Gifts - Tongues and the Interpretation of Tongues

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
May 30, 2015
1,179
7
0
Why does this upset you so much? In the whole scheme of things this is a petty difference.
It is petty, alright. Pettiness toward the truth of God's word. God is not amused by it.
 
K

kennethcadwell

Guest
Originally Posted by notuptome

You argue out of ignorance of the what the original languages teach.

Filled is pletho in the Greek seen in Acts 2. Bapto and "baptizo" are Greek terms used for baptism one for water and the other for Holy Spirit.

A Strongs concordance can be obtained online and supply ready references for these terms.

For the cause of Christ
Roger

For the cause of Christ
Roger






You are using your intellect and false understanding to hinder your knowledge of God.




Good thing you are not falling for this because Bapto is not for water baptism and Baptizo for Holy Spirit baptism.......

Here is there true definitions;


Bapto

a. to dip, dip in, immerse: τί, John 13:26 (but in 26 Lachmannἐμβάψας, as in 26b L text R G); followed by a genitive of the thing into which the object is dipped (because only a part of it is touched by the act of dipping), Luke 16:24 (cf. ἅπτεσθαι τίνος, λούεσθαι ποταμοιο,Homer, Iliad 5, 6; 6, 508; cf. Buttmann, § 132, 25; (Winers Grammar, § 30, 8. c.)).
b. to dip into dye, to dye, color: ἱμάτιον αἵματι, Revelation 19:13(Tdf. περιρεραμμενον, see under the word περιρραίνω; WHῥεραντισμενον, see ῤαντίζω). (Herodotus 7, 67; Anth. 11, 68;Josephus, Antiquities 3, 6, 1.) (Compare: ἐμβάπτω.)



