.]. A perfectly legitimate and credible source.

If you like, here's a Jewish person :]
Anthropologist Vera Rubin (Jewish, so she knows the language and is certainly qualified to comment on it) stated that cannabis "appears in the Old Testament because of the religious and sacred aspect of it." (Rubin 1978)

I'm still not sure why the big deal on the matter of cannabis being an incense is. Myrrh, frankincense, ambergris, even calamus if you reject cannabis as the translation, all are common incense ingredients in the Bible, and all are drugs that can have psychotropic effects. Even cinnamon and cassia, also incense ingredients, are mild stimulants. Cannabis being added to that list hardly suddenly introduces some sort of sinful drug effect that wasn't there before.
I don't own it, but one of the PSRS's that I work with did, sort of like me owning a Book of Mormon. I think that when you are talking about the translation of the word would require that one is in fact an expert on the language. Being Jewish isn't the issue. The issue is the translation of the Hebrew.
I'm not sure, if you do not understand what the big deal is, that you ever will. Some of it is simply not allowing the Bible to be twisted to mean what it doesn't. Some of it is not allowing the Bible to be used to justify the smoking of marijuana. It is one thing to argue it's morality based upon Biblical principle. It is another one to be able to say God approves of it. Believe me, I've heard incredible things justified through the twisting of scripture, including your argument regarding marijuana. If you are going to hold this position regarding marijuana as part of the temple rites, you'd best be correct. If you want to see the fleshly result, check out the Ethiopian Zion Coptic Church.
 
A

Artbox

Guest
I don't own it, but one of the PSRS's that I work with did, sort of like me owning a Book of Mormon. I think that when you are talking about the translation of the word would require that one is in fact an expert on the language. Being Jewish isn't the issue. The issue is the translation of the Hebrew.
I'm not sure, if you do not understand what the big deal is, that you ever will. Some of it is simply not allowing the Bible to be twisted to mean what it doesn't. Some of it is not allowing the Bible to be used to justify the smoking of marijuana. It is one thing to argue it's morality based upon Biblical principle. It is another one to be able to say God approves of it. Believe me, I've heard incredible things justified through the twisting of scripture, including your argument regarding marijuana. If you are going to hold this position regarding marijuana as part of the temple rites, you'd best be correct. If you want to see the fleshly result, check out the Ethiopian Zion Coptic Church.
Ah, I see.

Well, being a Jewish person I would expect them to have a knowledge of their own language. Doubly her opinion has weight being an anthropologist who studies people and should know of drug usage of the culture.

I'm just saying, the Bible clearly has other psychoactive drugs burnt as incense, and heck, given to Jesus at His birth, and these ones are clearly not in dispute, and even if it wasn't translated as cannabis it would be calamus, also a psychoactive drug. Cannabis is somehow worse?
 
C

charisenexcelcis

Guest
Ah, I see.

Well, being a Jewish person I would expect them to have a knowledge of their own language. Doubly her opinion has weight being an anthropologist who studies people and should know of drug usage of the culture.

I'm just saying, the Bible clearly has other psychoactive drugs burnt as incense, and heck, given to Jesus at His birth, and these ones are clearly not in dispute, and even if it wasn't translated as cannabis it would be calamus, also a psychoactive drug. Cannabis is somehow worse?
If it wasn't worse, wouldn't we see people soaking their tobacco in calumine lotion. lol....
 
A

Artbox

Guest
My point is, cannabis isn't the only drug being burnt as incense or being in oils in the Bible. Are you saying all drugs are bad, or aren't you? Because if you are, then do you realize that other incense ingredients are psychoactive drugs, and not simply cannabis. Why condemn cannabis as an incense ingredient and not frankincense, or ambergris, or calamus?
 
C

charisenexcelcis

Guest
My point is, cannabis isn't the only drug being burnt as incense or being in oils in the Bible. Are you saying all drugs are bad, or aren't you? Because if you are, then do you realize that other incense ingredients are psychoactive drugs, and not simply cannabis. Why condemn cannabis as an incense ingredient and not frankincense, or ambergris, or calamus?
You post shows what the problem is. At first it was just, "I'm not trying to justify the use of marijuana, its just what the Bible says." Then it is "Marijuana is no worse than these things." Now it is "If I can prove that there is any 'psychoactive' effect of anything else, then marijuana is OK."
So, this is what I am saying:
1. I do not believe, and I am supported by a huge body of Biblical and Hebrew scholarship, that marijuana was used in the incense in the temple worship of the Old Testament.
2. I do not believe that mind-altering drugs such as LSD, PCP, or marijuana are moral, nor do I believe they should be legalized.
3. I do not believe that the alleged minor effects of calimine, frankincense, or ambergris justifies the use of marijuana.
I would suggest that you look at my posting regarding the health effects of marijuana before you decide that it is OK to use.
 
G

Graybeard

Guest
I think it is ludicrous to assume that marijuana was used as incense....have you smelled it when it burns?...IT STINKS!
 
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
It's not really the drug itself that is the problem it's the idea of using (or abusing, rather) a certain substance in order to get an effect when there's no good reason (eg medicinal) for it.