Is Dr. Dino (Kent Hovind) a total joke?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Tintin said:
He's not working on his dissertation, but his next distraction from the truth at hand. That's academic (as in reputable - haha) for 'sleight-of-hand'. ;)
Click to expand...

My dissertation is about dinosaur fossils that are more than 65 million years old like real science says, not less than 6,000 years old like you and Dr. Dino and those pseudoscientific propaganda machines like ICR, AIG, and CMI you keep linking to say.
 
JackH said:
My dissertation is about dinosaur fossils that are more than 65 million years old like real science says, not less than 6,000 years old like you and Dr. Dino and those pseudoscientific propaganda machines like ICR, AIG, and CMI you keep linking to say.
Click to expand...
How long was that after nothing blew up and made everything? Why not do a paper on how silly and unscientific that kind of nonsense is?
 
Mitspa said:
So you admit its a matter of faith and not real science? That was my point from the start, you have your faith and I have mine :)
Click to expand...

An earth around 4.5 billion years old and not around 6,000 years old is a matter of real science and not faith.

Dinosaur fossils all older than 65 million years old is a matter of real science and not faith.

According to real science, no global flood occurred 4,000 to 5,000 years ago.
 
JackH said:
An earth around 4.5 billion years old and not around 6,000 years old is a matter of real science and not faith.

Dinosaur fossils all older than 65 million years old is a matter of real science and not faith.
Click to expand...

but what you call real science is a matter of faith and hypothesis and interpretation of doubtful evidence. It is not fact..
 
valiant said:
but what you call real science is a matter of faith and hypothesis and interpretation of doubtful evidence. It is not fact..
Click to expand...

Real science sent us to the moon.

Real science provided the technology you use to get online and post to this forum.

You don't think technology is such that scientists can not determine if a dinosaur fossil is millions of years old as opposed to thousands of years old?
 
JackH said:
Real science sent us to the moon.

Real science provided the technology you use to get online and post to this forum.

You don't think technology is such that scientists can not determine if a dinosaur fossil is millions of years old as opposed to thousands of years old?
Click to expand...

no actually I don't. It is one thing dealing with the here and now. But the long past raises many imponderables and carbon dating and other forms of dating are not all that reliable in these matters. 'scientists' don't have an axe to grind about the present but they do about the past..

lol look at the spanner that microbiology has thrown in the Darwinian works. the evolution of a cell must have taken over 4 billion years in itself, if it happened.
 
valiant said:
no actually I don't. It is one thing dealing with the here and now. But the long past raises many imponderables and carbon dating and other forms of dating are not all that reliable in these matters.
Click to expand...

What is the long past?

Do you think that there is overwhelming scientific evidence that Neathderthals lived on this planet 50,000 years ago?
 
JackH said:
What is the long past?

Do you think that there is overwhelming scientific evidence that Neathderthals lived on this planet 50,000 years ago?
Click to expand...

well I think they lived on earth but I never got to asking them how old they were. although I've met a few

your problem is you throw numbers around like water
 
I just wanted to stop in and say first "Kent Hovind does perfectly fine defending his own views, as anyone can see with a little youtube" I am especially fond of him against 3 professors lol. I like when the one on the left says "oh my God." (on their left I guess that's our right) that cracks me up.

However I really just wanted to stop in and claim love for my brother. I love Kent and I really look forward to spending time with him in heaven. Along with David Wilkerson. Man I love those guys.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meIg-TyDm-g
 
Deadtosin said:
I just wanted to stop in and say first "Kent Hovind does perfectly fine defending his own views

However I really just wanted to stop in and claim love for my brother. I love Kent
Click to expand...

How about King James Bible Onlyism?

How well does Dr. Dino (Kent Hovind) defend that?

Do you generally find that those convicted of fraud are truthful individuals?

Do you agree with Dr. Dino that the government was behind 9/11 and the Oklahoma City bombings?

Back to the Bible, Dr. Dino teaches that a comet caused Noah's Flood.

Do you agree with that?

Dr. Dino has serious credibility issues.
 
valiant said:
well I think they lived on earth but I never got to asking them how old they were. although I've met a few

your problem is you throw numbers around like water
Click to expand...

The question you are responding to here is whether there is overwhelming scientific evidence that Neanderthals lived on this planet 50,000 years ago.

I'll answer it for you.

Yes, there is.

I didn't pick 50,000 years out of thin air.