Baptizo


1. properly, to dip repeatedly, to immerge, submerge (of vessels sunk,Polybius 1, 51, 6; 8, 8, 4; of animals, Diodorus 1, 36).
2. to cleanse by dipping or submerging, to wash, to make clean with water; in the middle and the 1 aorist passive to wash oneself, bathe; soMark 7:4 (where WH text ῥαντισωνται); Luke 11:38 (2 Kings 5:14ἐβαπτίσατο ἐν τῷ Ιορδάνῃ, for טָבַל; Sir. 31:30 (Sir. 34:30; Judith 12:7).
3. metaphorically, to overwhelm, as ἰδιωτας ταῖς ἐισφοραις,Diodorus 1, 73; ὀφλημασι, Plutarch, Galba 21; τῇ συμφοράβεβαπτισμενος, Heliodorus Aeth. 2, 3; and alone, to inflict great and abounding calamities on one: ἐβαπτισαν τήν πόλιν, Josephus, b. j.4, 3, 3; ἀνομία με βαπτίζει, Isaiah 21:4 the Sept. hence,βαπτίζεσθαι βάπτισμα (cf. Winers Grammar, 225 (211); (Buttmann, 148 (129)); cf. λούεσθαι τό λουτρόν, Aelian de nat. an. 3, 42), to be overwhelmed with calamities, of those who must bear them, Matthew 20:22f Rec.; Mark 10:38; Luke 12:50 (cf. the Germanetwasauszubadenhaben, and the use of the word e. g. respecting those who cross a river with difficulty, ἕως τῶν μαστῶν οἱ πεζοίβαπτιζόμενοι διέβαινον, Polybius 3, 72, 4; (for examples seeSophocles' Lexicon under the word; also T. J. Conant, βαπτίζειν, its meaning and use, N. Y. 1864 (printed also as an Appendix to their revised version of the Gospel of Matthew by the American Bible Union); and especially four works by J. W. Dale entitled Classic, Judaic, Johannic, Christic, Baptism, Phil. 1867ff; D. B. Ford, Studies on the Bapt. Quest. (including a review of Dr. Dale's works), Bost. 1879)).
II. In the N. T. it is used particularly of the rite of sacred ablution, first instituted by John the Baptist, afterward by Christ's command received by Christians and adjusted to the contents and nature of their religion (seeβάπτισμα, 3), viz., an immersion in water, performed as a sign of the removal of sin, and administered to those who, impelled by a desire for salvation, sought admission to the benefits of the Messiah's kingdom; (for patristic references respecting the mode, ministrant, subjects, etc. of the rite, cf. Sophocles Lexicon, under the word; Dict. of Chris. Antiq. under the word Baptism).
a. The word is used absolutely, to administer the rite of ablution, to baptize (Vulg.baptizo; Tertulliantingo,tinguo (cf.metgiro, de corona mil. § 3)): Mark 1:4; John 1:25f, 28; John 3:22f, 26; John 4:2; John 10:40; 1 Corinthians 1:17; with the cognate noun τό βάπτισμα, Acts 19:4; βαπτίζων substantively equivalent to βαπτιστής, Mark 6:14 (24 TTr WH). τινα, John 4:1; Acts 8:38; 1 Corinthians 1:14, 16. Passive to be baptized: Matthew 3:13f, 16; Mark 16:16; Luke 3:21; Acts 2:41; Acts 8:12, 13,(); ; 1 Corinthians 1:15 L T Tr WH; L T Tr marginal reading. WHmarginal reading. Passive in a reflexive sense (i. e. middle, cf. Winers Grammar, § 38, 3), to allow oneself to be initiated by baptism, to receive baptism: Luke (); ; Acts 2:38; Acts 9:18; Acts 16:33; Acts 18:8; with the cognate noun τό βάπτισμα added, Luke 7:29; 1 aorist middle,1 Corinthians 10:2 (L T Tr marginal reading WH marginal readingἐβαπτίσθησαν (cf. Winer's Grammar, § 38, 4 b.)); Acts 22:16. followed by a dative of the thing with which baptism is performed, ὕδατι, see bb. below.
b. with prepositions; aa. εἰς, to mark the element into which the immersion is made: εἰς τόν Ιορδάνην, Mark 1:9. to mark the end: εἰςμετάνοιαν, to bind one to repentance, Matthew 3:11; εἰς τόἸωάννου βάπτισμα, to bind to the duties imposed by John's baptism,Acts 19:3 (cf. Winer's Grammar, 397 (371)); εἰς ὄνομα τίνος, to profess the name (see ὄνομα, 2) of one whose follower we become,Matthew 28:19; Acts 8:16; Acts 19:5; 1 Corinthians 1:13, 15; εἰς ἄφεσινἁμαρτιῶν, to obtain the forgiveness of sins, Acts 2:38; εἰς τόνΜωυσῆν, to follow Moses as a leader, 1 Corinthians 10:2. to indicate the effect: εἰς ἕν σῶμα, to unite together into one body by baptism, 1 Corinthians 12:13; εἰς Χριστόν, εἰς τόν θάνατον αὐτοῦ, to bring by baptism into fellowship with Christ, into fellowship in his death, by which fellowship we have died to sin, Galatians 3:27; Romans 6:3 (cf. Meyer on the latter passive, Ellicott on the former). bb. ἐν, with the dative of the thing in which one is immersed: ἐν τῷ Ιορδάνῃ, Mark 1:5; ἐν τῷὕδατι, John 1:31 (L T Tr WH ἐν ὕδατι, but compare Meyer at the passage (who makes the article deictic)). of the thing used in baptizing: ἐνὕδατι, Matthew 3:11; Mark 1:8 (T WH Tr marginal reading omit; Tr text brackets ἐν); John 1:26, 33; cf. Buttmann, § 133, 19; (cf. Winers Grammar, 412 (384); see ἐν, I. 5 d. α.); with the simple dative, ὕδατι,Luke 3:16; Acts 1:5; Acts 11:16. ἐν πνεύματι ἁγίῳ, to imbue richly with the Holy Spirit (just as its large bestowment is called an outpouring):Matthew 3:11; Mark 1:8 (L Tr brackets ἐν); Luke 3:16; John 1:33; Acts 1:5; Acts 11:16; with the addition καί πυρί to overwhelm with fire (those who do not repent), i. e. to subject them to the terrible penalties of hell,Matthew 3:11. ἐν ὀνόματι τοῦ κυρίου, by the authority of the Lord,Acts 10:48. cc. Passive ἐπί (L Tr WH ἐν) τῷ ὀνόματι ἸησοῦΧριστοῦ, relying on the name of Jesus Christ, i. e. reposing one's hope on him, Acts 2:38. dd. ὑπέρ τῶν νεκρῶν on behalf of the dead, i. e. to promote their eternal salvation by undergoing baptism in their stead, 1 Corinthians 15:29; cf. (Winers Grammar, 175 (165); 279 (262); 382 (358); Meyer (or Beet) at the passage); especially Neander at the passage; Rückert, Progr. on the passage, Jen. 18 47; Paret in Ewald's Jahrb. d. Biblical Wissensch. ix., p. 247; (cf. B. D. under the word Baptism XII. Alex.'s Kitto ibid. VI.).
 
