Why did the Lord try to kill Moses in Exodus 4:24-27

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
J

Jay3009

Guest
#1
Can anybody on cc try to explain to me why the Lord tries to kill Moses on his way to Egypt after he had been called and was on his way to do the Lords work? Also how did Zipporah cutting the foreskin of her son and touching Moses feet with it lead to the Lord sparing Moses life?
 
Last edited:
F

flob

Guest
#2
Our flesh, my flesh, is God's enemy. Because, as Paul says, no good thing dwells in it. Sin dwells in it.
Satan's nature.
So............that's why Christ was crucified. In the flesh--in the form of a serpent (like Moses lifted up).
Not only to substitute for us, taking our penalty,
But.........also to destroy him who has the power of death, that is, the devil.
Christ crucified the flesh.
So that when we receive, and take, enjoy, believe in, and experience Christ:
we also receive the inoculation against the flesh, the death to the flesh which is now contained in the Spirit
(in our spirit).


Anyway.............that is what circumcision is a picture of. The cutting off of the flesh. In the crucifixion of Christ.
As Paul says. So Jehovah commanded Moses to do it...............and Moses, because he didn't want to offend his wife,
didn't do it. But------as a picture--------there's no 'getting around' our denial of ourselves, the cross of Christ. All of us
have to go through it. Otherwise----------we're in death. So..........Moses did it, when faced with its real, practical importance. And his wife was still mad. I'm missing the 'touching the feet' thing..........is that in the Bible?
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
614
113
70
Alabama
#3
Can anybody on cc try to explain to me why the Lord tries to kill Moses on his way to Egypt after he had been called and was on his way to do the Lords work? Also how did Zipporah cutting the foreskin of her son and touching Moses feet with it lead to the Lord sparing Moses life?

There may be information here that we are not given regarding this incident. Here is what we do know.

1. Circumcision was a covenant practice given to the Hebrews as a sign that separates them from the rest of humanity.

2. Failure to keep this sign was punishable by disinheritance and death.
3. This only relates to the circumcision of Eliezer, "cut of the foreskin of her son and cast it at his feet." Clearly Moses had kept this practice with his older son. We have no indication as to why Moses had not honored this covenant with Eliezer. It is possible that Eliezer is only a few days old and since Moses has been away too long to perform the task, Zipporah may have taken it on herself perhaps even beyond the proper time of the eighth day. We simply do not know.

We are not told how Zipporah learned of the urgent need for her actions. Did she know of God's intent toward Moses? If so, how did she know?

1. Her words toward Moses "You are a bridegroom of blood," is clearly a rebuke because his neglect has put the blood on her hands.
2. This practice should not have been new to her. As the descendants of Abraham, the Midianites also were to keep this covenant of circumcision and Zipporah was a Midianite. Genesis 17:10-14.
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
126
63
#4
Can anybody on cc try to explain to me why the Lord tries to kill Moses on his way to Egypt after he had been called and was on his way to do the Lords work? Also how did Zipporah cutting the foreskin of her son and touching Moses feet with it lead to the Lord sparing Moses life?
A little intelligent thought will make you realise that God did not really try to kill Moses. Had He really tried to kill Moses, Moses would have been dead. It is an anthropomorphism indicating that Moses was near death as a consequence of God's action because Moses had not ensured the circumcision of his child and was returning to Egypt.
 

breno785au

Senior Member
Jul 23, 2013
6,002
767
113
39
Australia
#5
Sorry, I'm not that intelligent, what is an anthropomorphism?
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
614
113
70
Alabama
#6
Sorry, I'm not that intelligent, what is an anthropomorphism?
It means to assign human characteristics to something other than man. For example, cartoon animal characters in Disney moves being able to speak or reason as humans.
 
P

psychomom

Guest
#7
It means to assign human characteristics to something other than man. For example, cartoon animal characters in Disney moves being able to speak or reason as humans.
there are a few such zombies roaming around here, too. :rolleyes:
 

breno785au

Senior Member
Jul 23, 2013
6,002
767
113
39
Australia
#9
It means to assign human characteristics to something other than man. For example, cartoon animal characters in Disney moves being able to speak or reason as humans.
Thank you for explaining. Now im still not sure how that word applies to the subject matter?
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
614
113
70
Alabama
#10
Thank you for explaining. Now im still not sure how that word applies to the subject matter?
In this case, if I were you, I would simply consider its source and move on.