I didn't say 25,000 years because Neanderthal had become extinct by then:

This may interest you:

"The Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalensis) inhabited Europe and parts of western Asia between 230,000 and 28,000 years ago; during the last few millennia they coincided with Homo Sapiens, and became extinct for reasons that are still being challenged."

http://zeenews.india.com/news/science/neanderthal-had-different-ear-bones-than-modern-humans-study_1569661.html

 
JackH said:
The question you are responding to here is whether there is overwhelming scientific evidence that Neanderthals lived on this planet 50,000 years ago.

I'll answer it for you.

Yes, there is.

I didn't pick 50,000 years out of thin air.

I didn't say 25,000 years because Neanderthal had become extinct by then:

This may interest you:

"The Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalensis) inhabited Europe and parts of western Asia between 230,000 and 28,000 years ago; during the last few millennia they coincided with Homo Sapiens, and became extinct for reasons that are still being challenged."

http://zeenews.india.com/news/science/neanderthal-had-different-ear-bones-than-modern-humans-study_1569661.html
Click to expand...

Incidentally, Dr. Dino (Kent Hovind) says Neanderthal were perfectly normal humans. The reasons they looked different was things like they were 200-300 years old and had arthritis.

Hey DiscipleDave, isn't that another false teaching on the part of Dr. Dino?
 
JackH said:
Incidentally, Dr. Dino (Kent Hovind) says Neanderthal were perfectly normal humans. The reasons they looked different was things like they were 200-300 years old and had arthritis.

Hey DiscipleDave, isn't that another false teaching on the part of Dr. Dino?
Click to expand...

LOL I KNOW PEOPLE who look like Neanderthals. They are perfectly normal human beings.
 
JackH said:
An earth around 4.5 billion years old and not around 6,000 years old is a matter of real science and not faith.

Dinosaur fossils all older than 65 million years old is a matter of real science and not faith.

According to real science, no global flood occurred 4,000 to 5,000 years ago.
Click to expand...

Sorry ..you believe these things based on a belief system that has to have these great periods of time in order to leave the realm of real logic and science .... The fairy tale needs "a long, long time ago" to deny logic and true provable science.

There is no known physical law (provable by clear evidence) that determine these made-up dates.
 
JackH said:
Incidentally, Dr. Dino (Kent Hovind) says Neanderthal were perfectly normal humans. The reasons they looked different was things like they were 200-300 years old and had arthritis.

Hey DiscipleDave, isn't that another false teaching on the part of Dr. Dino?
Click to expand...

Why was a Neanderthals brain larger than modern humans...don't this disprove your fairy tale of evolution...

Or do we have to ignore those things that disprove evolution, so the lie can continue?
 
Mitspa said:
Sorry ..you believe these things based on a belief system that has to have these great periods of time in order to leave the realm of real logic and science .... The fairy tale needs "a long, long time ago" to deny logic and true provable science.

There is no known physical law (provable by clear evidence) that determine these made-up dates.
Click to expand...

We went to the moon, right?

And we got rocks from the moon right?

And the rocks were determined by real science to be billions of years old.

You believe we can go to the moon but can not tell how old moon rocks are?

What do you consider to be real logic and science?

That the moon is around 6,000 years old?
 
JackH said:
We went to the moon, right?

And we got rocks from the moon right?

And the rocks were determined by real science to be billions of years old.

You believe we can go to the moon but can not tell how old moon rocks are?

What do you consider to be real logic and science?

That the moon is around 6,000 years old?
Click to expand...
Not sure how old the moon is...God made it according to His Word...I accept it by faith :)

Now you say somebody told you the moon is "billions" of years old? Same folks who believe nothing blew up and made everything...billions of years ago... lol Yea...I think you can put your trust and faith in those knuckle heads if you like and I hope you enjoy tour faith as much as I do mine :)
 
JackH said:
An earth around 4.5 billion years old and not around 6,000 years old is a matter of real science and not faith.

Dinosaur fossils all older than 65 million years old is a matter of real science and not faith.

According to real science, no global flood occurred 4,000 to 5,000 years ago.
Click to expand...

Real science assured us the earth was flat a few hundred years ago. Real science bled people to relieve them of "bad humors" as little as two hundred years ago. Real science today assures GMO's are fine to eat.

Funny, but the "science" of radiometric dating has serious flaws.

I personally do believe the earth could be 4.5 billion years old. I personally believe the universe could be 15 billion or 18 to 20 billion years old. I personally KNOW the earth is not the result of the big bang. I personally KNOW that the inflation theory is MBFM. I personally KNOW that the first two humans were specially created about six thousand years ago in a garden the Eternal God planted. Evolution is a fairy tale and not a very good one at that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back