May 30, 2015
1,179
7
0

Your right, it is the blood of jesus, but how is that blood applied to us?

Paul says in roms 6, we were baptized into his death and burial. This is baptism of the spirit. where our sins are washed away.

in 1 cor 12, Paul says we were baptized into Christ. This is baptism of the spirit.

Paul says in col. our spiritual baptism is the circumcision done by the hands of God not men this is baptism of the spirit.

John the baptist said he will baptize with the HS and fire. this is baptism of the spirit.
We receive the cleansing blood through faith in Jesus Christ. In Romans 6, Paul is talking about water baptism, where we identify publically with Jesus death, burial and resurrection. That is NOT the baptism of the Holy Spirit.

We receive the baptism of the Holy Spirit when we ask Him for it, and then submit our entire beings to it. He comes upon us with His powerful anointing, which is unmistakeable.


No. I am trying to show you the truth. But it seems you have no desire to hear.
I have been taught the truth, and I do not receive from people who dispute these matters.


Baptizo (from whence the term comes) means to immerse into. or to plung unt. it means to die, and was used by the jews to represent spiritual cleansings.

when we think of the word annoint, we think of a priest pouring a holy oil over our heads to annoint us, (especially in the OT. This is representative of the HS comming into us. Jesus was annointed when the spirit of God descended as a dove and came into him.

We also see this in the OT priesthood. the priest was washed first (this represents baptism of the spirit. Finally, he was annointed with the Holy Oil. This is representative of the annointing of the spirit.

The baptism of the spirit is where we are cleaned, and our sins are washed away.

The annointing of the spirit is where the spirit comes into us, seals us, teaches us, and gives us differing gifts.

I am sorry, but your church has mislead you
Holy Spirit, when He baptizes us with Himself, comes UPON us and pours Himself liberally over us just like that oil of old that poured over Aaron's head and down over his beard and down to his feet---from head to toe! Just like Holy Spirit came UPON Jesus at His baptism in water.

Psalm 133:2
It is like the precious oil upon the head,
Running down on the beard,
The beard of Aaron,
Running down on the edge of his garments.


The baptism of the Holy Spirit is not a cleansing fire. It is His precious anointing of those who are already cleansed by the blood of the Lamb!

You have been misled about this beautiful act of God toward His children.
 
May 30, 2015
1,179
7
0
I wasn't trying to be cute.
And nothing inaccurate about the fact that people that talk gibberish is doing nothing but looking like a fool.
I guess you think the whole word of God that records this event in the life of a Christian is also foolish. I am pleased to be considered a fool for Christ!

Your judgment is a stone of stumbling for yourself and others.
 
May 30, 2015
1,179
7
0
Come on now, can you tell me what other KNOWN language you are speaking in, or even what you are saying? I'm not saying you don't and if you read my earlier comments here I hope you can see I'm not trying to be judgmental or suggest you can't. Really though if no one understands what you're saying, and it's just a personal think between you and Him then honestly what purpose does it serve to glorify God around people if there's no interpreter? I think it should be done in privet, and honestly I am pretty sure that what they do in my own church is not the same thing described in Acts, and certainly is not an actual language. If it's good for you and brings you closer to God the great please have at it, but in front of others who don't understand it how does that edify God?
The purpose for the language we are given in prayer is for God to edify us.
 

Preach2u

Junior Member
Jun 10, 2015
13
0
1
Always beware of ppl who say, but in the original language, it's says this or that. I don't believe we need to study the original languages to understand most of the Bible. Im a Pastor (evangelist) for COGIC , the largest pentecostal denom in America. I have not spoken in tongues. Speaking in tongues was not an issue with the leaders I met. Also speaking in tongues and other practices some pentecostal use are strikingly similar to pagan practices.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
If you have experienced the baptism of the Holy Spirit, you wouldn't be arguing with me about it, or the gifts of the Holy Spirit.
Your experiences are askew of scripture. You argue against the word of God. You reject direct counsel from Gods word.

The Holy Spirit leads into the truth in Gods word. The Holy Spirit does not speak of Himself but only that which He has heard of the Father in heaven.