Scripture is also filled with anthropomorphisms - God characterized as having hands, a bosom, wings, etc...
 
Last edited:
G

Gr8grace

Guest
#13
Thank you for explaining. Now im still not sure how that word applies to the subject matter?
It doesn't in this case. Moses was right next to the sin unto death and he was about to get it.

Hermit explains it perfectly.

And in reality, it would be closer to an anthropopathism in this case but that doesn't fit either in this context.
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
614
113
70
Alabama
#14
It doesn't in this case. Moses was right next to the sin unto death and he was about to get it.

Hermit explains it perfectly.

And in reality, it would be closer to an anthropopathism in this case but that doesn't fit either in this context.
I do not think this was an anthropomorphism. I think the text means precisely what it says. "Now it came about at the lodging place on the way that the LORD met him and sought to put him to death." The reason was because he had violated the covenant of circumcision and the penalty was death. God meant what he said, "But an uncircumcised male who is not circumcised in the flesh of his foreskin, that person shall be cut off from his people; he has broken My covenant." It was the intervention of Zipporah that stayed the hand of the Lord against Moses.
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
126
63
#15
Sorry, I'm not that intelligent, what is an anthropomorphism?
it was an anthropomorphism because it suggested that God had to approach Moses in order to kill him in the same way as a man would. But in fact God could have struck him dead on the spot if He had really intended to kill him like he did Uzzah,

but some are a little lacking in understanding lol
 
J

Jay3009

Guest
#16
Some are also lacking in humility valiant such as yourself. In both your comments on this thread you seem to mock other people's intelligence and understanding as though you are somehow better. It was also you who told me on another thread that my 2 year old sons blood will be on my hands because he was conceived out of wedlock to a woman who is an unbeliever before I became a christian and more than one person on that thread rebuked you for that comment, what kind of christian says a 2 year old little boys blood will be on his fathers hands, where is the fruit in that. Remember the Lord prefers a man who repents with his face to the floor rather than a man who revels in his own righteousness as you seem to do. I've only been a christian for around 3 months now so excuse me if my understanding isn't as great as yours, my humility though seems to surpass yours ten fold. Keep your mocking comments to yourself in future please and try to represent the Lord with love and humility instead off puffed up prideful knowledge which you use to mock people. Your 81 years old you should know better than that by now and your understanding of the Lord can't be that great when u seem to think mocking people who are trying to learn and ask questions is His way when it isn't. Love covers a multitude of sins old man, remember that!
 
Last edited:
G

Gr8grace

Guest
#17
I do not think this was an anthropomorphism. I think the text means precisely what it says. "Now it came about at the lodging place on the way that the LORD met him and sought to put him to death." The reason was because he had violated the covenant of circumcision and the penalty was death. God meant what he said, "But an uncircumcised male who is not circumcised in the flesh of his foreskin, that person shall be cut off from his people; he has broken My covenant." It was the intervention of Zipporah that stayed the hand of the Lord against Moses.
I agree with you Hermit. And I believe you are spot on in your explanation.

Anthropomorphism nor anthropopathism are in this passage. I was just saying that an anthropopathism would have been a closer definition than anthropomorphism if we were confused about this passage.
 
G

Gr8grace

Guest
#18
it was an anthropomorphism because it suggested that God had to approach Moses in order to kill him in the same way as a man would. But in fact God could have struck him dead on the spot if He had really intended to kill him like he did Uzzah,

but some are a little lacking in understanding lol
No Valiant. It would describe God as having an "arm" to approach Moses to kill Him. Or the "hand" of god approached Moses to kill Him. Or the "finger" of God approached Moses.

Arm,hand,finger would be the anthropomorphism. A Human Characteristic ascribed to God, that God doesn't have.
 
E

EdisonTrent

Guest
#19
Can anybody on cc try to explain to me why the Lord tries to kill Moses on his way to Egypt after he had been called and was on his way to do the Lords work? Also how did Zipporah cutting the foreskin of her son and touching Moses feet with it lead to the Lord sparing Moses life?
Huh really I never knew thats written, cutting off foreskin and touching Moses feet with it. I can't but think how odd and wierd that seems.
 
J

Jay3009

Guest
#20
Casted it at Moses feet I meant, I worded it incorrectly!
 
Last edited: