-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Lol Tintin is just trying to mock me I am fairly certain, for tintin does not fully believe in the literal view of biblical creation, like many.
I saw it though, but then the Mythbusters are anti-Christian it seems and they have a tendency to wonk their experiments to get the results they wish to achieve. Perhaps they should rename their show Mythmakers.
They might be anti Christian but that is irrelevant to the point I'm making. They offered pretty convincing evidence that the moon landing could not have been faked. And why make a moon landing anyway..... what purpose would that serve?
Lol, man, are we going to make every space fakery topic about the moon landing? Lol we should really make a topic purely for the moon and focus on why this even more ludicrous "live webcast of Pluto" is impossible, even ludicrously impossible. For instance with the alleged distance and how long this vessel has supposedly been travelling without needing to hit the gas station, etc.
All right to be brief about it: Firstly knowing the Mythmakers be atheists, that even means they understand nothing, and even moreso means they have an agenda to try to disprove anything biblical. Their attempt to prove the moon landing was not faked is even ridiculous because they themselves even say they cherry-picked the strawmen arguments. They even admit to working with NASA in the very episode. They cannot prove the moon landing is real though, nor can they even prove it is even possible to achieve it, nor can they prove the harder arguments such as the impossible feat of leaving the moon once landed on it with 1960s technology, much less even our technology today.
The purpose is more interesting and is the only part subject to theory, but the motives are many, but the two best is Cold War Propaganda and to lie against the Bible. Though the Cold War Propaganda Theory is seemingly more rational, it is actually the Anti-Bible Theory that I find to be more feasible. It is really no secret that NASA and the so-called space community are atheists and pagans. After all, just look what they name stuff.
Yea indeed, and they similarly have agendas, particularly anti-Christian agendas.
Here's the difference between the two there's a mountain of proof for the Holocaust, but there's only fake images by a dubious institution known for fakery for the moon landing. The witnesses to the Holocaust are quite numerous and of many backgrounds. The supposed astronauts from the moon landing are few and have conflicting stories and also a curious connection to an infamous organization of witchcraft. Also there's numerous Holocaust artifacts which are known and solidly proven to be genuine, as where there are official artifacts from the moon that are actually fake, even confirmed by government sources to have been handed over by our government as official but tested and turned out be fake.
Like I said though, we're gonna overrun this topic with moon stuff, let's focus on just how this case is fake lol, we can always make a Moon topic, it is surely one that has enough material to keep a discussion going for years.
V
VioletReigns
Guest
Well, if you want to get REAL technical, in the words of the Oracle from "The Matrix":
...EVERYTHING you're looking at right NOW is not reality. For the things seen are temporal, disappearing moment by moment. And TIME is not reality either. In fact, your flesh is crucified with Christ, it's no longer you who live, but Christ IN you.
So in that regard, I don't think we can put any trust in anything temporary. Not even that chair you're sitting in.
This is not reality. I am Not really replying to your commentWell, if you want to get REAL technical, in the words of the Oracle from "The Matrix":
View attachment 126864
...EVERYTHING you're looking at right NOW is not reality. For the things seen are temporal, disappearing moment by moment. And TIME is not reality either. In fact, your flesh is crucified with Christ, it's no longer you who live, but Christ IN you.
So in that regard, I don't think we can put any trust in anything temporary. Not even that chair you're sitting in.
Well, if you want to get REAL technical, in the words of the Oracle from "The Matrix":
View attachment 126864
...EVERYTHING you're looking at right NOW is not reality. For the things seen are temporal, disappearing moment by moment. And TIME is not reality either. In fact, your flesh is crucified with Christ, it's no longer you who live, but Christ IN you.
So in that regard, I don't think we can put any trust in anything temporary. Not even that chair you're sitting in.
Well I'm not in a chair, but sure, I get your point. Though temporary there is still a difference between truth and lies. On subjects regarding space and earth, is note how they are perpetrated mostly by false images, be it false images from NASA pretended to be real, or by Hollywood even known to be false.
Beforetimes when I was new to reading the Bible I never really understood why God is so against images. Being now older, and having acquired more knowledge it trully is much wisdom in it for even though it seems absurd, people in this time are easily brainwashed by images and thrust out of the way of true wisdom.
Or how about billions of objects randomly flying in space are bound to set off a chain reaction of collisions of universal proportions...assuming it is all random events.
Colossians 1:17 (NET) He himself is before all things and all things are held together in him.
B
bowharp
Guest
Phew! That's good to know!
Just got to tell my boss not to worry so much on the engineering standards for NASA...
It's not like they're gonna be using it...
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh indeed, and that's even just playing under their paradigm, for which no one really knows even a small part of what all is up there. Once you understand they be faking it all it is actually somewhat hilarious all the contradictions. A great example is how they claim there to be an asteroid belt and then go on to claim they can just so happen to luckily get fragile and sophisticated machines through that totally unscathed.
V
VioletReigns
Guest
Yea sarcasm doth not suit you, and that's even a common counter-argument. It's funny because people that know the space stuff is largely fake know your arguments, but you don't know theirs. Which is hilarious because people assume we're stupid and yet we have all your knowledge plus more.
Satellites are in orbit. It is possible to get into orbit (satellites in orbit in fact in part proves the earth a disk, to which Tintin alluded, but we'll save that for another topic). It is not possible to leave orbit. In fact whenever they send something up to space (ie: rockets) the rockets can only continue to a certain altitude before it is forced to level out and can ascend no further. This is called by some The Glass Ceiling, not that it is actually made of glass, but then, maybe it is lol, they just know you can't get past it.
Well, I don't disagree it's a waste of money but neither will I call it a Capricorn One.
Well the money also is a way to support that most of space stuff is faked. They actually slashed the crap out of NASA's budget because NASA is obsolete and their lies are obsolete, and allegedly were paying the Russians to take stuff up to orbit. Lol so much for the Space Race, but I have heard not long ago from my friend more interested in science and space stuff than I that Russia is even taking the axe to their space program as well. Lol NASA only has a budget after the military and aerospace (ie: airplanes) anymore for to make propaganda for the space department essentially. Which actually explains the poor quality of their CGI images which are cheaper to fabricate. I think that's why they're gearing up to fake a Mars landing to try to get some publicity and thus funding, but I suppose that's just a theory.
yup, all theory without hard facts. I'm sure there are enough Snowdens out there dying to blow NASAs cover if they had the hard facts to show.