The only way to get out of a hole is to stop digging.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
Always beware of ppl who say, but in the original language, it's says this or that. I don't believe we need to study the original languages to understand most of the Bible. Im a Pastor (evangelist) for COGIC , the largest pentecostal denom in America. I have not spoken in tongues. Speaking in tongues was not an issue with the leaders I met. Also speaking in tongues and other practices some pentecostal use are strikingly similar to pagan practices.
The best bible you can find is still a translation from the Greek and Hebrew. It is the height of stupidity to say we don't need to refer to the original languages. Thank God for good and honest translations but they are done by men and still have some textual variances in them.

Aligning the translations with the original texts is only a good workman studying to show himself approved that needeth not to be ashamed.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
Originally Posted by notuptome

You argue out of ignorance of the what the original languages teach.

Filled is pletho in the Greek seen in Acts 2. Bapto and "baptizo" are Greek terms used for baptism one for water and the other for Holy Spirit.

A Strongs concordance can be obtained online and supply ready references for these terms.

For the cause of Christ
Roger









Good thing you are not falling for this because Bapto is not for water baptism and Baptizo for Holy Spirit baptism.......

Here is there true definitions;


Bapto

a. to dip, dip in, immerse: τί, John 13:26 (but in 26 Lachmannἐμβάψας, as in 26b L text R G); followed by a genitive of the thing into which the object is dipped (because only a part of it is touched by the act of dipping), Luke 16:24 (cf. ἅπτεσθαι τίνος, λούεσθαι ποταμοιο,Homer, Iliad 5, 6; 6, 508; cf. Buttmann, § 132, 25; (Winers Grammar, § 30, 8. c.)).
b. to dip into dye, to dye, color: ἱμάτιον αἵματι, Revelation 19:13(Tdf. περιρεραμμενον, see under the word περιρραίνω; WHῥεραντισμενον, see ῤαντίζω). (Herodotus 7, 67; Anth. 11, 68;Josephus, Antiquities 3, 6, 1.) (Compare: ἐμβάπτω.)



