Nicolaitanes philosophy of “systematic distortion” and negation of scripture.
- Thread starter just-me
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Then there is another very interesting possibility for the origin of this sect so despised by Almighty God. This theory teaches that the original Nicolas was Nimrod. Their basis for this is that Nicolaitan means "a follower of Nicolas." It comes from two Greek words, nikos and laos. Nikos means "conqueror" or "destroyer," and laos means "people," and that means the original Nicolas was a conqueror or destroyer of the people. Nimrod conquered the people and established a man-made society within 200 years of the Flood (Genesis 10:8-12) and when he died his followers still continued to worship him. They called him “Baal,” which means “master” or “lord.”
Nimrod was known by other names as well. One which was commonly used in Asia Minor was “Santa” (see Lempriere's Classical Dictionary.) “Santa Claus” is merely a shortened form of “Santa Nicholas.” We are all familiar with how the customs associated with December 25 have become a firmly established part of our modern culture. What we are not as familiar with is the fact that December 25 was Nimrod’s birthday, Jesus Christ’s birthday. These customs have been handed down and their elements manipulated in order to be accepted by “Christian” churches.
Whichever theory is true, there is no doubt from what scripture itself tells us, that the deeds of the Nicolaitans are an abomination to Christ. Nicolaitans and their philosophy are usually thought of in a historical manner but the fact of the matter is that very few churches in the 21[SUP]st[/SUP] century are operating outside of Nicolaitans antinomian and pagan-infused doctrine.
It is unlikely that there existed a sect of people that actually called themselves the Nicolaitans but we are told enough about them in scripture to know this much: first, Nicolaitanism is a belief system, like a religion or a philosophy; secondly, Nicolaitanism results in ungodly behavior; and third, Christ abhors it.
Nimrod was known by other names as well. One which was commonly used in Asia Minor was “Santa” (see Lempriere's Classical Dictionary.) “Santa Claus” is merely a shortened form of “Santa Nicholas.” We are all familiar with how the customs associated with December 25 have become a firmly established part of our modern culture. What we are not as familiar with is the fact that December 25 was Nimrod’s birthday, Jesus Christ’s birthday. These customs have been handed down and their elements manipulated in order to be accepted by “Christian” churches.
Whichever theory is true, there is no doubt from what scripture itself tells us, that the deeds of the Nicolaitans are an abomination to Christ. Nicolaitans and their philosophy are usually thought of in a historical manner but the fact of the matter is that very few churches in the 21[SUP]st[/SUP] century are operating outside of Nicolaitans antinomian and pagan-infused doctrine.
It is unlikely that there existed a sect of people that actually called themselves the Nicolaitans but we are told enough about them in scripture to know this much: first, Nicolaitanism is a belief system, like a religion or a philosophy; secondly, Nicolaitanism results in ungodly behavior; and third, Christ abhors it.
no wonder there is confusion. on here. you want to make up your minds, follow the law, like the non christian jew, or follow grace
repent, of evil.
You are severed from Christ, you who would be justified by the law; you have fallen away from grace
saved by grace a gift.
For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery.(law)
iin simple terms , if jesus is your saviour, looking again at law, for justification is pointless,
law v grace explained.
2 Look: I, Paul, say to you that if you accept circumcision, Christ will be of no advantage to you.3 I testify again to every man who accepts circumcision that he is obligated to keep the whole law.4 You are severed from Christ, you who would be justified by the law; you have fallen away from grace
in simple terms going back to the law when you believe jesus has saved you. or trying to win more favour in gods eyes thinking my good deeds with make me more saved or have more standing. etc
21 I do not nullify the grace of God, for if righteousness were through the law, then Christ died for no purpose.Galatians 2
repent, of evil.
You are severed from Christ, you who would be justified by the law; you have fallen away from grace
saved by grace a gift.
For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery.(law)
iin simple terms , if jesus is your saviour, looking again at law, for justification is pointless,
law v grace explained.
2 Look: I, Paul, say to you that if you accept circumcision, Christ will be of no advantage to you.3 I testify again to every man who accepts circumcision that he is obligated to keep the whole law.4 You are severed from Christ, you who would be justified by the law; you have fallen away from grace
in simple terms going back to the law when you believe jesus has saved you. or trying to win more favour in gods eyes thinking my good deeds with make me more saved or have more standing. etc
21 I do not nullify the grace of God, for if righteousness were through the law, then Christ died for no purpose.Galatians 2
The proof is in the pudding! Or to use scripture, You will know them by their fruits. Matthew 7:16-20 (NAS)
16 "You will know them by their fruits. Grapes are not gathered from thorn bushes nor figs from thistles, are they?
17 "So every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit.
18 "A good tree cannot * produce bad fruit, nor can a bad tree produce good fruit.
19 "Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.
20 "So then, you will know them by their fruits.
16 "You will know them by their fruits. Grapes are not gathered from thorn bushes nor figs from thistles, are they?
17 "So every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit.
18 "A good tree cannot * produce bad fruit, nor can a bad tree produce good fruit.
19 "Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.
20 "So then, you will know them by their fruits.
Last edited:
I am looking for a forum where topics from the Bible, particularly things relevant to these last days we are living in are discussed and I thought this would be the right one to start with. I am looking for a place where people actually talk to each other politely with the love Christ said we are to show others, and this thread isn't it for sure. Can anyone suggest a forum where a kinder atmosphere prevails?
Elin follows me around, so if you are looking for a sane conversation, do not attribute to her post. I would suggest that you put her on ignore if you want to discuss without any hindrance. If not you need to reject my postings as will, but keep in mind I do not start conflicts. See my signature. I usually don't read what she posts because I know she's refuting what I write. May God bless you in your search for decent people in CC. There are many.
I would be happy to but that can only take place if certain conditions exist. One cannot teach someone else anything if they don't want to learn, and you manifest an attitude of already knowing everything there is to learn and you belittle anyone who expresses beliefs or thoughts different than yours. So when I asked why you believe you are absolutely correct and I am totally wrong, I expected a real answer from someone so smart.
Elin follows me around, so if you are looking for a sane conversation, do not attribute to her post. I would suggest that you put her on ignore if you want to discuss without any hindrance. If not you need to reject my postings as will, but keep in mind I do not start conflicts. See my signature. I usually don't read what she posts because I know she's refuting what I write. May God bless you in your search for decent people in CC. There are many.