Baptizo


1. properly, to dip repeatedly, to immerge, submerge (of vessels sunk,Polybius 1, 51, 6; 8, 8, 4; of animals, Diodorus 1, 36).
2. to cleanse by dipping or submerging, to wash, to make clean with water; in the middle and the 1 aorist passive to wash oneself, bathe; soMark 7:4 (where WH text ῥαντισωνται); Luke 11:38 (2 Kings 5:14ἐβαπτίσατο ἐν τῷ Ιορδάνῃ, for טָבַל; Sir. 31:30 (Sir. 34:30; Judith 12:7).
3. metaphorically, to overwhelm, as ἰδιωτας ταῖς ἐισφοραις,Diodorus 1, 73; ὀφλημασι, Plutarch, Galba 21; τῇ συμφοράβεβαπτισμενος, Heliodorus Aeth. 2, 3; and alone, to inflict great and abounding calamities on one: ἐβαπτισαν τήν πόλιν, Josephus, b. j.4, 3, 3; ἀνομία με βαπτίζει, Isaiah 21:4 the Sept. hence,βαπτίζεσθαι βάπτισμα (cf. Winers Grammar, 225 (211); (Buttmann, 148 (129)); cf. λούεσθαι τό λουτρόν, Aelian de nat. an. 3, 42), to be overwhelmed with calamities, of those who must bear them, Matthew 20:22f Rec.; Mark 10:38; Luke 12:50 (cf. the Germanetwasauszubadenhaben, and the use of the word e. g. respecting those who cross a river with difficulty, ἕως τῶν μαστῶν οἱ πεζοίβαπτιζόμενοι διέβαινον, Polybius 3, 72, 4; (for examples seeSophocles' Lexicon under the word; also T. J. Conant, βαπτίζειν, its meaning and use, N. Y. 1864 (printed also as an Appendix to their revised version of the Gospel of Matthew by the American Bible Union); and especially four works by J. W. Dale entitled Classic, Judaic, Johannic, Christic, Baptism, Phil. 1867ff; D. B. Ford, Studies on the Bapt. Quest. (including a review of Dr. Dale's works), Bost. 1879)).
II. In the N. T. it is used particularly of the rite of sacred ablution, first instituted by John the Baptist, afterward by Christ's command received by Christians and adjusted to the contents and nature of their religion (seeβάπτισμα, 3), viz., an immersion in water, performed as a sign of the removal of sin, and administered to those who, impelled by a desire for salvation, sought admission to the benefits of the Messiah's kingdom; (for patristic references respecting the mode, ministrant, subjects, etc. of the rite, cf. Sophocles Lexicon, under the word; Dict. of Chris. Antiq. under the word Baptism).
a. The word is used absolutely, to administer the rite of ablution, to baptize (Vulg.baptizo; Tertulliantingo,tinguo (cf.metgiro, de corona mil. § 3)): Mark 1:4; John 1:25f, 28; John 3:22f, 26; John 4:2; John 10:40; 1 Corinthians 1:17; with the cognate noun τό βάπτισμα, Acts 19:4; βαπτίζων substantively equivalent to βαπτιστής, Mark 6:14 (24 TTr WH). τινα, John 4:1; Acts 8:38; 1 Corinthians 1:14, 16. Passive to be baptized: Matthew 3:13f, 16; Mark 16:16; Luke 3:21; Acts 2:41; Acts 8:12, 13,(); ; 1 Corinthians 1:15 L T Tr WH; L T Tr marginal reading. WHmarginal reading. Passive in a reflexive sense (i. e. middle, cf. Winers Grammar, § 38, 3), to allow oneself to be initiated by baptism, to receive baptism: Luke (); ; Acts 2:38; Acts 9:18; Acts 16:33; Acts 18:8; with the cognate noun τό βάπτισμα added, Luke 7:29; 1 aorist middle,1 Corinthians 10:2 (L T Tr marginal reading WH marginal readingἐβαπτίσθησαν (cf. Winer's Grammar, § 38, 4 b.)); Acts 22:16. followed by a dative of the thing with which baptism is performed, ὕδατι, see bb. below.
b. with prepositions; aa. εἰς, to mark the element into which the immersion is made: εἰς τόν Ιορδάνην, Mark 1:9. to mark the end: εἰςμετάνοιαν, to bind one to repentance, Matthew 3:11; εἰς τόἸωάννου βάπτισμα, to bind to the duties imposed by John's baptism,Acts 19:3 (cf. Winer's Grammar, 397 (371)); εἰς ὄνομα τίνος, to profess the name (see ὄνομα, 2) of one whose follower we become,Matthew 28:19; Acts 8:16; Acts 19:5; 1 Corinthians 1:13, 15; εἰς ἄφεσινἁμαρτιῶν, to obtain the forgiveness of sins, Acts 2:38; εἰς τόνΜωυσῆν, to follow Moses as a leader, 1 Corinthians 10:2. to indicate the effect: εἰς ἕν σῶμα, to unite together into one body by baptism, 1 Corinthians 12:13; εἰς Χριστόν, εἰς τόν θάνατον αὐτοῦ, to bring by baptism into fellowship with Christ, into fellowship in his death, by which fellowship we have died to sin, Galatians 3:27; Romans 6:3 (cf. Meyer on the latter passive, Ellicott on the former). bb. ἐν, with the dative of the thing in which one is immersed: ἐν τῷ Ιορδάνῃ, Mark 1:5; ἐν τῷὕδατι, John 1:31 (L T Tr WH ἐν ὕδατι, but compare Meyer at the passage (who makes the article deictic)). of the thing used in baptizing: ἐνὕδατι, Matthew 3:11; Mark 1:8 (T WH Tr marginal reading omit; Tr text brackets ἐν); John 1:26, 33; cf. Buttmann, § 133, 19; (cf. Winers Grammar, 412 (384); see ἐν, I. 5 d. α.); with the simple dative, ὕδατι,Luke 3:16; Acts 1:5; Acts 11:16. ἐν πνεύματι ἁγίῳ, to imbue richly with the Holy Spirit (just as its large bestowment is called an outpouring):Matthew 3:11; Mark 1:8 (L Tr brackets ἐν); Luke 3:16; John 1:33; Acts 1:5; Acts 11:16; with the addition καί πυρί to overwhelm with fire (those who do not repent), i. e. to subject them to the terrible penalties of hell,Matthew 3:11. ἐν ὀνόματι τοῦ κυρίου, by the authority of the Lord,Acts 10:48. cc. Passive ἐπί (L Tr WH ἐν) τῷ ὀνόματι ἸησοῦΧριστοῦ, relying on the name of Jesus Christ, i. e. reposing one's hope on him, Acts 2:38. dd. ὑπέρ τῶν νεκρῶν on behalf of the dead, i. e. to promote their eternal salvation by undergoing baptism in their stead, 1 Corinthians 15:29; cf. (Winers Grammar, 175 (165); 279 (262); 382 (358); Meyer (or Beet) at the passage); especially Neander at the passage; Rückert, Progr. on the passage, Jen. 18 47; Paret in Ewald's Jahrb. d. Biblical Wissensch. ix., p. 247; (cf. B. D. under the word Baptism XII. Alex.'s Kitto ibid. VI.).
You cut and paste but you do not comprehend. Of course as a baptismal regenerationist you have a vested interest in confusing Holy Spirit baptism and water baptism.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
May 30, 2015
1,179
7
0
Your experiences are askew of scripture. You argue against the word of God. You reject direct counsel from Gods word.

The Holy Spirit leads into the truth in Gods word. The Holy Spirit does not speak of Himself but only that which He has heard of the Father in heaven.

The only way to get out of a hole is to stop digging.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
You really do not know what you're talking about. My experience equals millions and millions of other believers' experiences since Pentecost. Totally aligned with scripture.

You are fighting God's word because you are devoid of His revelation about Holy Spirit. It's all right there for you in black and white, but it eludes you because your spiritual eyes are closed. There is no convincing you apart from Holy Spirit Himself opening your eyes. Holy Spirit indeed leads us into all truth, but you are still outside looking in. Your confusion about Holy Spirit is a glaring flaw. He teaches us about Himself! He is the Spirit of Christ!
 
Last edited:
Aug 15, 2009
9,745
179
0
Well I do not know what seminary you went to but they ought to give you your money back.
Gee, that's quite a judgement call considering you say you don't do those things.
Praying in tongues is akin to pagan prayers that cannot edify anyone. Praying in the Spirit is not praying in tongues. Singing in the Spirit is not singing in tongues. You take great liberty with the scriptures to arrive at such a conclusion.
All you've proven here is that you either don't read your Bible, or you don't believe what it says.
You know that I believe in the gifts of the Holy Spirit but God ended tongues, prophecy and knowledge.
The world teaches theory as fact. So do you.
Boldly unbiblical and something that should shame every Pentecostal or charismatic. Yet some here will fawn all over this kind of stuff. And we wonder what's wrong with the church in this day.
This is stated by someone that thinks the RCC is biblical. Go figure.
This is stated by a cessationist that believes we've been in the millennial reign of Christ since 70 AD, 1,930 years over the limit & during The Obamaination?

Before you start assassinating people's character left & right, you outta take a good look at yer own..... just say'in.

 
Aug 15, 2009
9,745
179
0
I wasn't trying to be cute.
And nothing inaccurate about the fact that people that talk gibberish is doing nothing but looking like a fool.
1 Corinthians 1:25-29 (KJV) [SUP]25 [/SUP]Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men; and the weakness of God is stronger than men. [SUP]26 [/SUP]For ye see your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called: [SUP]27 [/SUP]But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty; [SUP]28 [/SUP]And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are: [SUP]29 [/SUP]That no flesh should glory in his presence.

It's so sad when people glory in their knowledge & wisdom.


1 Corinthians 2:14 (KJV) But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
[HR][/HR]1 Corinthians 3:19 (KJV) For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
Gee, that's quite a judgement call considering you say you don't do those things.
You I hold to a higher standard.
All you've proven here is that you either don't read your Bible, or you don't believe what it says.
Baseless accusation. No foundational argument laid.
The world teaches theory as fact. So do you.
Just another unsupported accusation.
This is stated by someone that thinks the RCC is biblical. Go figure.
This is stated by a cessationist that believes we've been in the millennial reign of Christ since 70 AD, 1,930 years over the limit & during The Obamaination?[
This is about as accurate as the rest of your post. But you felt like you had to say something I suppose.
Before you start assassinating people's character left & right, you outta take a good look at yer own..... just say'in.
Considering the source I could take that as a compliment. 1 Peter 4:14

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
You really do not know what you're talking about. My experience equals millions and millions of other believers' experiences since Pentecost. Totally aligned with scripture.

You are fighting God's word because you are devoid of His revelation about Holy Spirit. It's all right there for you in black and white, but it eludes you because your spiritual eyes are closed. There is no convincing you apart from Holy Spirit Himself opening your eyes. Holy Spirit indeed leads us into all truth, but you are still outside looking in. Your confusion about Holy Spirit is a glaring flaw. He teaches us about Himself! He is the Spirit of Christ!
You are way out of line here in your accusations.

The number of Pentecostals in the world today is really very small. They just think they are big.

Pentecostals are way off on a number of core tenets of the faith. That has been the subject of a number of threads on CC so I'll not chase down that rabbit trail.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
G

Gr8grace

Guest
It is petty, alright. Pettiness toward the truth of God's word. God is not amused by it.
We do have a verse that says tongues will cease. When do you think that will happen? And why?
 
Aug 15, 2009
9,745
179
0
Always beware of ppl who say, but in the original language, it's says this or that. I don't believe we need to study the original languages to understand most of the Bible.
That's a real problem right there. Most believers, including Pentecostals, WANT to know what the original languages say. That's part of "study to show yourselves approved".

Im a Pastor (evangelist) for COGIC , the largest pentecostal denom in America. I have not spoken in tongues. Speaking in tongues was not an issue with the leaders I met. Also speaking in tongues and other practices some pentecostal use are strikingly similar to pagan practices.
Since scripture plainly states it is a gift of the Spirit, & God validates it on the Day of Pentecost, it's not just "good 'nuf for me", it necessitates its use in the church, & the church SHOULD be exercising this gift. Reasons:

1. God gave it to the church, therefore He knows we need it, & we should appreciate it as God's gift..... not deny it, not abuse it, but be glad we have the Holy Spirit using us in this gifting. It should be a privilege to serve with His gift!
2. In these last days, the church needs all the help it can get..... agreed?

Luke 24:45-49 (KJV) [SUP]45 [/SUP]Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures, [SUP]46 [/SUP]And said unto them, Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day: [SUP]47 [/SUP]And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem. [SUP]48 [/SUP]And ye are witnesses of these things. [SUP]49 [/SUP]And, behold, I send the promise of my Father upon you: but tarry ye in the city of Jerusalem, until ye be endued with power from on high.

Why did Jesus tell the disciples to tarry until this power from on high was instilled within them?

John 15:4-5 (KJV) [SUP]4 [/SUP]Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine; no more can ye, except ye abide in me. [SUP]5 [/SUP]I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,396
113
Always beware of ppl who say, but in the original language, it's says this or that. I don't believe we need to study the original languages to understand most of the Bible. Im a Pastor (evangelist) for COGIC , the largest pentecostal denom in America. I have not spoken in tongues. Speaking in tongues was not an issue with the leaders I met. Also speaking in tongues and other practices some pentecostal use are strikingly similar to pagan practices.
Maybe that is why you make the stand you make......the bolded that is.....and to be quite frank...as a preacher/pastor/evangelist you should be ashamed to say that...you should use every tool in the box to biblically understand the word so as to accurately convey it...the bible was given in Hebrew, Chaldean (Daniel) and Greek in the N.T. and contains verb tenses, portrayed thoughts and truths that cannot be accurately described in English.....WHY would you not want to know EXACTLY what was meant by any given verse based upon the ISPIRED WORDS that make up said document....EVERY word of GOD is inspired...including the verb tenses, nouns, adjectives etc in the language they were inspired in for a reason.......
 
G

Gr8grace

Guest
Maybe that is why you make the stand you make......the bolded that is.....and to be quite frank...as a preacher/pastor/evangelist you should be ashamed to say that...you should use every tool in the box to biblically understand the word so as to accurately convey it...the bible was given in Hebrew, Chaldean (Daniel) and Greek in the N.T. and contains verb tenses, portrayed thoughts and truths that cannot be accurately described in English.....WHY would you not want to know EXACTLY what was meant by any given verse based upon the ISPIRED WORDS that make up said document....EVERY word of GOD is inspired...including the verb tenses, nouns, adjectives etc in the language they were inspired in for a reason.......
Agreed 100%. But if we want to hold onto some of our "pet" doctrines. Stay away from the original languages.
 
May 30, 2015
1,179
7
0
You are way out of line here in your accusations.

The number of Pentecostals in the world today is really very small. They just think they are big.

Pentecostals are way off on a number of core tenets of the faith. That has been the subject of a number of threads on CC so I'll not chase down that rabbit trail.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
I am not talking about Pentecostals, man!!!!!

 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,396
113
Agreed 100%. But if we want to hold onto some of our "pet" doctrines. Stay away from the original languages.
I agree...the word was inspired and means exactly what it means in context.....God inspired words and each one of them has bearing on what is conveyed......to disregard the Hebrew and Greek and the meanings of the original inspired words does an injustice to any interpretation....